Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-5
Design and implementation of an underactuated gripper with enhanced shape adaptability and lateral stiffness through semi-active multi-degree-of-freedom endoskeletons
Grasping is a key task for robots to interact with humans and the environment. Soft grippers have been widely studied and some have been applied in industry and daily life. Typical soft grippers face two challenges: lack of stiffness and insufficient adaptability to various objects. Inspired by the human hand, this paper proposes a soft-rigid hybrid pneumatic gripper composed of fingers with soft skin and rigid endoskeletons, and an active palm. Through different combinations of the four joints’ locking states within the rigid endoskeleton, each finger obtains 9 different postures in its inflating state and 13 different postures in its deflating state, endowing the gripper with the capability of adapting to a wider variety of objects. Simultaneously, due to the endoskeletons, the lateral stiffness of the gripper is significantly enhanced (load-to-weight ratio∼7.5 for lateral grasping). We also propose a series of grasping strategies for grasping objects with different sizes and shapes to utilize the versatile configurations of the gripper. Experiments demonstrated that the gripper conformed well to the surfaces of cylindrical and prismatic objects and successfully grasped all tool items and shape items in the Yale–CMU–Berkeley object set.
AbondanceSTeepleCBWoodRJ (2020) A dexterous soft robotic hand for delicate in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(4): 5502–5509.
2.
AmendJRBrownERodenbergN, et al. (2012) A positive pressure universal gripper based on the jamming of granular material. IEEE Transactions on Robotics28(2): 341–350.
3.
BircherWGMorganASDollarAM (2021) Complex manipulation with a simple robotic hand through contact breaking and caging. Science Robotics6(54): eabd2666
4.
BrownERodenbergNAmendJ, et al. (2010) Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(44): 18809–18814.
5.
BullockIMFeixTDollarAM (2015) The Yale human grasping dataset: grasp, object, and task data in household and machine shop environments. The International Journal of Robotics Research34(3): 251–255.
6.
Burgner-KahrsJRuckerCChosetH (2015) Continuum robots for medical applications: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics31(6): 1261–1280.
7.
CalliBWalsmanASinghA, et al. (2015) Benchmarking in manipulation research: using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley object and model set. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine22(3): 36–52.
8.
ConnollyFWalshCJBertoldiK (2017) Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114(1): 51–56.
9.
CuiYLiuXJDongX, et al. (2021) Enhancing the universality of a pneumatic gripper via continuously adjustable initial grasp postures. IEEE Transactions on Robotics37(5): 1604–1618.
10.
DeimelRBrockO (2013). "A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator." In: 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 May 2013
11.
DeimelRBrockO (2016) A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping. The International Journal of Robotics Research35(1-3): 161–185.
12.
DollarAMHoweRD (2010) The highly adaptive SDM hand: design and performance evaluation. The International Journal of Robotics Research29(5): 585–597.
13.
DragusanuMAchilliGMValigiMC, et al. (2022a) The WaveJoints: a novel methodology to design soft-rigid grippers made by monolithic 3D printed fingers with adjustable joint stiffness. 2022 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 23–27 May 2022.
14.
DragusanuMMarulloSMalvezziM, et al. (2022b) The dressgripper: a collaborative gripper with electromagnetic fingertips for dressing assistance. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(3): 7479–7486.
15.
ElfferichJFDodouDSantinaCD (2022) Soft robotic grippers for crop handling or harvesting: a review. IEEE Access10: 75428–75443.
GallowayKCPolygerinosPWalshCJ, et al. (2013) Mechanically programmable bend radius for finger-reinforced soft actuators. 16th international conference on advanced robotics. Montevideo, Uruguay, 25–29 November 2013
18.
GallowayKCBeckerKPPhillipsB, et al. (2016) Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robotics3(1): 23–33.
19.
GaoGLiangJLiarokapisM (2022) Mechanically programmable jamming based on articulated mesh structures for variable stiffness robots. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Kyoto, Japan, 23–27 October 2022
20.
GlickPSureshSARuffattoD, et al. (2018) A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(2): 903–910.
21.
GongZFangXChenX, et al. (2021) A soft manipulator for efficient delicate grasping in shallow water: modeling, control, and real-world experiments. The International Journal of Robotics Research40(1): 449–469.
22.
GuGZhangNXuH, et al. (2021) A soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback. Nature Biomedical Engineering7: 589–598. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00767-0.
23.
GuoX-YLiW-BGaoQ-H, et al. (2020) Self-locking mechanism for variable stiffness rigid–soft gripper. Smart Materials and Structures29(3): 035033.
24.
HaoYGongZXieZ, et al. (2016) Universal soft pneumatic robotic gripper with variable effective length. In: 2016 35th Chinese control conference (CCC), Chengdu, China, 27–29 July 2016.
25.
HaoYBiswasSHawkesEW, et al. (2021) A multimodal, enveloping soft gripper: shape conformation, bioinspired adhesion, and expansion-driven suction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics37(2): 350–362.
26.
HughesJCulhaUGiardinaF, et al. (2016) Soft manipulators and grippers: a review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI3: 69.
27.
HussainIIqbalZMalvezziM, et al. (2020) How to 3d-print compliant joints with a selected stiffness for cooperative underactuated soft grippers. Human-Friendly Robotics12: 139–153.
28.
IlievskiFMazzeoADShepherdRF, et al. (2011) Soft robotics for chemists. Angewandte Chemie50(8): 1890–1895.
29.
JiangHHawkesEWFullerC, et al. (2017) A robotic device using gecko-inspired adhesives can grasp and manipulate large objects in microgravity. Science Robotics2(7): eaan4545
30.
JiangHWangZJinY, et al. (2021) Hierarchical control of soft manipulators towards unstructured interactions. The International Journal of Robotics Research40(1): 411–434.
31.
KimHIIHanMWSongSH, et al. (2016) Soft morphing hand driven by SMA tendon wire. Composites Part B: Engineering105: 138–148.
32.
LaffranchiMBoccardoNTraversoS, et al. (2020) The Hannes hand prosthesis replicates the key biological properties of the human hand. Science Robotics5(46): eabb0467.
33.
LangowskiJKASharmaPShoushtariAL (2020) In the soft grip of nature. Science Robotics5(49): eabd9120.
34.
LiYChenYYangY, et al. (2017) Passive particle jamming and its stiffening of soft robotic grippers. IEEE Transactions on Robotics33(2): 446–455.
35.
LiHYaoJWeiC, et al. (2021) An untethered soft robotic gripper with high payload-to-weight ratio. Mechanism and Machine Theory158: 104226.
36.
LiuSWangFLiuZ, et al. (2021) A two-finger soft-robotic gripper with enveloping and pinching grasping modes. IEEE26(1): 1–155.
37.
LotfianiAZhaoHShaoZ, et al. (2020) Torsional stiffness improvement of a soft pneumatic finger using embedded skeleton. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics12(1): 011016.
38.
MantiMHassanTPassettiG, et al. (2015) A bioinspired soft robotic gripper for adaptable and effective grasping. Soft Robotics2(3): 107–116.
39.
OdhnerLUJentoftLPClaffeeMR, et al. (2014) A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research33(5): 736–752.
40.
O’BrienKWXuALevineDJ, et al. (2018) Elastomeric passive transmission for autonomousforce-velocity adaptation applied to 3D-printed prosthetics. Science Robotics3(23): eaau5543
41.
PagoliAChapelleFCorralesJA, et al. (2021) A soft robotic gripper with an active palm and reconfigurable fingers for fully dexterous in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters6(4): 7706–7713.
42.
PhillipsBTBeckerKPKurumayaS, et al. (2018) A dexterous, glove-based teleoperable low-power soft robotic arm for delicate deep-sea biological exploration. Scientific Reports8(1): 14779.
43.
PolygerinosPWangZGallowayKC, et al. (2015) Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems73: 135–143.
44.
PuhlmannSHarrisJBrockO (2022) RBO Hand 3: a platform for soft dexterous manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38: 3434–3449. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3156806.
45.
RusDTolleyMT (2015) Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature521(7553): 467–475.
46.
SachinWZWangZHiraiS (2022) Analytical modeling of a soft Pneu-Net actuator subjected to planar tip contact. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38: 2720–2733. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3160048.
47.
SalviettiGIqbalZHussainI, et al. (2018) The co-gripper: a wireless cooperative gripper for safe human robot interaction. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Madrid, Spain, 1–5 October 2018
48.
ShianSBertoldiKClarkeDR (2015) Dielectric elastomer based “grippers” for soft robotics. Advanced Materials27(43): 6814–6819.
49.
ShintakeJRossetSSchubertB, et al. (2016) Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. Advanced Materials28(2): 231–238.
50.
ShintakeJCacuccioloVFloreanoD, et al. (2018) Soft robotic grippers. Advanced Materials30(29): 1707035.
51.
SinatraNRTeepleCBVogtDM, et al. (2019) Ultragentle manipulation of delicate structures using a soft robotic gripper. Science Robotics4(33): eaax5425.
52.
SivčevSColemanJOmerdićE, et al. (2018) Underwater manipulators: a review. Ocean Engineering163(1): 431–450.
53.
TangYChenMWangC, et al. (2020) Recognition and localization methods for vision-based fruit picking robots: a review. Frontiers in Plant Science11: 510. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00510.
54.
TawkCGaoYMutluR, et al. (2019) Fully 3d printed monolithic soft gripper with high conformal grasping capability. In: 2019 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), Hong Kong, China, 8–12 July 2019
55.
TeepleCBKoutrosTNGrauleMA, et al. (2021) Multi-segment soft robotic fingers enable robust precision grasping. The International Journal of Robotics Research39(14): 1647–1667.
56.
TownsendW (2000) The BarrettHand grasper programmably flexible part handling and assembly. Industrial Robot: International Journal27(3): 181–188.
57.
TrubyRLKatzschmannRKLewisJA, et al. (2019) Soft robotic fingers with embedded ionogel sensors and discrete actuation modes for somatosensitive manipulation. 2019 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), Seoul, Korea, 14–18 April 2019.
58.
VogtDMBeckerKPPhillipsBT, et al. (2018) Shipboard design and fabrication of custom 3D-printed soft robotic manipulators for theinvestigation of delicate deep-sea organisms. PLoS One13(8): e0200386.
59.
WangWAhnSH (2017) Shape memory alloy-based soft gripper with variable stiffness for compliant and effective grasping. Soft Robotics4(4): 379–389.
60.
WangYLiLHofmannD, et al. (2021) Structured fabrics with tunable mechanical properties. Nature596: 238–243.
61.
WeiYChenYRenT, et al. (2016) A novel, variable stiffness robotic gripper based on integrated soft actuating and particle jamming. Soft Robotics3(3): 134–143.
62.
WeiHShanYZhaoY, et al. (2022) A soft robot with variable stiffness multidirectional grasping based on a folded plate mechanism and particle jamming. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38: 3821–3831. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3183533.
63.
WuMZhengXLiuR, et al. (2022) Glowing sucker octopus (stauroteuthis syrtensis)-inspired soft robotic gripper for underwater self-adaptive grasping and sensing. Advanced Science9: e2104382. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202104382.
64.
XieZDomelAGAnN, et al. (2020) Octopus arm-inspired tapered soft actuators with suckers for improved grasping. Soft Robotics7(5): 639–648.
65.
XieZChenBLiuJ, et al. (2021) A tapered soft robotic oropharyngeal swab for throat testing: a new way to collect sputa samples. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine28(1): 90–100.
66.
YangYChenYLiY, et al. (2017) Bioinspired robotic fingers based on pneumatic actuator and 3D printing of smart material. Soft Robotics4(2): 147–162.
67.
ZhaoHJalvingJHuangR, et al. (2016a) A helping hand: soft orthosis with integrated optical strain sensors and EMG control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine23(3): 55–64.
68.
ZhaoHO’BrienKLiS, et al. (2016b) Optoelectronically innervated soft prosthetic hand via stretchable optical waveguides. Science Robotics1(1): eaai7529.
69.
ZhouJChenSWangZ (2017) A soft-robotic gripper with enhanced object adaptation and grasping reliability. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters2(4): 2287–2293.
70.
ZhouJChenYHuY, et al. (2020) Adaptive variable stiffness particle phalange for robust and durable robotic grasping. Soft Robotics7(6): 743–757.
71.
ZhuJChaiZYongH, et al. (2022) Bioinspired multimodal multipose hybrid fingers for wide-range force, compliant, and stable grasping. Soft Robotics10: 30–39. DOI: 10.1089/soro.2021.0126.
72.
ZolfagharianAGharaieSGregoryJ, et al. (2022) A bioinspired compliant 3D-printed soft gripper. Soft Robotics9(4): 680–689.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
