Diagnostic reference levels for fluoroscopically guided procedures in a South African tertiary hospital

Abstract

Background

The burgeoning usage and complexity of fluoroscopically guided procedures (FGPs) contribute to extended examination times and increased risk of adverse radiation effects. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) play a pivotal role in dose optimization. There are limited DRL data for FGPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Purpose

To determine local DRLs (LDRLs) for common FGPs in the South African (SA) context and compare these with published international data.

Material and Methods

A three-year, retrospective study of the 15 most frequently performed FGPs at a SA institution. For each procedure, the 50th and 75th percentiles of kerma area product (KAP), reference point air kerma (K_a,r), and fluoroscopy time data were derived. Published international FGP DRL data were collated and compared with the 75th percentiles of local institutional dosage parameters.

Results

The commonest FGPs were aorto-bifemoral diagnostic angiography (n = 590), aorto-bifemoral interventional angiography (n = 287), nephrostomy (n = 265), and bronchial arterial embolization (BAE) (n = 208). Selective abdominal vessel interventional angiography (KAP = 170 Gy . cm²; K_a,r = 877 mGy) recorded the highest LDRL dosages; BAE was the longest procedure (LDRL = 38 min). Nephrostomies achieved the lowest LDRLs across all parameters (KAP = 10 Gy . cm²; K_a,r = 63 mGy, fluoroscopy time = 4.3 min). All Tygerberg Hospital LDRLs with comprehensive comparable data were within or below published ranges.

Conclusion

This study advances international radiation protection initiatives, addresses the paucity of LMIC DRL data, demonstrates broad alignment of Tygerberg Hospital FGP practice with international norms and highlights areas for optimization of institutional practice.