Serum total antioxidant capacity prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with 1-year liver transplantation survival

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether there was an association between serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels prior to in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1-year LT mortality.

Methods

This observational retrospective single-centre study of patients with LT for HCC measured serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde (as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation) before LT. The study endpoint was 1-year LT mortality.

Results

This study included 142 patients who underwent LT for HCC. Patients who survived the first year (n = 127) had significantly lower aged liver donors, significantly higher serum TAC levels, and significantly lower serum malondialdehyde levels compared with the non-survivors (n = 15). Logistic regression analysis found that serum TAC levels (odds ratio [OR] 0.275; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.135, 0.562) and the age of the LT donor (OR 1.050; 95% CI 1.009, 1.094) were associated with 1-year LT mortality. There was an inverse association between serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde levels (rho = –0.22).

Conclusions

There was an association between low serum TAC levels prior to LT for HCC and mortality during the first year after LT. There was an inverse association between serum TAC levels and lipid peroxidation as measured by malondialdehyde levels.

Keywords

Serum total antioxidant capacity hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation mortality outcome

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary hepatic malignant tumour, is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-attributable death.^1–3 Liver transplantation (LT), which treats the hepatic insufficiency and eliminates the hepatic tumour, is the treatment of choice for some patients with HCC.^1–7

The peroxidation of membrane lipids results in the production of different chemical entities.^8,9 Malondialdehyde is an aldehyde produced by the effects of free radicals on polyunsaturated fatty acids in the cellular membranes.^8,9 Malondialdehyde is released into the extracellular space and can reach the blood stream; therefore, it has been used as a circulating biomarker of lipid peroxidation.^8,9 Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are balanced by the action of antioxidant defences, and the determination of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) can provide information about the antioxidant status of patients.^10,11

Lower circulating TAC levels have been found in LT patients compared with healthy controls.¹² LT patients also have lower circulating antioxidant vitamin levels than healthy controls;^13,14 and patients with HCC have lower circulating TAC levels than healthy controls.^15–18 Higher serum malondialdehyde levels have been demonstrated in LT patients compared with healthy controls,^12–14 and higher serum malondialdehyde levels have been found in HCC patients compared with healthy controls.^15,18–20 Higher circulating lipid peroxide levels have been found in patients that do not survive LT (i.e. non-survivor LT patients) compared with LT survivors.²¹ Higher serum concentrations of reactive oxygen metabolites were found in HCC patients with a greater risk of disease recurrence after curative treatment.²² The levels of circulating malondialdehyde were higher in non-survivor LT patients than survivors.²³ However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no published data describing circulating TAC levels in non-survivor and survivor patients with HCC who have undergone LT. Thus, the objective of this present study was to determine whether there was an association between serum TAC levels prior to LT and 1-year LT mortality in patients with HCC.

Patients and methods

Study design and patient population

This observational retrospective single-centre study included consecutive patients who underwent LT for HCC in the Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain between January 1996 and January 2016. Livers for LT were collected from brain dead donors in all cases. The study was carried out with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria and written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their family members.

The serum levels of malondialdehyde were determined previously in some of the patients who participated in this current study.²³ Serum TAC levels were analysed in the current study to determine their association with 1-year LT mortality.

Variables recorded

The following variables were recorded for each patient: degree of tumour differentiation; the Child-Pugh score;²⁴ presence of a multinodular tumour; met the Milan criteria before and after LT;²⁵ macrovascular invasion; microvascular invasion; model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score²⁶ by hepatic function; age of liver recipient; infiltration of adjacent tissues; age of liver donor; serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels; portal hypertension (determined clinically or by hepatic venous pressure gradient); LT technique; treatment prior to LT; nodule size; ABO blood type; leukocyte count; serum albumin levels; serum protein levels; and sex. The 1-year LT survival was the study endpoint.

Determination of serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde

A 5-ml sample of venous blood was collected approximately 2 h prior to LT from a peripheral intravenous catheter inserted in the middle third of the arm. The blood sample was transferred to a serum separator tube and centrifuged within 30 min at 1000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The serum was removed and frozen at −80°C until determination of serum TAC and malondialdehyde levels. TAC concentrations were determined in the Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain using the Antioxidant Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), which is based on the ability of serum antioxidants to inhibit the oxidation of 2,2′-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulphonate). The limit of detection of the assay was 0.04 nmol/ml, the inter-assay coefficient of variation was 3.0%, and the intra-assay coefficient of variation was 3.4%.

Malondialdehyde concentrations were determined in the Faculty of Medicine of La Laguna University, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain using the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance method as previously described.²⁷ The limit of detection of the assay was 0.079 nmol/ml, the inter-assay coefficient of variation was 4.01%, and the intra-assay coefficient of variation was 1.82%.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS® statistical package, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows® and MedCalc® version 15.2.1 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium). Categorical variables are presented as frequency (percentage) and were compared using χ²-test. Continuous variables are presented median (interquartile range) and were compared using Mann–Whitney U-test. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to estimate the prognostic capacity of serum TAC levels for 1-year LT mortality. Kaplan–Meier 1-year LT survival analysis of patients with serum TAC ≥2.98 nmol/ml and <2.98 nmol/ml was undertaken. The Youden J index was used to select this cut-off of serum TAC levels. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between serum TAC levels prior to LT and 1-year LT mortality controlled for the age of LT donor. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the clinical impact of each predictive variable. Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to determine the association between serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 142 patients that were included in the study, a total of 127 were alive at 1 year after LT and 15 died during the first year after LT. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients are presented in Table 1. Patients who survived the LT had a significantly lower age of liver donor (P = 0.03), significantly higher serum TAC levels (P = 0.003) and significantly lower serum malondialdehyde levels (P = 0.02) compared with non-survivor patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients (survivors versus non-survivors) in terms of sex, met the Milan criteria before and after LT, degree of tumour differentiation, presence of a multinodular tumour, portal hypertension, infiltration of adjacent tissues, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion, Child-Pugh score, ABO blood type, LT technique, treatment prior to LT, age of liver recipient, leukocyte count, serum albumin levels, serum protein levels, serum AFP levels, MELD score, and nodule size (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (n = 142) with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver transplantation stratified according to their 1-year survival.

	1-year survivors n = 127	1-year non-survivors n = 15	Statistical significance^a
Sex, female	21 (16.5)	0 (0.0)	NS
Met the Milan criteria prior to LT	122 (96.1)	14 (93.3)	NS
Met the Milan criteria after LT	106 (83.5)	11 (73.3)	NS
Degree of tumour differentiation			NS
Well	95 (74.8)	12 (80.0)
Moderate	29 (22.8)	2 (13.3)
Poor	3 (2.4)	1 (6.7)
Multinodular tumour	39 (30.7)	5 (33.3)	NS
Portal hypertension	87 (65.8)	11 (73.3)	NS
Infiltration	40 (31.5)	4 (26.7)	NS
Macrovascular invasion	7 (5.5)	0 (0.0)	NS
Microvascular invasion	27 (21.3)	3 (20.0)	NS
Child-Pugh score			NS
A	62 (48.8)	10 (66.7)
B	36 (28.3)	3 (20.0)
C	29 (22.8)	2 (13.3)
ABO blood type			NS
A	59 (46.5)	6 (40.0)
B	11 (8.7)	2 (13.3)
O	51 (40.2)	6 (40.0)
AB	6 (4.7)	1 (6.7)
Transplantation technique			NS
By-pass	44 (34.6)	6 (40.0)
Piggy back	83 (65.4)	9 (60.0)
Treatment prior to LT	69 (54.3)	10 (66.7)	NS
Percutaneous ethanol injection	28 (22.0)	7 (46.7)	NS
Radiofrequency ablation	8 (6.3)	0 (0.0)	NS
Transarterial chemoembolization	27 (21.3)	3 (20.0)	NS
Liver resection	3 (2.4)	0 (0.0)	NS
Mixed treatment	3 (2.4)	0 (0.0)	NS
Age of LT recipient, years	59 (52–62)	56 (53–62)	NS
Serum alpha-fetoprotein, ng/dl	7.0 (4.0–42.0)	12.0 (4.8–164.9)	NS
Leukocyte count, 10³/mm³	4.90 (3.60–6.25)	4.94 (3.49–7.92)	NS
Albumin, g/dl	3.33 (2.90–4.10)	3.31 (2.93–4.16)	NS
Protein, g/dl	6.70 (6.10–7.10)	6.70 (5.70–7.68)	NS
MELD score	15 (12–18)	15 (15–18)	NS
Nodule size, cm	3.0 (2.0–3.5)	3.2 (1.7–4.6)	NS
Age of liver donor, years	52 (35–63)	62 (49–72)	P = 0.03
Malondialdehyde, nmol/ml	2.96 (2.28–4.04)	3.66 (3.39–4.62)	P = 0.02
TAC, nmol/ml	4.00 (3.40–4.80)	2.98 (2.26–4.00)	P = 0.003

Data presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range).

Categorical variables were compared using χ²-test; and continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U-test.

LT, liver transplantation; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; NS, no significant between-group difference (P ≥ 0.05).

The logistic regression analysis found that serum TAC levels (OR 0.275; 95% CI 0.135, 0.562; P < 0.001) and the age of the LT donor (OR 1.050; 95% CI 1.009, 1.094; P = 0.02) were associated with 1-year LT mortality (Table 2).

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of variables associated with 1-year mortality after liver transplantation in patients (n = 142) with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Variable	Odds ratio	95% confidence interval	Statistical significance
Serum total antioxidant capacity levels, nmol/ml	0.275	0.135, 0.562	P < 0.001
Age of liver donor, years	1.050	1.009, 1.094	P = 0.02

The ROC curve analysis found that the area under the curve of serum TAC levels for the prediction of 1-year LT survival was 74% (95% CI 66%, 81%; P = 0.003); and that serum TAC levels >2.98 nmol/ml had a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 89%, 97%) and specificity of 53% (95% CI 26%, 78%) for the prediction of 1-year LT survival (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to estimate the prognostic capacity of serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels for 1-year liver transplantation survival. AUC, area under the curve; IC 95%, 95% confidence interval.

The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis found that patients with serum TAC levels ≥2.98 nmol/ml had a higher 1-year LT survival probability than patients with serum TAC levels <2.98 nmol/ml (94.5% [120/127] versus 46.7% [7/15]; hazard Ratio 13.4; 95% CI 2.04, 87.98; P < 0.001; Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier 1-year survival analysis of patients with serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) ≥ or < 2.98 nmol/ml. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

There was an inverse association between serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde levels (as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation) (rho = –0.22; P = 0.01).

Discussion

The novel findings of this current study were: (i) that there was an association between low serum TAC levels (<2.98 nmol/ml) prior to LT for HCC and mortality during the first year after LT; and (ii) that there was an inverse association between serum TAC levels and lipid peroxidation as measured by malondialdehyde levels.

Previous studies have demonstrated higher serum malondialdehyde levels in LT patients^12–14 and in HCC patients^15,18–20 compared with healthy controls. In addition, lower circulating TAC levels in LT patients¹² and in HCC patients compared with healthy controls have been reported.^15–18 Thus, it was not unexpected to get similar data in patients with LT for HCC. However, to the best of our knowledge, this current study is the first to report an association between serum TAC levels ≥2.98 nmol/ml prior to LT for HCC and survival during the first year after LT, and an inverse association between serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde.

These current findings suggest that an imbalance in the oxidative state might be of pathophysiological importance in HCC patients undergoing to LT. It is possible that LT patients who do not survive the first year after LT continue to have lower serum TAC levels and higher serum malondialdehyde levels (representing higher lipid peroxidation due to ROS overproduction that is not balanced by sufficient antioxidant compound production) than patients that survive during the first year after LT.

The use of different antioxidant agents reduced malondialdehyde levels and increased survival in animal models of sepsis^28–31 and of trauma-related brain injury.^32–34 In addition, lower circulating malondialdehyde levels and higher survival rates with the administration of different antioxidant agents were observed in clinical studies of asphyxiated newborn infants,³⁵ septic newborns,³⁶ adult burn patients,³⁷ and in patients with traumatic brain injury.³⁸ Thus, the administration of antioxidant agents could be a new class of treatment for patients with HCC undergoing LT.

This current study had a number of limitations. First, serum samples to determine serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde levels during follow-up were not obtained. Secondly, data regarding other compounds associated with oxidant and antioxidant states were not available for analysis.

In conclusion, these current findings suggest that serum TAC levels could help in predicting mortality in patients with LT for HCC. In particular, patients with serum TAC levels <2.98 nmol/ml have a higher risk of death. However, serum TAC levels should not be used as the only prognostic biomarker, but should be used in combination with other factors such as age of LT donor, outside the Milan criteria, serum AFP levels, tumour size, tumour number, hepatic microinvasion, degree of differentiation, infiltration, and vascular invasion.^6,39 These current findings also suggest that further research should be undertaken to investigate the possible administration of antioxidant agents to patients with HCC undergoing LT.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Concept and study design: LL; acquisition of data: LL, STR, PS, APC, PAG, JP, DD, AG, MMM, PC, MAB; determination of serum total antioxidant capacity levels: APC; determination of serum malondialdehyde levels: PAG; analysis of data: LL, AJ; drafted the paper: LL. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and provided final approval of the version to be published.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (INT16/00165) and co-financed by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional. The funders played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 908–943.

Bodzin

Busuttil

RW.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in diagnosis, management, and long term outcome.

World J Hepatol 2015; 7: 1157–1167.

Guerrero-Misas

Rodríguez-Perálvarez

De la Mata

Strategies to improve outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving a liver transplantation.

World J Hepatol 2015; 7: 649–661.

Clavien

Lesurtel

Bossuyt

et al.

Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An international consensus conference report.

Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: e11–e22.

Verslype

Rosmorduc

Rougier

Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Ann Oncol 2012; 23 (Suppl. 7): vii41–vii48.

Cescon

Bertuzzo

Ercolani

et al.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: role of inflammatory and immunological state on recurrence and prognosis.

World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 9174–9182.

Toyoda

Kumada

Tada

et al.

Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma: simple and significant predictors of outcome in patients with HCC.

Liver Cancer 2015; 4: 126–136.

Draper

Hadley

Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation.

Methods Enzymol 1990; 186: 421–431.

Dalle-Donne

Rossi

Colombo

et al.

Biomarkers of oxidative damage in human disease.

Clin Chem 2006; 52: 601–623.

10.

Young

Woodside

JV.

Antioxidants in health and disease.

J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 176–186.

11.

Ghiselli

Serafini

Natella

et al.

Total antioxidant capacity as a tool to assess redox status: critical view and experimental data.

Free Radic Biol Med 2000; 29: 1106–1114.

12.

Thorat

Suryakar

Naik

et al.

Total antioxidant capacity and lipid peroxidation in liver transplantation.

Indian J Clin Biochem 2009; 24: 102–104.

13.

Trevisani

Caraceni

Simoncini

et al.

Evidence of oxidative imbalance in long-term liver transplant patients.

Dig Liver Dis 2002; 34: 279–284.

14.

Goode

Webster

Howdle

et al.

Reperfusion injury, antioxidants and hemodynamics during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Hepatology 1994; 19: 354–359.

15.

Zhao

Wang

et al . Association between metabolic abnormalities and HBV related hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J 2011; 10: 49.

16.

Gao

Nie

Yang

et al . Changes of the mitochondrial DNA copy number and the antioxidant system in the PBMC of hepatocellular carcinoma. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi 2016; 32: 1–5 [In Chinese, English abstract].

17.

Poungpairoj

Whongsiri

Suwannasin

et al . Increased oxidative stress and RUNX3 hypermethylation in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and induction of RUNX3 hypermethylation by reactive oxygen species in HCC cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16: 5343–5348.

18.

Yahya

Ghanem

Foyouh

et al . Role of interleukin-8 and oxidative stress in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Lab 2013; 59: 969–976.

19.

Galley

Richardson

Howdle

et al.

Total antioxidant capacity and lipid peroxidation during liver transplantation.

Clin Sci (Lond) 1995; 89: 329–332.

20.

Tsai

Lin

Lee

et al.

Evaluation of redox statuses in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ann Clin Biochem 2009; 46: 394–400.

21.

Liu

Zhou

Geng

QM.

Evaluation oxygen free radicals related index before liver transplantation to forejudge prognosis. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2003; 15: 560–562 [In Chinese, English abstract].

22.

Suzuki

Imai

Takai

et al.

Hepatocellular carcinoma patients with increased oxidative stress levels are prone to recurrence after curative treatment: a prospective case series study using the d-ROM test.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013; 139: 845–852.

23.

Lorente

Rodriguez

Sanz

et al.

Association between pre-transplant serum malondialdehyde levels and survival one year after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 500.

24.

Pugh

Murray-Lyon

Dawson

et al.

Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices.

Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646–649.

25.

Mazzaferro

Regalia

Doci

et al.

Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.

N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 693–699.

26.

Kamath

Wiesner

Malinchoc

et al . A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001; 33: 464–470.

27.

Kikugawa

Kojima

Yamaki

et al.

Interpretation of the thiobarbituric acid reactivity of rat liver and brain homogenates in the presence of ferric ion and ethylediaminotetraacetic acid.

Anal Biochem 1992; 202: 249–255.

28.

Sener

Toklu

Kapucu

et al.

Melatonin protects against oxidative organ injury in a rat model of sepsis. Surg Today 2005; 35: 52–59.

29.

Carrillo-Vico

Lardone

Naji

et al.

Beneficial pleiotropic actions of melatonin in an experimental model of septic shock in mice: regulation of pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokine network, protection against oxidative damage and anti-apoptotic effects.

J Pineal Res 2005; 39: 400–408.

30.

Lowes

Webster

Murphy

et al.

Antioxidants that protect mitochondria reduce interleukin-6 and oxidative stress, improve mitochondrial function, and reduce biochemical markers of organ dysfunction in a rat model of acute sepsis.

Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 472–480.

31.

Paskaloğlu

Sener

Kapucu

et al.

Melatonin treatment protects against sepsis-induced functional and biochemical changes in rat ileum and urinary bladder.

Life Sci 2004; 74: 1093–1104.

32.

Kerman

Cirak

Ozguner

et al.

Does melatonin protect or treat brain damage from traumatic oxidative stress?

Exp Brain Res 2005; 163: 406–410.

33.

Horáková

Ondrejicková

Bachratá

et al.

Preventive effect of several antioxidants after oxidative stress on rat brain homogenates. Gen Physiol Biophys 2000; 19: 195–205.

34.

Ozsüer

Görgülü

Kiriş

et al.

The effects of memantine on lipid peroxidation following closed-head trauma in rats.

Neurosurg Rev 2005; 28: 143–147.

35.

Fulia

Gitto

Cuzzocrea

et al.

Increased levels of malondialdehyde and nitrite/nitrate in the blood of asphyxiated newborns: reduction by melatonin.

J Pineal Res 2001; 31: 343–349.

36.

Gitto

Karbownik

Reiter

et al.

Effects of melatonin treatment in septic newborns.

Pediatr Res 2001; 50: 756–60.

37.

Sahib

Al-Jawad

Alkaisy

AA.

Effect of antioxidants on the incidence of wound infection in burn patients. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2010; 23: 199–205.

38.

Saniova

Drobny

Lehotsky

et al.

Biochemical and clinical improvement of cytotoxic state by amantadine sulphate.

Cell Mol Neurobiol 2006; 26: 1475–1482.

39.

Varona

Soriano

Aguirre-Jaime

et al.

Risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: accuracy of the α-fetoprotein model in a single-center experience. Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 84–89.