Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Intellectuals have debated aesthetic taste since ancient times. However, fragmented definitions and a lack of consensus among authors represent challenges for empirical aesthetics, limiting its practical application in contexts such as consumer research. Despite its relevance, this broad and elusive concept remains underexplored in empirical consumer studies. This article reviews aesthetic taste to reveal three streams of thought and nine perspectives that describe how authors have addressed the concept since the eighteenth century. The challenges posed by these diverse, apparently disjointed views for empirical consumer studies are discussed. This study proposes a comprehensive framework for applying the concept in future studies. Findings suggest that aesthetic taste is a subjective and complex concept, best understood as a multidimensional, multifaceted, and multilevel phenomenon that harmonizes our perception of beauty and dynamically shapes consumer behavior. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of aesthetic phenomena in empirical consumer research.

Keywords

aesthetic taste taste judgment preference aesthetics consumer fashion beauty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaka

M. A.

Schau

H. J.

Vargo

S. L.

(2022). Practice diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 939–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab045

Arsel

Bean

(2013). Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 899–917. https://doi.org/10.1086/666595

Bayley

(1991). Taste: The secret meaning of things. Pantheon.

Bennett

Emmison

Frow

(1999). Accounting for tastes: Australian everyday cultures. Cambridge University Press.

Berghman

Hekkert

(2017). Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004

Berlyne

D. E.

(1949). Interest as a psychological concept. British Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1949.tb00219.x

Berlyne

D. E.

(1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

Blijlevens

Thurgood

Hekkert

Chen

L. L.

Leder

Whitfield

T. W.

(2017). The aesthetic pleasure in design scale: The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 86. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2017-05893-002. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000098

Bloch

P. H.

Brunel

F. F.

Arnold

T. J.

(2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1086/346250

10.

Blumer

(1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.

11.

Boulet

Hoek

A. C.

Raven

(2021). Towards a multi-level framework of household food waste and consumer behaviour: Untangling spaghetti soup. Appetite, 156, 104856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104856

12.

Bourdieu

(1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

13.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

14.

Brielmann

A. A.

Pelli

D. G.

(2019). Intense beauty requires intense pleasure. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02420

15.

Cabildo

S. C.

(2019). Hannah arendt: Lectura politológica del juicio del gusto de kant. Res Publica: Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, 22(2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.5209/rpub.65061

16.

Ceballos

L. M.

Hodges

Watchravesringkan

(2021). Decoding typicality in apparel products. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 14(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1850884

17.

Daenekindt

Roose

(2014). Ways of preferring: Distinction through the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of cultural consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 25–45. https://doi-org.ezproxy.eafit.edu.co/10.1177/1469540514553715 (Original work published 2017).

18.

Desmet

Hekkert

(2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57–66. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/66/15

19.

Dickie

G. T.

(1996). The century of taste. Oxford University Press.

20.

Gans

H. J.

(1999). Popular and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste. Basic Books.

21.

Gherardi

(2009). Practice? It’s a matter of taste!. Management Learning, 40(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609340812

22.

Greenhalgh

Thorne

Malterud

(2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931

23.

Gronow

(1993). Taste and fashion: The social function of fashion and style. Acta Sociologica, 36(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939303600201

24.

Gronow

(1997). The sociology of taste. Routledge.

25.

Guyer

(2017). Seventy-five years of kant… and counting. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12396

26.

Hekkert

(2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157–172. https://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/54686438/Hekkert_P._Design_aesthetics_principles_of_pleasure_in_design.pdf

27.

Hekkert

Leder

(2008). Product aesthetics. In Product experience (pp. 259–285). Elsevier.

28.

Hennion

(2007). Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507073923

29.

Hitt

M. A.

Beamish

P. W.

Jackson

S. E.

Mathieu

J. E.

(2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166219

30.

Hoyer

W. D.

Stokburger-Sauer

N. E.

(2012). The role of aesthetic taste in consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0269-y

31.

Hume

(1757). Of the standard of taste [in, four dissertations]. Chadwyck-Healey.

32.

Kant

(1790/1987). Critique of judgment. Werner S. Pluhar (Original work published 1790).

33.

Kasiewicz

(2019). Taste as a cognitive ability shared by all people in the concept of salomon maimon. Studia Philosophica Kantiana, 8(2), 45–56. https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/34536/SPhK_2_2019_07_Kaskiewicz.pdf

34.

LaTour

K. A.

Deighton

J. A.

(2019). Learning to become a taste expert. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy054

35.

Leder

Belke

Oeberst

Augustin

(2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811

36.

Leder

Golfer

Rigotti

Forster

(2016). Private and shared taste in art and face appreciation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(155), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155

37.

Leder

Nadal

(2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode-Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084

38.

Levy

(1988). Art critics and art publics: A study in the sociology and politics of taste. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.2190/9CW3-KXHE-G921-YAPW

39.

Lomas

J. D.

Xue

(2022). Harmony in design: A synthesis of literature from classical philosophy, the sciences, economics, and design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 8(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2022.01.001

40.

Lopes

D. M.

(2015). Aesthetic experts, guides to value. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12170

41.

MacDonald

N. M.

Lazorchak

S. A.

Currie

K. M.

(2009). African American women's satisfaction with the design and marketing of ready-to-wear clothing. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 37(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X08329541

42.

MacInnis

D. J.

(2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136

43.

Mandoki

(2016). Everyday aesthetics: Prosaics, the play of culture and social identities. Routledge.

44.

McQuarrie

E. F.

Miller

Phillips

B. J.

(2013). The megaphone effect: Taste and audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/669042

45.

Mears

(2014). Seeing culture through the eye of the beholder: Four methods in pursuit of taste. Theory and Society, 43, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9217-4

46.

Morin

(1996). A new way of thinking. UNESCO Courier, 49(2), 10–14. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000102554 .

47.

Myszkowski

Storme

(2017). Measuring “good taste” with the visual aesthetic sensitivity test-revised (VAST-R). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.041

48.

Nehamas

(2000). The return of the beautiful: Morality, pleasure, and the value of uncertainty. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/432184

49.

Palmer

S. E.

Schloss

K. B.

Sammartino

(2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504

50.

Peracchio

L. A.

Luce

M. F.

McGill

A. L.

(2014). Building bridges for an interconnected field of consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), v-viii. https://doi.org/10.1086/675854

51.

Ronen

(2021). Aesthetic community. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 60(2), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217321000093

52.

Savaş

Ö.

(2014). Taste diaspora: The aesthetic and material practice of belonging. Journal of Material Culture, 19(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183514521922

53.

Schubert

(2024). The aesthetic emotion lexicon: A literature review of emotion words used by researchers to describe aesthetic experiences. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 42(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374221143728

54.

Shapin

(2012). The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435375

55.

Shusterman

(2018). Winckelmann on taste: A somaesthetic perspective. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 76(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12442

56.

Siddaway

A. P.

Wood

A. M.

Hedges

L. V.

(2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

57.

Simmel

(1957). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1086/222102

58.

Spicher

M. R.

(2020). Aesthetic taste now: A look beyond art and the history of philosophy. Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, 43(3), 159–167.

59.

Spiggle

(1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1086/209413

60.

Szecsenyi

(2014). Gustus spiritualis: Remarks on the emergence of modern aesthetics. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, 51(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.116

61.

Tranfield

Denyer

Smart

(2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

62.

Van den Haak

Wilterdink

(2019). Struggling with distinction: How and why people switch between cultural hierarchy and equality. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549419861632

63.

Vercelloni

(2020). The invention of taste: A cultural account of desire, delight and disgust in fashion, food and art. Bloomsbury publishing.

64.

Vessel

E. A.

Maurer

Denker

A. H.

Starr

G. G.

(2018). Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture. Cognition, 179, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009

65.

Wang

(2022). A conceptual framework of contemporary luxury consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), 788–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.10.010

66.

Wilde

(2000). The picture of Dorian Gray. Penguin Books.

67.

Winckelmann

J. J.

(1764). Geschichte der kunst des alterthums [History of the art of antiquity] (Vol. 1). In der Waltherischen Hof–Buchhandlung.

68.

Wohl

(2015). Community sense: The cohesive power of aesthetic judgment. Sociological Theory, 33(4), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115617800

69.

Woodward

Emmison

(2001). From aesthetic principles to collective sentiments: The logics of everyday judgements of taste. Poetics, 29(6), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00035-8

70.

Yeh

Y. C.

Peng

Y. Y.

(2019). The influences of aesthetic life experience and expertise on aesthetic judgement and emotion in mundane arts. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38, 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12213

A Narrative Review of the Concept of Aesthetic Taste: Challenges for Empirical Consumer Research

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References