Can FLAIR hyperintense vessel (FHV) signs be influenced by varying MR parameters and flow velocities? A flow phantom analysis

Abstract

Background

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense vessels (FHVs) have been used to assess leptomeningeal collateral flow in acute ischemic stroke. However, prior FHVs studies showed inconsistent results, which may be ascribable to different magnetic resonance (MR) parameters used.

Purpose

To evaluate whether FHVs could be influenced by varying MR parameters and flow velocities, using a flow phantom.

Material and Methods

A total of 512 sets of FLAIRs were performed with varying parameters and flow velocities, using a flow phantom. Flow phantom was manufactured with 3.5% agarose solution, an 8-mm inner diameter silicone tube and non-pulsatile pump. Varying MR parameters were repetition time (TR)/inversion time (TI), echo time (TE), flip angle (FA) of refocusing pulse, and periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER). The signal intensity of flow were measured and regarded as the degree of FHVs. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were applied to evaluate the association between the degree of FHVs and varying MR parameters as well as flow velocities.

Results

On univariate analysis, PROPELLER technique (R²= 0.448) demonstrated strongest correlation with the degree of FHV, followed by flow velocities (R²= 0.204), FA (R²= 0.126), and TE (R²= 0.031), whereas TR/TI showed no significant correlations. On multivariate analysis, TE, FA, PROPELLER technique, and flow velocities were independent factors influencing the degree of FHVs (<0.001).

Conclusion

Flow velocities, FA of refocusing pulse, TE, and PROPELLER technique significantly affected the degree of FHVs. Optimized MR parameters should be used consistently in future studies, which may provide more reliable results.

Keywords

Stroke collateral circulation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)FLAIR flow phantom

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lee

Latour

Luby

. Distal hyperintense vessels on FLAIR: an MRI marker for collateral circulation in acute stroke? Neurology 2009; 72: 1134–1139.

Lee

Suh

. Different meaning of vessel signs in acute cerebral infarction. Neurology 2010; 75: 668–668.

Sanossian

Saver

Alger

. Angiography reveals that fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities are due to slow flow, not thrombus. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 564–568.

Tsushima

Endo

. Significance of hyperintense vessels on FLAIR MRI in acute stroke. Neurology 2001; 56: 1248–1249.

Storey

Atanasova

Lim

. Tailoring the flow sensitivity of fast spin-echo sequences for noncontrast peripheral MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1098–1108.

Park

Kim

. Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional, whole-brain, black-blood imaging: application to small brain metastases. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 553–561.

Ebinger

Kufner

Galinovic

. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images and stroke outcome after thrombolysis. Stroke 2012; 43: 539–542.

Girot

Gauvrit

Cordonnier

. Prognostic value of hyperintense vessel signals on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences in acute cerebral ischemia. Eur Neurol 2007; 57: 75–79.

Kakeda

Korogi

Hiai

. Pitfalls of 3D FLAIR brain imaging: a prospective comparison with 2D FLAIR. Acad Radiol 2012; 19: 1225–1232.

10.

Wang

Duan

Zhou

. Middle cerebral arterial flow changes on transcranial color and spectral Doppler sonography in patients with increased intracranial pressure. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 2131–2136.

11.

Becker

Bogdahn

Gehlberg

. Transcranial color-coded real-time sonography of intracranial veins. Normal values of blood flow velocities and findings in superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. J Neuroimaging 1995; 5: 87–94.

12.

Stolz

Babacan

Bodeker

. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of venous transcranial color-coded flow velocity measurements. J Neuroimaging 2001; 11: 385–392.

13.

Bradley

Jr Waluch

. Blood flow: magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1985; 154: 443–450.

14.

McVerry

Liebeskind

Muir

. Systematic review of methods for assessing leptomeningeal collateral flow. Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 576–582.

15.

Busse

Brau

. Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 640–649.

16.

Gawlitza

Gragert

Quaschling

. FLAIR-hyperintense vessel sign, diffusion-perfusion mismatch and infarct growth in acute ischemic stroke without vascular recanalisation therapy. J Neuroradiol 2014; 41: 227–233.

17.

Chen

Xian

Wang

. Role of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction diffusion-weighted imaging in correcting distortion and evaluating head and neck masses using 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 403–409.

18.

Fries

Runge

Kirchin

. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER). Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 351–359.

19.

Forbes

Pipe

Karis

. Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 225: 551–555.

20.

Kwag

Lim

Park

. Arterial hyperintensity on BLADE fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images (FLAIR) in hyperacute territorial infarction: comparison with conventional FLAIR. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2045–2051.

21.

Tatlisumak

. Is CT or MRI the method of choice for imaging patients with acute stroke? Why should men divide if fate has united? Stroke 2002; 33: 2144–2145.

22.

Emeriau

Serre

Toubas

. Can diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch (positive diffusion-weighted imaging/negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) at 3 Tesla identify patients with stroke at <4.5 hours? Stroke 2013; 44: 1647–1651.