Evaluation of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI using deep learning reconstruction

Abstract

Background

Deep learning (DL)-based methods have been used to improve the imaging quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by denoising.

Purpose

To assess the effects of DL-based MR reconstruction (DLR) method on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) image quality.

Material and Methods

A total of 85 patients who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination, including LGE imaging using conventional construction and DLR with varying levels of noise reduction (NR) levels, were included. Both magnitude LGE (MLGE) and phase-sensitive LGE (PSLGE) images were reviewed independently by double-blinded observers who used a 5-point Likert scale for multiple measures regarding image quality. Meanwhile, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge sharpness of images were calculated and compared between conventional LGE imaging and DLR LGE imaging.

Results

Both MLGE and PSLGE with DLR at 50% and 75% noise reduction levels received significantly higher scores than conventional imaging for overall imaging quality (all P < 0.01). In addition, the SNR, CNR, and edge sharpness of all DLR LGE imaging are higher than conventional imaging (all P < 0.01). The highest subjective score and best image quality is obtained when the DLR noise reduction level is at 75%.

Conclusion

DLR reduced image noise while improving image contrast and sharpness in the cardiovascular LGE imaging.

Keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement deep learning-based reconstruction signal-to-noise ratio contrast-to-noise ratio

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kramer

Barkhausen

Bucciarelli-Ducci

, et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020;22:17.

Patel

Kramer

. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis and prognosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:1180–1193.

Kwong

Farzaneh-Far

. Value of late gadolinium enhancement imaging in diagnosis of myocardial infarction and unobstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:1149–1151.

Kellman

Arai

. Cardiac imaging techniques for physicians: late enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:529–542.

Viallon

Jacquier

Rotaru

, et al. Head-to-head comparison of eight late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR (LGE CMR) sequences at 1.5 tesla: from bench to bedside. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1374–1387.

Muehlberg

Arnhold

Fritschi

, et al. Comparison of fast multi-slice and standard segmented techniques for detection of late gadolinium enhancement in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy - a prospective clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018;20:13.

Piehler

Wong

Puntil

, et al. Free-breathing, motion-corrected late gadolinium enhancement is robust and extends risk stratification to vulnerable patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:423–432.

Ueda

Ohno

Yamamoto

, et al. Deep learning reconstruction of diffusion-weighted MRI improves image quality for prostatic imaging. Radiology 2022;303:373–381.

Kim

, et al. Thin-slice pituitary MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction: diagnostic performance in a postoperative setting. Radiology 2021;298:114–122.

10.

Kidoh

Shinoda

Kitajima

, et al. Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci 2020;19:195–206.

11.

Toledano-Massiah

Sayadi

de Boer

, et al. Accuracy of the compressed sensing accelerated 3D-FLAIR sequence for the detection of MS plaques at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:454–458.

12.

Vranic

Cross

Wang

, et al. Compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) accelerated brain imaging: reduced scan time without reduced image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:92–98.

13.

Bratis

Henningsson

Grigoratos

, et al. Image-navigated 3-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and initial clinical results. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017;19:97.

14.

Feng

Benkert

Block

, et al. Compressed sensing for body MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;45:966–987.

15.

Lin

Johnson

Knoll

, et al. Artificial intelligence for MR image reconstruction: an overview for clinicians. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;53:1015–1028.

16.

Cau

Cherchi

Micheletti

, et al.

Potential role of artificial intelligence in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: can it help clinicians in making a diagnosis?

J Thorac Imaging 2021;36:142–148.

17.

Oksuz

Ruijsink

Puyol-Antón

, et al. Automatic CNN-based detection of cardiac MR motion artefacts using k-space data augmentation and curriculum learning. Med Image Anal 2019;55:136–147.

18.

Fahmy

Neisius

Chan

, et al. Three-dimensional deep convolutional neural networks for automated myocardial scar quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multicenter multivendor study. Radiology 2020;294:52–60.

19.

Zhou

Han

Ghodrati

, et al. Parallel imaging and convolutional neural network combined fast MR image reconstruction: applications in low-latency accelerated real-time imaging. Med Phys 2019;46:3399–3413.

20.

Hauptmann

Arridge

Lucka

, et al. Real-time cardiovascular MR with spatio-temporal artifact suppression using deep learning-proof of concept in congenital heart disease. Magn Reson Med 2019;81:1143–1156.

21.

Fahmy

Rowin

Chan

, et al. Improved quantification of myocardium scar in late gadolinium enhancement images: deep learning based image fusion approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;54:303–312.

22.

Muscogiuri

Martini

Gatti

, et al. Feasibility of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in ischemic cardiomyopathy using 2D-multisegment LGE combined with artificial intelligence reconstruction deep learning noise reduction algorithm. Int J Cardiol 2021;15:164–170.

23.

van der Velde

Hassing

Bakker

, et al. Improvement of late gadolinium enhancement image quality using a deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm and its influence on myocardial scar quantification. Eur Radiol 2021;31:3846–3855.

24.

Yasaka

Tanishima

Ohtake

, et al. Deep learning reconstruction for 1.5 T cervical spine MRI: effect on interobserver agreement in the evaluation of degenerative changes. Eur Radiol 2022;32:6118–6125.

25.

Hahn

Lee

, et al. Image quality and diagnostic performance of accelerated shoulder MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;218:506–516.

26.

Johnson

Tong

Donthireddy

, et al. Deep learning reconstruction enables highly accelerated biparametric MR imaging of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;56:184–195.

27.

Kim

Cho

, et al. Accelerated synthetic MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction for pediatric neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1653–1659.

28.

Flett

Hasleton

Cook

, et al. Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:150–156.