We draw on in-depth interview data collected from participants in communities impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to explore how public and private sector decision makers express their understanding of the disaster recovery process. Two key themes emerged from our interviews and served as the central categories under which other issues were grouped: 1) disaster impacts; and 2) recovery activities. Disaster impacts included effects on community-level human capital, infrastructure, and the psychological/psychosocial toll wrought by the hurricanes. Community recovery activities in the wake of the storms included navigating financing/funding issues, employment growth, and more ambitious planning processes. A key finding from our analysis is the interconnectedness of the various themes discussed by participants. The implications of our findings are then discussed.
BatesFredrick L., and PelandaCarlo. 1994. “An Ecological Approach to Disasters.” Pp. 149–159 in Disasters: Collective Behavior and Social Organization, edited by DynesR.R., TierneyK.J.. Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
2.
BolinRobert. 1985. “Disaster Characteristics and Psychosocial Impacts.” Pp. 3–28 in Disasters and Mental Health: Selected Contemporary Perspectives, edited by SowderB.J.. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
3.
BolinRobert. 1994. Household and Community Recovery after Earthquakes.Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science.
4.
BolinRobert, and BoltonPatricia. 1986. Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery.Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science.
5.
BolinRobert, and StanfordLois. 1998. The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster.New York: Routledge.
6.
Committee on Disaster Research in the Social Sciences.2006. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7.
CutterSusan L.1996. “Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards.” Progress in Human Geography20: 529–539.
8.
DashNicole, PeacockWalter G., and MorrowBetty H.. 1997. “And the Poor Get Poorer: A Neglected Black Community.” Pp. 206–225 in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, edited by PeacockW.G., MorrowB.H., GladwinH.. New York: Routledge.
9.
DeyIan. 2003. “Grounded Theory.” Pp. 80–93 in Qualitative Research Practice, edited by SealeC., GoboG., GubriumJ., SilverD.. London: Sage.
10.
GerrityEllen T., and FlynnBrian W.. 1997. “Mental Health Consequences of Disasters.” Pp. 101–121 in The Public Health Consequences of Disasters, edited by NojiE.K.. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
GlaserBarney G., and StraussAnselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
HaasJ.E., KatesRobert W., and BowdenMartyn J.. 1977. Reconstruction Following Disaster.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
HolsteinJames A., and GubriumJaber F.. 1995. “The Active Interview.” Qualitative Research Methods Series.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
HoutsPeter S., ClearyPaul D., and HuTeh-wei1988. The Three Mile Island Crisis: Psychological, Social, and Economic Impacts on the Surrounding Population.University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
16.
HunterLaurie M.2005. “Migration and Environmental Hazards.” Population and Environment26: 273–302.
17.
IssermanAndrew M., and WesterveltJames. 2006. “1.5 Million Missing Numbers: Overcoming Employment Suppression in County Business Patterns Data.” International Regional Science Review29(3): 311–335.
18.
KatesRobert W.1977. “Major Insights: A Summary and Recommendations.” Pp. 261–293 in Reconstruction Following Disaster, edited by HaasJ.E., KatesR.W., BowdenM.J.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
KatesRobert W., and PijawkaDavid. 1977. “From Rubble to Monument: The Pace of Reconstruction.” Pp. 1–24 in Reconstruction Following Disaster, edited by HaasJ.E., KatesR.W., BowdenM.J.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
KnabbRichard D., RhomeJamie R., and BrownDaniel P.. 2005. “Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Katrina.” National Hurricane Center, National Weather Service. Retrieved on November 28, 2007 from http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2005atlan.shtml.
21.
KnabbRichard D., BrownDaniel P., and RhomeJamie R.. 2006. “Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Rita.” National Hurricane Center, National Weather Service. Retrieved on November 28, 2007 from http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2005atlan.shtml.
22.
LaRossaRalph. 2005. “Grounded Theory Methods and Qualitative Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and Family67: 837–857.
23.
LindellMichael K., and PraterCarla S.. 2003. “Assessing Community Impacts of Natural Disasters.” Natural Hazards Review4: 176–186.
24.
LindellMichael K., PraterCarla S., and PerryRonald W.. 2006. Fundamentals of Emergency Management.Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Management Institute. Retrieved on March 2, 2009 from http://www.training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/fem.asp.
25.
MiletiDennis S.1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
26.
Morrow-JonesHazel A., and Morrow-JonesCharles R.. 1991. “Mobility Due to Natural Disaster: Theoretical Considerations and Preliminary Analyses.” Disasters15: 126–32.
27.
MyersCandice A., SlackTim, and SingelmannJoachim. 2008. “Social Vulnerability and Migration in the Wake of Disaster: The Case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.” Population and Environment29: 271–291.
28.
PeacockWalter G., and RagsdaleA. Kathleen. 1997. “Social Systems, Ecological Networks and Disasters: Toward A Socio-Political Ecology of Disasters.” Pp. 20–35 in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, edited by PeacockW.G., MorrowB.H., GladwinH.. New York: Routledge.
29.
PeacockWalter G., MorrowBetty H., and GladwinHugh. 1997. Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters.New York: Routledge.
30.
PerryRonald W.2006. “What is a Disaster?” Pp. 1–15 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodríguezH., Havidán, QuarantelliE.L., DynesR.R.. New York: Springer.
31.
PerryRonald W., and LindellMichael K.. 1978. “The Psychological Consequences of Natural Disaster: A Review of the Literature on American Communities.” Mass Emergencies3: 105–115.
32.
QuarantelliEnrico L.2000. “Disaster research.” Pp. 681–688 in Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by BorgattaE.F., MontgomeryR.J.V.. New York: MacMillan.
33.
QuarantelliEnrico L.2005. “A Social Science Research Agenda for the Disasters of the 21st Century. Pp. 325–396 in What is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions, edited by PerryR.W., QuarantelliE.L.. Philadelphia: Xlibris.
34.
RubinClaire B., SapersteinMartin D., and BarbeeDaniel G.. 1985. Community Recovery from a Major Natural Disaster.Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science.
35.
SchwabJim, ToppingKenneth C., EadieCharles C., DeyleRobert E., and SmithRichard A.. 1998. Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Planning Advisory Service Report Number 483/484. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
36.
SingelmannJoachim, and SchaferMark. Forthcoming. “Dislocation and Depression: Social Consequences of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.” Society and Natural Resources.
37.
SmithGavin P., and WengerDennis. 2006. “Sustainable Disaster Recovery: Operationalizing an Existing Agenda.” Pp. 234–257 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodríguezH., Havidán, QuarantelliE.L., DynesR.R.. New York: Springer.
38.
StraussAnselm, and CorbinJuliet. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
WebbGary R., TierneyKathleen J., and DahlhamerJames M.. 2000. “Businesses and Disasters: Empirical Patterns and Unanswered Questions.” Natural Hazards Review1: 83–90.
40.
WebbGary R., TierneyKathleen J., and DahlhamerJames M.. 2002. Predicting long-term business recovery from disasters: A comparison of the Loma Prieta earthquake and Hurricane Andrew. Environmental Hazards4: 45–58.
