The cultural-match effect on art appreciation refers to a higher aesthetic evaluation of artworks that match the viewers’ cultural background. The present study examines this effect in Western adolescents. We hypothesized longer viewing time (H1) and higher art appreciation (H2) for culturally matching (Western) than mismatching (Eastern) paintings. Representing three age groups (12–13, 14–15, and 16–17 years old), Polish adolescents were tested in a lab. They viewed images of paintings that varied in origin (West vs. East) and time period (historic vs. contemporary), while their viewing time and ratings of art appreciation were obtained. H1 was supported as the participants viewed culturally matching paintings for longer. H2 was partially supported as the cultural-match effect interacted with time period and age group. H2 was supported within historic paintings and mainly among the oldest age group. Hence, the cultural-match effect among adolescents might not generalize to contemporary art.
BaoY.YangT.LinX.FangY.WangY.PöppelE.LeiQ. (2016). Aesthetic preferences for Eastern and Western traditional visual art: Identity matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01596
2.
BourdieuP. (1979/1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge Kegan & Paul.
3.
BrieberD.NadalM.LederH.RosenbergR. (2014). Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS One, 9(6), e99019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099019
4.
CacchioneT.MöhringW.BertinE. (2012). “What is it about Picasso? Infants’ categorical and discriminatory abilities in the visual arts”: Correction to Cacchione, Möhring, and Bertin (2011). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027301
5.
CuttingJ. E. (2003). Gustave Caillebotte, French Impressionism, and mere exposure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196493
6.
DardaK. M.ChristensenA. P.ChatterjeeA. (2023). Does the frame of an artwork matter? Cultural framing and aesthetic judgments for abstract and representational art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(4), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000569
FurnhamA.WalkerJ. (2001). The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00202-6
9.
GanczarekJ.PietrasK.StolińskaA.SzubielskaM. (2022). Titles and semantic violations affect eye movements when viewing contemporary paintings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 808330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.808330
HoR.SzubielskaM.Kopiś-PosiejN. (2023). Cultural-match effect on the appreciation of traditional and contemporary visual arts: Evidence from Poland and Hong Kong. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(4), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000535
12.
IshiiK.MiyamotoY.RuleN. O.ToriyamaR. (2014). Physical objects as vehicles of cultural transmission: Maintaining harmony and uniqueness through colored geometric patterns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213508151
13.
KoromM.CallaghanB. L.VanTieghemM.SilversJ. A.ChoyT.KalterJ.BlumenthalE.TottenhamN. (2022). Shifting children’s attentional focus to emotions during art museum experiences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12390
14.
KrentzU. C.EarlR. K. (2013). The baby as beholder: Adults and infants have common preferences for original art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030691
15.
KuscevicD.KardumG.BrajcicM. (2014). Visual preferences of young school children for paintings from the 20th century. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929410
16.
LederH.BelkeB.OeberstA.AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
17.
LewickaM. (2011). On the varieties of people’s relationships with places: Hummon’s typology revisited. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 676–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510364917
18.
MargaritiK.BoutsoukiC.HatzithomasL.ZotosY. (2019). Visual metaphors in food advertising: A cross-cultural study. Food Research International, 115, 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.030
19.
MastandreaS.WagonerJ. A.HoggM. A. (2021). Liking for abstract and representational art: National identity as an art appreciation heuristic. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000272
20.
MasudaT.GonzalezR.KwanL.NisbettR. E. (2008). Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1260–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555
21.
MasudaT.WangH.ItoK.SenzakiS. (2012). Culture and the mind: Implications for art, design and advertisement. In OkazakiS. (Ed.), Handbook of research on international advertising (pp. 109–133). Edward Elgar Publishing.
22.
McAdamsP.ChambersM.BostenJ. M.SkeltonA. E.FranklinA. (2023). Chromatic and spatial image statistics predict infants’ visual preferences and adults’ aesthetic preferences for art. Journal of Vision, 23(8), 2. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.8.2
23.
MitschkeV.GollerJ.LederH. (2017). Exploring everyday encounters with street art using a multimethod design. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000131
24.
MorlingB.LamoreauxM. (2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A meta-analysis of individualism–collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308318260
25.
NisselJ.Hawley-DolanA.WinnerE. (2016). Can young children distinguish abstract expressionist art from superficially similar works by preschoolers and animals?Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2015.1014488
26.
ÖzgerC.ChoudhuryN. A. (2024). Cultural frame-dependent differences in artistic appraisals between White and Black Americans. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000648
27.
PalumboL.HarrisonN. R.TrawińskiT.KassJ.MetelmannA. C.BariR. S. G.DonnellyN. (2023). Visual exploration mediates the influence of personal traits on responses to artworks in an art gallery setting. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000529
28.
ParsonsM. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge University Press.
29.
PeirceJ.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
30.
PelowskiM.MarkeyP. S.ForsterM.GergerG.LederH. (2017). Move me, astonish me . . . delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
31.
PlumhoffJ. E.SchirilloJ. A. (2009). Mondrian, eye movements, and the oblique effect. Perception, 38(5), 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6160
32.
PöppelE. (2018). East of West, West of East: A matter of global and local identity. Cognitive Processing, 19(Suppl. 1), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0885-2
33.
SchabmannA.GergerG.SchmidtB. M.WögererE.OsipovI.LederH. (2016). Where does it come from? Developmental aspects of art appreciation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(4), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415573642
34.
SenzakiS.MasudaT.NandK. (2014). Holistic versus analytic expressions in artworks: Cross-cultural differences and similarities in drawings and collages by Canadian and Japanese school-age children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(8), 1297–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114537704
35.
SzubielskaM. (2018). Wpływ zajęć edukacyjnych prowadzonych w galerii na odbiór abstrakcyjnej sztuki współczesnej przez uczniów młodszych klas szkoły podstawowej [The influence of educational workshops held in a gallery on the reception of abstract contemporary art by primary education students]. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 26(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2018.002
36.
SzubielskaM.GanczarekJ.PietrasK.StolińskaA. (2021). The impact of ambiguity in the image and title on the liking and understanding of contemporary paintings. Poetics, 87, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101537
37.
SzubielskaM.RatomskaM.WójtowiczM.SzymańskaA. (2020). The effect of educational workshops in an art gallery on children’s evaluation and interpretation of contemporary art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 38(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418790917
38.
SzubielskaM.WojtasińskiM. (2024). Appreciation of modern/contemporary art by Polish primary school children: Evidence from abstract paintings and conceptual works. The Elementary School Journal, 124(3), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1086/728450
39.
TrawińskiT.ZangC.LiversedgeS. P.GeY.DonnellyN. (2023). The time-course of fixations in representational paintings: A cross-cultural study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(4), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000508
40.
TrawińskiT.ZangC.LiversedgeS. P.GeY.FuY.DonnellyN. (2024). The influence of culture on the viewing of Western and East Asian paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000411
41.
WangW.IshizakiK. (2002). Aesthetic development in cross-cultural contexts: A study of art appreciation in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Studies in Art Education, 43(4), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320984
42.
YangT.SilveiraS.FormuliA.PaoliniM.PöppelE.SanderT.BaoY. (2019). Aesthetic experiences across cultures: Neural correlates when viewing traditional Eastern or Western landscape paintings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00798
43.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
44.
ZhangY.GelbD. B. (1996). Matching advertising appeals to culture: The influence of products’ use conditions. Journal of Advertising, 25(3), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1996.10673505
