Despite the growing emphasis on government transparency, there is a noticeable scarcity of studies investigating citizens’ actual demand for information, especially at the local level. This paper addresses this gap by empirically exploring the contextual factors that influence FOI requests within Italian local administrations. The research leverages a unique dataset comprising FOI logs extracted from 305 Italian municipalities, spanning the period from 2018 to 2021. By combining FOI data with pertinent contextual variables, this study seeks to elucidate the correlates of information demand. This study not only enhances our understanding of FOI demand dynamics but also serves as the first comprehensive exploration of information demand within Italy, a country that adopted FOI norms relatively late.
BerlinerD.BagozziB. E.Palmer-RubinB.ErlichA. (2021). The political logic of government disclosure: Evidence from information requests in Mexico. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 229–245.
Caamaño-AlegreJ.Lago-PeñnasS.Reyes-SantiasF.Santiago-BoubetaA. (2013). Budget transparency in local governments: An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies, 39(2), 182–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.693075
4.
CamajL. (2016). From ‘window dressing’ to ‘door openers’? Freedom of Information legislation, public demand, and state compliance in South East Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 346–357.
5.
CicatielloL.De SimoneE.Di MascioF.GaetaG. L.NataliniA.WorthyB. (2022). Exploring FOI publicity patterns: The case of Italian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101678
6.
CicatielloL.De SimoneE.Di MascioF.GaetaG. L.NataliniA.WorthyB. (2024). Response, awareness and requester identity in FOI law: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 220(April), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.010
7.
CuccinielloM.PorumbescuG. A.GrimmelikhuijsenS. G. (2017). 25 Years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685.25
8.
CuillierD. (2008). Access attitudes: A social learning approach to examining community engagement and support for press access to government records. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500305
9.
CuillierD. (2010). Honey v. vinegar: Testing compliance-gaining theories in the context of freedom of information laws. Communication Law and Policy, 15(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2010.489842
10.
CuillierD.PinkletonB. E. (2011). Suspicion and secrecy: Political attitudes and their relationship to support for freedom of information. Communication Law and Policy, 16(3), 227–254.
11.
CuillierD.PiotrowskiS. J. (2009). Internet information-seeking and its relation to support for access to government records. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.001
12.
DarbishireH. (2010). Proactive transparency: The future of the right to information?World Bank.
13.
ErcolanoS. (2012). Il dualismo italiano nelle analisi degli studiosi stranieri. Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, 26(3), 411–444. https://doi.org/10.1432/38970
14.
EspositoG.CicatielloL.MabillardV.GaetaG. L. (2024). Toward a citizen science framework for public policy evaluation: Lessons from a field experiment on Freedom of Information laws in Belgium. Evaluation, 30(4), 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890241270195
15.
GirouxG.MclellandA. J. (2003). Governance structures and accounting at large municipalities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(3), 203–230.
16.
GrimmelikhuijsenS.JohnP.MeijerA.WorthyB. (2018). Do freedom of information laws increase transparency of government? A replication of a field experiment. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.12.34
17.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.WelchE. W. (2012). Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02532.x
18.
GuillamónM. D.BastidaF.BenitoB. (2011). The determinants of local government's financial transparency. Local Government Studies, 37(4), 391–406.
19.
HealdD. (2006). Varieties of transparency. In HoodC.HealdD. (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 25–43). Oxford University Press.
20.
HealdD. (2022). Uses and abuses of transparency. This obscure thing called transparency: Politics and aesthetics of a contemporary metaphor, 37–66.
21.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 153–161.
22.
IngramR. W. (1984). Economic incentives and the choice of state government accounting practices. Journal of Accounting Research, 126–144.
23.
JanssenM.CharalabidisY.ZuiderwijkA. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
24.
KrahR. D. Y.MertensG. (2020). Transparency in local governments: Patterns and practices of twenty-first century. State and Local Government Review, 52(3), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X20970245
25.
KwokaM. B. (2021). Saving the freedom of information act. Cambridge University Press.
26.
LagunesP.PocasangreO. (2019). Dynamic transparency: An audit of Mexico's freedom of information act. Public Administration, 97(1), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12553
27.
LandgraveM. (2022). Do citizens demand transparency from co-partisans? Evidence from a pre-registered experiment in Mexico. Electoral Studies, 80, 102544.
MichenerG.RodriguesK. (2015). Who wants to know? Assessing discrimination in transparency and freedom of information regimes. In Global conference on transparency studies.
32.
MichenerG.WorthyB. (2018). The information-gathering matrix: A framework for conceptualizing the use of freedom of information laws. Administration & Society, 50(4), 476–500.
33.
Moon, M. Jae. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
34.
NamT. (2016). Citizen attitudes about open government and government 2.0: A path analysis. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 12(4), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2016100104
35.
NifoA.VecchioneG. (2014). Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The case of Italy. Regional Studies, 48(10), 1628–1649.
36.
OliverR. E. (2004). What is transparency. McGraw-Hill.
37.
ParkS.Gil-GarciaJ. R. (2022). Open data innovation: Visualizations and process redesign as a way to bridge the transparency-accountability gap. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101456
38.
PiotrowskiS. J.Van RyzinG. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.
39.
PorumbescuG.MeijerA.GrimmelikhuijsenS. (2022). Government transparency: State of the art and new perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
40.
SchnellS. (2022). Transparency in a ‘post-fact’ world. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(3), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac010
41.
SchnellS.KimJ.MunnoG.NabatchiT. (2024). How citizens want to ‘see’ the state: Exploring the relationship between transparency and public values. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13769
42.
ShepherdE.StevensonA.FlinnA. (2009). The impact of freedom of information on records management and record use in local government: A literature review. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 30(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903445000
43.
SpáčP.VodaP.ZagrapanJ. (2018). Does the freedom of information law increase transparency at the local level? Evidence from a field experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.003
44.
TrautendorferJ.SchmidthuberL.HilgersD. (2024). Are the answers all out there? Investigating citizen information requests in the haze of bureaucratic responsiveness. Governance, 37(3), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12805
45.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. University of Chicago Press.
46.
WagnerA. J. (2021). Piercing the veil: Examining demographic and political variables in state FOI Law administration. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101541
47.
WagnerA. J. (2022). Popular information: An analysis of FOI use and behavior. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101677
48.
WorthyB.JohnP.VannoniM. (2017). Transparency at the parish pump: A field experiment to measure the effectiveness of Freedom of Information requests in England. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw063
