Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Computed tomography (CT) of the left atrium (LA) is performed prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to improve success of circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation. The ablation procedure itself exposes patients to substantial radiation doses, therefore radiation dose reduction in pre-ablational imaging is of concern.

Purpose

To assess and compare diagnostic performance of low-radiation dose preprocedural CT in patients scheduled for PVI using two types of reconstruction algorithms.

Material and Methods

Forty-six patients (61 ± 10 years) scheduled for PVI were enrolled in this study irrespective of body-mass-index or cardiac rhythm at examination. An electrocardiographically triggered dual-source CT scan was performed. Filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms were applied. Images were integrated into an electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system. Subjective image quality was scored independently by two readers on a five-point scale for both reconstruction algorithms (1 = excellent to 5 = non-diagnostic). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and effective radiation dose were calculated.

Results

Data acquisition and EAM integration were successful in all patients. Median image quality score was 1 for both FBP (quartiles = 1, 1.62; range = 1–3) and IR (quartiles = 1, 1.5; range = 1–3). Mean SNR was 7.61 ± 2.14 for FBP and 9.02 ± 2.69 for IR. Mean CNR was 5.92 ± 1.80 for FBP and 6.95 ± 2.29 for IR. Mean effective radiation dose was 0.3 ± 0.1 mSv.

Conclusion

At a radiation dose of 0.3 ± 0.1 mSv, high-pitch dual-source CT yields LA images of consistently high quality using both FBP and IR. IR raises SNR and CNR without significantly improving subjective image quality.

Keywords

Computed tomography (CT)left atrium atrial fibrillation radiation dose

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Haissaguerre

Jais

Shah

et al.

Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 659–666.

Calkins

Kuck

Cappato

et al.

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace 2012; 14: 528–606.

Dong

Dickfeld

Dalal

et al.

Initial experience in the use of integrated electroanatomic mapping with three-dimensional MR/CT images to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 459–466.

Kistler

Rajappan

Jahngir

et al.

The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 1093–1101.

Blanke

Baumann

Langer

et al.

Imaging of pulmonary vein anatomy using low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1851–1855.

Thai

Wai

Lin

et al.

Pulmonary venous anatomy imaging with low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch 128-slice dual-source computed tomography. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2012; 5: 521–530.

Yang

Yan

et al.

Low dose 320-row CT for left atrium and pulmonary veins imaging-the feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2011; 81: 1549–1554.

Gosling

Loader

Venables

et al.

A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 2010; 96: 922–926.

Pontana

Pagniez

Flohr

et al.

Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 627–635.

10.

Pontana

Duhamel

Pagniez

et al.

Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 636–643.

11.

Winklehner

Karlo

Puippe

et al.

Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2521–2526.

12.

Eisentopf

Achenbach

Ulzheimer

et al.

Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 458–465.

13.

Schuhbaeck

Achenbach

Layritz

et al.

Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose < 0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 597–606.

14.

Annoni

Andreini

Pontone

et al.

Ultra-low-dose CT for left atrium and pulmonary veins imaging using new model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16: 1366–1373.

15.

Layritz

Schmid

Achenbach

et al.

Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15: 1238–1245.

16.

Moscariello

Takx

Schoepf

et al.

Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2130–2138.

17.

Halliburton

Abbara

Chen

et al.

SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5: 198–224.

18.

Seguchi

Aoyama

Koyama

et al.

Evaluation of exposure dose to patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures–a phantom study. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2559–2567.

19.

Lickfett

Mahesh

Vasamreddy

et al.

Radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2004; 110: 3003–3010.

20.

Sawhney

Anousheh

Chen

et al.

Five-year outcomes after segmental pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 366–372.

21.

Cappato

Calkins

Chen

et al.

Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010; 3: 32–38.

22.

Cao

Zhang

Liu

et al.

Evaluation of high-pitch flash scan for pulmonary venous CTA on a 128-slice dual source CT: compared with prospective ECG-triggered sequence scan. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 29: 1557–1564.

23.

Chen

Christianson

Wilson

et al.

Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods. Med Phys 2014; 41: 071909–071909.

24.

Leipsic

Labounty

Heilbron

et al.

Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 655–660.

25.

Bittencourt

Schmidt

Seltmann

et al.

Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 27: 1081–1087.

Image quality of low-radiation dose left atrial CT using filtered back projection and an iterative reconstruction algorithm: intra-individual comparison in unselected patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References