This study examined the effects of psychotic tendencies on aesthetic preferences for paintings. Although psychotic tendencies and related phenomena are often associated with creative achievements, little research in the field of experimental aesthetics has investigated their effects on the aesthetic experience. This study (N = 153) examined how the positive, negative and disorganized aspects of psychotic tendencies, defined through a comprehensive model of the Disintegration trait, are related to the aesthetic preferences of paintings. Results indicated a general trend whereby Disintegration and its modalities had a positive effect on the aesthetic preferences of non-canonical (Ugly and Incomprehensible) paintings, and a negative effect on canonical, traditional (Beautiful and Comprehensible) paintings. Examination of the Disintegration trait provides us with additional information regarding aesthetic preferences, compared to use of the Big Five model alone. Two processes – conservation and progression – are proposed as explanations for the findings.
AndresenB. (2000). Six basic dimensions of personality and a seventh factor of generalized dysfunctional personality: A diathesis system covering all personality disorders. Neuropsychobiology, 41(1), 5–23.
3.
AsaiT.SugimoriE.BandoN.TannoY. (2011). The hierarchic structure in schizotypy and the five-factor model of personality. Psychiatry Research, 185(1–2), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.07.018.
AugustinM. D.WagemansJ.CarbonC. C. (2012). All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.004.
6.
BaasM.NijstadB. A.KoenJ.BootN. C.De DreuC. K. W. (2020). Vulnerability to psychopathology and creativity: The role of approach-avoidance motivation and novelty seeking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000223.
7.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
8.
BornsteinM. H.BerlyneD. E. (1975). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.2307/428656.
9.
BurtC. (1933). The psychology of art. In C. Burt (Ed.), How the mind works (pp. 267–310). London: Allen & Unwin.
10.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.BurkeC.HsuA.SwamiV. (2010). Personality predictors of artistic preferences as a function of the emotional valence and perceived complexity of paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019211.
11.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA.ReimersS. (2007). The artistic personality. The Psychologist, 20(2), 84–87.
12.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.ReimersS.HsuA.AhmetogluG. (2009). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X366867.
13.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ. P.KwapilT. R.EckbladM.ZinserM. C. (1994). Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(2), 171.
ClaridgeG.McCreeryC.MasonO.BentallR.BoyleG.SladeP.PopplewellD. (1996). The factor structure of “schizotypal” traits: A large replication study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01166.x.
16.
CleridouK.FurnhamA. (2014). Personality correlates of aesthetic preferences for art, architecture, and music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.32.2.f.
17.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (p. 39). New York: Harper Perennial.
18.
ErcegovacI. R.DobrotaS.KuščevićD. (2015). Relationship between music and visual art preferences and some personality traits. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237415597390.
EysenckH. J. (1972). Personal preferences, aesthetic sensitivity and personality in trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00079.x.
21.
EysenckH. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147–178.
22.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
23.
FingerhutJ.Gomez-LavinJ.WinklmayrC.PrinzJ. J. (2021). The Aesthetic Self. The Importance of Aesthetic Taste in Music and Art for Our Perceived Identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577703.
24.
FunchB. S. (1997). The psychology of art appreciation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
FurnhamA.WalkerJ. (2001). The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00202-6.
27.
GoodwinR. D.FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J. (2004). Panic attacks and psychoticism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(1), 88–92.
28.
HarveyP. D.KorenD.ReichenbergA.BowieC. R. (2006). Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits: What is the nature of their relationship?Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbj011.
29.
HoltN. J. (2019). The expression of schizotypy in the daily lives of artists. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000176.
30.
KalusO. (2010). To make the familiar strange – aesthetic derealization in the work of Alberto Giacometti. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.1.c.
31.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
32.
KneževićG.LazarevićL. B.BosnjakM.KellerJ. (2022a). Proneness to psychotic–like experiences as a basic personality trait complementing the HEXACO model—A preregistered cross–national study. Personality and Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1537.
33.
KneževićG.LazarevićL. B.ZorićA. (2022b). The meaning of momentary psychotic-like experiences in a non-clinical sample: A personality perspective. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0267054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267054.
34.
KneževićG.RadovićB.OpačićG. (1997). Evaluacija “big five” modela ličnosti kroz analizu inventara ličnosti NEO PI-R [evaluation of the “big five” personality model through the analysis of the NEO PI-R personality inventory]. Psihologija, 1–2, 7–40.
35.
KnezevicG.SavicD.KutlesicV.OpacicG. (2017). Disintegration: A reconceptualization of psychosis proneness as a personality trait separate from the big five. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001.
36.
KwapilT. R.GrossG. M.SilviaP. J.Barrantes-VidalN. (2013). Prediction of psychopathology and functional impairment by positive and negative schizotypy in the Chapmans’ ten-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033759.
37.
LeBoutillierN.BarryR.WestleyD. (2016). Creativity and the measurement of subclinical psychopathology in the general population: Schizotypy, psychoticism, and hypomania. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000047.
38.
LederH.NadalM. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode – developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084.
39.
LenzenwegerM. F. (2011). Schizotypy and schizophrenia: The view from experimental psychopathology. New York: Guilford Press.
40.
LudwigA. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.
41.
MarkovićS. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. I-Perception, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap.
42.
MaslowA. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature (Vol. 19711). New York: Viking Press.
43.
McManusI. C.CookR.HuntA. (2010). Beyond the golden section and normative aesthetics: Why do individuals differ so much in their aesthetic preferences for rectangles?Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017316.
44.
MillerG. F.TalI. R. (2007). Schizotypy versus openness and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Schizophrenia Research, 93(1–3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.02.007.
45.
MyszkowskiN.StormeM.ZenasniF. (2016). Order in complexity: How Hans Eysenck brought differential psychology and aesthetics together. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.034.
46.
MyszkowskiN.StormeM.ZenasniF.LubartT. (2014). Is visual aesthetic sensitivity independent from intelligence, personality and creativity?Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.021.
47.
MyszkowskiN.ZenasniF. (2019). Individual differences in aesthetic ability: The case for an aesthetic quotient. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00750.
48.
NelsonB.RawlingsD. (2010). Relating schizotypy and personality to the phenomenology of creativity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(2), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn098.
49.
OgnjenovicP. (2003). Psihološke teorije umetnosti [Psychological theory of art]. Beograd: Gutenbergova Galaksija.
50.
OrkibiH.Ram-VlasovN. (2019). Linking trauma to posttraumatic growth and mental health through emotional and cognitive creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000193.
51.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning (Issue 47). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
52.
PelowskiM. (2015). Tears and transformation: Feeling like crying as an indicator of insightful or “aesthetic” experience with art. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01006.
53.
PelowskiM.HurY.-J.CotterK. N.IshizuT.ChristensenA. P.LederH.McManusI. C. (2021). Quantifying the if, the when, and the what of the sublime: A survey and latent class analysis of incidence, emotions, and distinct varieties of personal sublime experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(2), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000273.
54.
RawlingsD. (2000). The interaction of openness to experience and schizotypy in predicting preference for abstract and violent paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.2190/71ct-aa49-xrmg-c842.
55.
RawlingsD. (2003). Personality correlates of liking for “unpleasant” paintings and photographs. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00062-4.
56.
RawlingsD.HodgeM.SherrD.DempseyA. (1995). Toughmindedness and preference for musical excerpts, categories and triads. Psychology of Music, 23(1), 63–80.
57.
RawlingsD.LeowS. H. (2008). Investigating the role of psychoticism and sensation seeking in predicting emotional reactions to music. Psychology of Music, 36(3), 269–287.
58.
RawlingsD.TwomeyF.BurnsE.MorrisS. (1998). Personality, creativity, and aesthetic preference: Comparing psychoticism, sensation seeking, schizotypy, and openness to experience. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(2), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.2190/8gvj-erl3-hyum-eh88.
59.
RawlingsD.VidalN. B. I.FurnhamA. (2000). Personality and aesthetic preference in Spain and England: Two studies relating sensation seeking and openness to experience to liking for paintings and music. European Journal of Personality, 14(6), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0984(200011/12)14:6<553::AID-PER384>3.0.CO;2-H.
60.
SaucierG. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a big six structure. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1577–1614.
61.
SiegelJ.BuggJ. M. (2016). Dissociating divergent thinking and creative achievement by examining attentional flexibility and hypomania. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000071.
62.
SimontonD. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.151.
63.
SolomonS. R.SawilowskyS. S. (2009). Impact of rank-based normalizing transformations on the accuracy of test scores. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257034080.
64.
SwamiV.FurnhamA. (2014). Personality and aesthetic experiences. In TinioP. P. L.SmithJ. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 540–561). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207058.026.
65.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S.UllmanJ. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston: Pearson.
66.
TellegenA.AtkinsonG. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Hypnosis: Theory, Research and Application, 83(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315252858-23.
67.
TucakovićL.MarkovićS. (2021). The Dark Tetrad and aesthetic preferences: The role of the dark side of personality in the aesthetic preference for paintings. Primenjena Psihologija, 14(4), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.4.443-463.
68.
ZausnerT. (2007). Artist and audience: Everyday creativity and visual art. In RichardsR. E. (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives (pp. 75–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
