Thoracic-abdominal imaging with a novel dual-layer spectral detector CT: intra-individual comparison of image quality and radiation dose with 128-row single-energy acquisition

Abstract

Background

A novel, multi-energy, dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) is commercially available now with the vendor’s claim that it yields the same or better quality of polychromatic, conventional CT images like modern single-energy CT scanners without any radiation dose penalty.

Purpose

To intra-individually compare the quality of conventional polychromatic CT images acquired with a dual-layer spectral detector (SDCT) and the latest generation 128-row single-energy-detector (CT128) from the same manufacturer.

Material and Methods

Fifty patients underwent portal-venous phase, thoracic-abdominal CT scans with the SDCT and prior CT128 imaging. The SDCT scanning protocol was adapted to yield a similar estimated dose length product (DLP) as the CT128. Patient dose optimization by automatic tube current modulation and CT image reconstruction with a state-of-the-art iterative algorithm were identical on both scanners. CT image contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was compared between the SDCT and CT128 in different anatomic structures. Image quality and noise were assessed independently by two readers with 5-point-Likert-scales. Volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol), and DLP were recorded and normalized to 68 cm acquisition length (DLP₆₈).

Results

The SDCT yielded higher mean CNR values of 30.0% ± 2.0% (26.4–32.5%) in all anatomic structures (P < 0.001) and excellent scores for qualitative parameters surpassing the CT128 (all P < 0.0001) with substantial inter-rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.801). Despite adapted scan protocols the SDCT yielded lower values for CTDI_vol (–10.1 ± 12.8%), DLP (−13.1 ± 13.9%), and DLP₆₈ (–15.3 ± 16.9%) than the CT128 (all P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The SDCT scanner yielded better CT image quality compared to the CT128 and lower radiation dose parameters.

Keywords

Computed tomography CT abdomen thorax adults radiation safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avrin

Macovski

Zatz

. Clinical application of Compton and photo-electric reconstruction in computed tomography: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 1978; 13: 217–222.

Coursey

Nelson

Boll

et al.

Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging?

Radiographics 2010; 30: 1037–1055.

Graser

Johnson

TRC

Bader

et al.

Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 112–119.

Uotani

Watanabe

Higashi

et al.

Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: Utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2060–2065.

Carrascosa PM, Cury RC, García MJ, et al., editors. Dual-energy CT in cardiovascular imaging. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015:33–44.

Johnson T, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, et al., editors. Dual energy CT in clinical practice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011:21–34.

Wichmann

Hardie

Schoepf

et al.

Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 642–650.

Sudarski

Apfaltrer

Nance

Jr et al.

Objective and subjective image quality of liver parenchyma and hepatic metastases with virtual. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 514–522.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

10.

Romman Z, Uman I, Yagil Y, et al. Detector technology in simultaneous spectral imaging - White paper. Amsterdam: Philips Healthcare, 2014. Available at: http://clinical.netforum.healthcare.philips.com/global/Explore/White-Papers/CT/Detector-technology-in-simultaneous-spectral-imaging (last accessed 8 February 2017).

11.

Doerner

Hauger

Hickethier

et al.

Image quality evaluation of dual-layer spectral detector CT of the chest and comparison with conventional CT imaging. Eur J Radiol 2017; 93: 52–58.

12.

De Zordo

Von Lutterotti

Dejaco

et al.

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: High-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 279–286.

13.

Purysko

Primak

Baker

et al.

Comparison of radiation dose and image quality from single-energy and dual-energy CT examinations in the same patients screened for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: e538–e544.

14.

Bauer

Kramer

Renker

et al.

Dose and image quality at CT pulmonary angiography-comparison of first and second generation dual-energy CT and 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2139–2147.

15.

De Cecco

Darnell

Macias

et al.

Second-generation dual-energy computed tomography of the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013; 37: 543–546.

16.

Primak

Giraldo

JCR

Eusemann

et al.

Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: Dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 1164–1174.

17.

Taylor

Van Muylem

Howarth

et al.

CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision?

Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 365–373.