Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluor-18-deoxy-glucose (FDG) is widely used for diagnosing recurrent or metastatic disease in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Purpose

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET for DTC in patients after ablative therapy.

Material and Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Open Grey looking for all English-language original articles on the performance of FDG-PET in series of at least 20 patients with DTC having undergone ablative therapy including total thyroidectomy. Diagnostic performance measures were pooled using Reitsma’s bivariate model.

Results

Thirty-four publications between 1996 and 2014 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.9–84.1) and 79.4% (95% CI, 71.2–85.4), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.858.

Conclusion

F18-FDG-PET is a useful method for detecting recurrent DTC in patients having undergone ablative therapy.

Keywords

Head/neck thyroid neoplasms PET-CT

Introduction

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common malignant endocrine tumor. Although prognosis is generally favorable, with reported 5-year survival rates of 95% for women and 87% for men (1), some patients continue to experience adverse outcomes despite improvements in imaging and surgical technique (2,3).

Serum human thyroglobulin (hTg) is a reliable marker for persistent or recurrent disease after previous ablative therapy with total thyroidectomy with or without additional ablative radioiodine therapy (RIT). Routine ultrasound of the neck is often negative in these patients, as we recently demonstrated in a prospective cohort from our institution (2). Scanning with radioactive iodine, in particular after a therapeutic activity of iodine 131 (I-131), may reveal tumor lesions missed by conventional imaging (4). In two seminal papers in 1995 and 1996, Feine et al. demonstrated that positron emission tomography (PET) with fluor-18-deoxy-glucose (FDG) can detect tumor lesions that are missed by I-131-scintigraphy (5, 6). To explain their findings, they postulated a “flip-flop-phenomenon”, whereby highly differentiated thyroid cancer cells show iodine uptake due to the expression of sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) but no glucose uptake, while less differentiated cells that ceased to express NIS exhibit upregulated glucose and FDG uptake (7 –9).

Since then F18-FDG-PET has become an important method in patients with DTC with suspected recurrent or persistent DTC, as is evidenced in many series published since the late 1990s. A systematic meta-analysis, published by Dong et al. in 2009, documented a pooled patient-based sensitivity of F18-FDG-PET of 83.5% and specificity of 84.3% (10). We recently published results from multimodal imaging including F18-FDG-PET from a prospective cohort of 51 patients (2) and wanted to compare our results with more current data from the literature.

Material and Methods

We performed a systematic literature search for all English-language original articles addressing diagnostic performance of F18-FDG-PET in series of 20 patients or more with suspected or known recurrence after previous ablative therapy published from 1996 until 31 December 2014.

More specifically, our selection criteria were: (i) all patients had undergone previous ablative therapy including total thyroidectomy; (ii) patients were suspected of having recurrences and/or metastases or had risk factors such as a measurable or rising hTg or circulating hTg antibodies; (iii) patients underwent an FDG-PET or combined hybrid FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) of the torso; (iv) reported study data were sufficient to calculate sensitivity and specificity for tumor detection; (v) histology, cytology, or follow-up were used as gold standard. Exclusion criteria were: article types other than original articles such as abstracts, letters, editorials, and comments. When data or subsets of data were presented in more than one article, the most recent article was chosen.

A systematic literature search was conducted on 17 February 2015 in five databases including Ovid MEDLINE(R)/PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed; U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda/MD), EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Thomson Reuters), and Open Grey (http://www.opengrey.eu) using standardized subject headings (MeSH, EMTREE) for thyroid cancer and FDG or PET as well as their free-text equivalents. The detailed search strategy can be obtained from the author.

All of 3625 hits were screened based on abstract and title by two authors (MB, TH), and then further analyzed based on the full manuscript. All relevant manuscripts were available in full text format. To assess the methodologic quality and the applicability of the included articles, the QUADAS-2 instrument was independently applied by the two authors (11). As suggested by the QUADAS-2 instrument, additional signaling questions were defined. Based on the follow-up results from our own cohort (2) we introduced an extra signaling question “Is the mean or median follow-up duration after imaging two years or more?” and we assumed a risk of bias regarding the time/flow domain when it was not (see Supplementary Materials 1 [online only] for further details on the study-specific signaling questions and scoring criteria).

All pertinent data from the included articles were registered in MDCake, a dedicated client-server database application developed by our group for data collection and management (12). The observers were blinded to each other when entering QUADAS-scores. Data were re-aggregated into a single SQL view for qualitative as for statistical analysis. Pooled diagnostic performance was estimated using R package mada based on Reitsma’s bivariate model (13,14). The application of univariate models for pooling sensitivities and specificities in diagnostic studies is no longer considered appropriate (15).

Results

The literature search identified 34 studies with a total of 2639 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (6,16 –48). Eleven studies reported on the diagnostic accuracy of single-modality PET, 17 on PET/CT, and six on both PET and PET/CT (“mixed”). The pertinent details of the 34 studies are presented in Supplementary Materials 2, Table (online only).

Methodological quality. QUADAS-2 scores are summarized in Fig. 1. According to the QUADAS-2 standard, patient selection should be consecutive in a prospective study design (11). The precise mode of patient selection was however unclear in 14 (41%) of the studies and apparently biased in three (9%). The index test should be applied blinded to the outcomes or in a prospective manner. This was insufficiently documented in nine (26%) of the studies. Most frequently the reviewers had concerns regarding the timing and the flow of the studies: only in eight (24%) of the studies was the duration of post-imaging follow-up considered sufficient, while potential bias was found in 18 (53%) of the studies and high risk of bias in eight (24%).

Fig. 1.

Results of QUADAS-2 scoring of the 34 component studies according to the four QUADAS-2 domains patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow/timing (11).

Meta-analysis. Forest plots of sensitivity and specificities in the component studies are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of all studies in relation to the reference standard were 79.4 % (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.9–84.1) and 79.4% (95% CI, 71.2–85.4), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.858 (Fig. 4). In a subgroup analysis, PET-CT performed slightly better than single modality PET (Table 1), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Fig. 2.

Forest plot of the diagnostic sensitivities of the 34 component studies with 95% confidence intervals (continuity corrected).

Fig. 3.

Forest plot of the diagnostic specificities of the 34 component studies with 95% confidence intervals (continuity corrected). The raw specificity in the study by Mirallié et al. was 0% (seven false positive FDG-PET studies among the seven patients without detectable disease) (37).

Fig. 4.

Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve of the 34 component studies. Pooled sensitivity/specificity over all studies is marked in the center of the plot with a surrounding 95% confidence ellipse. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual studies are plotted in ROC space. PET, studies using single-modality PET; PET-CT hybrid PET + CT; mixed, studies reporting on a mixture of PET and PET-CT; PET, studies using single-modality PET; PET-CT, hybrid PET + CT.

Table 1.

Pooled diagnostic performance of PET and PET/CT.

Type	Studies (n)	Patients (n)	Pooled sensitivity	Pooled specificity	AUC
PET	11	640	76.6% (62.8–86.4)	75.7% (59.5–86.8)	0.826
PET-CT	17	905	80.2% (73.5–85.6)	75.5% (62.8–85.0)	0.844
Mixed	6	1094	82.1% (69.4–90.2)	91.2% (82.8–95.7)	0.933
All	34	2639	79.4% (73.9–84.1)	79.4% (71.2–85.4)	0.858

Pooled diagnostic performance measures with 95% confidence intervals.

AUC, area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve; PET, studies using single-modality PET only; PET-CT hybrid PET + CT only; mixed, mixture of PET and PET-CT in the same study; PET-CT, hybrid PET + CT.

An AUC of 1 represents an ideal test while a non-discriminatory test will have an AUC of 0.5.

Discussion

F18-FDG-PET is a useful tool for evaluating patients with suspected recurrence of DTC with a pooled sensitivity of 79.4% and specificity of 79.4% across all studies. These results compare well to the most recent systematic meta-analysis published in 2009, which reported a pooled patient-based sensitivity and specificity of 81% (74–86%) and 82% (73–88%) based on 17 studies using comparable statistical methodology (10).

The stable, rather than improved diagnostic performance over the past 5–6 years was surprising, given the latest developments in imaging technology such as high resolution PET-CT (Table 1). Although PET-CT performs better than single-modality PET in head-to-head comparisons (2,38), the effect did not reach statistical significance in the meta-analysis. Interestingly, pooled specificity was highest for “mixed” studies reporting on cohorts examined with either single-modality PET or PET-CT. We regard this as an outlier as the “mixed” studies did not differ in their QUADAS-2 scores from the PET-CT studies.

The apparently constant diagnostic performance of PET despite major advances in imaging technology can hardly be explained by the considerable heterogeneity of the individual studies uderlying the present meta-analysis, by publication bias or overoptimistic reporting (49,50). We suspect that this rather points to two methodical flaws common to most studies on our meta-analysis. The generally accepted definition of a “true positive” examination is the finding of at least one true positive lesion in the imaging study confirmed in a surgical specimen or a biopsy regardless of the number of possible false negative lesions that may have been overlooked. True positive and false negative lesions can, however, coexist in the same patient, and if overlooked in a thyroid cancer patient, may lead to avoidable repeat surgery (2). Similarly, false positive lesions, which may lead to unnecessary surgery, will not be scored in patients who have at least one true positive lesion. Thus patient-based sensitivity and specificity tend to be overoptimistic compared with lesion-based analysis. The second problem lies in the composite reference standard that is based on a combination of pathology, imaging, and clinical outcomes. As discussed in our recent publication, prophylactic surgery for DTC in the absence of imaging findings is considered unethical (2). Thus the only means of identifying false negative (overlooked) findings in an imaging study is careful patient follow-up. To a large extent, this follow-up relies on the same imaging techniques (e. g. ultrasound and PET) in which the false negative lesion was potentially overlooked. Thus the reference standard is not independent from the index test. An independent reference standard is, however, the fundamental assumption underlying diagnostic accuracy studies (11). A similar issue occurs if image-guided biopsy forms part of the composite standard: Only lesions that are seen can be biopsied, thus a biopsy will not guard against overlooked lesions. Thyroid cancer is, as a rule, a slow growing tumor. In our QUADAS-2 analysis, we therefore stipulated that the mean or median follow-up should be 2 years or more. This was based on our experience that, until now, four overlooked false negative lesions in our series were detected 0.9, 1.1, 1.1, and 3.8 years after the initial PET study (2). We therefore suggest that future diagnostic imaging studies in solid tumors employ both patient-based and lesion-based analysis, and follow-up of sufficient duration for the cancer type under study.

Our meta-analysis has the following limitations. First, we restricted our analysis to English language articles. Second, we excluded studies with fewer than 20 subjects. Meaningful estimates of sensitivity and specificity need a minimum number of cases with and without disease (51). However, the choice of the threshold was arbitrary given that disease prevalence varies between studies. Third, we abstained from conducting extensive subgroup analyses, such as on the role of TSH stimulation on the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET, the presence or absence of iodine uptake, or the correlation of serum hTg or hTg antibodies and true positive PET findings. Given the considerable heterogeneity between the component studies, we do not think a meta-analysis will provide reliable valid conclusions. Finally, we did not pool lesion-based sensitivities and specificities as there are were only five studies that presented lesion-based diagnostic performance data (Supplementary Table).

In conclusion, F18-FDG-PET continues to be a useful method for detecting recurrent thyroid cancer, with a pooled patient-based sensitivity of 79.4% and specificity of 79.4% across all studies.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Karen Rosendahl, Consultant Physician at the Section of Pediatric Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, and Professor at the Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine at the University of Bergen for valuable advice in writing this manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2012. Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway [Internet]. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2014. Available at: http://www.kreftregisteret.no/en/.

Biermann M, Kråkenes J, Brauckhoff K, et al. Post-PET ultrasound improves specificity of 18F-FDG-PET for recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer while maintaining sensitivity. Acta Radiol 2015. Epub ahead of print: doi: 10.1177/0284185115574298.

Biermann

Pixberg

Riemann

. Clinical outcomes of adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy for differentiated thyroid cancer - results after 874 patient-years of follow-up in the MSDS-trial. Nuklearmedizin 2009; 48: 89–98.

Maxon

. Detection of residual and recurrent thyroid cancer by radionuclide imaging. Thyroid 1999; 9: 443–446.

Feine

Lietzenmayer

Hanke

. 18FDG whole-body PET in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Flipflop in uptake patterns of 18FDG and 131I. Nuklearmedizin 1995; 34: 127–134.

Feine

Lietzenmayer

Hanke

. Fluorine-18-FDG and iodine-131-iodide uptake in thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 1468–1472.

Moon

Choi

. Comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with the expressions of glucose transporter type 1 and Na+/I- symporter in patients with untreated papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Res 2013; 38: 77–84.

Grabellus

Nagarajah

Bockisch

. Glucose transporter 1 expression, tumor proliferation, and iodine/glucose uptake in thyroid cancer with emphasis on poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 2012; 37: 121–127.

Schönberger

Rüschoff

Grimm

. Glucose transporter 1 gene expression is related to thyroid neoplasms with an unfavorable prognosis: an immunohistochemical study. Thyroid 2002; 12: 747–754.

10.

Dong

M-J

Liu

Z-F

Zhao

. Value of 18F-FDG-PET/PET-CT in differentiated thyroid carcinoma with radioiodine-negative whole-body scan: a meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun 2009; 30: 639–650.

11.

Whiting

Rutjes

AWS

Westwood

. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529–536.

12.

Biermann

. A simple versatile solution for collecting multidimensional clinical data based on the CakePHP web application framework. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2014; 114: 70–79.

13.

Doebler P. mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy (mada). R-package 0.5.6 [Internet]. 2014. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mada.

14.

Reitsma

Glas

Rutjes

AWS

. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 982–990.

15.

Zwinderman

Bossuyt

. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med 2008; 27: 687–697.

16.

Özdemir

Yildirim Poyraz

Polat

. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with TENIS syndrome: correlation with thyroglobulin levels. Ann Nucl Med 2014; 28: 241–247.

17.

Asa

Aksoy

Vatankulu

. The role of FDG-PET/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with negative iodine-131 whole-body scan and elevated anti-Tg level. Ann Nucl Med 2014; 28: 970–979.

18.

Van Dijk

Plukker

JTM

Phan

HTT

. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the early diagnostic workup of differentiated thyroid cancer patients with a negative post-therapeutic iodine scan and detectable thyroglobulin. Thyroid 2013; 23: 1003–1009.

19.

Riemann

Uhrhan

Dietlein

. Diagnostic value and therapeutic impact of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer. Results of a German multicentre study. Nuklearmedizin 2013; 52: 1–6.

20.

Ozkan

Aras

Kucuk

. Correlation of 18F-FDG PET/CT findings with histopathological results in differentiated thyroid cancer patients who have increased thyroglobulin or antithyroglobulin antibody levels and negative 131I whole-body scan results. Clin Nucl Med 2013; 38: 326–331.

21.

Giovanella

Trimboli

Verburg

. Thyroglobulin levels and thyroglobulin doubling time independently predict a positive 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in patients with biochemical recurrence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40: 874–880.

22.

Vural

Akkas

Ercakmak

. Prognostic significance of FDG PET/CT on the follow-up of patients of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with negative 131I whole-body scan and elevated thyroglobulin levels: correlation with clinical and histopathologic characteristics and long-term follow-up data. Clin Nucl Med 2012; 37: 953–959.

23.

Rosenbaum-Krumme

Görges

Bockisch

. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT changes therapy management in high-risk DTC after first radioiodine therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39: 1373–1380.

24.

Prestwich

RJD

Viner

Gerrard

. Increasing the yield of recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone-stimulated 2-(18-fluoride)-flu-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-CT in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: e805–e813.

25.

Yoo

. Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with elevated thyroglobulin and negative (131)I whole body scan: evaluation by thyroglobulin level. Ann Nucl Med 2012; 26: 26–34.

26.

Kunawudhi

Pak-art

Keelawat

. Detection of subcentimeter metastatic cervical lymph node by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma and high serum thyroglobulin but negative 131I whole-body scan. Clin Nucl Med 2012; 37: 561–567.

27.

Bannas

Derlin

Groth

. Can (18)F-FDG-PET/CT be generally recommended in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma and elevated thyroglobulin levels but negative I-131 whole body scan? Ann Nucl Med 2012; 26: 77–85.

28.

J-R

Byun

B-H

Hong

S-P

. Comparison of ¹³¹I whole-body imaging, ¹³¹I SPECT/CT, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of metastatic thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 38: 1459–1468.

29.

Kingpetch

Pipatrattana

Tepmongkol

. Utility of 8F-FDG PET/CT in well differentiated thyroid carcinoma with high serum antithyroglobulin antibody. J Med Assoc Thai 2011; 94: 1238–1244.

30.

Vera

Kuhn-Lansoy

Edet-Sanson

. Does recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated positron emission tomography with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose improve detection of recurrence of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma in patients with low serum thyroglobulin? Thyroid 2010; 20: 15–23.

31.

Seo

Lee

Ahn

B-C

. Recurrence detection in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with elevated serum level of antithyroglobulin antibody: special emphasis on using (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010; 72: 558–563.

32.

Razfar

Branstetter

Christopoulos

. Clinical usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in recurrent thyroid carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136: 120–125.

33.

Piciu

Irimie

Duncea

. Positron emission tomography - computer tomography fusion image, with 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Acta Endocrinologica-Bucharest 2010; 6: 15–26.

34.

Lal

Fairchild

Howe

. PET-CT scans in recurrent or persistent differentiated thyroid cancer: is there added utility beyond conventional imaging? Surgery 2010; 148: 1082–1089.

35.

Esteva

Muros

Llamas-Elvira

. Clinical and pathological factors related to 18F-FDG-PET positivity in the diagnosis of recurrence and/or metastasis in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 2006–2013.

36.

Zuijdwijk

Vogel

Corstens

FHM

. Utility of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2008; 29: 636–641.

37.

Mirallié

Guillan

Bridji

. Therapeutic impact of 18FDG-PET/CT in the management of iodine-negative recurrence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 2007; 142: 952–958.

38.

Freudenberg

Frilling

Kühl

. Dual-modality FDG-PET/CT in follow-up of patients with recurrent iodine-negative differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 3139–3147.

39.

Palmedo

Bucerius

Joe

. Integrated PET/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 616–624.

40.

Gabriel

Froehlich

Decristoforo

. 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC and (18)F-FDG in thyroid cancer patients with negative (131)I whole-body scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31: 330–341.

41.

Hung

M-C

H-S

Kao

C-H

. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in detecting metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma with elevated human serum thyroglobulin levels but negative I-131 whole body scan. Endocr Res 2003; 29: 169–175.

42.

Schlüter

Bohuslavizki

Beyer

. Impact of FDG PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scan. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 71–76.

43.

Helal

Merlet

Toubert

. Clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET in thyroid carcinoma patients with elevated thyroglobulin levels and negative (131)I scanning results after therapy. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 1464–1469.

44.

Frilling

Tecklenborg

Görges

. Preoperative diagnostic value of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with radioiodine-negative recurrent well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 804–811.

45.

Wang

Macapinlac

Larson

. [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography localizes residual thyroid cancer in patients with negative diagnostic (131)I whole body scans and elevated serum thyroglobulin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 2291–2302.

46.

Grünwald

Kälicke

Feine

. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in thyroid cancer: results of a multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 1547–1552.

47.

Chung

Lee

. Value of FDG PET in papillary thyroid carcinoma with negative 131I whole-body scan. J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 986–992.

48.

Dietlein

Scheidhauer

Voth

. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and iodine-131 whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1997; 24: 1342–1348.

49.

Naaktgeboren

van Enst

Ochodo

. Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 1200–1209.

50.

Ochodo

de Haan

Reitsma

. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of ‘spin’. Radiology 2013; 267: 581–588.

51.

Mulla

Schulte

K-M

. Terminology inaccuracies in the interpretation of imaging results in detection of cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr Connect 2012; 1: 78–86.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.41 MB

0.43 MB

F18-FDG-PET for recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Material and Methods

Results

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References

Supplementary Material