Pseudo-admittance is introduced as a novel bilateral telemanipulation system that is designed to mimic proportional-velocity admittance control on systems where the master is an impedance-type robot. The controller generalizes to systems with slave robots of the impedance or admittance type. Pseudo-admittance uses a proxy with admittance dynamics combined with direct force feedback from the slave, resulting in unique properties that mimic admittance control and exhibit tremor attenuation and quasi-static transparency. Pseudo-admittance control has potential benefits for tasks that require better-than-human levels of precision, as well as with systems that are typically run under rate control. The controller can also be modified to include virtual fixtures that provide guidance during task execution, while leaving ultimate control of the system with the operator. Guidance virtual fixtures could be used as macros that increase both speed and precision on structured tasks that require direct human control. The properties of the system are verified through simulations and experiments.
Abbott, J.J. (2005). Virtual Fixtures for Bilateral Telemanipulation. PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering , The Johns Hopkins University.
2.
Abbott, J.J., Marayong, P., and Okamura, A.M. (2007). Haptic virtual fixtures for robot-assisted manipulation . Robotics Research: Results of the 12th International Symposium ISRR (2005), pp. 49—64.
3.
Abbott, J.J. and Okamura, A.M. (2003). Steady-hand teleoperation with virtual fixtures . Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 145—151.
4.
Abbott, J.J. and Okamura, A.M. (2006). Stable forbidden-region virtual fixtures for bilateral telemanipulation. ASME Journal on Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 128(1): 53—64.
5.
Adams, R.J. and Hannaford, B. (1999). Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments . IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 15(3): 465—474.
6.
Bettini, A., Marayong P., Lang, S., Okamura, A.M., and Hager, G.D. (2004). Vision-assisted control for manipulation using virtual fixtures. IEEE Transactions on Robotics20(6): 953—966.
7.
Boctor, E., Webster, R.J. III, Mathieu, H., Okamura, A.M., and Fichtinger, G. (2004). Virtual remote center of motion control for needle placement robots. Computer-aided Surgery, 9(5): 175—183.
8.
Casals, A., Munoz, L., and Amat, J.2003. Workspace deformation based teleoperation for the increase of movement precision. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2824—2829.
9.
Çavuşoğlu, M.C., Feygin, D., and Tendick, F. (2002). A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the PHANToM haptic interface and improvements for high-performance control. Presence, 11(6): 555—568.
10.
Colgate, J.E., Stanley, M.C., and Brown, J.M. (1995). Issues in the haptic display of tool use. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp.140—145.
11.
Craig, J.J., Hsu, P., and Sastry, S.S. (1987). Adaptive control of mechanical manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research, 6(2): 16—28.
12.
Craig, J.J. (1989). Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control , 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
13.
Esen, H., Yano, K., and Buss, M. (2003). A control algorithm and preliminary user studies for a bone drilling medical training system. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 153—158.
14.
Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. and Salcudean, S.E. (2001). Analysis of control architectures for teleoperation systems with impedance/admittance master and slave manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(6): 419—445.
15.
Horn, R. and Johnson, C.R. (1985). Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16.
Kang, H. and Wen, J.T. (2000). Autonomous suturing using minimally invasive surgical robots. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 742—747.
17.
Kim, W.S., Tendick, F., Ellis, S.R., and Stark, L.W. (1987). A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulators with consideration of manipulator system dynamics. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-3(5): 426— 436.
18.
Kontz, M.E. and Book, W.J. (2003). Position/rate haptic control of a hydraulic forklift . Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 801—808.
19.
Lawrence, P.D., Salcudean, S.E., Sepehri, N., Chan, D., Bachmann, S., Parker, N., et al. (1995). Coordinated and force-feedback control of hydraulic excavators. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 223, 4th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, pp. 181—194, Springer-Verlag, London.
20.
Micaelli, A., Bidard, C., and Andriot, C.1998. Decoupling control based on virtual mechanisms for telemanipulation . In Proc. IEEE International Conference Robotics and Automation, pp. 1924—1931.
21.
Mitra, P. and Niemeyer, G. (2004). Dynamic proxy objects in haptic simulations. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Automation, and Mechatronics, pp. 1054—1059.
22.
Mobasser, F. and Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. (2004). Implementation of a rate mode impedance reflecting teleoperation controller on a haptic simulation system. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1974—1979.
23.
Moore, C.A., Peshkin, M.A., and Colgate, J.E. (2003). Cobot implementation of virtual paths and 3-D virtual surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , 19(2): 347—351.
24.
Parker, N.R., Salcudean, S.E., and Lawrence, P.D. (1993). Application of force feedback to heavy duty hydraulic machines. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 375—381.
25.
Roy, J. and Whitcomb, L.L. (2002). Adaptive force control of position/velocity controlled robots: theory and experiment. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(2): 121—137.
26.
Rugh, W.J. (1996). Linear Systems Theory, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
27.
Ruspini, D.C., Kolarov, K., and Khatib, O. (1997). The haptic display of complex graphical environments . In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 345—352.
28.
Smid, M. (2000). In Handbook of Computational Geometry (eds J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia), North Holland/Elsevier .
29.
Tan, H.Z., Barbagli, F., Salisbury, K., Ho, C., and Spence, C. (2006). Force-direction discrimination is not influenced by reference force direction. Haptics-e, 4(1): 1—6.
30.
Turro, N., Khatib, O., and Coste-Maniere, E. (2001). Haptically augmented teleoperation . Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 386— 392.
31.
Williams, R.L. Ii, Henry, J.M., Murphy, M.A., and Repperger, D.W. (1999). Naturally-transitioning rate-to-force control in free and constrained motion. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 121(3): 425— 432.
32.
Zhai, S. and Milgram, P. (1993). Human performance evaluation of manipulation schemes in virtual environments. Proceedings of First IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 155—161.
33.
Zilles, C.B. and Salisbury, J.K. (1995). A constraint-based God-object method for haptic display. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 146—151.
