Scholars argue that human services should be contracted through relational rather than transactional contracting because of contract management costs and perfunctory behavior. However, the empirical research on the consequences of transactional contracting for human services is limited. Based on interviews with service providers of contractors for the Employment Success Package Program in South Korea, this study examines the perceptions, experiences, and behaviors of frontline service providers and their implications for service quality when human services are provided under a strict transactional contracting model. Under strict hierarchical relationships with and control of the government, workers experience stress, anxiety, skepticism, and loss of professional identity, defining themselves as clerks rather than professionals. Service providers lose their identity as professionals as they must prioritize compliance over meaningful outcomes to avoid sanctions. Without discretion, they find it difficult to address problems and experience little meaning in their work, resulting in the provision of standardized, minimized services.
AgranoffR. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Georgetown University Press.
2.
AmirkhanyanA. A. (2010). Monitoring across sectors: Examining the effect of nonprofit and for-profit contractor ownership on performance monitoring in state and local contracts. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02202.x
3.
AmirkhanyanA. A.KimH. J.LambrightK. T. (2012). Closer than “arms length”: Understanding the factors associated with collaborative contracting. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011402319
4.
AnguelovL. G.BrunjesB. M. (2023). A replication of “contracting out: For what? With whom?”. Public Administration, 101(3), 1163–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12921
5.
BertelliA.SmithC. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl. 1), i21–i40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup033
6.
BrodkinE. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 2), i253–i277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093
7.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. V. (2015). Managing complex contracts: A theoretical approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv004
8.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2018). Complex contracting: Management challenges and solutions. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12959
9.
BrunjesB. M. (2024). Partners or providers? An analysis of nonprofit federal contractor performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(2), 428–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231160137
ChoiS. (2019). 중앙부처 민간위탁 종합평가 방안 연구 [Policy alternatives for comprehensive evaluation of central government contracting out]. Korea Institute of Public Administration.
12.
ChuangE.McBeathB.CarnochanS.AustinM. J. (2020). Relational mechanisms in complex contracting: Factors associated with private managers’ satisfaction with and commitment to the contract relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz021
13.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
14.
DarwinJ.DuberleyJ.JohnsonP. (2000). Contracting in ten English local authorities: Preferences and practices. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550010334467
15.
DeHoogH. (1990). Competition, negotiation, or cooperation: Three models for service contracting. Administration and Society, 22(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979002200303
16.
DiasJ. J.Maynard-MoodyS. (2007). For-profit welfare: Contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul002
17.
FehrE.HartO.ZehnderC. (2011). Contracts as reference points—experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 101(2), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.493
18.
FerrisJ.GraddyE. (1986). Contracting out: For what? With whom?Public Administration Review, 46(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/976307
19.
ForrerJ.KeeJ. E.NewcomerK. E.BoyerE. (2010). Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02161.x
20.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Polity Press.
21.
FrydlingerD.HartO.VitasekK. (2019). A new approach to contracts: How to build better long-term strategic partnerships. Harvard Business Review, 97(5), 116–126.
22.
GazleyB. (2008). Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government–nonprofit partnerships. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00844.x
23.
GirthA.HefetzA.JohnstonJ.WarnerM. (2012). Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02596.x
24.
GirthA. M.LopezL. E. (2019). Contract design, complexity, and incentives: Evidence from US federal agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018787558
25.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (3rd Paperback Printing). Aldine Transaction.
HasenfeldY. (2010). The attributes of human service organizations. In HasenfeldY. (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 9–32). Sage Publications.
28.
HasenfeldY. (2015). What exactly is human services management?Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1007773
29.
HeinrichC. J.ChoiY. (2007). Performance-based contracting in social welfare programs. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006297553
JohnstonJ.RomzekB. S. (2005). Traditional contracts as partnerships: Effective accountability in social services contracts in the American states. In HodgeG.GreveC. (Eds.), The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience (pp. 117–143). Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
JonesC.HesterlyW. S.BorgattiS. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109
33.
KettlD. F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Brookings Institution Press.
34.
KimS. T.EomM. J.YuB. J.LeeC. H. (2023). 민원서비스 민간위탁의 함의: 서울교통공사 고객센터 상담업무 질적 사례분석 [Implications of contracting out civil affairs services: A qualitative case study of Seoul metro customer center counseling service]. The Korean Journal of Public Administration, 32(4), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.22897/kipajn.2023.32.4.011
35.
KimS.HanC. (2015). Administrative reform in South Korea: New public management and the bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314558034
36.
KlijnE. H.TeismanG. (2005). Public–private partnerships as the management of co-production: Strategic and institutional obstacles in a difficult marriage. In HodgeG.GreveC. (Eds.), The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience (pp. 95–116). Edward Elgar Publishing.
37.
KlingnerD.NalbandianJ.RomzekB. (2002). Politics, administration, and markets: Conflicting expectations and accountability. The American Review of Public Administration, 32(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/02774002032002001
38.
KoningP.HeinrichC. J. (2013). Cream-skimming, parking and other intended and unintended effects of high-powered, performance-based contracts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21695
39.
LamotheM.LamotheS. (2009). Beyond the search for competition in social service contracting: Procurement, consolidation, and accountability. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008316557
40.
LeeB.-H. (2017). 취업성공패키지 성과분석 및 제도개선방안 [Performance analysis and suggestions for improving design of employment success package program]. Korea Labor Institute.
41.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
42.
LindholstA. C.Helby PetersenO.HoulbergK. (2018). Contracting out local road and park services: Economic effects and their strategic, contractual and competitive conditions. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1398647
43.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th anniversary ed.). Russell Sage Foundation(Originally published in 1980).
44.
LoflandJ.SnowD.AndersonL.LoflandL. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
45.
LuJ. (2016). The performance of performance-based contracting in human services: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv002
46.
LuJ.ParkJ. (2018). Bureaucratization, professionalization, and advocacy engagement in nonprofit human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(4), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2018.1495138
47.
MarchJ. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Free Press.
48.
MarvelM. K.MarvelH. P. (2008). Government-to-government contracting: Stewardship, agency, and substitution. International Public Management Journal, 11(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802095870
49.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. C. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
50.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
51.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. C. (2012). Social equities and inequities in practice: Street-level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02633.x
52.
Maynard-MoodyS.PortilloS. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy theory. In DurantR. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252–257). Oxford University Press.
53.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.HubermanM. A.SaldanaJ. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
MOEL. (2020b). 취업성공패키지 관련기관 사업지침 위반사항 적발시 규정따라 조치 [When violations of the guidelines for agencies related to the Employment Success Package are detected, take measures in accordance with the regulations]. https://www.korea.kr/news/policyNewsView.do?newsId=148868255
MOEL. (2021b). Employment and labor policy in Korea 2020.
62.
MOEL. (2022). 시행 2년차 ‘국민취업지원제도’, 올해 규모 대폭 늘려 총 60만명 지원한다 [National Employment Support Program, in its 2nd year, will significantly increase its beneficiaries, up to 600,000 people] [Press release]. https://www.korea.kr/news/policyNewsView.do?newsId=148897648
63.
MussoJ. A.WeareC. (2020). Performance management goldilocks style: A transaction cost analysis of incentive intensity in performance regimes. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1677481
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Towards better social and employment security in Korea, Connecting people with jobs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264288256-en
66.
OrrJ. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press.
67.
O’TooleL. J.Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/976691
68.
ParkS.-A. (2009). 민간위탁 단계별 영향요인에 관한 연구: 국내・외 민간위탁 연구에 대한 내용분석을 중심으로 [Content analysis of studies on the factors influencing the phases of contracting-out]. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 47(1), 101–131. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/70049
69.
ParkC. M.ShinD. C. (2006). Do Asian values deter popular support for democracy in South Korea?Asian Survey, 46(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2006.46.3.341
70.
ParkS. H.WildingM. (2016). The politics of government reform in Korea: From tripartite to bipartite politicization. Administration & Society, 48(9), 1059–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714527753
71.
PetersenO. H.HoulbergK.ChristensenL. R. (2015). Contracting out local services: A tale of technical and social services. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12367
72.
PoppoL.ZengerT. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249
73.
ReevesE. (2008). The practice of contracting in public private partnerships: Transaction costs and relational contracting in the Irish schools sector. Public Administration, 86(4), 969–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00743.x
74.
RomzekB. S.JohnstonJ. M. (2002). Effective contract implementation and management: A preliminary model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003541
75.
RomzekB. S.JohnstonJ. M. (2005). State social services contracting: Exploring the determinants of effective contract accountability. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00470.x
76.
SandfortJ. R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289
77.
SavasE. S. (2000). Privatization and public–private partnerships. Chatham House Publishers.
78.
SclarE. (2000). You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Cornell University Press.
79.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press.
80.
SosinM. R. (2010). Discretion in human service organizations: Traditional and institutional perspectives. In HasenfeldY. (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 381–404). Sage Publications.
81.
SowaJ. E. (2008). Implementing interagency collaborations: Exploring variation in collaborative ventures in human service organizations. Administration & Society, 40(3), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707313701
82.
ThomannE.van EngenN.TummersL. (2018). The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy024
TummersL.BekkersV. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
85.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2002). Welfare reform: Federal oversight of state and local contracting can be strengthened (GAO-02–661). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-02-661
86.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2017). Contracting data analysis: Assessment of government-wide trends (GAO-17-244SP). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-17-244sp
87.
Van SlykeD. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00291
88.
Van SlykeD. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul012
89.
WarsenR.KlijnE. H.KoppenjanJ. (2019). Mix and match: How contractual and relational conditions are combined in successful public–private partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy082
WeickK. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Blackwell Publishers.
92.
WilliamsonO. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
93.
WitesmanE. M.FernandezS. (2013). Government contracts with private organizations: Are there differences between nonprofits and for-profits?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012442592
94.
YouJ. (2020). Lessons from South Korea’s COVID-19 policy response. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 801–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020943708
