The purpose of this study is to examine relational dissolution using the technique of ghosting. This qualitative study explores the emerging adults’ dissolution strategies leading up to and through enactment of disengagement through mediated contexts. Participants (N = 99) completed questionnaires about their ghosting familiarity and participation as initiators or noninitiators. The majority of participants reported participating in both roles. Five themes described why initiators chose to enact ghosting, and three themes chronicled their ghosting decision-making processes. Noninitiators illustrated how they realized ghosting occurred through three themes. This exploratory investigation offers a definitive definition of ghosting and a modern discussion of its contents to dissolution, communication, and romantic relationship development.
ArnettJ. J. (2000).
Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist,
55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.).
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
3.
BaxterL. A. (1979).
Self-disclosure as a relationship disengagement strategy: An exploratory investigation. Human Communication Research,
5, 215–222. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00635.x
4.
BaxterL. A. (1984).
Trajectories of relationship disengagement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
1, 24–48. doi:10.1177/0265407584011003
5.
BaxterL. A. (1985). Accomplishing relationship disengagement. In DuckS.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 243–265).
London, England:
Sage.
6.
BergerC. R.BradacJ. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relationships.
London, England:
Edward Arnold.
7.
BergerC. R.CalabreseR. J. (1975).
Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research,
1, 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
8.
BlairK. (2014, April).
The state of LGBTQ-Inclusive research methods in relationship science and how we can do better. Relationship Research News,
13(1), 7–12.
9.
BorguetaM. (2015, August 17). The psychology of ghosting: Why people do it and a better way to break up. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com
10.
BossP. (2007).
Ambiguous loss theory: Challenges for scholars and practitioners. Family Relations,
56, 105–111. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4541653
11.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
12.
BredowC. A.CateR. M.HustonT. L. (2008). Have we met before?: A conceptual model of first romantic encounters. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 2–28).
New York, NY:
Psychology Press.
13.
BulmerM. (1979).
Concepts in the analysis of qualitative data. Sociological Review,
27, 651–677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00354.x
14.
CodyM. (1982).
A typology of disengagement strategies and an examination of the role intimacy reactions to inequity, and behavioral problems play in strategy selection. Communication Monographs,
49, 148–170. doi:10.1080/03637758209376079
15.
CollinsT. J.GillathO. (2012).
Attachment, breakup strategies, and associated outcomes: The effects of security enhancement on the selection of breakup strategies. Journal of Research in Personality,
46, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.008
16.
CupachM. R.MettsS. (1994). Facework. In KnappM.DalyJ. (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
17.
DaileyR. M.BrodyN.LeFebvreL.CrookB. (2013).
Charting changes in commitment: Trajectories of on-again/off-again relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
30, 1020–1044. doi:10.1177/0265407513480284
DoeringJ. (2010).
Face, accounts, and schemes in the context of relationship breakups. Symbolic Interaction,
33, 71–95. doi:10.1525/si.2010.33.1.71
20.
FieldT.DiegoM.PelazM.DeedsO.DelgadoJ. (2009).
Breakups distress in university students. Adolescence,
44, 705–727. doi:10.4236/psych.2010.13023
21.
FinchamF. D.CuiM. (2011). Emerging adulthood and romantic relationships: An introduction. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 3–14).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
22.
FreedmanG.PowellD. N.LeB.WilliamsK. D. (2018). Ghosting and destiny: Implicit theories of relationships predict beliefs about ghosting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0265407517748791
23.
GershonI. (2010). The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication.
Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press.
27.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction.
Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press.
28.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2019). Coping with trauma: Promoting mental health through imagery and imagined interactions.
New York, NY:
Peter Lang.
29.
KendlerK. S.HettemaJ. M.ButeraF.GardnerC. O.PrescottC. A. (2003).
Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and danger in the prediction of onsets of major depression and generalized anxiety. Archives of General Psychiatry,
60, 789–796. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.789
30.
KnappM. L.VangelistiA. L. (2010). Interpersonal communication and human relationships (6th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
31.
KnoxD.ZusmanM. E.NievesW. (1998).
Breaking away: How college students end love relationships. College Student Journal,
32, 482–484.
32.
LeFebvreL. E. (2017a). Phantom lovers: Ghosting as a relationship dissolution strategy in the technological age. In Punyanunt-CarterN.WrenchJ. S. (Eds.), Swipe right for love: The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 219–236).
Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
LeFebvreL. E. (2017b). Swipe me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1205–1229. doi:10.1177/0265407517706419
34.
LukacsV.Quan-HaaseA. (2015).
Romantic breakups on Facebook: New scales for studying post-breakup behaviors, digital distress, and surveillance. Information, Communication, & Society,
5, 492–508. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008540
35.
McDanielB. T.CoyneS. (2014).
Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture,
5, 85–98. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
36.
MeierA.AllenG. (2007).
Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Sociology Quarterly,
5, 308–335. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01142.x
37.
MillerG. R.SteinbergM. (1975). Between people.
Chicago, IL:
Science Research Associates.
MorganE. (2012).
Contemporary issues in sexual orientation and identity development in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood,
1, 52–66. doi:10.1177/2167696812469187
40.
MyersS. A.GoodboyA. K., & Members of COMM 201. (2013).
Using equity theory to explore adult siblings’ use of relational maintenance behaviors and relational characteristics. Communication Research Reports,
30, 275–281. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.836627
ReganP. C. (2017). The mating game: A primer on love, sex, and marriage (3rd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
43.
ReifmanA. (2011). Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Conceptual foundations. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 15–26).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
44.
SandelowskiM. (1995).
Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health,
18, 179–183. doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211
SprecherS.ZimmermanC.AbrahamE. M. (2010).
Choosing compassionate strategies to end a relationship: Effects of compassionate love for partner and reason for the breakup. Social Psychology,
41, 66–75.
48.
SprecherS.ZimmermanC.FehrB. (2014).
The influence of compassionate love on strategies used to end a relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
31, 697–705. doi:10.1177/0265407513517958
49.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.FinchamF. D. (2011). Understanding romantic relationship among emerging adults: The significant roles of cohabitation and ambiguity. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 234–251).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
van DulmenM. H. M.ClaxtonS. E.CollinsW. A.SimpsonJ. A. (2014).
Work and love among emerging adults: Current status and future directions. Emerging Adulthood,
2, 59–62. doi:10.1177/2167696813516092
52.
VekslerA. E.MeyerM. D. E. (2014).
Identity management in interpersonal relationships: Contextualizing communication as central to research on emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood,
2, 243–245. doi:10.1177/2167696814558061
53.
WeisskirchR. S.DeleviR. (2013).
Attachment style and conflict resolution skills predicting technology use in relationship dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior,
29, 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.027
54.
ZimmermanC. (2009). Dissolution of relationships, breakup strategies. In ReisH. T.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 434–435).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
