This article examines an antediluvian justification for the regulation of marketing and other dimensions of commerce: the concept of the common calling. The authors trace the roots of the common calling to medieval times, outline its eventual evolution into the common carrier, and discuss how policy makers through the years have used it to grapple with the often contradictory interests of both private enterprise and the public welfare.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abram, Annie . 1913. English life and manners in the later middle ages. New York: Routledge & Dutton.
2.
Adler, Edward A.1914-1915. Business jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review28: 135-162. Aldnutt v. Inglis. 1810. 12 East, 5271-5271.
3.
Angell, Joseph Kinnicut . 1849. Treatise on the law of carriers of goods and passengers, by land and by water. Boston: Little, Brown.
4.
Arterburn, Norman F.1927. The origin and first test of public callings. University of Pennsylvania Law Review75 (March): 411-428.
5.
Basedow, Jurgen . 1983. Common carriers—continuity and disintegration in United States transportation law: Part 1. Transportation Law Journal13 (1): 1-42.
6.
Beale, Joseph H.1897. The carrier’s liability: Its history. Harvard Law Review11 (3): 158-168.
7.
Biddle, Wayne . 1995. A field guide to germs. New York: Holt and Company.
8.
Blair v. American Forwarding Co. 1911. 159 Illinois Appelate 511-511.
9.
Block v. Hirsh. 1921. 256 U. S. 135-135.
10.
Blum, John M. , Bruce Catton, Edmind S. Morgan, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., Kenneth M. Stampp, and C. Vann Woodward. 1963. The national experience. New York: Harcourt Brace.
11.
Brass v. North Dakota. 1894. 153 U. S. 391. Buckland v. Adams Express Co. 1867. 97 Mass. 124-124.
12.
Burdick, Charles K.1911. The origin of the peculiar duties of public service companies. Columbia Law Review11: S14-S31.
13.
Chitty, Tompson , and Leogric Temple. 1857. A practical treatise on the law of carriers of goods and passengers by land, inland navigation, and in ships with an appendix of statutes and forms of pleading. Philadelphia, PA: T. & J. W. Johnson.
14.
Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. 1896. 162 U. S. 184-184.
15.
Commercial Union Telegraph Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. 1888. 61 Vt. 241-241.
16.
Fitzherbert, Sir Anthony. 1514. Naturabrevium, Londini, inaedibus R. Tottelli.
17.
German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Kansas. 1914. 233 U. S. 389-389.
18.
Ginsbourn v. Hurst. 1710. 1 Salk. 249, 91 English Reporter 220-220.
19.
Hale, Matthew . 1787. A treatise in three parts. In Collection of tracts relative to the law of England, edited by Frances Hargrave. Dublin, Ireland: E. Lynch.
20.
Hale, Matthew . An analysis of the civil part of the law. 4th ed.Dublin: J. Moore.
21.
Haskell v. Boston District Messenger Co. 1906. 190 Mass. 189-189.
22.
Hoogenboom, Ari , and Olive Hoogenboom. 1976. A history of the ICC—From panacea to palliative. New York: Norton.
23.
In re Wohl, Inc. 1931. 50 F. 2d 254 (District Court of Michigan).
24.
Inter-Ocean Publishing Co. v. Associated Press. 1900. 184 Illinois 438-438.
25.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co. 1897. 168 U. S. 144-144.
26.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. 1897. 167 U. S. 479-479.
27.
J. H. Cownie Glove Co. v. Merchants’ Dispatch Transport Co. 1906. 130 Iowa 327-327.
28.
Jusserand, J.1961. English wayfaring life in the Middle Ages. Translated by L. Smith. 4th ed.London: T. F. Unwin.
29.
Kentucky and Indiana Bridge Co. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. 1889. 37 Fed. Rep. 567-567.
30.
Kettenhofen v. Globe Transfer & Storage Co. 1912. 70 Washington 645-645.
Leonard v. New York, Albany & Buffalo Electro Magnetic Telegraph Co. 1870. 41 New York 544-544.
33.
McCarter v. Firemen’s Insurance Co. 1909. 74 New Jersey Eq. 372-372.
34.
McKellar v. Yellow Cab Co. 1921. 148 Minnesota 247-247.
35.
Melconian v. City of Grand Rapids. 1922. 218 Mich. 507-507.
36.
Metropolitan Grain & Stock Exchange v. Chicago Board of Trade. 1883. 15 Fed. 847 (Circuit Court of Illinois).
37.
Miller, Sidney L.1924. Railway transportation, principles and point of view. Chicago: A. W. Shaw.
38.
Munn v. People of Illinois. 1876. 94 U. S. 113-154.
39.
Nash v. Page. 1882. 80 Kentucky 539-539.
40.
New York & Chicago Grain & Stock Exchange v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 1889. 127 Illinois 153-153.
41.
Parks v. Telegraph Co. 1859. 13 Cal. 423-423.
42.
Pickrell, Donald . 1991. The regulation and deregulation of U. S. airlines. In Airline deregulation: International experiences, edited by Kenneth Button. New York: New York University Press.
43.
Salzman, Louis Francis . 1914. Henry II. London: Oxford University Press.
44.
Saunders, Richard . 1978. The railroad mergers and the coming of Conrail. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
45.
Sharfman, I. Leo . 1915. Railway regulation. Chicago: LaSalle Extension University.
46.
Sharfman, I. Leo . 1931. The Interstate Commerce Commission. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
47.
Smith, Young R. , Noel T. Dowling, and Robert L. Hale. 1936. Cases on the law of public utilities. St. Paul, MO: West Publishing.
48.
State v. Nebraska Telephone Co. 1885. 17 Nebraska 126-126.
49.
State ex rel. Star Publishing Co. v. Associated Press. 1901. 159 Missouri 410-410.
50.
State, Trenton, etc., Turnpike Co. v. American etc., News Co. 1881. 43 New Jersey Law 381-381.
51.
Stone, Richard D.1991. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the railroad industry: A history of regulatory policy. New York: Praeger.
52.
Tallassee Oil&Fertilizer Co. v. H. S. &J. L. Holloway. 1917. 200Alabama492.
53.
Texas and Pacific Ry. Co. v. ICC. 1896. 162 U. S. 197-197.
54.
Tyler, Ullman & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Company. 1871. 60 Illinois 421-421.
55.
Tyson v. Banton. 1927. 273 U. S. 418-418.
56.
Uhlmann v. Sherman. 1919. 22 Ohio 225-225.
57.
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Associates. 1897. 166 U. S. 290-290.
58.
Vietor, Richard H. K.1994. Contrived competition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
59.
Washington ex rel. Stimson Lumber Company v. Kuykendall. 1927. 275 U. S. 207-207.
60.
Wolff Packing v. Court of Industrial Relations. 1922. 262 U. S. 522-522.
61.
Wyman, Bruce . 1903-1904. The law of the public callings as a solution of the trust problem. Harvard Law Review17 (November): 156-247.
62.
Wyman, Bruce . 1921. Public service corporations. New York: Baker, Voorhis.
