The 100 top-cited articles focused on magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Background

The number of citations that an article has received can be used to evaluate its impact on a particular research area.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the 100 top-cited articles focused on magnetic resonance (MR).

Material and Methods

We determined the 100 top-cited articles on MR via the Scopus database, using the search term. The following information was recorded for each article: year of publication; journal title; impact factor of journal; number of citations; number of annual citations; authorship; department; institution; country; type of article; topic; MR protocol; and disease.

Results

The number of citations for the 100 top-cited articles was in the range of 898–5679 (median = 1342.5) and the number of annual citations was in the range of 19.7–372.4 (median = 60.9). The 100 top-cited articles were published in 46 journals, led by Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (n = 13). The majority of articles were published in 1990–1999 (n = 53), originated in the United States (n = 69), were original articles (n = 81), and dealt with the clinical application of MR (n = 57). The Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (n = 5) was the leading institution. The majority of articles did not use any specific protocol (n = 51) and was not associated with any specific disease (n = 56).

Conclusion

Our study presents a detailed list and analysis of the 100 top-cited articles on MR, which provides an insight into historical development in this field.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance publication citation citation classics bibliometric analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rinck

PA.

Magnetic Resonance. A peer-reviewed, critical introduction. 2017. Available at: http://www.magnetic-resonance.org/contents.html (last accessed 31 May 2017).

Nobelprize.org. Press release. 2003. Available at: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2003/press.html.2003 (last accessed 26 May 2017).

Moed

HF.

New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp 2009; 57:13–18.

Eyre-Walker

Stoletzki

The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations.

PLoS Biol 2013; 11:e1001675.

Garfield

100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association.

JAMA 1987; 257:52–59.

Paladugu

Schein

Gardezi

et al . One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 2002; 26:1099–1105.

Baltussen

Kindler

CH.

Citation classics in anesthetic journals.

Anesth Analg 2004; 98:443–451.

Brandt

Downing

Howard

et al . Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:355.e1–7.

Kelly

Glynn

O’Briain

et al . The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92:1338–1343.

10.

Shadgan

Roig

Hajghanbari

et al . Top-cited articles in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91:806–815.

11.

Tam

Wong

et al . Citation classics: top 50 cited articles in ‘respiratory system’. Respirology 2013; 18:71–81.

12.

Yoon

Yun

et al . Citation classics in radiology journals: the 100 top-cited articles, 1945–2012. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:471–481.

13.

Moon

Yun

Yoon

et al . The 100 most-cited articles focused on ultrasound imaging: a bibliometric analysis. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38:311–317.

14.

Khan

Ullah

Riaz

et al . Top 100 cited articles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016; 18:87.

15.

Kim

Yoon

Kim

et al . The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: A bibliometric analysis. Neuroimage 2016; 139:149–156.

16.

Tzourio-Mazoyer

Landeau

Papathanassiou

et al . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002; 15:273–289.

17.

Smith

Jenkinson

Woolrich

et al . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004; 23(Suppl 1):S208–219.

18.

Pepe

Kurtz

MJ.

A measure of total research impact independent of time and discipline.

PLoS One 2012; 7:e46428.

19.

Pagni

Khan

Cohen

et al . Highly cited works in radiology: the top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Acad Radiol 2014; 21:1056–1066.

20.

Dolan

Hanna

Warraich

et al . The top 100 articles in the radiology of trauma: a bibliometric analysis. Emerg Radiol 2015; 22:667–675.

21.

Oelrich

Peter

Jung

A bibliometric evaluation of publications in urological journals among European Union countries between 2000–2005. Eur Urol 2007; 52:1238–1248.

22.

Braun

The reliability of total citation rankings.

J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003; 43:45–46.

23.

Kulkarni

Aziz

Shams

et al . Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 2009; 302:1092–1096.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB