Radiation dose should be as low as reasonably achievable. With the invention of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT), the radiation dose may be considerably reduced.
Purpose
To evaluate the potential of PCD-CT for dose reduction in pulmonary nodule visualization for human readers as well as for computer-aided detection (CAD) studies.
Material and Methods
A chest phantom containing pulmonary nodules of different sizes/densities (range 3–12 mm and −800–100 HU) was scanned on a PCD-CT with standard low-dose protocol as well as with half, quarter, and 1/40 dose (CTDIvol 0.4–0.03 mGy). Dose-matched scans were performed on a third-generation energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Evaluation of nodule visualization and detectability was performed by two blinded radiologists. Subjective image quality was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based nodule detection was performed using commercially available software.
Results
Highest image noise was found at the lowest dose setting of 1/40 radiation dose (eff. dose = 0.01mSv) with 166.1 ± 18.5 HU for PCD-CT and 351.8 ± 53.0 HU for EID-CT. Overall sensitivity was 100% versus 93% at standard low-dose protocol (eff. dose = 0.2 mSv) for PCD-CT and EID-CT, respectively. At the half radiation dose, sensitivity remained 100% for human reader and CAD studies in PCD-CT. At the quarter radiation dose, PCD-CT achieved the same results as EID-CT at the standard radiation dose setting (93%, P = 1.00) in human reading studies. The AI-CAD system delivered a sensitivity of 93% at the lowest radiation dose level in PCD-CT.
Conclusion
At half dose, PCD CT showed pulmonary nodules similar to full-dose PCD, and at quarter dose, PCD CT performed comparably to standard low-dose EID CT. The CAD algorithm is effective even at ultra-low doses.
HenschkeCIMcCauleyDIYankelevitzDF, et al.Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet1999;354:99–105.
2.
InfanteMCavutoSLutmanFR, et al.A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2009;180:445–453.
3.
SaghirZDirksenAAshrafH, et al.CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax2012;67:296–301.
4.
SwensenSJJettJRHartmanTE, et al.Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology2003;226:756–761.
5.
YankelevitzDFGuptaRZhaoB, et al.Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT–preliminary experience. Radiology1999;212:561–566.
6.
LillingtonGACaskeyCI. Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med1993;14:111–119.
7.
DawsonQ. NELSON trial: reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening. Lancet Respir Med2020;8:236.
8.
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, AberleDRAdamsAM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med2011;365:395–409.
9.
MayoJRAldrichJMullerNL, et al.Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology2003;228:15–21.
10.
KramerBSBergCDAberleDR, et al.Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT: results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). J Med Screen2011;18:109–111.
11.
LarkeFJKrugerRLCagnonCH, et al.Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol2011;197:1165–1169.
12.
National Lung Screening Trial Research Tean, AberleDRBergCD, et al. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology2011;258:243–253.
13.
MettlerFAJrHudaWYoshizumiTT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology2008;248:254–263.
14.
ValentinJ, International Commission on Radiation Protection. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP2007;37:1–79, iii.
15.
SarmaAHeilbrunMEConnerKE, et al.Radiation and chest CT scan examinations: what do we know?Chest2012;142:750–760.
16.
ChenJHJinEHHeW, et al.Combining automatic tube current modulation with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for low-dose chest CT screening. PLoS One2014;9:e92414.
17.
SpearmanJVSchoepfUJRottenkolberM, et al.Effect of automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection on radiation dose at CT: an observational study on a global scale. Radiology2016;279:167–174.
18.
KatsuraMMatsudaIAkahaneM, et al.Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol2013;48:206–212.
19.
YanagawaMGyobuTLeungAN, et al.Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality. Acad Radiol2014;21:695–703.
20.
FujitaMHigakiTAwayaY, et al.Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction. Jpn J Radiol2017;35:179–189.
21.
EbnerLButikoferYOttD, et al.Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted). AJR Am J Roentgenol2015;204:727–735.
22.
MartiniKHigashigaitoKBarthBK, et al.Ultralow-dose CT with tin filtration for detection of solid and sub solid pulmonary nodules: a phantom study. Br J Radiol2015;88:20150389.
23.
MartiniKBarthBKNguyen-KimTD, et al.Evaluation of pulmonary nodules and infection on chest CT with radiation dose equivalent to chest radiography: prospective intra-individual comparison study to standard dose CT. Eur J Radiol2016;85:360–365.
24.
FletcherJGLevinDLSykesAG, et al.Observer performance for detection of pulmonary nodules at chest CT over a large range of radiation dose levels. Radiology2020;297:699–707.
25.
SymonsRPourmortezaASandfortV, et al.Feasibility of dose-reduced chest CT with photon-counting detectors: initial results in humans. Radiology2017;285:980–989.
26.
MannilMHickethierTvon SpiczakJ, et al.Photon-counting CT: high-resolution imaging of coronary stents. Invest Radiol2018;53:143–149.
27.
BartlettDJKooCWBartholmaiBJ, et al.High-resolution chest computed tomography imaging of the lungs: impact of 1024 matrix reconstruction and photon-counting detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol2019;54:129–137.
28.
TaguchiKIwanczykJS. Vision 20/20: single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. Med Phys2013;40:100901.
29.
WilleminkMJNoelPB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol2019;29:2185–2195.
30.
WilleminkMJPerssonMPourmortezaA, et al.Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology2018;289:293–312.
31.
Jungblut L, Euler A, von Spiczak J, et al. Potential of photon-counting detector CT for radiation dose reduction for the assessment of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis. Invest Radiol 2022.
32.
Jungblut L, Bluthgen C, Polacin M, et al. First performance evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system for pulmonary nodule evaluation in dual-source photon-counting detector CT at different low-dose levels. Invest Radiol 2021.
33.
DunningCASMarshJFJrWinfreeT, et al.Accuracy of nodule volume and airway wall thickness measurement using low-dose chest CT on a photon-counting detector CT scanner. Invest Radiol2023;58:283–292.
34.
Sartoretti T, Landsmann A, Nakhostin D, et al. Quantum iterative reconstruction for abdominal photon-counting detector CT improves image quality. Radiology 2022;303:339–348.
35.
Sartoretti T, Racine D, Mergen V, et al. Quantum iterative reconstruction for low-dose ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT of the lung. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12.
36.
GordicSMorsbachFSchmidtB, et al.Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Invest Radiol2014;49:465–473.
37.
SiegelmanJWSupanichMPGavrielidesMA. Pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacity can be reliably measured with low-dose techniques regardless of iterative reconstruction: results of a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol2015;204:1242–1247.
38.
GraafenDEmrichTHalfmannMC, et al.Dose reduction and image quality in photon-counting detector high-resolution computed tomography of the chest: routine clinical data. J Thorac Imaging2022;37:315–322.
39.
InoueAJohnsonTFWalkoffLA, et al.Lung cancer screening using clinical photon-counting detector computed tomography and energy-integrating-detector computed tomography: a prospective patient study. J Comput Assist Tomogr2023;47:229–235.
40.
ZhouWMontoyaJGutjahrR, et al.Lung nodule volume quantification and shape differentiation with an ultra-high resolution technique on a photon-counting detector computed tomography system. J Med Imaging (Bellingham)2017;4:043502.
41.
SymonsRCorkTESahbaeeP, et al.Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol2017;62:202–213.
42.
LengSGutjahrRFerreroA, et al.Ultra-high spatial resolution, multi-energy CT using photon counting detector technology. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng2017;10132:101320Y. doi: 10.1117/12.2255589
43.
CavaliereCBaldiDBrancatoV, et al.A customized anthropomorphic 3D-printed phantom to reproducibility assessment in computed tomography: an oncological case study. Front Oncol2023;13:1123796.
