Communication in the Time of COVID-19: An Examination of Imagined Interactions and Communication Apprehension During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

As people all over the world continue to adjust to the new normal presented to them by COVID-19, they must adjust to the social restrictions that have been enforced. These restrictions include shelter-in-place and work-from-home orders that severely limit the face-to-face interactions that were considered a norm in many peoples’ lives (e.g., speaking with the grocer, hair stylist, etc.). As individuals adjust to these changes, their communication behaviors must adapt as well. This study seeks to determine how the restrictions of COVID-19 have impacted Imagined Interactions (IIs) and Communication Apprehension (CA). This study identifies significant relationships between IIs and CA before and during COVID-19, as well as how certain demographics have experienced IIs and CA during the pandemic.

Keywords

imagined interactions communication apprehension isolation communication pandemic COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

T. H.

(1990). The effects of imagined interaction and planning on speech fluency and message strategy selection [Thesis]. Louisiana State University. LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses, 4968. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5967&context=gradschool_disstheses

Allen

T. H.

Honeycutt

J. E.

(1997). Planning, imagined interaction, and the nonverbal display of anxiety. Communication Research, 24(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024001003

Berkos

(2010). Dialogue theory and imagined interactions. In Honeycutt

J. M.

(Ed.), Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 115–125). Hampton.

Bodie

G. D.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Vickery

A. J.

(2013). An analysis of the correspondence between imagined interaction attributes and functions. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12003

Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. S. Department of Labor. (2020, July 2). News release. U. S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Burke

(2020). California releases guidance for reopening colleges and universities. EdSource: Highlighting strategies for student success. https://edsource.org/2020/california-releases-guidance-for-reopening-colleges-and-universities/637909

Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. (2020, July 24). Health equity considerations and racial and ethnic minority groups. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/health-equity/race-ethnicity.html

Choi

C. W.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Bodie

G. D.

(2015). Effects of imagined interactions and rehearsal on speaking performance. Communication Education, 64(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.978795

Croghan

J. M.

Kelley

T. L.

(2004). Imagined interactions ad perceptions of older adults in the workplace [Paper presentation]. Interpersonal Communication Division at the International Communication Association Convention, New Orleans, LA, USA.

10.

Croghan

T. L.

Croghan

J. M.

(2010). In Honeycutt

J. M.

(Ed.). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 99–114). Hampton.

11.

Daly

J. A.

Leth

(1976). Communication apprehension and the personnel selection decision [Paper presentation]. International Communication Association, Portland, OR.

12.

Daly

J. A.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1975). Occupational desirability and choice as a function of communication apprehension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(4), 309–313. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.527.2929&rep=rep1&type=pdf

13.

Edwards

Honeycutt

J. M.

Zagacki

K. S.

(1988). Imagined interaction as an element of social cognition. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318809389623

14.

Edwards

Honeycutt

J. M.

Zagacki

K. S.

(1989). Sex differences in imagined interactions. Sex Roles, 21(3–4), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289906

15.

Falcione

R. L.

Daly

J. A.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1977). Job satisfaction as a function of employees’ communication apprehension, self-esteem, and perceptions of their immediate supervisor. In Ruben

B. D.

(Ed.), Communication yearbook I (pp. 263–276). Transaction.

16.

Fisher

(2020). How coronavirus is changing the dating game for the better. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/well/mind/dating-coronavirus-love-relationships.html

17.

Frier

(2020). Teens at risk for suicide during the pandemic. Edward-Elmhurst Health. https://www.eehealth.org/blog/2020/09/teens-suicide-risk/

18.

Gotcher

J. M.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(1989). An analysis of imagined interactions of forensic participants. The National Forensic Journal, 7(1), 1–20. http://www.nationalforensicjournal.org/uploads/9/1/9/3/91938460/vol7no1.pdf

19.

Hill, C. T.,

Rubin, Z., &

Peplau, L. A.

(1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues , 32(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02485.x

20.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(1989). A functional analysis of imagined interaction activity in everyday life. In Shorr

J. E.

Robin

Connelia

J. A.

Wolpin

(Eds.), Imagery: Current perspectives (pp. 13–25). Plenum.

21.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(1999). Differences in imagined interactions as a consequence of marital ideology and attachment. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 18(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.2190/DF9M-R77U-EH6P-93KV

22.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2003a). Imagined interaction conflict-linkage theory: Explaining the persistence and resolution of interpersonal conflict in everyday life. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.2190%2F240J-1VPK-K86D-1JL8

23.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2003b). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication. Hampton Press.

24.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2003c). Linking introversion and extraversion to guided imagery. Psychological Reports, 92(1), 1295–1298. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3c.1295

25.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2008). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In Baxter

L. A.

?0026; Braithwaite

(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 77–87). SAGE.

26.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2009). Symbolic interdependence, imagined interaction, and relationship quality. Imagination, Cognition and Psychology, 28(4), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FIC.28.4.b

27.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2010a). Appendix of instruments: Survey of imagined interaction (SII). In Honeycutt

J. M.

(Ed.). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 205–212). Hampton.

28.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2010b). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction. Hampton.

29.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2010c). Dialogue theory and imagined interactions. In Honeycutt

J. M.

(Ed.), Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 193–204). Hampton.

30.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2015). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In Braithwaite

D. O.

Schrodt

(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 75–87). SAGE.

31.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2019). Epilogue: Tips on using IIs to deal with trauma. In Honeycutt

J. M.

(Ed.) Promoting mental health through imagery and imagined interactions (pp. 177–181). Peter Lang.

32.

Honeycutt

J. M.

(2020). Imagined interactions and inner speech. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 39(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236619869163

33.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Choi

C. W.

Deberry

R. D.

(2009). Communication apprehension and imagined interactions. Communication Research Reports, 26(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090903074423

34.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Sheldon

(2018). Scripts and communication for relationships. Peter Lang.

35.

Hwang

T. J.

Rabheru

Peisah

Reichman

Ikeda

(2020). Loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(10), 1217–1214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000988

36.

Jewkes

Johnston

(2009). Cavemen in an era of speed-of-light technology’: Historical and contemporary perspectives on communication within prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00559.x

37.

May

J. R.

Asken

M. J.

(1987). Sport psychology. PMA Publishing Corp.

38.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1976a). The effects of communication apprehension on nonverbal behavior. Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377609369208

39.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1976b). The problems of communication apprehension in the classroom. The Florida Speech Communication Journal, 4(2), 1–12. http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/publications/066.pdf

40.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00599.x

41.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1982). An introduction to rhetorical communication (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

42.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1984). The communication apprehension perspective. In Daly

J. A.

?0026; McCroskey

J. C.

(Eds). Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 13–38). SAGE.

43.

McCroskey

J. C.

Daly

J. A.

Sorensen

G. A. I. L.

(1976). Personality correlates of communication apprehension: A research note. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00498.x

44.

McCroskey

J. C.

Richmond

V. P.

(1976). The effects of communication apprehension on the perception of peers. Western Speech Communication, 40(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317609373881

45.

McCroskey

J. C.

Richmond

V. P.

(1977). Communication apprehension as a predictor of self-disclosure. Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377709369271

46.

McCroskey

J. C.

Richmond

V. P.

(1979). The impact of communication apprehension on individuals in organizations. Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377909369343

47.

McCroskey

J. C.

Richmond

V. P.

(1982). The quiet ones: Communication apprehension and shyness (2nd ed.). Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.

48.

McCroskey

J. C.

Sheahan

M. E.

(1978). Communication apprehension, social preference, and social behavior in a college environment. Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377809369292

49.

McCroskey

J. C.

Richmond

V. P.

Davis

L. M.

(1986). Apprehension about communicating with supervisors: A test of a theoretical relationship between types of communication apprehension. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318609374223

50.

McCroskey

J. C.

Simpson

T. J.

Richmond

V. P.

(1982). Biological sex and communication apprehension. Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 129–133.

51.

Moore

(2020). Retailers selling non-essentials see double & triple-digit increases in online sales during COVID-19 crisis. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kaleighmoore/2020/04/17/retailers-selling-non-essentials-see-double–triple-digit-increases-in-online-sales-during-covid-19-crisis/#779d81776431

52.

Ross, M., &

Holmberg, D.

(1992). Are wives' memories for events in relationships more vivid than their husbands' memories?. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 9(4), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592094007

53.

Scott

G. D.

Gendreau

(1969). Psychiatric implications of sensory deprivation in maximum security prison. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674376901400404

54.

Scott

M. D.

McCroskey

J. C.

Sheahan

M. E.

(1978). Measuring communication apprehension. Journal of Communication, 28(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01571.x

55.

Sealy

M. K.

Sheldon

(2019). Imagined interactions in the learning center. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 43(1), 18–34.

56.

St. Amour

(2020). Pandemic increasing suicidal ideation. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/08/17/suicidal-ideation-rise-college-aged-adults-due-covid-19-pandemic

57.

Tai

D. B. G.

Shah

Doubeni

C. A.

Sia

I. G.

Wieland

M. L.

(2021). The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 703–704. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa815

58.

Talley

M. A.

Richmond

V. P.

(1980). The relationship between psychological gender orientation and communicator style. Human Communication Research, 6(4), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1980.tb00154.x

59.

Terry

(2020). Compare: 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic versus COVID-19. Biospace. https://www.biospace.com/article/compare-1918-spanish-influenza-pandemic-versus-covid-19/

60.

Tomiyoshi

(2020). COVID fatigue’ is hitting hard: Fighting it is hard, too, says UC Davis health psychologist. UC Davis Health. https://health.ucdavis.edu/health-news/newsroom/covid-fatigue-is-hitting-hard-fighting-it-is-hard-too-says-uc-davis-health-psychologist/2020/07

61.

Wittenberg

P. M.

(1996). Language and communication in prison. Federal Probation, 60(4), 45–50. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/fedpro60&div=67&id=&page=

62.

Zagacki

K. S.

Edwards

Honeycutt

J. M.

(1992). The role of mental imagery and emotion in imagined interactions. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369820