Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT

Abstract

Background

Patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain often undergo abdominal computed tomography (CT). However, abdominal CT is associated with high radiation exposure.

Purpose

To evaluate diagnostic performance of a reduced-dose 100 kVp CT protocol with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction as compared to a linearly blended 120 kVp protocol for assessment of acute, non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Material and Methods

Two radiologists assessed 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series of 112 consecutive patients with acute non-traumatic pain (onset < 48 h) regarding image quality, noise, and artifacts on a five-point Likert scale. Both radiologists assessed both series for abdominal pathologies and for diagnostic confidence. Both 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series were quantitatively evaluated regarding radiation dose and image noise. Comparative statistics and diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver operating curve (ROC) statistics, with final clinical diagnosis/clinical follow-up as reference standard.

Results

Image quality was high for both series without detectable significant differences (P = 0.157). Image noise and artifacts were rated low for both series but significantly higher for 100 kVp (P ≤ 0.021). Diagnostic accuracy was high for both series (120 kVp: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.950, sensitivity = 0.958, specificity = 0.941; 100 kVp: AUC ≥ 0.910, sensitivity ≥ 0.937, specificity = 0.882; P ≥ 0.516) with almost perfect inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.939). Diagnostic confidence was high for both dose levels without significant differences (100 kVp 5, range 4–5; 120 kVp 5, range 3–5; P = 0.134). The 100 kVp series yielded 26.1% lower radiation dose compared with the 120 kVp series (5.72 ± 2.23 mSv versus 7.75 ± 3.02 mSv, P < 0.001). Image noise was significantly higher in reduced-dose CT (13.3 ± 2.4 HU versus 10.6 ± 2.1 HU; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Reduced-dose abdominal CT using 100 kVp yields excellent image quality and high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Keywords

Low-dose CT radiation dose computed tomography (CT)acute abdominal pain diagnostic accuracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

van Randen

Lameris

van Es

et al.

A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1535–1545.

Alshamari

Norrman

Geijer

et al.

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain: prospective study and systematic review. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 1766–1774.

Kubo

Ohno

Kauczor

et al.

Radiation dose reduction in chest CT–review of available options. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 1953–1961.

Kim

et al.

Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1596–1605.

Othman

Afat

Brockmann

et al.

Radiation dose reduction in perfusion CT imaging of the brain: A review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 2016; 43: 1–5.

Othman

Hamou

Pjontek

et al.

Evaluation of whole body ultralow-dose CT for the assessment of ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications: an experimental ex-vivo study in a swine model. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 2199–2204.

Othman

Brockmann

Yang

et al.

Effects of radiation dose reduction in volume perfusion CT imaging of acute ischemic stroke. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 3415–3422.

Niemann

Van Straten

Resinger

et al.

Detection of urolithiasis using low-dose CT–a noise simulation study. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 213–218.

Liu

Esler

Kenny

et al.

Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology 2000; 215: 251–254.

10.

Christe

Heverhagen

Ozdoba

et al.

CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations. World J Radiol 2013; 5: 421–429.

11.

Solomon

Mileto

Ramirez-Giraldo

et al.

Diagnostic performance of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm for low-contrast detectability with a third-generation dual-source multidetector CT scanner: potential for radiation dose reduction in a multireader study. Radiology 2015; 275: 735–745.

12.

Solomon

Wilson

Samei

. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. Med Phys 2015; 42: 4941–4953.

13.

Christner

Kofler

McCollough

. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 881–889.

14.

Tack

Sourtzis

Delpierre

et al.

Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 305–311.

15.

Poletti

Platon

Rutschmann

et al.

Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 927–933.

16.

Remer

Herts

Primak

et al.

Detection of urolithiasis: comparison of 100% tube exposure images reconstructed with filtered back projection and 50% tube exposure images reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Radiology 2014; 272: 749–756.

17.

Tack

Bohy

Perlot

et al.

Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imaging with low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2005; 237: 189–196.

18.

Laqmani

Veldhoen

Dulz

et al.

Reduced-dose abdominopelvic CT using hybrid iterative reconstruction in suspected left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 216–224.

19.

May

Wust

Brand

et al.

Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2011; 46: 465–470.

20.

Primak

Giraldo

Eusemann

et al.

Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: Dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 1164–1174.

21.

Baker

Karim

Bullen

et al.

Estimated patient dose indexes in adult and pediatric MDCT: comparison of automatic tube voltage selection with fixed tube current, fixed tube voltage, and weight-based protocols. Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205: 592–598.

22.

Spearman

Schoepf

Rottenkolber

et al.

Effect of automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection on radiation dose at CT: an observational study on a global scale. Radiology 2016; 279: 167–174.

23.

Krazinski

Meinel

Schoepf

et al.

Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2677–2684.