Abstract
Background
Recurrent high-grade gliomas progressing after surgery and temozolomide plus radiation therapy have traditionally been treated using antiangiogenic drugs as the first-line therapy. Since the phase 3 EORTC 26101 trial showed no significant benefit of administering antiangiogenic drugs, the need to identify a biomarker to classify subgroups of potential responders has increased.
Purpose
To investigate the feasibility of using apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of the response of recurrent high-grade gliomas to bevacizumab or classifier for patients showing better response.
Material and Methods
This retrospective study analyzed magnetic resonance images obtained from 39 patients at the time of high-grade glioma progression who were treated using bevacizumab. The apparent diffusion coefficient maps were quantified and modelled as a mixture of Gaussian functions. The correlation of their descriptors and the time to second progression was studied. Log-rank tests were performed to determine the power of these descriptors as the classifiers for patients exhibiting better survival.
Results
None of the descriptors showed correlation with time to second progression (r < 0.35) but several of them stratified subgroups showing a better time to second progression passing log-rank tests (P < 0.02).
Conclusion
Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot be used to predict the time to second progression of recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab, but it can stratify groups with better time to second progression distributions.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
