Soft robotic layer jamming devices enable controlled movement restrictions through the application of vacuum pressure on jamming layers. Traditional vacuum-based layer jamming systems, however, have limitations such as a force that decreases throughout the deformation due to a decrease in the contact area of the jamming layers and are restricted to an increase in length equal to their initial length. This works proposes a rollable layer jamming device (RLJD) which offers a solution to these problems. This device leverages rolled and stacked films to overcome limitations in linear extension by storing the jamming layers compactly inside of a reel. Also, its tensile force increases throughout the deformation due to the frictional force between the polymer and the layers which increases as the radius decreases, effectively addressing the problem of force reduction encountered in conventional layer jamming systems. This paper details the device manufacturing process, introduces an analytical model that predicts the performance of the device and presents experimental results for various device parameters. The RLJD has been successfully incorporated as a wearable robot that provides support for both the upper limbs and the lower back when lifting and carrying objects.
AktasBHoweRD (2020) Tunable anisotropic stiffness with square fiber jamming. In: Proceedings 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE, 879–884.
2.
AktasBNarangYSVasiosN, et al. (2021) A modeling framework for jamming structures. Advanced Functional Materials31(16): 2007554.
3.
BamotraAWaliaPPritujaAV, et al. (2019) Layer-jamming suction grippers with variable stiffness. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics11(3): 035003.
4.
BardiEGandollaMBraghinF, et al. (2022) Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation19(1): 87.
5.
BrancadoroMMantiMTognarelliS, et al. (2020) Fiber jamming transition as a stiffening mechanism for soft robotics. Soft Robotics7(6): 663–674.
6.
BrownERodenbergNAmendJ, et al. (2010) Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(44): 18809–18814.
7.
CarusoFMantriotaGAfferranteL, et al. (2022a) A theoretical model for multi-layer jamming systems. Mechanism and Machine Theory172: 104788.
8.
CarusoFMantriotaGReinaG (2022b) An analytical model for cantilever layer-jamming structures. In Proceedings Advances in Italian Mechanism Science, 193–200.
9.
ChenalTPCaseJCPaikJ, et al. (2014) Variable stiffness fabrics with embedded shape memory materials for wearable applications. In: Proceedings 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2827–2831.
10.
ChengNGLobovskyMBKeatingSJ, et al. (2012) Design and analysis of a robust, low-cost, highly articulated manipulator enabled by jamming of granular media. In: Proceedings 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 4328–4333.
11.
ChoiICorsonNPeirosL, et al. (2018) A soft, controllable, high force density linear brake utilizing layer jamming. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(1): 450–457.
12.
ChoiWHKimSLeeD, et al. (2019) Soft, multi-DoF, variable stiffness mechanism using layer jamming for wearable robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4(3): 2539–2546.
13.
CoutinhoAParkJHJamilB, et al. (2023) Hyperbaric vacuum-based artificial muscles for high-performance actuation. Advanced Intelligent Systems5(1): 2200090.
14.
FinkinEF (1971) A theory for the friction of sulfide and other thin films. Wear18(3): 231–241.
15.
FirouzehASalernoMPaikJ (2017) Stiffness control with shape memory polymer in underactuated robotic origamis. IEEE Transactions on Robotics33(4): 765–777.
16.
FitzgeraldSGDelaneyGWHowardD (2020) A review of jamming actuation in soft robotics. Actuators9(4): 104.
17.
GerezLGaoGLiarokapisM (2020) Laminar jamming flexure joints for the development of variable stiffness robot grippers and hands. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 8709–8715.
18.
GuizzoEGoldsteinH (2005) The rise of the body bots. Ieee Spectrum42(10): 50–56.
19.
HawkesEWMajidiCTolleyMT (2021) Hard questions for soft robotics. Science Robotics6(53): eabg6049.
20.
IbrahimiMPaternòLRicottiL, et al. (2021) A layer jamming actuator for tunable stiffness and shape-changing devices. Soft Robotics8(1): 85–96.
21.
IlievskiFMazzeoADShepherdRE, et al. (2011) Soft robotics for chemists. Angewandte Chemie50(8): 1890–1895.
22.
JangJHCoutinhoAParkYJ, et al. (2023a) A positive and negative pressure soft linear brake for wearable applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics70(1): 688–698.
23.
JangJHJamilBMoonY, et al. (2023b) Design of gusseted pouch motors for improved soft pneumatic actuation. IEEE28(6): 3053–3063.
24.
JiangAAtaollahiAAlthoeferK, et al. (2012) A variable stiffness joint by granular jamming. In: Proceedings ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 267–275.
25.
KangBS (2014) Compliance characteristic and force control of antagonistic actuation by pneumatic artificial muscles. Meccanica49(3): 565–574.
26.
KimYJChengSBKimS, et al. (2013) A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics29(4): 1031–1042.
27.
KimMSHeoJKRodrigueH, et al. (2023) Shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators: the role of material, form, and scaling effects. Advanced Materials35(33): 2208517.
28.
LeeJGRodrigueH (2019) Origami-based vacuum pneumatic artificial muscles with large contraction ratios. Soft Robotics6(1): 109–117.
29.
LeeHERodrigueH (2023) Harnessing the nonlinear properties of buckling inflatable tubes for complex robotic behaviors. Materials Today63: 59–88.
30.
MajmudarTSSperlMLudingS, et al. (2007) Jamming transition in granular systems. Physical Review Letters98(5): 058001.
31.
MertzL (2012) The next generation of exoskeletons lighter, cheaper devices are in the works. Ieee Pulse3(4): 56–61.
32.
NarangYSDegirmenciAVlassakJJ, et al. (2018) Transforming the dynamic response of robotic structures and systems through laminar jamming. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(2): 688–695.
33.
NiiyamaRSunXSungC, et al. (2015) Pouch motors: printable soft actuators integrated with computational design. Soft Robotics2(2): 59–70.
34.
OhNLeeHShinJ, et al. (2024) Hybrid hard-soft robotic joint and robotic arm based on pneumatic origami chambers. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.
35.
OuJYaoLTauberD, et al. (2014) jamSheets: thin interfaces with tunable stiffness enabled by layer jamming. In: Proceedings 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, 65–72.
36.
PinskierJBrettJHansonL, et al. (2022) Jammkle: fibre jamming 3D printed multi-material tendons and their application in a robotic ankle. In: Proceedings 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 8507–8514.
37.
RusDTolleyMT (2015) Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature521(7553): 467–475.
38.
SeokSOnalCDChoKJ, et al. (2013) Meshworm: a peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE18(5): 1485–1497.
39.
ShepherdRFIlievskiFChoiW, et al. (2011) Multigait soft robot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America108(51): 20400–20403.
40.
SlucockT (2022) A systematic review of low-cost actuator implementations for lower-limb exoskeletons: a technical and financial perspective. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems106(1): 3.
41.
TakashimaKRossiterJMukaiT (2010) McKibben artificial muscle using shape-memory polymer. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical164(1-2): 116–124.
42.
TonduBLopezP (2000) Modeling and control of McKibben artificial muscle robot actuators. Ieee Control Systems Magazine20(2): 15–38.
43.
WangWRodrigueHAhnSH (2015) Smart soft composite actuator with shape retention capability using embedded fusible alloy structures. Composites Part B: Engineering78: 507–514.
44.
WangXXWuLYFangB, et al. (2020) Layer jamming-based soft robotic hand with variable stiffness for compliant and effective grasping. Cognitive Computation and Systems2(2): 44–49.
ZengXPSuHJ (2023) A high performance pneumatically actuated soft gripper based on layer jamming. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics15(1): 1478.
49.
ZengXPHurdCSuHJ, et al. (2020) A parallel-guided compliant mechanism with variable stiffness based on layer jamming. Mechanism and Machine Theory148: 103791.
50.
ZhuMMoriYWakayamaT, et al. (2019) A fully multi-material three-dimensional printed soft gripper with variable stiffness for robust grasping. Soft Robotics6(4): 507–519.
