The Robinson-Patman Act is an antitrust law, ignored for the most part by the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department. The act was passed to address abuses of power in interactions among business components within the channel of distribution. While the manifestations of power may have changed in elements of the business channel, evidence is offered that substantial power is being exercised within the channel today. Furthermore, it is clear that the Robinson-Patman Act is going to remain a law. Over time, there has been substantial business support for controls on blatant channel power and support for the maintenance of a healthy institutional environment. Protecting a healthy institutional environment is more in line with the antitrust positions taken by key European agencies. Macromarketers and other educators need to acknowledge the existence of this act, understand the logic and complexity of the act, and continue to examine its consequences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aalberts, Robert J., and L. Lynn Judd. 1991. Slotting in the retail grocery business: Does it violate the public policy goal of protecting businesses against price discrimination? Depaul Law Review40 (winter): 397-416.
2.
Ailawadi, Kusum L. 2001. The retail power-performance conundrum. What have we learned? Journal of Retailing77 (fall): 299-318.
3.
Balto, David A. 2001. Supermarket merger enforcement. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing20 (1): 38-50.
4.
Basuroy, Suman, Murali Mantrala, and Rockney Walters. 2001. The impact of category management on retailer prices and performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Marketing65 (October): 16-32.
5.
Becker, Gary S., and Kevin M. Murphy 2001. Rethinking antitrust. Wall Street Journal, February 26, A22.
6.
Bhasin, Ajay, Roger Dickinson, Christine G. Hauri, and William A. Robinson. 1989. Promotion investments that keep paying off. Journal of Consumer Marketing6 (winter): 31-36.
7.
Bloom, Paul N., Gregory Gundlach, and Joseph P. Cannon. 2000. Slotting allowances and fees: Schools of thought and the views of practicing managers. Journal of Marketing64 (April): 92-108.
8.
Bloom, Paul N., and Vanessa G. Perry. 2001. Retailer power and supplier welfare: The case of Wal-Mart. Journal of Retailing77 (3): 379-396.
9.
Bogdanich, Walt, Barry Meier, and Mary Williams Walsh. 2002. 2 hospital purchasing groups face questions over conflicts. New York Times, March 4, A1, A18.
10.
Bork, Robert. 1978. The antitrust paradox. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Calvani, Terry. 2000. Price discrimination: The Robinson-Patman Act. In The Antitrust Review of the Americas 2000. A global competition review special report.
12.
Cannon, Joseph P., and Paul Bloom. 1991. Are slotting allowances legal under the antitrust laws? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing10 (spring): 167-186.
13.
Cassady, Ralph. 1946. Techniques and purposes of price discrimination. Journal of Marketing11 (October): 135-150.
14.
Cassady, Ralph. 1947. Legal aspects of price discrimination: Federal law. Journal of Marketing11 (January): 258-272.
15.
Clark, Donald S. 1998. The Robinson-Patman Act: Annual update. Paper presented at the meeting of the Robinson-Patman Act Committee Section of Antitrust Law, April 2, Washington, DC.
16.
Clarke, Roger, Stephen Davies, Paul Dobson, and Michael Waterson. 2002. Buyer power and competition in European food retailing. North-hampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
17.
Davis, Bob, and Anita Raghavan 2001. GE-Honeywell deal gets caught up in diverging histories. Wall Street Journal, July 3, A1, A8.
18.
Dawson, Chester. 2001. Machete time: In a cost-cutting war with Nissan, Toyota leans on suppliers. Business Week, April 9, 42, 43.
19.
Desiraju, Ramarao. 2001. New product introductions, slotting allowances, and retailer discretion. Journal of Retailing77 (fall): 335-359.
20.
Dickinson, Roger. 1967. The retail buyer and the Robinson-Patman Act. California Management Review10 (spring): 47-54.
21.
[a special issue of the Journal of Advertising History].
22.
Dickinson, Roger, and Stanley C. Hollander. 1996. Some definition problems in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Channels5(1): 1-16.
23.
Edwards, Corwin D. 1959. The price discrimination law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24.
Evans, David S. 2002. The new trustbusters. Foreign Affairs81 (January): 14-20.
25.
Farris, Paul W., and K. L. Ailawadi. 1992. Retail power: Monster or mouse. Journal of Retailing68 (4): 351-369.
26.
Fitzell, Philip B. 1982. Private labels—Store brands and generic products. Westport, CT: AVI.
27.
Foer, Albert A. 1999. Food retailing: The two faces of supermarket mergers. Draft, August 26.
28.
Foer, Albert A. 2000a. Baked lasagne. Washington, DC: American Antitrust Institute.
29.
Foer, Albert A. 2000b. Small business and antitrust: Why the little guys left the fold and why they should return. Washington, DC: American Antitrust Institute.
30.
Foer, Albert A. 2001a. The category captain and the consolidating food industry. FTC:Watch 566. Washington, DC: American Antitrust Institute.
31.
Foer, Albert A. 2001b. E-commerce meets antitrust: A primer. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing20 (spring): 51-63.
32.
Foer, Albert A. 2001c. Public choice and public choices: Consumers and the politics of antitrust. Paper presented at the 47th annual conference of the American Council of Consumer Interests, April 7, Washington, DC.
33.
Foer, Albert A., and Robert H. Lande. 1999. The evolution of the United States antitrust law: The past, present, and (possible) future. Washington, DC: American Antitrust Institute.
34.
Foster, Julie. 2002. The hidden cost of shelf space. Business Week, April 15, 103.
35.
France, Mike. 2001. Europe: A different take on antitrust. Business Week, June 25, 40.
36.
FTC v. The Borden Company. 1966. Trade Reg. Rep. (New Court Decisions) para. 71, 716 at 82, 191.
37.
Gelhorn, Ernest. 1986. Climbing the antitrust staircase. The Antitrust Bulletin31 (summer): 341-357.
38.
Gellhorn, Ernest, and William E. Kovacic. 1994. Antitrust law and economics in a nutshell. St. Paul, MN: West.
39.
Gilpin, Kenneth N. 2002. For sellers of food, fewer chairs at the table. New York Times, September 29, B7.
40.
Green, Jeff. 2000. Can Chrysler get blood from a supplier? Business Week, December 24, 25.
41.
Hays, Constance. 2001. Send it right the first time: Manufacturers fight retailers' discounts for faulty shipping. New York Times, August 17, C1.
42.
Hays, Constance. 2002. Retailer deals for cash back from suppliers draw attention. New York Times, May 11, B1, B14.
43.
Hays, Constance, and Leslie Kaufman. 2001. Some suppliers say Kmart has pressed for deals. New York Times, October 25, C1.
44.
Hollander, Stanley C. 2001. Professor of marketing, Michigan State University. Conversations with author.
45.
Hollander, Stanley C., and William Keep. 1994. Mass merchandising/traditional retailing. In The future of U.S. retailing, edited by Robert A. Peterson, 129-163. New York: Quorum Books.
46.
Hollander, Stanley C., and Mary Sheffet. 1986. The Robinson-Patman Act: Boon or Bane for retailers. The Antitrust Bulletin31 (fall): 759-795.
47.
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1985. Antitrust policy after Chicago. Michigan Law Review84:213-284.
48.
Howard, Marshall C. 1983. Antitrust and trade regulation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49.
Hunt, Shelby D., and Dennis B. Arnett. 2001. Competition as an evolutionary process and antitrust policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing20 (1): 15-26.
50.
Incredible shrinking plants. 2002. The Economist, February 23, 71.
51.
Ingene, Charles A., and Mark E. Parry. 1995. Channel coordination when retailers compete. Marketing Science14 (4): 360-377.
52.
Jap, Sandy D. 2002. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science30 (4): 506-525.
53.
Kaufman, Leslie. 2000. As biggest business, Wal-Mart propels changes else-where. New York Times, October 22, 24.
54.
Kaufman, Leslie. 2002. For clothing makers, it's cut or bet cut. New York Times, January 6, sec. 3:1.
55.
Keep, William. 2001. Professor of marketing, Quinnipiac College. Interactions with the author.
56.
Kintner, Early, and Joseph Bauer. 1986. The Robinson-Patman Act: A look backwards, a view forward. The Antitrust Bulletin31 (fall): 571-609.
57.
LaRue, Paul H. 1995. Robinson-Patman Act in the twenty-first century: Will the Morton salt rule be retired? SMU Law Review48:1923.
58.
Levin, Lawrence R. 1994. Antitrust: Competitors vx. competition. Beverage World, March, 128.
59.
Muller, Joann. 2001. Visteon: Thrown into the deep end. Business Week, May 7, 79, 80.
60.
Nye, Joseph S. 2002. Globalization is about blending, not homogenizing. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, October 14-20, 23.
61.
Pinkerton, Richard L., and Deborah J. Kemp. 1996. The industrial buyer and the Robinson-Patman Act. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management32 (January): 29-36.
62.
Posner, Richard A. 1976. The Robinson-Patman Act: Federal regulation of price differences. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
63.
Progressive Grocer 54th Annual Report. 1987. April, Pt. 2.
64.
Progressive Grocer 55th Annual Report. 1988. April, Pt. 2.
65.
Progressive Grocer 56th Annual Report. 1989. April, Pt. 2.
Report of the Federal Trade Commission Workshop on Slotting Allowances and Other Marketing Practices in the Grocery Industry. 2001. A report by the Federal Trade Commission staff, February.
68.
Revzan, David. 1961. Wholesaling in marketing. New York: John Wiley.
Schwartz, Marius. 1986. The perverse effects of the Robinson-Patman Act. The Antitrust Bulletin31 (fall): 733-757.
71.
Sears Roebuck and Co., and Universal-Rundle Corp. 1963. Trade Reg. Rep. (FTC Complaints, Orders, Stipulations), para. 16644 at 16,644.
72.
Shenefield, John H., and Irwin M. Stelzer. 1996. The antitrust laws. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
73.
Skitol, Robert A. 2000. FTC spices up debate over slotting fees and Robinson-Patman Act with its McCormick action. FTC Watch540, March 13.
74.
Skitol, Robert A. 2001. Slotting fee barons: Watch your step. American Antitrust Institute Activities, February 26, AAI.
75.
— and Kathleen S. O'Neill. 2000. Petition to the Federal Trade Commission on behalf of the Independent Bakers Association, the Tortilla Industry Association, and the National Association of Chewing Gum Manufacturers for the issuance and enforcement of guidelines on slotting allowances in the grocery industry, April 14.
76.
Smith, Geri. 2002. War of the superstores. Business Week, September 23, 60.
77.
Stauth, Robert E. 2002. Oral presentation at the meeting of the American Marketing Association, August 5, San Diego, CA.
Stern, Louis. 1988. Reflections on channel research. Journal of Retailing64 (spring): 1-4.
80.
Thayer, Warren. 1995. Robinson-Patman lives, say Kushner and Larson. Frozen Food Age43 (January): 14.
81.
Trachtenberg, Jeffrey A. 2002. Borders sets out to make the book business businesslike. Wall Street Journal, May 20, B1, B6.
82.
Viscusi, W. Kip, John M. Vernon, and Joseph E. Harrington. 2000. Economics of regulation and antitrust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83.
Voorhees, John J. 1991. Price discrimination and software licensing: Does the Robinson-Patman Act fail to accommodate modern technology? Washington University Law Quarterly69 (winter): 317-336.
84.
Weyl, Walter E. 1912. The new democracy. New York: Macmillan.
85.
Zimmerman, Ann. 2002. Grocery distributor squeezes suppliers at bill-paying time. Wall Street Journal, September 5, A1, A10.
