Diagnostic reference levels in low- and middle-income countries: early “ALARAm” bells?

Abstract

Background

In 1996 the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) introduced diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as a quality assurance tool for radiation dose optimization. While many countries have published DRLs, available data are largely from high-income countries. There is arguably a greater need for DRLs in low- and middle-income-countries (LMICs), where imaging equipment may be older and trained imaging technicians are scarce. To date, there has been no critical analysis of the published work on DRLs in LMICs. Such work is important to evaluate data deficiencies and stimulate future quality assurance initiatives.

Purpose

To review the published work on DRLs in LMICs and to critically analyze the comprehensiveness of available data.

Material and Methods

Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science database searches were conducted for English-language articles published between 1996 and 2015 documenting DRLs for diagnostic imaging in LMICs. Retrieved articles were analyzed and classified by geographical region, country of origin, contributing author, year of publication, imaging modality, body part, and patient age.

Results

Fifty-three articles reported DRLs for 28 of 135 LMICs (21%), reflecting data from 26/104 (25%) middle-income countries and 2/31 (6%) low-income countries. General radiography (n = 26, 49%) and computerized tomography (n = 17, 32%) data were most commonly reported. Pediatric DRLs (n = 14, 26%) constituted approximately one-quarter of published work.

Conclusion

Published DRL data are deficient in the majority of LMICs, with the paucity most striking in low-income countries. DRL initiatives are required in LMICs to enhance dose optimization.

Keywords

Diagnostic reference levels (DRL)radiation dose optimization physics radiation safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. First WHO global forum on medical devices: context, outcomes, and future actions. Geneva: WHO, 2011. Available at: www.who.int/medical_devices/gfmd_report_final.pdf (accessed 17 November 2015).

UNSCEAR 2008 Report. Volume I. Annex A. Available at: www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/09-86753_Report_2008_Annex_A.pdf (accessed 22 November 2015).

Wall

Shrimpton

. The historical development of reference doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1998; 80: 15–20.

UNSCEAR 1958 Report. Annex C. Available at: www.unscear.org/docs/reports/1958,%2013th%20session%20(Suppl.%20No.17)/1958final-2_unscear.pdf (accessed 22 November 2015).

Gray

Archer

Butler

. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 2005; 235: 354–358.

Shrimpton

Wall

Jones

. A national survey of doses to patients undergoing a selection of routine x ray examinations in English hospitals. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 749–758.

Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1996; 26: 1–47.

Brady

Ramanauskas

Cain

. Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 1488–1498.

Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, Joint Working Party. Guidance on the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels for medical X-ray examinations. IPEM Report 88. Available at: http://www.ipem.ac.uk/Publications/IPEMReportSeries.aspx (accessed 23 October 2015).

10.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The evolution of the system of radiological protection. The justification for new ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot 2003; 23: 129–142.

11.

Vawda

Pitcher

Akudugu

. Diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. S Afr J Rad 2015; 19: 846–846.

12.

IAEA safety standards radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards interim edition for protecting people and the environment. No. GSR Part 3 (Interim). Available at: www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/p1531interim_web.pdf (accessed 21 October 2015).

13.

Council directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing directive 84/466/Euratom. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:31997L0043 (accessed 2 April 2015).

14.

Hart

Shrimpton

. Fourth review of the UK national patient dose database. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: e957–e958.

15.

PHE-CRCE-013: Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK (2011 Review). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/doses-from-computed-tomography-ct-examinations-in-the-uk (accessed 30 September 2015).

16.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRP Report No. 172. Bethesda, MD: NCRP, 2012. Available at: http://www.ncrppublications.org/Reports/172 (accessed 15 October 2015).

17.

Safety code 35: safety procedures for the installation, use and control of x-ray equipment in large medical radiological facilities. Available at: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/radiation/safety-code_35-securite/index-eng.php#sa35 (accessed 23 October 2015).

18.

Diagnostic reference levels based on the latest surveys in Japan-Japan DRLs 2015. Available at: www.radher.jp/J-RIME/report/DRLhoukokusyoEng.pdf (accessed 23 October 2015).

19.

Australian radiation protection and nuclear safety agency. Introducing the national diagnostic reference level service. Available at: http://www.arpansa.gov.au/services/ndrl/index.cfm (accessed 23 October 2015).

20.

Vodovatov A, Bernhardsson C. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels in the Russian federation based on regional dose surveys. Proceedings of the international conference “Medical Physics in the Baltic States”. Lithuania: Kuanas University of Technology, 2015, pp.11–14. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295075451_ESTABLISHING_NATIONAL_DIAGNOSTIC_REFERENCE_LEVELS_IN_THE_RUSSIAN_FEDERATION_BASED_ON_REGIONAL_DOSE_SURVEYS (accessed 14 May 2016).

21.

World Bank: country and lending groups. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups (accessed 1 November 2015).

22.

European Society of Radiology (ESR). Summary of the European directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. Insights Imaging 2015; 6: 411–417.

23.

WHO Baseline Country Survey on Medical Devices 2010. Available at: www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/95785/1/WHO_HSS_EHT_DIM_11.01_eng.pdf (accessed 17 November 2015).

24.

Kabongo

Nel

Pitcher

. Analysis of licensed South African diagnostic imaging equipment. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 18: 22–57.

25.

World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2015. Geneva: WHO, 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/170250/1/9789240694439_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 (accessed 25 October 2015).

26.

Zaidi

. Medical physics in developing countries: looking for a better world. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2008; 4: e29–e29.

27.

Podgorsak EB. Medical Physics – a profession and science. Intensive course and workshop. The world of medical physics, king Faisal specialist hospital & research center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. December, 2010. Available at: www.radmed.org/Med%20Phys%20Intro.pdf (accessed 24 October 2015).

28.

Richard Fowler. The bigger picture in radiology. Available at: http://m.hsj.co.uk/5053658 (accessed 29 April 2015).

29.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Workforce report 2010. Sydney: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, 2010. Available at: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CG4QFjAJ&url=http://www.ranzcr.edu.aucomponentdocmandoc_download718-2010-radiology-workforce-survey-report (accessed 29 April 2015).

30.

Monu

Muyinda

Taljanovic

. ISS outreach sub-Saharan Africa insight: Uganda 2011. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41: 1347–1348.

31.

Monu

Kopakopa

Taljanovic

. ISS outreach Sub-Saharan Africa: Zambia 2011. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41: 1493–1494.

32.

Mollura

Mayo-Smith

Radiology overview: Defining radiology and stakeholders in the radiology enterprise. In: Mollura

Lungren

(eds). Radiology in global health, New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014, pp. 7–11.

33.

WHO Bonn call for action. 10 Actions to improve radiation protection in medicine in the next decade. Available at: www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/medical_exposure/bonncallforaction2014.pdf (accessed 5 November 2015).

34.

Du Plessis

Pitcher

. Towards task shifting? A comparison of the accuracy of acute trauma-radiograph reporting by medical officers and senior radiographers in an African hospital. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 21: 308–308.

35.

World Health Organization. Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 2008. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/TTR-TaskShifting.pdf (accessed 25 October 2015).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.19 MB