Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To examine the value of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in the Vietnamese population.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study involved 42 wrists of 25 patients with idiopathic CTS evaluated by US. In addition, 38 wrists of 22 healthy volunteers were included as the control group.

Results

Significant differences in the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at different levels were found between patients with CTS and controls. Using a cut-off value of 9.5 mm² for the median nerve CSA at the pisiform (p-CSA), US had a sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 97.4%, respectively, for the diagnosis of CTS. Area under the curve analysis revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 95.4%, respectively, for the prediction of severe CTS using a p-CSA of >15.5 mm².

Conclusions

The median nerve CSA is a highly accurate parameter in the diagnosis of CTS. We recommend using a p-CSA of >9.5 mm² as a diagnostic criterion for CTS and a p-CSA of >15.5 mm² as a marker for severe CTS in the Vietnamese population.

Research Registry number: 7261

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome ultrasound electrophysiology Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM)Vietnam

Introduction

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), also known as median nerve entrapment syndrome at the wrist level, is the most common type of peripheral nerve compression.¹ Among the United States population, the annual prevalence and incidence of CTS is 3% to 8% and 100 to 300/100,000, respectively.^2,3 CTS is common among women, with most cases occurring in those aged 46 to 60 years.⁴ Most affected patients have primary CTS (also known as idiopathic CTS). According to the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine, a clinical diagnosis of CTS is based on functional signs and physical tests, and in suspected cases, an electrophysiological study is indicated to achieve a definitive diagnosis.⁵ However, electrophysiological studies are unable to distinguish primary CTS from secondary CTS. Therefore, several studies have been performed to explore the diagnostic value of different imaging techniques, especially high-resolution ultrasound (US), for the early diagnosis and grading of CTS.

High-resolution US is a highly valuable diagnostic tool for CTS. US is increasingly being used to confirm the diagnosis of CTS through the measurement of quantitative parameters and to detect pathologies that can result in secondary CTS, especially in structures around the median nerve and carpal tunnel (e.g., anatomical variants or space-occupying lesions). This is achieved by direct assessment of the exact location of the nerve compression and examination of signs indirectly related to nerve alterations.⁶ Applying color and power Doppler US is especially helpful in identifying vascular lesions, variant vascular anatomy, and tissue hyperemia.⁷ In particular, color and power Doppler imaging can be used in routine US examination to detect intraneural vascularity, which indicates the presence of inflammatory changes within the nerve.^8,9

Several new sonographic techniques, such as dynamic US and US elastography, have been developed in recent years and have the potential to differentiate CTS of different severities.^10–12 However, the ultrasonic morphology of the carpal tunnel, including the anatomy of the median nerve, may vary according to ethnicity, sex, and age.^13,14 Cut-off values specific to different ethnic groups would be of great benefit for practicing clinicians and radiologists. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the value of US in assessing idiopathic CTS in the Vietnamese population, with correlations to clinical and electrophysiological findings.

Patients and methods

Patients and controls

This was a prospective cross-sectional study. The sample comprised 42 wrists of 25 patients with CTS (5 men, 20 women; mean age, 46.6 ± 10.5 years), among whom 17 patients had bilateral disease and 8 patients had unilateral disease. In addition, 38 wrists of 22 healthy volunteers (4 men, 18 women; mean age, 43.6 ± 9.7 years) were included as the control group. The inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of CTS and subsequent confirmation by a nerve conduction study according to the American Academy of Neurology standards.¹⁵ The exclusion criteria were conditions that increased the risk of secondary CTS, such as diabetes mellitus, gout, inflammatory arthropathy, previous distal radial fractures, acute trauma, neurological diseases, pregnancy, hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism; receipt of regular medical treatment (such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or engagement in physical therapy within the previous month; and receipt of a steroid injection within the previous 3 months. Twelve wrists underwent subsequent surgical carpal tunnel release.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam (Approval No. H2020/159; date of approval, 5 June 2020). All participants provided written informed consent for participation in the study and publication of their images. In error, we did not prospectively register this study; however, we have now registered it retrospectively at the Research Registry (https://www.researchregistry.com/, registration number 7261). The reporting of this study conforms to the STROBE guidelines.¹⁶

Clinical and electrophysiological studies

The participants were evaluated using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), which includes both functional and symptom BCTQ scores.¹⁷ The patients subsequently underwent a nerve conduction study. The diagnosis of CTS was made according to the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine and the American Academy of Neurology.¹⁸ CTS was classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on the electrophysiological study results.¹⁹

Ultrasound technique and analysis

All US examinations were performed by two radiologists, one with 15 years of experience and the other with 5 years of experience, using a high-resolution linear-array 12.3-MHz transducer (Samsung HS70A; Samsung Healthcare, Seoul, Korea). The radiologists were blinded to the clinical and electrophysiological findings. The wrists were examined in the supine neutral position with the participant’s hand and wrist resting on a table and the fingers in a functional and relaxed position. US of the volar distal forearm, wrist, and carpal regions was performed mainly in the transverse and longitudinal planes. All US parameters were measured in each patient and control. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was measured at three levels: the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ-CSA, approximately 2 cm above the distal wrist crease), the pisiform (p-CSA), and the hook of the hamate (h-CSA). The neural epineurium was not included in the measurement because of its obscured outer border. The ratio change in the median nerve CSA (R-CSA) was calculated as p-CSA divided by DRUJ-CSA (p-CSA/DRUJ-CSA) and the difference between p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA (ΔCSA). The flattening ratio of the median nerve was defined as the ratio of the major and minor axes of the median nerve at the level of the pisiform. The flexor retinaculum thickness at the level of the hook of the hamate was also measured. All parameters were measured by gray-scale US (Figure 1). Color and power Doppler US was used to observe pulse points in the median nerve to estimate the vascularity score (Klauser and Shio’s method).²⁰

Figure 1.

Cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the (a) distal radioulnar joint (arrow), (b) pisiform (arrow), and (c) hook of the hamate (arrow). (d) The flattening ratio of the median nerve was calculated by measuring the major and minor axes of the nerve at the pisiform (arrow).

Statistical analysis

The statistical data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The mean age, body mass index, and different sonographic parameters along the carpal tunnel were calculated. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Quantitative values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The normality of quantitative data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Spearman’s coefficient was used to examine the correlation of the data. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to calculate the performance of sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of CTS.

Results

General features

There was no significant difference in age, sex, or body mass index between the patients with CTS and controls (Table 1). The participants’ main occupations were teacher, marine worker, worker, and homemaker.

Table 1.

Age, BMI, sex, electrophysiological findings, and BCTQ scores, and ultrasound parameters in the control and patient groups.

	Patients with CTS	Controls	p-value
Age (years)	46.6 ± 10.5	43.6 ± 9.7	0.194
BMI (kg/m²)	23.55 ± 1.03	23.27 ± 1.03	0.226
Female sex	34/42 (80.95)	30/38 (78.95)	0.823
Distal sensory latency time (ms)	3.81 ± 2.79	N.A.
Distal motor latency time (ms)	4.30 ± 1.15
Distal sensory amplitude (μV)	23.06 ± 14.45
Distal motor amplitude (mV)	9.47 ± 4.81
Sensory conduction velocity (m/s)	41.86 ± 14.45
Symptom BCTQ score	2.86 ± 0.78
Functional BCTQ score	2.41 ± 0.71
DRUJ-CSA (mm²)	8.31 ± 1.26	6.63 ± 0.68	<0.001
p-CSA (mm²)	16.05 ± 5.73	7.23 ± 1.14	<0.001
h-CSA (mm²)	11.14 ± 2.98	6.74 ± 1.13	<0.001
ΔCSA (mm²)	7.74 ± 5.78	0.66 ± 1.05	<0.001
R-CSA	1.97 ± 0.74	1.10 ± 0.16	<0.001
Flattening ratio of MN at pisiform	2.70 ± 0.71	2.50 ± 0.73	0.215
Flexor retinaculum thickness (mm)	1.13 ± 0.20	0.87 ± 0.17	<0.001
Intraneural vascularity	20/42	0/38	<0.001

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%).

BMI, body mass index; BCTQ, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; DRUJ-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at distal radioulnar joint; p-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at pisiform; h-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at hook of hamate; ΔCSA, difference between p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; R-CSA, ratio of p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; MN, median nerve; N.A., not applicable.

Clinical findings

For patients with CTS, the mean symptom BCTQ score was 2.86 ± 0.78 and the mean functional BCTQ score was 2.41 ± 0.71 (Table 1).

Only five wrists (11.9%) had thenar atrophy. None of the control participants showed thenar atrophy. Thenar atrophy had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%.

Electrophysiological findings

In total, 35.7% of patients had severe CTS according to the electrophysiological classification. The mean values of the symptom and functional conduction parameters of the median nerve in the CTS group are listed in Table 1.

Both the symptom and functional BCTQ scores were significantly higher in the severe group than in the mild and moderate groups according to the electrophysiological staging (p < 0.005). There was a significant relationship between both the clinical and electrophysiological stages and US parameters such as the p-CSA, ΔCSA, R-CSA, and intraneural vascularity score (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

Sonographic findings

Median nerve CSA

The DRUJ-CSA, p-CSA, h-CSA, ΔCSA, and R-CSA were significantly higher in the patients than in the controls (p < 0.001 for all) (Table 1). Using the area under the curve (AUC), a p-CSA cut-off value of 9.5 mm² provided a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 97.4%, respectively. A ΔCSA cut-off value of >2.5 mm² provided a sensitivity and specificity of 88.1% and 97.4%, respectively. An R-CSA cut-off value of >1.29 provided a sensitivity and specificity of 88.1% and 92.1%, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Cut-offs with sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound parameters in patients with CTS.

Diagnostic criteria	Cut-off	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	AUC (%)
DRUJ-CSA	7.5 mm²	73.8	92.1	86.7
p-CSA	9.5 mm²	95.2	97.4	99
p-CSA severe	15.5 mm²	100	95.4	99.2
h-CSA	8.5 mm²	88.1	92.1	94.9
ΔCSA	2.5 mm²	88.1	97.4	97.1
ΔCSA severe	5.5 mm²	100	86.2	97.9
R-CSA	1.29	88.1	92.1	94.9
R-CSA severe	1.59	100	83.1	96.7
Flattening ratio of MN at pisiform	2.1	85.7	28.9	57.8
Flexor retinaculum thickness	1.05 mm	61.9	94.7	84.6
Intraneural vascularity	Yes	47.6	100	73.8

CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; AUC, area under the curve; DRUJ-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at distal radioulnar joint; p-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at pisiform; h-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at hook of hamate; ΔCSA, difference between p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; R-CSA, ratio of p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; MN, median nerve.

Table 3.

Relationships of ultrasound parameters with clinical stage and electrophysiological stage.

Ultrasound parameters	Relationship with electrophysiological stage (p-value)	Relationship with clinical stage (p-value)
DRUJ-CSA	0.363	0.14
p-CSA	<0.001	<0.001
h-CSA	0.1	0.088
ΔCSA	<0.001	<0.001
R-CSA	<0.001	<0.001
Flattening ratio of MN at pisiform	0.182	0.129
Flexor retinaculum thickness	0.88	0.467
Intraneural vascularity	0.018	0.025

DRUJ-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at distal radioulnar joint; p-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at pisiform; h-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at hook of hamate; ΔCSA, difference between p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; R-CSA, ratio of p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; MN, median nerve.

Significant differences in the median nerve CSA at the pisiform (Figure 2) were found among patients with mild, moderate, and severe CTS (p < 0.001) compared with the electrophysiological findings. Using a cut-off value of >15.5 mm² for p-CSA and >5.5 mm² for ΔCSA provided a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and 100% and specificity of 95.4% and 86.2% for severe CTS, respectively.

Figure 2.

(a) Axial and (b) sagittal planes through the median nerve at the wrist level on ultrasound (arrow).

Flattening ratio of the median nerve

No significant difference in the flattening ratio at the pisiform was found between the two groups (Table 1).

Flexor retinaculum thickness

The flexor retinaculum thickness was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

Intraneural vascularity

Twenty (41.7%) of the 42 wrists with CTS had demonstrable intraneural vascularity (Figure 3) compared with none of the 38 control participants’ wrists (p < 0.001) (Table 1). The sensitivity and specificity of intraneural vascularity for diagnosing CTS were 47.6% and 100%, respectively (Table 2).

Figure 3.

Axial ultrasound image of median nerve enlargement with intraneural vascularity by color and power Doppler in two patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (arrow).

Correlations of ultrasonic parameters with clinical scale and electrophysiological parameters

There was a high positive correlation of the p-CSA, ΔCSA, and R-CSA of the median nerve with both the symptom and functional BCTQ scores (0.6 < r < 0.8, p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation of the vascularity score of the median nerve with the symptom and functional BCTQ scores (Tables 3 and 4). In particular, there were strong positive correlations of both the p-CSA and ΔCSA and the symptom BCTQ score (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). There was a moderate negative correlation of the sensory conduction velocity parameter with the p-CSA, ΔCSA, and R-CSA electrophysiologically (r > 0.4, p < 0.01) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Correlations of ultrasound parameters with BCTQ scores and electrophysiological parameters.

Ultrasound parameters	Symptom BCTQ score		Functional BCTQ score		Distal motor latency time		Sensory conduction velocity
Ultrasound parameters	r	p-value	r	p-value	r	p-value	r	p-value
DRUJ-CSA	p = 0.43		p = 0.24		p > 0.05		p = 0.93
p-CSA	0.72	<0.001	0.59	<0.001			−0.418	0.006
h-CSA	0.33	0.03	0.23				p = 0.10
ΔCSA	0.72	<0.001	0.63	<0.001			−0.439	0.004
R-CSA	0.68	<0.001	0.62	<0.001			−0.434	0.004
Flattening ratio of MN at pisiform	p > 0.05						p > 0.05
Flexor retinaculum thickness	p > 0.05
Intraneural vascularity	0.39	0.01	0.39	0.012

BCTQ, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; DRUJ-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at distal radioulnar joint; p-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at pisiform; h-CSA, cross-sectional area of median nerve at hook of hamate; ΔCSA, difference between p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; R-CSA, ratio of p-CSA and DRUJ-CSA; MN, median nerve.

Discussion

The diagnosis of CTS is often dependent upon the presence of typical clinical signs and symptoms and can be confirmed with a positive electrodiagnostic test in most cases.²¹ Recent studies have proven that median nerve sonography is nearly as sensitive as the gold standard electrophysiological test for the diagnosis of CTS.^22,23

In the current study, we found good correlations between CTS and quantitative US parameters (CSA of the median nerve at different levels, flattening ratio of the median nerve at the pisiform, and flexor retinaculum thickness at the hook of the hamate) in comparison with clinical and electrophysiological findings. This validates the utility of US in the diagnosis of CTS in the Vietnamese population.

This study also showed significant relationships of the BCTQ score and electrophysiological stage with US parameters, such as the p-CSA, R-CSA, ΔCSA, and intraneural vascularity score (p < 0.01). These findings are in accordance with studies by Baiee et al.,²⁴ Chan et al.,²⁵ Elnady et al.,²⁶ and Mohamed et al.²⁷ However, there was no relationship with the h-CSA, DRUJ-CSA, flattening ratio of the median nerve at the pisiform, or flexor retinaculum thickness at the hook of the hamate, in contrast to the results reported by Sernik et al.²⁸ and El Miedany et al.²⁹ Furthermore, in our study, there was a significant positive correlation of the p-CSA, ΔCSA, and R-CSA of the median nerve with both the symptom and functional BCTQ scores and a moderately negative correlation with the sensory conduction velocity.

The reported cut-off values for the CSA of the median nerve at the pisiform on US widely vary from 9 to 14 mm²,^22,30 which affects the sensitivity and specificity of this measurement for CTS. The AUC analysis showed that a p-CSA cut-off value of >15.5 mm² had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 95.4%, respectively, for the prediction of severe CTS (Figure 4). The differences in the cut-off values were affected by not only the disease severity but also the nerve size related to height, sex, weight, age, and race of the individual as well as the imaging equipment and technique. Two useful parameters related to nerve enlargement were the ΔCSA and R-CSA of the median nerve at the level of the pisiform relative to the DRUJ. The cut-off values of the ΔCSA and R-CSA were 2.5 mm² and 1.295, respectively. The threshold of the ΔCSA is equivalent to the results reported by Elnady et al.²⁶ The threshold of the R-CSA was lower than that reported by Billakota and Hobson-Webb²² (wrist-to-forearm ratio of ≥1.4). These resulted in sensitivity values of 88.1% and 88.1% and specificity values of 97.4% and 92.1%, respectively.

Figure 4.

Receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve of sonographic parameters

The flexor retinaculum thickness at the hook of the hamate was significantly different between the two groups, in agreement with the result reported by Bartolomé-Villar et al.³¹ This was a highly specific parameter for diagnosing CTS, with a cut-off value of 1.05 providing an AUC of 0.85. This result is equivalent to that of a previous report.³⁰

In the current study, we used color and power Doppler sonography to quantitatively study the intraneural vascularization at the carpal tunnel. None of controls had a vascular signal in the median nerve. We found vessels in only 20 (47.6%) CTS-diagnosed wrists, which is a lower proportion than that found by Vanderschueren et al.³² We also found a significant relationship between intraneural vascular flow in the median nerve and the severity of CTS based on the diagnostic electrophysiology findings and the BCTQ score. We therefore concluded that Doppler sonography may be a good diagnostic tool to detect CTS. However, further studies are needed to gain more insight into the diagnostic and prognostic value of the sonographically detected median intraneural vascular flow in patients with CTS.^33,34

A limitation of this study is the relatively small number of patients. However, an obvious difference in the above-mentioned parameters was demonstrated between patients with CTS and controls. Another limitation is that only patients diagnosed by electrophysiological studies were included. Negative electrophysiological studies do not preclude the diagnosis of CTS because the cut-off values for abnormalities are variable. In addition, patients with a bifid median nerve were excluded from the study.

Conclusion

The most discriminatory parameters in the diagnosis of CTS are the CSA of the median nerve at the pisiform, ΔCSA, R-CSA of the median nerve at the pisiform and at the distal radioulnar joint, flexor retinaculum thickness, and intraneural vascularity score. We recommend using a median nerve CSA of ≥9.5 mm² at the pisiform and a ΔCSA of ≥2.5 mm² as the US diagnostic criteria for CTS and a median nerve CSA of >15.5 mm² at the pisiform and a ΔCSA of ≥5.5 mm² as the US markers of severe CTS in the Vietnamese population. Moreover, color and power Doppler US are promising tools for the future and may be helpful in detecting and diagnosing the severity of CTS.

Footnotes

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

(I) Conception and design: T Nguyen Thanh; (II) Administrative support: T Binh Le; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: T Binh Le, D Nguyen Duy, D Nguyen Thi Hieu; (IV) Collection data: Q Vo Nhu, T Nguyen Thanh; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: T Nguyen Thanh, Q Vo Nhu, NTN Le; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: This work was supported by Hue University under the Core Research Program [Grant No. NCM.DHH.2020.09].

ORCID iDs

Nhu Quynh Vo

Trong Binh Le

Thanh Thao Nguyen

References

Ibrahim

Khan

Goddard

, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J 2012; 6: 69–76. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010069

Gelfman

Melton

Yawn

, et al. Long-term trends in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 2009; 72: 33–41. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000338533.88960.b9

Dale

Harris-Adamson

Rempel

, et al. Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013; 39: 495–505. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3351

Hegmann

Merryweather

Thiese

, et al. Median nerve symptoms, signs, and electrodiagnostic abnormalities among working adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26: 576–584. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00034

Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (Summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1993; 43: 2406–2409. doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.11.2406

El-Shintenawy

Kassem

El-Saadany

, et al. Diagnostic potential of high resolution ultrasound and nerve conduction study in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt Rheumatol 2019; 41: 71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2018.04.001

Duncan

SFM

and Kakinoki

(eds) Carpal tunnel syndrome and related median neuropathies: challenges and complications. 1st ed. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57010-5

Ghasemi-Esfe

Khalilzadeh

Vaziri-Bozorg

, et al. Color and power Doppler US for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome and determining its severity: a quantitative image processing method. Radiology 2011; 261: 499–506. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110150

Karahan

Arslan

Ordahan

, et al. Superb microvascular imaging of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: an electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic study. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 2855–2861. doi: 10.1002/jum.14645

10.

Yoshii

Zhao

and Amadio

PC.

Recent advances in ultrasound diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Diagnostics 2020; 10: 596. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080596

11.

Lin

Chen

Chang

, et al. Utility of ultrasound elastography in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 2855–2865. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.07.409

12.

Xin

Liu

, et al. Ultrasound elastographic evaluation of the median nerve in hemodialysis with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2017; 44: 123–131. doi: 10.1007/s10396-016-0733-x

13.

Walker

Cartwright

Blocker

, et al. Prevalence of bifid median nerves and persistent median arteries and their association with carpal tunnel syndrome in a sample of Latino poultry processors and other manual workers. Muscle Nerve 2013; 48: 539–544. doi: 10.1002/mus.23797

14.

Bathala

Kumar

, et al. Normal values of median nerve cross-sectional area obtained by ultrasound along its course in the arm with electrophysiological correlations, in 100 Asian subjects. Muscle Nerve 2014; 49: 284–286. doi: 10.1002/mus.23912

15.

15. American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1993; 43: 2406–2409.

16.

Von Elm

Altman

Egger

, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573–577. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010

17.

Levine

Simmons

Koris

, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1585–1592.

18.

American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. Muscle Nerve 2002; 25: 918–922. doi: 10.1002/mus.10185

19.

Stevens

Sun

Beard

, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980. Neurology 1988; 38: 134–138. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.1.134

20.

Klauser

Frauscher

Schirmer

, et al. The value of contrast-enhanced color doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 647–653. doi: 10.1002/art.10136

21.

Rempel

Evanoff

Amadio

, et al. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1447–1451. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.88.10.1447

22.

Billakota

and Hobson-Webb

LD.

Standard median nerve ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome: a retrospective review of 1,021 cases.

Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2017; 2: 188–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2017.07.004

23.

El-Najjar

Abu-Elsoaud

Sabbah

, et al. Emerging role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: relation to risk factors, clinical and electrodiagnostic severity. Egypt Rheumatol 2021; 43: 341–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2020.07.006

24.

Al-Mukhtar

Baiee

Al-Rubiae

, et al. Neurophysiological findings in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome by nerve conduction study in comparing with ultrasound study. J Nat Sci Res 2015; 5: 111–128.

25.

Chan

George

Goh

, et al. Ultrasonography in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic criteria and comparison with nerve conduction studies. Neurol Asia 2011; 16: 57–64.

26.

Elnady

Rageh

Ekhouly

, et al. Diagnostic potential of ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome with different etiologies: correlation of sonographic median nerve measures with electrodiagnostic severity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20: 634. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3010-5

27.

Mohamed

Amin

Aboelsafa

, et al. Contribution of power Doppler and gray-scale ultrasound of the median nerve in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2014; 45: 191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.10.004

28.

Sernik

Abicalaf

Pimentel

, et al. Ultrasound features of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective case-control study. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 49–53. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0372-9

29.

El Miedany

El Gaafary

Youssef

, et al. Ultrasound assessment of the median nerve: a biomarker that can help in setting a treat to target approach tailored for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Springerplus 2015; 4: 13. doi: 10.1186/s40064-014-0779-4

30.

AWH

Griffith

Lee

RKL

, et al. Ultrasound carpal tunnel syndrome: additional criteria for diagnosis. Clin Radiol 2018; 73: 214.e11–214.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.025

31.

Bartolomé-Villar

Pastor-Valero

Fuentes-Sanz

, et al. Influence of the thickness of the transverse carpal ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2018; 62: 100–104. doi: 10.1016/j.recote.2018.01.002

32.

Vanderschueren

GAKB

Meys

VEWH

and Beekman

Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A critical review.

Muscle Nerve 2014; 50: 159–163. doi: 10.1002/mus.24241

33.

El Miedany

Aty

and Ashour

Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests?

Rheumatology 2004; 43: 887–895. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh190

34.

Evans

Roll

Volz

, et al. Relationship between intraneural vascular flow measured with sonography and carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis based on electrodiagnostic testing. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 729–736. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.5.729

The value of sonographic quantitative parameters in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in the Vietnamese population

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Patients and methods

Patients and controls

Clinical and electrophysiological studies

Ultrasound technique and analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

General features

Clinical findings

Electrophysiological findings

Sonographic findings

Median nerve CSA

Flattening ratio of the median nerve

Flexor retinaculum thickness

Intraneural vascularity

Correlations of ultrasonic parameters with clinical scale and electrophysiological parameters

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Availability of data and material

Authors’ contributions

Declaration of conflicting interest

Funding

ORCID iDs

References