Abstract
Acute secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is characterized by escalating neurological disability, with limited disease-modifying therapeutic options. A 48-year-old woman with acute SPMS being treated with interferon beta-1a and oral corticosteroids presented as a clinical outpatient with no disease-modifying effects after treatment. A decision was made to treat her with a combination of guanidinoacetate and creatine for 21 days. She had made clinical progress at follow-up, with the intensity of fatigue dropping from severe to mild. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed increased brain choline, creatine, N-acetylaspartate, and glutathione. Patients with SPMS may benefit from guanidinoacetate–creatine treatment in terms of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes; this requires additional study.
Introduction
Conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is associated with a relatively poor prognosis, partly owing to the limited effects of the available disease-modifying therapies in progressive disease. 1 Among other features, SPMS is accompanied by unfavorable brain metabolism changes that lead to diffuse neuroaxonal loss and clinical deterioration during the disease course. 2 Reprogramming of energy metabolism has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in MS. 3 Specifically, a disease-driven brain creatine deficit can be seen as a distinctive pathological facet in severe MS that might be approached with targeted therapies to restore creatine homeostasis in cerebral tissue (for a detailed review, see Ref. 4). Among potential therapeutic candidates, guanidinoacetate (GAA, also known as guanidinoacetic acid or glycocyamine) has recently been identified as a direct precursor of creatine that may favorably upregulate location-specific brain creatine concentrations in white matter. 5 Interestingly, a GAA–creatine mixture has been found to be superior to creatine itself in effectively improving bioenergetics in the human brain, 6 perhaps owing to the unique transportability features of this combination in the nervous system. 7
Case presentation
A 48-year-old woman with SPMS being treated with interferon beta-1a and oral corticosteroids presented as a clinical outpatient with no disease-modifying effects after treatment and rapidly progressive fatigue. She had completed two cycles of combination therapy in the past 6 months and noted no significant decreases in muscle spasms, numbness, weakness, or tremor in one or both arms and legs. The patient was diagnosed with the disease at age 30 years, and a secondary progressive phenotype developed approximately 3 years prior to the current admission. Initially, MS was diagnosed as a relapsing–remitting type, characterized by periods of active symptoms (e.g., fatigue, tingling, pronounced reflexes, cognitive impairment) alternating with periods of less severe symptoms.
At the initial examination on admission, the patient reported a current episode of SPMS with moderate-to-severe weakness or increased spasticity (including mono- and paraparesis), dysdiadochokinesia, and problems with the heel-to-shin test, bladder incontinence, and severe general fatigue. Use of a visual analog scale (VAS) for SPMS symptoms revealed high scores for weakness (9.5 out of 10) and depression/anxiety (7.5 out of 10). Her brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed diffuse multinodular demyelination areas in the cerebral cortex, midbrain, and cerebellum, accompanied by impaired metabolism illustrated by low levels of creatine (4.51 mM), choline (1.05 mM), N-acetylaspartate (NAA, 7.37 mM), and glutathione (0.13 mM) and high glutamate (8.35 mM) in the gyrus cinguli as evaluated with single-voxel
1
H MR spectroscopy (Figure 1a). MR imaging and spectroscopy were performed using a 1.5 T scanner (Siemens Avanto Tim, Erlangen, Germany) with a matrix head coil (receiver coil) in circularly polarized mode. The MR protocol included: (a) sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo sequence with repetition time to echo time

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showing (a) diffuse multinodular demyelination areas in the brain of the patient, with red square indicating a specific area (gyrus cinguli) for MR spectroscopy assessment of selected brain metabolites, (b) at initial examination and 21-day follow-up after guanidinoacetate–creatine intervention (concentration shown in mM).
Numerous lines of evidence point to the possibility that creatine depletion, 9 glutamate toxicity, 10 and low glutathione 11 in the brain might contribute to various types of MS (including SPMS), likely leading to the loss of brain volume and symptomatology of the disease. Our patient’s routine biochemistry revealed no significant disturbances in blood urea nitrogen, inflammatory markers, lipid profiles and glucose, or clinical enzymes. Given the limited effects of current treatments and the clinical presentation, a decision was made to treat her with a combination of oral GAA and creatine (4 g per day, 2:2 ratio) for 21 days. She made moderate clinical progress at follow-up, with the intensity of general fatigue dropping from severe to mild and VAS scores for weakness and numbness dropping by 1.25 points, on average, using a 10-point scale; her depression/anxiety scores remained identical to the baseline values. MR spectroscopy revealed increased brain choline, total creatine, NAA, and glutathione, and a drop in glutamate levels at 21-day follow-up compared with levels at initial examination (Figure 1b). The patient reported no side effects of the intervention, as evaluated using an open-ended questionnaire administered during the treatment.
The design of this study was approved by the local institutional review board at the University of Novi Sad (#46-06-02/2020-1). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference of Harmonization Efficacy Guidelines E6. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient before the experimental treatment with oral GAA and creatine was administered. The reporting of this study conforms to the CARE guidelines. 12
Discussion
We confirmed that a GAA–creatine formulation augmented creatine concentrations at the gyrus cinguli in a patient with SPMS. This was accompanied by a rise in brain glutathione and mild elevation in NAA, implying a relatively favorable metabolic milieu post-administration. However, the increase in brain choline found after the intervention might indicate possible gliosis and/or hidden lesioning,13,14 requiring caution and further investigation. Given that the spectral fitting of MR spectroscopy has a more significant CRLB than the difference in metabolic outcomes, 15 no firm conclusions can be drawn, but the results remain very promising. Additionally, our patient reported easing of symptoms (including fatigue, weakness, and numbness) when many other SPMS therapies had failed. This is in accordance with another randomized controlled trial suggesting that GAA is a potent approach to tackling general fatigue in clinical patients. 16 Although the subjective nature of the symptoms and study design somewhat limit the scope and significance of the present findings, including the lack of past or current Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, the GAA–creatine mixture remains worthy of further scrutiny in MS and perhaps other white matter disorders.
In conclusion, patients with SPMS may benefit from 21-day GAA–creatine treatment in terms of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes. The present study findings require further investigation in well-powered randomized controlled trials.
Supplemental Material
sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605211073305 - Supplemental material for Guanidinoacetate–creatine in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a case report
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605211073305 for Guanidinoacetate–creatine in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a case report by Sergej M. Ostojic, Jelena Ostojic, Dragana Zanini, Tatjana Jezdimirovic and Valdemar Stajer in Journal of International Medical Research
Footnotes
Authors’ contributions
SMO: research design (project conception, development of overall research plan, and study oversight); analyzed the data and performed the statistical analysis; wrote the article draft; and had primary responsibility for the final content. JO, DZ, TJ and VS: conducted the research; analyzed the data and performed the statistical analysis; wrote the article draft; and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Declaration of conflicting interest
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SMO serves as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board on Creatine in Health and Medicine (AlzChem LLC). SMO owns the patent “Sports Supplements Based on Liquid Creatine” registered with the European Patent Office (WO2019150323 A1) and has an active patent application, “Synergistic Creatine” submitted to the UK Intellectual Property Office (GB2012773.4). SMO has served as a speaker at Abbott Nutrition, a consultant for Allied Beverages Adriatic and IMLEK, and an advisory board member of the University of Novi Sad School of Medicine. SMO has received research funding related to creatine from the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development, Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, AlzChem GmbH, KW Pfannenschmidt GmbH, ThermoLife International LLC, and Monster Energy Company. SMO is an employee of the University of Novi Sad and does not own stocks and shares in any organization. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. JO, DZ, TJ, and VS declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
