Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Using the hybrid electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) technique, assessment of entire aorta, coronary arteries, and aortic valve can be possible using single-bolus contrast administration within a single acquisition.

Purpose

To compare the image quality of hybrid ECG-gated and non-gated CT angiography of the aorta and evaluate the effect of a motion correction algorithm (MCA) on coronary artery image quality in a hybrid ECG-gated aorta CT group.

Material and Methods

In total, 104 patients (76 men; mean age = 65.8 years) prospectively randomized into two groups (Group 1 = hybrid ECG-gated CT; Group 2 = non-gated CT) underwent wide-detector array aorta CT. Image quality, assessed using a four-point scale, was compared between the groups. Coronary artery image quality was compared between the conventional reconstruction and motion correction reconstruction subgroups in Group 1.

Results

Group 1 showed significant advantages over Group 2 in aortic wall, cardiac chamber, aortic valve, coronary ostia, and main coronary arteries image quality (all P < 0.001). All Group 1 patients had diagnostic image quality of the aortic wall and left ostium. The MCA significantly improved the image quality of the three main coronary arteries (P < 0.05). Moreover, per-vessel interpretability improved from 92.3% to 97.1% with the MCA (P = 0.013).

Conclusion

Hybrid ECG-gated CT significantly improved the heart and aortic wall image quality and the MCA can further improve the image quality and interpretability of coronary arteries.

Keywords

X-ray computed tomography aorta coronary vessels radiation dosage ECG-triggered imaging technique

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ramanath

Eagle

Nienaber

et al.

The role of preoperative coronary angiography in the setting of type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 790–796.

Larson

Edwards

. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 849–855.

Britto

Thomas

Balaratnam

et al.

Hepatocellular carcinoma arising in non-cirrhotic liver in genetic haemochromatosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 889–893.

Russo

Garattoni

Buia

et al.

128-slice CT angiography of the aorta without ECG-gating: efficacy of faster gantry rotation time and iterative reconstruction in terms of image quality and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 359–369.

Walker

Boll

Bueno

et al.

Assessment of single-bolus contrast administration technique using hybrid dual-source ECG-gated thoracic and dual-source non-ECG-gated high-pitch abdominopelvic CT acquisitions for procedural planning before transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015; 39: 207–212.

Min

Arsanjani

Kurabayashi

et al.

Rationale and design of the ViCTORY (Validation of an Intracycle CT Motion CORrection Algorithm for Diagnostic AccuracY) trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013; 7: 200–206.

Leipsic

Labounty

Hague

et al.

Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012; 6: 164–171.

Andreini

Pontone

Mushtaq

et al.

Low-dose CT coronary angiography with a novel IntraCycle motion-correction algorithm in patients with high heart rate or heart rate variability. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16: 1093–1100.

Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: European Commission, 2000.

10.

Goetti

Baumuller

Feuchtner

et al.

High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: is simultaneous coronary artery assessment possible?

Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 938–944.

11.

Shen

Sun

et al.

High-pitch, low-voltage and low-iodine-concentration CT angiography of aorta: assessment of image quality and radiation dose with iterative reconstruction. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0117469–e0117469.

12.

Schernthaner

Stadler

Beitzke

et al.

Dose modulated retrospective ECG-gated versus non-gated 64-row CT angiography of the aorta at the same radiation dose: comparison of motion artifacts, diagnostic confidence and signal-to-noise-ratios. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: e585–e590.

13.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

14.

Fan

et al.

Prospective ECG-gated 320-row CT angiography of the whole aorta and coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2432–2440.

15.

Penn

Smedira

Lytle

et al.

Does coronary angiography before emergency aortic surgery affect in-hospital mortality?

J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 889–894.

16.

Motallebzadeh

Batas

Valencia

et al.

The role of coronary angiography in acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 231–235.

17.

Machida

Tanaka

Fukui

et al.

Current and novel imaging techniques in coronary CT. Radiographics 2015; 35: 991–1010.

18.

Grimmer

Oelhafen

Elstrom

et al.

Cone-beam CT image reconstruction with extended z range. Med Phys 2009; 36: 3363–3370.

19.

Zheng

Weiss

et al.

Optimization of a Linac-based 4D cone-beam CT acquisition protocol for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol 2009; 75: S628–S628.

Hybrid ECG-gated versus non-gated 512-slice CT angiography of the aorta and coronary artery: image quality and effect of a motion correction algorithm

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References