The underpinnings of intergroup dynamics, particularly in relation to outgroup antipathy, have been systematically examined from psychological and sociocultural perspectives. In this paper, I make a case for the added consideration of imagination-based factors in our explanations of the foundations that give rise to outgroup-directed hate and discrimination. The proposal is an application of the BLINCS model, which holds that our implicit understanding of the reality-fiction distinction is rooted in the inherent features of fictional narratives, namely that they are bounded, inference-light, curated, and sparse. I propose that intergroup hate derives in part from our propensity to render the stories about our outgroups to be more akin to fiction than to reality.
AbrahamA. (2015). How social dynamics shape our understanding of reality. In WarnickJ. E.LandisD. (Eds.), Neuroscience in intercultural contexts (pp. 243–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2260-4_10
AbrahamA.von CramonD. Y. (2009). Reality = relevance? Insights from spontaneous modulations of the brain’s default network when telling apart reality from fiction. PloS One, 4(3), e4741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004741
4.
AbrahamA.von CramonD. Y.SchubotzR. I. (2008). Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20059
5.
AbramsD. (2010). Processes of prejudices: Theory, evidence and intervention (Research Report 56). Equality and Human Rights Commission.
6.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice (pp. xviii, 537). Addison-Wesley.
7.
Beyond Conflict (2020). America’s divided mind: Understanding the psychology that drives us apart. https://beyondconflictint.org/americas-divided-mind/
8.
BientzleM.EggelingM.KanzleiterM.ThiemeK.KimmerleJ. (2021). The impact of narrative writing on empathy, perspective-taking, and attitude: Two randomized controlled experiments on violations of COVID-19 protection regulations. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0254501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254501
9.
BientzleM.EggelingM.KimmerleJ. (2024). Good reasons for bad behavior: A randomized controlled experiment on the impact of narrative Reading and writing on empathic concern, perspective-taking, and attitude. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1343225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1343225
10.
BilewiczM.SoralW. (2020). Hate speech epidemic. The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Political Psychology, 41(S1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670
11.
BliucA.-M.ChidleyA. (2022). From cooperation to conflict: The role of collective narratives in shaping group behaviour. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(7), e12670. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12670
BoldryJ. G.GaertnerL.QuinnJ. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207075153
14.
Borum ChattooC.FeldmanL. (2017). Storytelling for social change: Leveraging documentary and comedy for public engagement in global poverty. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12318
15.
BoydB. (2010). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction (1. paperback ed). Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
16.
BoydB. (2017). The evolution of stories: From mimesis to language, from fact to fiction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1444
17.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
18.
BrewerM. B. (2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? In The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 90–110). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.005
19.
BrundidgeJ. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x
20.
ButtersR.HareC. (2022). Polarized networks? New evidence on American Voters’ political discussion networks. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1079–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09647-w
21.
CallaghanT.RochatP.LillardA.ClauxM. L.OddenH.ItakuraS.TapanyaS.SinghS. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16(5), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01544.x
22.
ChouliarakiL. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage.
23.
CostabileK. A.Shedlosky-ShoemakerR.AustinA. B. (2020). Universal stories: How narratives satisfy core motives. Self and Identity, 17(4), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1413008
24.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
DuckittJ. (2010). Historical overview. In The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 29–44). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919
FiskeS. T. (2002). What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00183
29.
FiskeS. T. (2019). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology (4th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
30.
ForsythD. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
31.
FrenchF. C. (1908). Discussion: Group self-consciousness: A stage in the evolution of mind. Psychological Review, 15(3), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0069563
GonzalesT. I.ThissellE. M.ThoratS. (2022). The stories we tell: Colorblind racism, classblindness, and narrative framing in the rural midwest⋆. Rural Sociology, 87(4), 1274–1301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12461
34.
GraesserA. C.OttatiV. (1995). Why stories? Some evidence, questions, and challenges (p. 132). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
HaidtJ.JosephC. (2008). 19 The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In StichS.CarruthersP.LaurenceS. (Eds.), The innate mind, volume 3: Foundations and the future (pp. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019
HeiderF.SimmelM. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950
39.
HuckfeldtR.MendezJ. M.OsbornT. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
40.
JahodaG. (1999). Images of savages: Ancient roots of modern prejudice in western culture (pp. xx, 297). Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
41.
KeysersC.GazzolaV. (2014). Dissociating the ability and propensity for empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.011
42.
KlarS.ShmargadY. (2017). The effect of network structure on preference formation. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 717–721. https://doi.org/10.1086/689972
43.
KteilyN. S.LandryA. P. (2022). Defining dehumanization broadly does not mean including everything. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(7), 540–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.04.003
LernerR. M.ChaseP. A. (2020). Hate in contemporary America: Pathology or opportunism? In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Perspectives on hate: How it originates, develops, manifests, and spreads (pp. 137–160). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000180-007
47.
LevyA.GalinskyA.NguyenC. Q.SaguyT.IkizerE. G.DovidioJ. F. (2023). Ingroup love, outgroup hate, and the gateway group effect: Comparing the direct and indirect impact of dual versus single identification. PloS One, 18(8), e0287631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287631
48.
LewinK. (1945). The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts institute of technology. Sociometry, 8(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785233
49.
MaassA. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79–121). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60272-5
50.
MacAdamsD. P. (1997). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self (1st edition). The Guilford Press.
McFarlandS. (2016). Identification with all humanity: The antithesis of prejudice, and more. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 632–654). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.028
54.
McLoughlinN.OverH. (2018). The developmental origins of dehumanization. In Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 54, pp. 153–178). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2017.10.006
55.
MichotteA. (1946). La perception de la causalité. (Etudes Psychol.), Vol. VI [Perception of causality.] (p. 296). Inst. Sup. De Philosophie.
56.
MullenB.HuL.-T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1003_3
57.
MutzD. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
58.
MutzD. C.GoldmanS. K. (2010). Mass Media. In DovidioJ.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 241–258). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n15
ParkerM. T.Janoff-BulmanR. (2013). Lessons from morality-based social identity: The power of outgroup “hate,” not just ingroup “love.”. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0175-6
RausserG. C.SimonL. K.ZhaoJ. (2020). Polarization, hyperbole and the battle for control over the narrative (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3683160). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683160
64.
RozarioK. (2003). Delicious horrors”: Mass culture, the red cross, and the appeal of modern American humanitarianism. American Quarterly, 55(3), 417–455. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2003.0026
65.
RubinD. C. (1995). Stories about stories (p. 164). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
66.
RuzzanteD.VaesJ. (2023). Elaborating humanness: A direct comparison between mindful and mindless entities. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 49, 101235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101235
67.
RyanM.-L.RuppertJ.BernetJ. W. (2004). Narrative Across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. U of Nebraska Press.
ShiraiT. (1953). Systemic models for social groups. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 7(3), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083579
70.
SkolnickD.BloomP. (2006). What does batman think about SpongeBob? Children’s understanding of the fantasy/fantasy distinction. Cognition, 101(1), B9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.001
71.
SmithD. L. (2012). Less than human: Why we demean, enslave, and exterminate others (First Edition). St. Martin’s Griffin.
72.
SmithD. L. (2021). Making monsters: The uncanny power of dehumanization. Harvard University Press.
73.
SmithD.SchlaepferP.MajorK.DybleM.PageA. E.ThompsonJ.ChaudharyN.SalaliG. D.MaceR.AsteteL.NgalesM.ViniciusL.MiglianoA. B. (2017). Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling. Nature Communications, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02036-8
74.
SmithG.SearlesK. (2014). Who let the (attack) dogs out? New evidence for partisan Media effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft082
75.
StroudN. J.MuddimanA.LeeJ. K. (2014). Seeing Media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perceptions. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12110
76.
SzantoT. (2020). In hate we trust: The collectivization and habitualization of hatred. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9604-9
77.
TaibbiM. (2021). Hate, Inc.: Why Today’s Media makes us despise one another. OR Books.
78.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
79.
TauschN.HewstoneM. (2010). Intergroup contact. In The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 544–560). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919
80.
VaesJ.LeyensJ.-P.Paola PaladinoM.Pires MirandaM. (2012). We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 64–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.665250
81.
van LoonA.GoldbergA.SrivastavaS. B. (2024). Imagined otherness fuels blatant dehumanization of outgroups. Communications Psychology, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00087-4
82.
VasistP. N.ChatterjeeD.KrishnanS. (2023). The polarizing impact of political disinformation and hate speech: A cross-country configural narrative. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10390-w
83.
WarnerB.HorstmanH.KearneyC. (2020). Reducing political polarization through narrative writing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1789195
84.
WeiselO.BöhmR. (2015). Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008
85.
WinstonE. A. (1999). Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in Deaf communities. Gallaudet University Press.
86.
WistrichR. S. (1999). The Devil, the Jews, and hatred of the “Other.” In Demonizing the other (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
87.
WoolleyJ. D. (1997). Thinking about fantasy: Are children fundamentally different thinkers and believers from adults?Child Development, 68(6), 991–1011. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132282
88.
WoolleyJ. D.NisselJ. (2020). Development of the fantasy-reality distinction. In AbrahamA. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 479–499). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580298.029
