This article argues for expanding the ethical frame of concern in disaster research from the early phases of site access to longer-term issues that may arise in the field. Drawing on ethical theory, these arguments are developed in five sections. First, we identify the philosophical roots of ethical principles used in social science research. Second, we discuss how ethical concerns span the entire lifecycle of disaster-related research projects but are not fully addressed in the initial protocols for gaining Institutional Research Board (IRB) approval. Third, we introduce the idea of the philosophically informed “ethical toolkit,” established to help build awareness of moral obligations and to provide ways to navigate ethical confusion to reach sound research decisions. Specifically, we use the work of W. D. Ross to introduce a template of moral considerations that includefidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, andnon-maleficence. We suggest that in the absence of a clear framework that researchers can use to think through ethical dilemmas as they arise, Ross’ pluralist approach to ethical problem solving offers flexibility and clarity and, at the same time, leaves space to apply our own understanding of the context in question. Fourth, we draw on six examples from our research studies conducted following Hurricane Katrina. Using these examples, we discuss how, in retrospect, we can apply Ross’ moral considerations to the ethical issues raised including: (1) shifting vulnerability among disaster survivors, (2) the expectations of participants, and (3) concerns about reciprocity in long-term fieldwork. Fifth, we consider how the ethical toolkit we are proposing may improve the quality of research and research relationships.
AusbrooksCarrie Y. Barron, BarrettEdith J., and Martinez-CosioMaria. 2009. “Ethical Issues in Disaster Research: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina.” Population Research and Policy Review28(1): 93–106.
2.
BenightCharles C., and McFarlaneAlexander C.. 2007. “Challenges for Disaster Research: Recommendations for Planning and Implementing Disaster Mental Health Studies.” Journal of Loss and Trauma12: 419–434.
3.
BenthamJeremy. 1776. A Fragment on Government.London: Printed for T. Payne; P. Elmsly; and E. Brooke.
4.
BrinkDavid. 2006. “Some Forms and Limits of Consequentialism.” Pp. 380–423 in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by CoppD.. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BrowneKate. 2008. “From the Filmmaker, Still Waiting: Life After Katrina.” National Women's Studies Association Journal20(3): 196–199.
6.
BrowneKate, and MartinGinny. 2007. Still Waiting: Life After Katrina. Documentary Film broadcast by Public Broadcasting Service channels across the U.S.
7.
BrowneKatherine E.2004. Creole Economics: Caribbean Cunning under the French Flag.Austin: University of Texas Press.
8.
BrowneKatherine E.2009. Economics and Morality: Introduction. Pp 1–40 in Economics and Morality: Anthropological Approaches, edited by BrowneKatherine E., and MilgramLynne. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
9.
BrowneKatherine E.2013. Standing in the Need: Life After Katrina. Anthropology Now5(1): 54–66.
10.
CampbellJohn R.2010. “The ‘Problem’ of Ethics in Contemporary Anthropological Research.” Anthropology Matters Journal12(1): 1–17.
11.
ChungBowen, JonesLoretta, CampbellLarry X., GloverHenrietta, GelbergLillian, and ChenDonna T.. 2008. “National Recommendations for Enhancing the Conduct of Ethical Health Research with Human Participants in Post-Disaster Situations.” Ethnicity and Disease18: 378–383.
12.
DennisMichael Robert, KunkelAdrianne D., WoodsGillian, and SchrodtPaul. 2006. “Making Sense of New Orleans Flood Trauma Recovery: Ethics, Research Design, and Policy Considerations for Future Disasters.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy6(1): 191–213.
13.
DePrinceAnne P., and ChuAnn. 2008. “Perceived Benefits in Trauma Research: Examining Methodological and Individual Differences in Responses to Research Participation.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics3(1): 35–47.
14.
FleischmanAlan R., ColloganLauren, and TumaFarris. 2006. “Ethical Issues in Disaster Research.” Pp. 78–92 in Methods for Disaster Mental Health Research, edited by NorrisF. H., GaleaS., FriedmanM. J., WatsonP. J.. New York: The Guilford Press.
15.
Fluehr-LobbanCarolyn. 2003. “Ethics and Anthropology, 1890–2000.” Pp. 1–28 in Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology, 2nd ed., edited by Fluehr-LobbanC.. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
16.
FothergillAlice, and PeekLori. 2006. “Surviving Catastrophe: A Study of Children in Hurricane Katrina.” Pp. 97–130 in Learning from Catastrophe: Quick Response Research in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina, edited by Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
17.
FothergillAlice, and PeekLori. 2012. “Permanent Temporariness: Displaced Children in Louisiana.” Pp. 119–143 in Displaced: Life in the Katrina Diaspora, edited by WeberL., PeekL.. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18.
FothergillAlice, and PeekLori. 2015. Children of Katrina.Austin: University of Texas Press.
19.
GaleaSandro, MaxwellAndrea R., and NorrisFran. 2008. “Sampling and Design Challenges in Studying the Mental Health Consequences of Disasters.” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research17(S2): S21–S28.
20.
GuilleminMarilys, and GillamLynn. 2004. “Ethics, Reflexivity, and ‘Ethically Important Moments’ in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry10(2): 261–280.
21.
GuyerPaul. 2007. A Reader's Guide to Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.New York: Continuum.
22.
HewittJeanette. 2007. “Ethical Components of Researcher Researched Relationships in Qualitative Interviewing.” Qualitative Health Research17: 1149–1159.
23.
HillThomas E.Jr.2000. “Kantianism.” Pp. 227–246 in The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, editedby LaFolletteH.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
24.
HillThomas E.Jr.2006. “Kantian Normative Ethics.” Pp. 480–514 in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by CoppD.. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
HookerBrad. 2000. “Rule-Consequentialism.” Pp. 183–204 in The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, edited by LaFolletteH.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
26.
IutcovichJoyce M., KennedyJohn M., and LevineFelice J.. 2003. “Establishing an Ethical Climate in Support of Research Integrity: Efforts and Activities of the American Sociological Association.” Science and Engineering Ethics9: 201–205.
27.
KantImmanuel. 1998 [1785]. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals.New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KantImmanuel. 1997 [1788]. Critique of Practical Reason.New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KantImmanuel. 1996 [1797]. Metaphysics of Morals.New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
KnackJennifer M., ChenZhansheng, WilliamsKipling D., and Jensen-CampbellLauri A.. 2006. “Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Disaster Survivors.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy6(1): 175–189.
31.
LaFolletteHugh. 2000. “Introduction” Pp. 1–13 in The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, edited by LaFolletteH.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
32.
MaussMarcel. 1990 [1925]. The Gift: The Form and Reasons for Exchange in Archaic Societies.Translation: W.D. Halls. New York: Routledge.
33.
McClainNatalie, LaughonKathryn, SteevesRichard, and ParkerBarbara. 2007. “Balancing the Needs of the Scientist and the Subject in Trauma Research.” Western Journal of Nursing Research29(1): 121–128.
34.
McNaughtonDavid. 2000. “Intuitionism.” Pp. 268–287 in The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, edited by LaFolletteH.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
35.
MichaelsSarah. 2003. “Perishable Information, Enduring Insights? Understanding Quick Response Research.” Pp. 15–48 in Beyond September 11: An Account of Post-Disaster Research, edited by MondayJ. L.. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
36.
MillJohn Stuart. 1863. Utilitarianism.London: Parker, Son, and Bourn.
37.
MooreG. E.2011 [1912]. Ethics.Oakgrove Digital Publishing.
38.
MurphyElizabeth, and DingwallRobert. 2001. “The Ethics of Ethnography.” Pp. 339–351 in Handbook of Ethnography, edited by AtkinsonP., CoffeyA., DelamontS., LoflandJ., LoflandL.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
NewmanElana, RischElizabeth, and Kassam-AdamsNancy. 2006. “Ethical Issues in Trauma-Related Research: A Review.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics1(3): 29–46.
40.
NorrisFran H., FriedmanMatthew J., WatsonPatricia J., ByrneChristopher M., DiazEolia, and KaniastyKrzysztof. 2002. “60,000 Disaster Victims Speak: Part I. An Empirical Review of the Empirical Literature, 1981–2001.” Psychiatry65(3): 207–239.
41.
NorrisFran H., GaleaSandro, FriedmanMatthew J., and WatsonPatricia J. eds. 2006. Methods for Disaster Mental Health Research.New York: The Guilford Press.
42.
OlesenVirginia. 2000. “Feminisms and Qualitative Research at and into the Millennium.” Pp. 215–256 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., edited by DenzinN., LincolnY.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
PeekLori. 2012. “They Call it ‘Katrina Fatigue’: Displaced Families and Discrimination in Colorado.” Pp. 31–46 in Displaced: Life in the Katrina Diaspora, edited by WeberL., PeekL.. Austin: University of Texas Press.
44.
PeekLori, and FothergillAlice. 2008. “Displacement, Gender, and the Challenges of Parenting after Hurricane Katrina.” National Women's Studies Association Journal20(3): 69–105.
45.
PeekLori, MorrisseyBridget, and MarlattHolly. 2011. “Disaster Hits Home: A Model of Displaced Family Adjustment after Hurricane Katrina.” Journal of Family Issues32(10): 1371–1396.
46.
PeekLori, and RichardsonKrista. 2010. “In Their Own Words: Displaced Children's Educational Recovery Needs after Hurricane Katrina.” Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness4(3): S63–S70.
47.
PhillipsBrenda. 2002. “Qualitative Methods and Disaster Research.” Pp. 194–211 in Methods of Disaster Research, edited by StallingsR. A.. Philadelphia: Xlibris.
48.
PhillipsBrenda D., ThomasDeborah S. K., FothergillAlice, and Blinn-PikeLynn eds. 2010. Social Vulnerability to Disasters.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
49.
RollinBernard E.2010. Science and Ethics.Cambridge University Press.
50.
RossW. D.2002. [1930]. The Right and the Good.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
StallingsRobert A., ed. 2002. Methods of Disaster Research.Philadelphia: Xlibris.
53.
ThomasDeborah S. K., PhillipsBrenda D., LovekampWilliam E., and FothergillAlice eds. 2013. Social Vulnerability to Disasters, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
54.
Tobin-GurleyJennifer, PeekLori, and LoomisJennifer. 2010. “Displaced Single Mothers in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Resource Needs and Resource Acquisition.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters28(2): 170–206.
55.
WeissRobert S.1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies.New York: The Free Press.
56.
WhitefordLinda, and RobertTrotterII2008. Ethics for Anthropological Research and Practice.Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
57.
WoodAllen W.2007. Kantian Ethics.New York: Cambridge University Press.
