The ability to envision what is not directly seen is important in the visual arts, since artists do more than reproduce what they see. Such envisioning requires visual imagery abilities. In this study, we examined whether art students (n = 32) have enhanced visual imagery abilities compared to nonart students (n = 40). We administered four tasks designed to assess visual imagery. Three tasks assessed the ability to activate mental images: vividness of visual imagery, recognition of out-of-focus pictures, and abstraction; the fourth task assessed the ability to manipulate mental images: mental rotation. We also administered a verbal IQ and a creativity test to determine whether these measures should be included as covariates in our analyses. Results showed that art students excelled on two of the three image activation tasks, vividness of visual imagery and abstraction, but did not excel on the image manipulation task of mental rotation.
ArnheimR. (1969). Visual thinking.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
2.
CaseyM.WinnerE.BrabeckM.SullivanK. (1990). Visual-spatial abilities in art, math, and science majors: Effects of sex, handedness, and spatial experience. In GihoolyK.KeaneM.LogieR.ErdosG. (Eds.), Lines of thinking: Reflections on the psychology of thought (pp. 275–294).
New York, NY:
Wiley.
3.
ChamberlainR.DrakeJ. E.KozbeltA.HickmanR.SievJ.WagemansJ. (2019).
Artists as experts in visual cognition: An update. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
13, 58–73. doi:10.1037/aca0000156
4.
ChamberlainR.WagemansJ. (2015).
Visual arts training is linked to flexible attention to local and global levels of visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica,
161, 185–197. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.08.012
5.
GetzelsJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1976). The creative vision: Longitudinal study of problem finding in art.
New York, NY:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6.
GoffK. (2002). Abbreviated Torrance test for adults.
Bensenville, IL:
Scholastic Testing Service.
7.
GoldsmithL. T.HetlandL.HoyleC.WinnerE. (2016).
Visual-spatial thinking in geometry and the visual arts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
10(1), 56–71. doi:10.1037/aca0000027
8.
GombrichE. H. (1960). Art and illusion.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
9.
KosslynS. M. (1980). Image and mind.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
10.
KosslynS. M.ThompsonW.GanisG. (2006). The case for mental imagery.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
11.
KozbeltA. (2001).
Artists as experts in visual cognition. Visual Cognition,
8(6), 705–723. doi:10.1080/13506280042000090
12.
KozbeltA.SeidelA.ElbassiounyA.MarkY.OwenD. R. (2010).
Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
4(2), 93–102. doi:10.1037/a0017657
13.
MarksD. F. (1973).
Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology,
64, 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
14.
MorrisonR. J.WallaceB. (2001).
Imagery, vividness, creativity and visual arts. Journal of Mental Imagery,
25, 135–152. doi:2002-10949-008
15.
OstrofskyJ.KozbeltA.SeidelA. (2012).
Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
6(2), 124–136. doi:10.1037/a0026384
16.
PalmieroM.NoriR.AloisiV.FerraraM.PiccardiL. (2015).
Domain-specificity of creativity: A study on the relationship between visual creativity and visual mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychology,
6, 1870. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01870
17.
PalmieroM.SrinivasanN. (2015). Creativity and spatial ability: A critical evaluation. In ManialyJ.IndurkhyaB. (Eds.), Cognition, experience, and creativity (pp. 189–214).
New Delhi, India:
Orient Blackswan.
18.
Pérez-FabelloM. J.CamposA. (2007).
Influence of training in artistic skills on mental imaging capacity. Creativity Research Journal,
19, 227–232. doi:10.1080/10400410701397495
19.
RuskinJ. (2011). The harbours of England.
New York, NY:
Barnes & Noble.
20.
SeeleyW.KozbeltA. (2008).
Art, artists, and perception: A model for premotor contributions to perceptual analysis and form recognition. Philosophical Psychology,
21(2), 149–171. doi:10.1080/09515080801976573
21.
VarnedoeK. (2006). Pictures of nothing: Abstract art since Pollock.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
WinnerE.CaseyM. (1993). Cognitive profiles of artists. In CupchikG.LaszloJ. (Eds.), Emerging visions: Contemporary approaches to the aesthetic process.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
24.
ZemoreS. E. (1995).
Ability to generate mental images in students of art. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social,
14, 83–88. doi:10.1007/BF02686876
