Non-mass breast lesions on ultrasound: final outcomes and predictors of malignancy

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer can present as non-mass lesions (NMLs) on ultrasound. However, knowledge of and understanding about NMLs are scarce.

Purpose

To retrospectively investigate the final outcomes of sonographic breast NMLs and determine the clinical and radiologic variables associated with malignancy

Material and Methods

In our radiologic database of breast ultrasound examinations between 2011 and 2014, we found 119 women with 121 NMLs with available histopathologic or sonographic follow-up (over 2 years) data. We collected the clinical variables (patient’s age, symptoms, and mammographic density) and histopathologic data as well as radiologic variables (mammographic and ultrasound findings) after retrospective review by two radiologists, the authors of the current paper, in consensus. We classified the ultrasound findings according to distribution (focal, linear or segmental, and regional) and associated features (calcification, architectural distortion, and ductal changes) and analyzed the associations between variables and malignancy using the t test and χ² test.

Results

Of the 121 NMLs, 88 (72.7%) were benign and 33 (27.3%) were malignant. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (17/33, 51.5%) and invasive ductal cancer with or without DCIS (13/33, 39.4%) comprised the main malignancies, and malignancy was significantly associated with palpability (P = 0.000). Mammographic findings and sonographic distribution and associated features were significantly different between benign and malignant lesions (P = 0.000, P = 0.004, and P = 0.001, respectively). Malignant lesions showed more frequent calcifications combined with asymmetry (P = 0.000) on mammography and linear-segmental distributions (P = 0.001) and associated calcifications (P = 0.019) or architectural distortions (P = 0.015) on ultrasound.

Conclusion

Breast NMLs on ultrasound showed high risk of malignancy. Symptoms and mammographic and ultrasound findings can be possible predictors of malignancy in NMLs.

Keywords

Breast breast ultrasound non-mass lesion ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hooley

Scoutt

Philpotts

. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art. Radiology 2013; 268: 642–659.

Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.

Uematsu

. Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasonography: a systematic review. Breast Cancer 2012; 19: 295–301.

Morishima I, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Ultrasonic diagnosis of non-mass image-forming breast cancer. In: Ueno E, Shiina T, Kubota M, Sawai K (eds). Research and Development in Breast Ultrasound. Tokyo: Springer, 2005:127–134.

Hsu

. Non-mass-like breast lesions at ultrasonography: Feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 77–85.

Kim

Park

Jung

. Nonmasslike lesions on breast sonography: comparison between benign and malignant lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 421–430.

Jung

Kim

. Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 305–311.

D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.

Shin

Kim

. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 516–525.

10.

Kim

Kim do

. Noncalcified ductal carcinoma in situ: imaging and histologic findings in 36 tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 903–910.

11.

Japanese Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology. Guideline for Breast Ultrasound: Management and Diagnosis. Tokyo: Nankodo Co, 2004.

12.

Morakkabati-Spitz

Leutner

Schild

. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2010–2017.

13.

Moon

Koh

. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 2000; 217: 849–854.

14.

Kang

Han

. Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 2008; 67: 285–291.

15.

Soo

Baker

Rosen

. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 941–948.