This study investigates the unexplored territory of psychological transformations in green gamified banking, focusing on the mediating role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in e-banking and its impact on the intention to use green gamified banking. A framework for consumer psychology of brands, driven by green gamified banking, was developed and tested through a survey conducted in mainland China. This study utilizes Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (FsQCA) to support theory with empirical evidence. The results reveal that AI has a complete mediation effect on brand identification and brand significance in e-banking, while brand experience, brand integration, and brand connection are partially mediated. Furthermore, the results from the Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (FsQCA) showed that the intention to use green gamified banking is most strongly associated with brand integration and connection. In contrast, AI in e-banking is most strongly linked to brand experience and significance. This research contributes to the understanding of psychological transformations in sustainable behavior, shedding light on the crucial role of artificial intelligence in e-banking and the consumer psychology of the brand in green, gamified banking.
Aaker. (1996). Building strong brands.The Free Press.
2.
Ab HamidM. R.SamiW.Mohmad SidekM. H. (2017) Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterionJournal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
3.
AfonsoC.SilvaG. M.GonçalvesH. M.DuarteM. (2018). The role of motivations and involvement in wine tourists’ intention to return: SEM and fsQCA findings. Journal of Business Research, 89, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.042
Al-ArajR.HaddadHShehadehM.HasanE.NawaisehM. Y. (2022) The effect of artificial intelligence on service quality and customer satisfaction in Jordanian banking sector. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 12(1), 1929–1947.https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.173
6.
AL-DosariK.FetaisN.KucukvarM. (2024). Artificial intelligence and cyber defense system for banking industry: A qualitative study of AI applications and challenges. Cybernetics and Systems, 55(2) 302–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2022.2112539
7.
AlfaroE.BressanMGirardinFMurilloJSomehIWixomB (2019) BBVA’s Data Monetization Journey. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.17705/2MSQE.00011
8.
AlmustafaE.AssafAAllahhamM (2023) Implementation of artificial intelligence for financial process innovation of commercial banksRevista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n9-004
9.
Anderson. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory, The American Journal of Psychology. Academic Press.
10.
AryaV.SethiDHollebeekL D (2024) Using augmented reality to strengthen consumer/brand relationships: The case of luxury brandsJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(2), 546–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2419
11.
BarrettA. J.PackA.QuaidE. D. (2021). Understanding learners’ acceptance of high-immersion virtual reality systems: Insights from confirmatory and exploratory PLS-SEM analyses. Computers & Education, 169, 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104214
12.
BeegeM.NebelS.SchneiderS.ReyG. D. (2021). The effect of signaling in dependence on the extraneous cognitive load in learning environments. Cognitive Processing, 22(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-01002-5
13.
BentleyK.RajagopalP.KulowK. (2025). Unfaithful brands: How brand attachment can lead to negative responses to influencer marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 35(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1432
14.
BrandãoA.RibeiroB.GadekarM. (2023). You ruined our love story, but I just cannot hate you—A moderation–mediation analysis of past experienced brand love and brand hate. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(3), 1126–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12892
15.
CaoY.KouF.HuH.WanG. (2022). How gamified cooperation and competition motivate low-carbon actions: An investigation of gamification in a popular online payment platform in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 324, 116259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116259
ChakrabortyD.BiswasW.DashG. (2021). Marching toward ‘heart work’: Connecting in new ways to thrive amidst COVID-19 crisis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 39(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21313
18.
CheungM. L.PiresG. D.RosenbergerP. J.LeungW. K. S.SharipudinM.-N. S. (2021). The role of consumer-consumer interaction and consumer-brand interaction in driving consumer-brand engagement and behavioral intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102574
19.
ChungM.KoE.JoungH.KimS. J. (2020). Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 117, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.004
20.
CoelhoP. S.RitaP.SantosZ. R. (2018). On the relationship between consumer-brand identification, brand community, and brand loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.011
21.
DashG.PaulJ. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
22.
ErtzM.KarakasF.SarigöllüE. (2016). Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3971–3980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010
23.
EschF. R.MöllT.SchmittB.ElgerC. E.NeuhausC.WeberB. (2012). Brands on the brain: Do consumers use declarative information or experienced emotions to evaluate brands?Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.004
24.
FangY. H.LiC YBhattiZ A (2021) Building brand loyalty and endorsement with brand pages: integration of the lens of affordance and customer-dominant logic. Information Technology and People, 34(2), 743–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2019-0208
25.
FernandoY.JabbourC. J. C.WahW.-X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter?Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031
26.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
27.
ForoughiB.Naghmeh-AbbaspourB.WenJ.GhobakhlooM.Al-EmranM.Al-SharafiM. A. (2025). Determinants of generative AI in promoting green purchasing behavior: A hybrid partial least squares–artificial neural network approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4072–4094. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4186
28.
FrankB. (2021). Artificial intelligence-enabled environmental sustainability of products: Marketing benefits and their variation by consumer, location, and product types. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125242
29.
GaraialdeD.CoxA. L.CowanB. R. (2021). Designing gamified rewards to encourage repeated app selection: Effect of reward placement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 153, 102661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102661
Gómez-RamirezI.Valencia-AriasA.DuqueL. (2019) Approach to M-learning acceptance among university students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4061
32.
HabilaM. A.OuladsmaneM.AlothmanZ. A. (2023). Role of artificial intelligence in environmental sustainability. Visualization Techniques for Climate Change with Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99714-0.00009-1
33.
HairJ. F.BabinB. J.KreyN. (2017). Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281777
HarriganP.EversU.MilesM. P.DalyT. (2018). Customer engagement and the relationship between involvement, engagement, self-brand connection and brand usage intent. Journal of Business Research, 88, 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.046
36.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
37.
HermannE.PuntoniS. (2024). Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI. Journal of Business Research, 180, 114720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114720
38.
HsuC. L. (2023) Enhancing brand love, customer engagement, brand experience, and repurchase intention: Focusing on the role of gamification in mobile appsDecision Support Systems, 174, 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114020
39.
HussainA.AbidM. F.ShamimA.TingD. H.TohaM. A. (2023). Videogames-as-a-service: How does in-game value co-creation enhance premium gaming co-creation experience for players?Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103128
40.
IkhsanR. B.FernandoY.Hartiwi PrabowoY.GuiA.KuncoroE. A. (2025). An empirical study on the use of artificial intelligence in the banking sector of Indonesia by extending the TAM model and the moderating effect of perceived trust. Digital Business, 5(1), 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100103
41.
JohnstoneM. L.TanL. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between Consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3
42.
KaluarachchiB. N.SederaD. (2024). Improving efficiency through AI-powered customer engagement by providing personalized solutions in the banking industry, pp. 299–342.
43.
KautishP.KhareA.SharmaR. (2020). Values, sustainability consciousness and intentions for SDG endorsement. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 38(7), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2019-0490
44.
KayaB.Mohammed AbubakarA.BehraveshE.YildizH.MertI. S. (2020). Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Journal of Business Research, 114, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016
45.
KimY.-K.SullivanP. (2019). Emotional branding speaks to consumers’ heart: The case of fashion brands. Fashion and Textiles, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-018-0164-y
46.
KinardB. R.HartmanK. B. (2013). Are you entertained? The impact of brand integration and brand experience in television-related advergames. Journal of Advertising, 42(2–3), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.775794
47.
KlineR. B. (2015). TXTBK Principles and practices of structural equation modelling Ed. 4 ***, Methodology in the social sciences.
48.
Kunshan Agricultural Commercial Bank. (2022). SME selection: kunshan agricultural commercial bank: green finance - mobile banking ant forest project. Retrieved July 11, 2023, from https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/564284822?utm_id=0
49.
LiM.-W.TengH-YChenC-Y. (2020) Unlocking the customer engagement-brand loyalty relationship in tourism social media: The roles of brand attachment and customer trustJournal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.015
50.
LöweB.KroenkeK.GräfeK. (2005). Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.09.006
51.
LuffarelliJ.DelreS. A.LandgrafP. (2023). How has the effect of brand personality on customer-based brand equity changed over time? Longitudinal evidence from a panel data set spanning 18 years. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(3), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2
52.
MahalakshmiV.KulkarniN.Pradeep KumarK. V.Suresh KumarK.Nidhi SreeD.DurgaS. (2022). The role of implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in the financial services industry for creating competitive intelligence. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 2252–2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.577
53.
MalhotraN.KimS.PatilA. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
54.
MarianiM. M.Perez-VegaR.WirtzJ. (2022). AI In marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Psychology and Marketing, 39(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21619
55.
Markus. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
56.
MathewV.ThomasS. (2018). Direct and indirect effect of brand experience on true brand loyalty: Role of involvement. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(3), 725–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2017-0189
57.
MendelJ. M.KorjaniM. M. (2018). A new method for calibrating the fuzzy sets used in fsQCA. Information Sciences, 468, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.050
58.
MerrillR. K.SchillebeeckxS. J.BlakstadS. (2019). Sustainable digital finance in Asia: Creating environmental impact through bank transformation, DBS Bank, Sustainable Digital Finance Alliance, and UN Environment.
59.
MuellerJ.WoodE.WilloughbyT.RossC.SpechtJ. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
60.
Musleh Al-SartawiA. M. A.HussaineyK.RazzaqueA. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in sustainable finance, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2057405
61.
NtiE. K.CobbinaS. J.AttafuahE. E.OpokuE.GyanM. A. (2022). Environmental sustainability technologies in biodiversity, energy, transportation and water management using artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Sustainable Futures, 4, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100068
62.
PapadomichelakiX.MentzasG. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.011
63.
PappasI. O.WoodsideA. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
64.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
65.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
RaginC. C.FissP. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, 190–212. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
68.
RahmanM.Hui MingT.BaighT. A.SarkerM. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in banking services: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(10), 4270–4300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2020-0724
69.
RamanathanS.WilliamsP. (2007). Immediate and delayed emotional consequences of indulgence: The moderating influence of personality type on mixed emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1086/519149
70.
RehmanO. u.JunT. Z. (2024a). Unleashing enjoyment, engagement, and motivation to boost green gamified banking investigating the cognitive role in green green-gamified banking. 2024 5th Technology Innovation Management and Engineering Science International Conference (TIMES-iCON), (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2483860
71.
RehmanO. u.JunT Z (2024b) Gamifying green: Does gamified advertisement affect consumer intentions to use green gamified banking – the moderating role of environmental concerns. Environmental Claims Journal, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2024.2428832
72.
RehmanO. u.TangZ.AhmedS. (2025). What happens when sustainability meets e-banking? A delighted message from the gamification. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–17.
73.
RehmanO. U.ZhongjunT.KhanF. N. (2025). Investigating consumer intentions to use green gamified banking: A multiple mediation analysis. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2025.2521584
74.
RehmanO. u.ZhongjunT.ShahzadM. F. (2025). Positive Affecter and the Path to Green Gamified Banking: Unveiling the Mediation effect of E-banking Services. Review of Marketing Science.
75.
RihouxB.RaginC. (2009). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.
76.
SalonenA.ZimmerM.KeränenJ. (2021). Theory development in servitization through the application of fsQCA and experiments. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(5), 746–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2020-0537
77.
Sanz-BlasS.BuzovaDGómezM C O (2025) ‘Brand love goes through the interactive brand community’: The role of member-to-member emotional bonds. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2024-0513
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
80.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis, 1–350.
81.
ShankarA.RishiB. (2020). Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.008
82.
ShethJ. N.JainV.RoyG.ChakrabortyA. (2022). AI-driven banking services: The next frontier for a personalised experience in the emerging market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1248–1271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2021-0449
SouidenN.LadhariR.ChaoualiW. (2020). Mobile banking adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(2), 214–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0182
85.
StrattonG.NorthcoteJ. (2016). When totems beget clans: The brand symbol as the defining marker of brand communities. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(2), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514528194
86.
SunJ.SarfrazM.OzturkI. (2024). Eco-consciousness to eco-consumption: Unraveling the drivers of sustainable consumption behavior under the mediated-moderated model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(24), 35018–35037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33560-y
87.
SyrjäläH.Kauppinen-RäisänenH.LuomalaH. T.JoelssonT. N.KönnöläK.MäkiläT. (2020). Gamified package: Consumer insights into multidimensional brand engagement. Journal of Business Research, 119, 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.089
88.
The Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative (GeSI). (2019). “Digital with Purpose: Delivering a SMARTer2030,” Belgium.
89.
TuškejU.GolobU.PodnarK. (2013). The role of consumer-brand identification in building brand relationships. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.022
90.
VigorosoL.RoccatoMCavalloECaffaroF (2024) Intention to adopt digital games for safety training in young farm operators: the role of ease of use, perceived usefulness, and game design characteristicsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1056–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2310353
91.
VlačićB.CorboL.Costa e SilvaS.DabićM. (2021). The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 188–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.055
92.
VoorheesC. M.BradyM. K.CalantoneR.RamirezE. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
93.
WindasariN. A.KusumawatiN.LarasatiN.AmeliaR. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(2), 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170
94.
WoodsideA. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
95.
XiongJ.MengQ.XiongJ.MengQ. (2018). The analysis of ant forest business model— under ‘internet green finance’. Open Access Library Journal, 5(9), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104887
96.
YangC.YangP.FengY. (2022). Effect of achievement-related gamification on brand attachment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(1), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0088
97.
YangX.YangJ.HouY.LiS.SunS. (2023) Gamification of mobile wallet as an unconventional innovation for promoting Fintech: An fsQCA approachJournal of Business Research, 155(Part A), 113406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113406
98.
YangY.AsaadY.DwivediY. (2017). Examining the impact of gamification on intention of engagement and brand attitude in the marketing context. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.066
99.
ZeithamlV. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
100.
ZhaD.ForoudiP.JinZ.MelewarT. C. (2022). Making sense of sensory brand experience: Constructing an integrative framework for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(1), 130–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12270
101.
ZhangQ.AnwarM. A. (2023) Leveraging gamification technology to motivate environmentally responsible behavior: An empirical examination of Ant Forest. Decision Sciences, 56(1), 25–27.
102.
ZhangY.ChenJ.HanY.QianM.GuoX.ChenR., et al. (2021). The contribution of Fintech to sustainable development in the digital age: Ant forest and land restoration in China. Land Use Policy, 103, 105306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105306
103.
ZhuR.YiC. (2024). Avatar design in Metaverse: The effect of avatar-user similarity in procedural and creative tasks. Internet Research, 34(1), 39–57.
104.
ZschochM. A. (2011). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques, Benoit Rihoux and Charles Ragin, eds., Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. xxv, 209.Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 44(3), 743–746. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423911000709
