This paper extends the use of virtual constraints and hybrid zero dynamics (HZD), a successful control strategy for point-foot bipeds, to the design of controllers for planar curved foot bipeds. Although the rolling contact constraint at the foot–ground interface increases complexity somewhat, the measure of local stability remains a function of configuration only, and a closed-form solution still determines the existence of a periodic orbit. The formulation is validated in experiment using the planar five-link biped ERNIE. While gaits designed for point feet yielded stable walking when ERNIE was equipped with curved feet, errors in both desired speed and joint tracking were significantly larger than for gaits designed for the correct radius curved feet. Thus, HZD-based control of this biped is shown to be robust to some modeling error in the foot radius, but at the same time, to require consideration of foot radius to achieve predictably reliable walking gaits. Additionally, under HZD-based control, this biped walked with lower specific energetic cost of transport and joint tracking errors for matched curved foot gait design and hardware compared to matched point-foot gait design and hardware.
AdamczykPGCollinsSHKuoAD (2006) The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking. The Journal of Experimental Biology209(20): 3953–3963.
2.
AmesADCousineauEAPowellMJ (2012). Dynamically stable bipedal robotic walking with NAO via human-inspired hybrid zero dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International conference on hybrid systems: computation and control - HSCC’12, pp. 135–144. New York, USA: ACM Press.
3.
AsanoFLuoZW (2006) On energy-efficient and high-speed dynamic biped locomotion with semicircular feet. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems, Beijing, 9–15 October 2006, pp. 5901–5906.
4.
BianchiLAngeliniDOraniGP. (1998) Kinematic coordination in human gait: Relation to mechanical energy cost. Journal of Neurophysiology79(4): 2155–2170.
5.
ChevallereauCAbbaGAoustinY. (2003) RABBIT: A testbed for advanced control theory. IEEE Control Systems Magazine23(5): 57–79.
6.
ChevallereauCGrizzleJWShihCL (2009) Asymptotically stable walking of a five-link underactuated 3-D bipedal robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics25(1): 37–50.
7.
CollinsSHRuinaATedrakeR. (2005) Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science307(5712): 1082–1085.
8.
CollinsSHWisseMRuinaA (2001) A three-dimensional passive-dynamic walking robot with two legs and knees. The International Journal of Robotics Research20(7): 607–615.
9.
DonelanJMKramRKuoAD (2002) Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking. Journal of Experimental Biology205(23): 3717–3727.
10.
GarciaMChatterjeeARuinaA. (1998) The simplest walking model: Stability, complexity, and scaling. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering120(2): 281–288.
GrizzleJHurstJMorrisB. (2009) MABEL, a new robotic bipedal walker and runner. In: Proceedings of the American controls conference, St Louis, MO, USA, 10–12 June 2009, pp. 2030–2036.
HansenAHChildressDSKnoxEH (2000) Prosthetic foot roll-over shapes with implications for alignment of trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthetics and Orthotics International24(3): 205–215.
15.
HansenAHChildressDSKnoxEH (2004) Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: Effects of walking speed. Clinical Biomechanics19(4): 407–414.
16.
HaseTHuangQChenX (2008) Performance analysis of biped walking robot with circular feet using optimal trajectory planning method. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on robotics and biomimetics, Bangkok, 22–25 February 2008, pp. 143–148.
HowlandRA (2006) Intermediate Dynamics: A Linear Algebraic Approach. 1st edition. New York: Springer.
19.
IsidoriA (1989) Nonlinear Control Systems. 2nd edition. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag.
20.
KinugasaTChevallereauCAoustinY (2009) Effect of circular arc feet on a control law for a biped. Robotica27(4): 621–632.
21.
KuoAD (2007) The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. Human Movement Science26: 617–656.
22.
LamarcheJCPBruneauOFontaineJ (2010) Humanoid walking coordination through a single spatial parameter. In: Proceedings of 10th IEEE-RAS International conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids), Nashville, TN, USA, 6–8 December 2010, pp. 230–236.
23.
LiuZWangLChenCLP. (2012) Energy-efficiency-based gait control system architecture and algorithm for biped robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews42(6): 926–933.
24.
ManchesterIRMettinUIidaF. (2011) Stable dynamic walking over uneven terrain. International Journal of Robotics Research30(3): 265–279.
25.
MartinAESchmiedelerJP (2011) Experimental validation of a walking model for planar bipeds with curved feet. In: Proceedings of the ASME International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Washington DC, USA, 28–31 August 2011, pp. 777–785.
26.
MartinAESchmiedelerJP (2012) The effects of curved foot design parameters on planar biped walking. In: Proceedings of the ASME International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–15 August 2012, pp. 815–824.
27.
McCandlessBO (2008) The effect of curved feet on the energetic cost of walking with a planar bipedal robot. Master’s Thesis, The Ohio State University.
28.
McGeerT (1990) Passive dynamic walking. The International Journal of Robotics Research9(2): 62–82.
29.
MillsPMBarrettRS (2001) Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men. Human Movement Science20(4–5): 427–446.
30.
MorrisBGrizzleJW (2005) A restricted Poincaré map for determining exponentially stable periodic orbits in systems with impulse effects: Application to bipedal robots. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, Seville, Spain, 12–15 December 2005, pp. 4199–4206.
31.
ParkHSreenathKHurstJ. (2011) Identification of a bipedal robot with a compliant drivetrain: Parameter estimation for control design. IEEE Control Systems Magazine31(2): 63–88.
32.
PekarekDAmesADMarsdenJE (2007) Discrete mechanics and optimal control applied to the compass gait biped. In: Proceedings of 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, LA, USA, 12–14 December 2007, pp. 5376–5382.
33.
PerryJ (1992) Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
34.
SilvaFTenreiro MachadoJ (1999) Energy analysis during biped walking. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation, Detroit, MI, USA, 10–15 May 1999, Vol. 1, pp. 59–64.
35.
SpongMWVidyasagarM (1989) Robot Dynamics and Control. New York: Wiley.
36.
SreenathKParkHWPoulakakisI. (2013) Embedding active force control within the compliant hybrid zero dynamics to achieve stable, fast running on MABEL. The International Journal of Robotics Research32(3): 324–345.
37.
SreenathKParkHWPoulakakisI. (2011) A compliant hybrid zero dynamics controller for stable, efficient and fast bipedal walking on MABEL. International Journal of Robotics Research30(9): 1170–1193.
38.
SrinivasanS (2007) Low-dimensional modeling and analysis of human gait with application to the gait of prosthesis users. PhD Thesis, The Ohio State University.
39.
SrinivasanSRaptisIAWesterveltER (2008) Low-dimensional sagittal plane model of normal human walking. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering130(5): 051017.
40.
TedrakeRManchesterIRTobenkinM. (2010) LQR-trees: Feedback motion planning via sums-of-squares verification. International Journal of Robotics Research29(8): 1038–1052.
41.
VukobratovicMBorovacB (2004) Zero-moment point—Thirty five years of its life. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics1(1): 157–173.
42.
WesterveltEBucheGGrizzleJ (2004) Experimental validation of a framework for the design of controllers that induce stable walking in planar bipeds. International Journal of Robotics Research23(6): 559–582.
43.
WesterveltERGrizzleJWChevallereauC. (2007) Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
44.
WinterDEngP (1995) Kinetics: Our window into the goals and strategies of the central nervous system. Behavioural Brain Research67: 111–120.
YangT (2007) Control of aperiodic walking and the energetic effects of parallel joint compliance of planar bipedal robots. PhD Thesis, The Ohio State University.
47.
YangTWesterveltESchmiedelerJ. (2008) Design and control of a planar bipedal robot ERNIE with parallel knee compliance. Autonomous Robots25: 317–330.
48.
YangTWesterveltESerraniA. (2009) A framework for the control of stable aperiodic walking in underactuated planar bipeds. Autonomous Robots27(3): 277–290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
