People have access to varied entertainment choices through online audiovisual media. Uses and Gratification Theory postulates viewers as active participants in their entertainment selection who watch media for a variety of reasons. Both hedonic and eudaimonic motivations drive user engagement. This paper focuses on how users’ implicit psychological factors (e.g., curiosity, need for affect) influence their motivations for watching online audiovisual media (n = 339). We employed multiple regression to examine predictors of eudaimonic and hedonic motivations alongside information, social interaction, and entertainment uses. The results indicate (1) people's awareness of AI recommender systems does not influence their media engagement, (2) people's need for affect underlies all types of media engagement, and (3) the effect of people's curiosity on their media engagement motivations were dimension-specific (i.e., dependent on the subtype). Our findings are in line with entertainment gratification models and reveal curiosity's unique role in people's motivations for audiovisual entertainment.
AbedinB.MeskeC.JunglasI.RabhiF.Motahari-NezhadH. R. (2022). Designing and managing human-AI interaction. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(2022), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10313-1
ArriagaP.AlexandreJ.PostolacheO.FonsecaM. J.LangloisT.ChambelT. (2020). Why do we watch? The role of emotion gratifications and individual differences in predicting rewatchability and movie recommendation. Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010008
4.
BartschA. (2012). Emotional gratification in entertainment experience. Why viewers of movies and television series find it rewarding to experience emotions. Media Psychology, 15(3), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.693811
5.
BartschA.AppelM.StorchD. (2010). Predicting emotions and meta-emotions at the movies: The role of the need for affect in audiences’ experience of horror and drama. Communication Research, 37(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356441
6.
BartschA.HartmannT. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502145921
7.
BartschA.VordererP.MangoldR.ViehoffR. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701813447
8.
BentleyF.MurrayJ. (2016). Understanding video rewatching experiences. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference of Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX’16), June 2016, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/2932206.2932213
BondB. J. (2021). Social and parasocial relationships during COVID-19 social distancing. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(8), 2308–2329. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211019129
11.
Bondad-BrownB. A.RiceR. E.PearceK. E. (2012). Influences on tv viewing and online user-shared video use: Demographics, generations, contextual age, media use, motivations, and audience activity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732139
12.
ByerJ.SpeerscheiderK. (2016). Analysis and visualization likert items. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.likert. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=likert.
13.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
14.
ClaytonR. B.RaneyA. A.OliverM. B.NeumannD.Janicke-BowlesS. H.DaleK. R. (2021). Feeling transcendent? Measuring psychophysiological responses to self-transcendent media content. Media Psychology, 24(3), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1700135
15.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
16.
de Holanda CoelhoG. L.HanelP. H. P.WolfL. J. (2020). The very efficient assessment of need for cognition: Developing a six-item version. Assessment, 27(8), 1870–1885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118793208
17.
ElliotP. (1974). Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative. In BlumlerJ. G.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. (pp. 249-268). Sage.
18.
FathS.LarrickR. P.SollJ. B. (2022). Blinding curiosity: Exploring preferences for “blinding” one’s own judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 170(2022), 104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104135
GillespieT. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In GillespieT.BoczkowskiP.FootK. A. (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). MIT Press.
Gomez-UribeC. A.HuntN. (2015). The Netflix recommender systems: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transaction on Management Information Systems, 6(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843948
23.
GomillionS.GabrielS.KawakamiK.YoungA. F. (2017). Let’s stay home and watch TV: The benefits of shared media use for close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516660388
HasanM. R.JhaA. K.LiuY. (2018). Excessive use of online video streaming services: Impact of recommender system use, psychological factors, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 80(2018), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.020.
26.
HildénJ. (2022). The public service approach to recommender systems: Filtering to cultivate. Television & New Media, 23(7), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.117/1527464211020106
27.
HowittD.CramerD. (2016). Research methods in psychology. NFER-Pearson. ISBN: 978-1292134277.
28.
JooJ.SangY. (2013). Exploring Koreans’ smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2512–2518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.002.
29.
KashdanT. B.DisabatoD. J.GoodmanF. R.McKnightP. E. (2020). The Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale Revised (5DCR): Briefer subscales while separating overt and covert social curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 157(2020), Article 109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109836.
30.
KashdanT. B.GallagherM. W.SilviaP. J.WintersteinB. P.BreenW. E.TerharD.StegerM. F. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011.
31.
KashdanT. B.StiksmaM. C.DisabatoD. J.McknightP. E.BekierJ.KajiJ.LazarusR. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73(2018), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In BlumlerG.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–31). Sage.
34.
KhanE. M.MuktaS. H.AliM. E.MahmudJ. (2020). Predicting users’ movie preference and rating behavior from personality and values. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 10(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338244
35.
KhooO. (2023). Picturing diversity: Netflix’s inclusion strategy and the Netflix recommender algorithm (NRA). Television and New Media, 24(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476422102864
36.
KimD. D. E. (2020). The search for pleasure and meaning on tv, captured in-app: Eudaimonia and hedonism effects on tv consumption as self-reported via mobile app. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(5), 693–713. https://doi.org/1080/08838151.2020.1849702
37.
KraaykampG.EijckK. (2005). Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.002.
38.
LaRoseR.EastinM. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2
39.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
40.
LobatoR. (2019). Netflix nations: The geography of digital distribution. New York University Press.
ManolikaM. (2022). The big five and beyond: Which personality traits do predict movie and reading preferences?Psychology of Popular Media, 12(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000394.
43.
MonteiroR. P.CoelhoG. L.MonterioT. M. C.PimentelC. E. (2022). The MOVIE model: Assessing movie preferences and personality correlates. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 27(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.2249/1678-4669.20220014.
OliverM. B.HartmannT. (2010). Exploring the role of meaningful experiences in users; appreciation of “good movies”. Projections, 4(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2010.040208
46.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x.
47.
PajkovicN. (2022). Algorithms and taste-making: Exposing the Netflix recommender system’s operational logics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 28(1), 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211014464
48.
PalmgreenP. (1984). Uses and gratifications: A theoretical perspective. Annals of the International Communication Association, 8(1), 22–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1984.11678570
49.
PapacharissiZ. (2008). Uses and gratification. In StacksD. W.SalwenM. B. (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research second edition (pp. 137–152). Routledge.
50.
RaneyA.JanickeS. H.OliverM. B.DaleK. R.JonesR. P.CoxD. (2018). Profiling the audience for self-transcendent media: A national survey. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1413195
51.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and environment for statistical processing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
52.
ReineckeL.KrelingR. J. (2022). The longitudinal influence of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment preferences or psychological resilience and wellbeing. Frontiers in Communication, 7(2022), 991458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.991458.
53.
RosengrenK. E. (1974). Uses and gratifications: a paradigm outlined. In BlumlerG.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 269–186). Sage.
RussellC. A.LevyS. J. (2012). The temporal and focal dynamics of volitional reconsumption: A phenomenological investigation of repeated hedonic experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 341–359. https://doi.org/10/1086/662996
56.
SchutteN. S.MalouffJ. M. (2020). Connections between curiosity, flow, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 152(2020), 109555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109555.
57.
ScivnerC. (2021). The psychology of morbid curiosity: Development and initial validation of the morbid curiosity scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 183(2021), 1–10. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.paid.2021.111139
58.
SilesI.Espinoza-RojasJ.NaranjoA.TristánM. F. (2019). The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. Communication, Culture & Critique, 12(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz025.
59.
SilviaP. J.ChristensenA. P. (2020). Looking up at the curious personality: Individual differences in curiosity and openness to experience. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35(2020), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.013.
ThakkerU.PatelR.ShahM. (2021). The comprehensive analysis on movie recommendation system employing collaborative filtering. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(2021), 2864–28672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10965-2.
62.
TuC.DilleyA. E.KaufmanJ. C. (2015). Do we create what we watch? Creativity and entertainment preferences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000032
63.
VarelaD.KaunA. (2019). The Netflix experience: A user-focused approach to the Netflix recommendation algorithm. In PlotheT.BuckA. M. (Eds.), Netflix at the nexus: Content, practice, and production in the age of streaming television (pp. 197–211). Peter Lang Publishing.
64.
VordererP.HalfmannA. (2019). Why do we entertain ourselves with media narratives? A theory of resonance perspective on entertainment experiences. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1599298
65.
VordererP.ReineckeL. (2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12082
WickhamH. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
68.
WooS. E.ChernyshenkoO. S.LongleyA.ZhangZ.ChiuC.StarkS. E. (2014). Openness to experience: Its lower-level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.806328.
69.
Zemack-RugarY.MooreS. G. (2019). Play it again, Sam! An empirical examination of the volitional reconsumption’s motivations and behavioral consequences. In BagchiR.BlockL.LeeL. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research volume 47 (pp. 933–934). Association for Consumer Research.
ZillmannD. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. In RoloffM. F. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 23 (pp. 103–123). Routledge.
72.
ZillmannD.CantorJ. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80008-5
73.
ZuckermanM. (1979) Sensation seeking and risk taking. In IzardC. E. (Ed.) Emotions in personality and psychopathology. Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy. Springer.
