Abstract
Background
The use of weight-adapted pediatric computed tomography (CT) tube voltage protocols has been suggested, but a consensus standard has not been established and clinical available studies are not sufficient.
Purpose
To determine the best tube voltage for low dose abdominal CT imaging in children.
Material and Methods
Eighty-seven cases who needed three CT exams in a 1–3-month interval between scans were enrolled (mean age = 4.69 ± 3.20 years). The three scans were performed with three different tube voltages at 80 kV, 100 kV, and 120 kV, keeping the same radiation dose and same contrast injection protocol. Patients were divided into five groups for analysis based on their body weight. The subjective image quality of the three exams were evaluated using a 4-point scale (4 being the best) for image noise and image quality. The objective evaluation in terms of CT values and standard deviation in aorta, liver, spleen, pancreas, and kidney were measured to calculate the degree of enhancement and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of organs. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the subjective and objective image quality with respect to different tube voltages and different patient weights.
Result
The 80-kV tube voltage provided the highest overall enhancement and CNR for the entire patient population and the best objective image quality for the 6.1–28.0 kg subgroup.
Conclusion
Patient weight-dependent tube voltage selection maximizes image quality for abdominal enhanced CT in children. The optimal tube voltage for children with weight <28 kg is 80 kV; higher voltages should be selected for children weighing 28.1–50.0 kg.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
