Over the past years, the anti-corruption strategy in public administrations has been shifting from a formal way of control towards a risk management and assessment one. However, it is not clear whether these legal reforms at EU and at national level are reaching local institutions. The study evaluates the degree of compliance of the Greater Metropolitan Area of Barcelona by analysing a set of indicators divided into five main areas: codes of ethics, oversight bodies, transparency, conflicts of interests, and whistleblowing channels and protection. The results show that, even if there are also positive outcomes, the process of transforming the public administration and its contracting bodies towards a culture of integrity or risk management is still far from complete at local levels, and there are still institutional and normative shortcomings in terms of anti-corruption strategy and planning that should be promptly addressed.
Points for practitioners
This article explores the impact of the current anti-corruption legislation on local governments and public bodies. It analyses the state of development of four key public procurement areas of action within the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona, gathering 170 entities of different legal nature and size. The results show that the impact of European and national legislations seems to be still weak in local administrative structures, although the degree of development varies significantly among different types of entities.
AgerbergM (2019) The curse of knowledge? Education, corruption, and politics. Political Behavior41(2): 369–399.
2.
AranhaALM (2017) Accountability, corruption and local government: Mapping the control steps. Brazilian Political Science Review11.
3.
AubyJ-BBreenEPerroudT (2014) Corruption and Conflicts of InterestCheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
4.
BadaraM (2013) Impact of the effective internal control system on the internal audit effectiveness at local government level. Journal of Social and Development Sciences4(1): 16–23.
5.
Baena GarcíaL (2019) La gestión de riesgos de corrupción, fraude y otras irregularidades en la contratación pública. Revista de Contabilidad y Dirección28: 91–106.
6.
BashirMHassanS (2020) The need for ethical leadership in combating corruption. International Review of Administrative Sciences86(4): 673–690.
7.
BeeriINavotD (2013) Local political corruption: potential structural malfunctions at the central–local, local–local and intra-local levels. Public Management Review15(5): 712–739.
8.
BensonGCS (1989) Codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics8(5): 305–319.
9.
BertiCBratuRWickbergS (2020) A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. In: Mungiu-PippidiAHeywoodPM (eds) Chapter 8: Corruption and the media. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
10.
BethE (2007) Integrity in Public Procurement: Good Practice from A to Z. Paris: OECD.
11.
BovisC (1998) The Liberalisation of Public Procurement and Its Effects on the Common Market. London and New York: Ashgate.
12.
CamposJEPradhanS (2007) The Many Faces of Corruption: Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level. Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications.
13.
CaramanisCDedoulisELeventisS (2015) Transplanting Anglo-American Accounting Oversight Boards to a Diverse Institutional Context. Accounting, Organizations and Society42(C): 12–31.
14.
Casadesús de MingoACerrillo-i-MartínezA (2018) Improving records management to promote transparency and prevent corruption. International Journal of Information Management38(1): 256–261.
15.
Cerrillo i MartínezA (2018a) El principio de integridad en la contratación pública: mecanismos para la prevención de los conflictos de intereses y la lucha contra la corrupción. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi.
16.
Cerrillo i MartínezA (2018b) La integridad y la transparencia en la contratación pública. Anuario del Gobierno Local (1): 77–127.
17.
ChenCGanapatiS (2021) Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences: 00208523211033236.
18.
CortiFNunez-FerrerJ (2021) Steering and monitoring the recovery and resilience plans: Reading between the lines. CEPS Recovery and Resilience Reflection Papers.
19.
DoigA (2014) Roadworks ahead? Addressing fraud, corruption and conflict of interest in English local government. Local Government Studies40(5): 670–686.
20.
FischerFZinkeRC (1989) Public administration and the code of ethics: Administrative reform or professional ideology?International Journal of Public Administration12(6): 841–854.
21.
García PellicerJL (2017) Herramientas y propuestas para luchar contra la corrupción en el sector público: ética, transparencia y compliance. Revista Internacional de Transparencia e Integridad5(1): 1–9.
22.
GeorgievaI (2017) Using Transparency Against Corruption in Public Procurement. Cham: Springer.
23.
Gimeno FeliúJM (2021) El desafío de fondos next generation como elemento de transformación de la gestión pública. Revista Aragonesa de Administración Pública20(1): 21–41.
24.
GraycarAPrenzlerT (2013) The architecture of corruption control. In: Understanding and Preventing Corruption. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 50–69.
25.
HeathAFRichardsLde GraafND (2016) Explaining corruption in the developed world: The potential of sociological approaches. Annual Review of Sociology42(1): 51–79.
26.
HillionC (2021) Compromising (on) the general conditionality mechanism and the rule of law. Common Market Law Review58(2): 267–284.
27.
HubertsLWJC (2018) Integrity: What it is and why it is important. Public Integrity20(sup1): S18–S32.
28.
HunsakerK (2009) Ethics in public procurement: Buying public trust.Journal of Public Procurement9(3/4): 411–418.
29.
JohnstonM (2012) Corruption control in the United States: Law, values, and the political foundations of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences78(2): 329–345.
30.
JurichJ (2012) International approaches to conflicts of interest in public procurement: A comparative review. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review7(4): 242–257.
31.
KampourakisI (2021) Whistleblowers as regulatory intermediaries: Instrumental and reflexive considerations in decentralizing regulation. Regulation & Governance15(3): 745–759.
32.
KerkhoffTOvereemP (2021) The fluidity of integrity: Lessons from Dutch scandals. Public Integrity23(1): 82–94.
33.
LambsdorffJG (2007) The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MagreJPanoE (2018) The architecture of the local political community: France, Italy, Portugal and Spain. In: KerekeyRLiddleJDunningPT (eds) The Routledge Handbook of International Local Government. London: Routledge, pp. 418–432.
35.
MakhadoRMasehelaKMokhariR (2012) Effectiveness and efficiency of public accounts committees (PACs) in enhancing oversight and accountability in the public sector. 2012 SALSA Development Seminar: 2–5.
36.
MansbachABachnerYG (2010) Internal or external whistleblowing: Nurses’ willingness to report wrongdoing. Nursing Ethics17(4): 483–490.
37.
MartinSHartleyKCoxA (1999) Public procurement directives in the European Union: A study of local authority purchasing. Public Administration77(2): 387–406.
38.
MastersABGraycarA (2016) Making corruption disappear in local government. Public Integrity18(1): 42–58.
39.
MHCLG (2020) Local government procurement: Fraud and corruption risk review.
40.
Miranzo DíazJ (2017) The procedural treatment of conflicts of interest in EU public procurement. In: FerrariGMondéjar-JiménezJ (eds) Tourism, Economy and Environment: New Trends and Research Perspectives. Oxford: Chartridge Books Oxford, pp. 191–205.
41.
Miranzo DíazJ (2019a) La nueva directiva europea de protección del denunciante: un análisis desde el Derecho Público. Revista General de Derecho Europeo49(1).
42.
Miranzo DíazJ (2019b) La prevención de la corrupción de la contratación pública. Las Rozas: Wolters Kluwer.
43.
Miranzo DíazJ (2020a) Hacia la configuración de una estrategia eficiente de integridad en la contratación pública. Aranzadi.
44.
Miranzo DíazJ (2020b) ‘Optional’ exclusion from public tenders grounded on conflicts of interests and principle of proportionality: Whose choice?European Public Law27(3): 679–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/EURO2020060
45.
Moreno MolinaJA (2006) Los principios generales de la contratación de las administraciones públicas. Albacete: Bomarzo.
46.
OECD (2013) Anti-corruption Reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Paris: OECD.
47.
PigaG (2011) A fighting chance against corruption in public procurement. In: Rose-AckermanSSøreideT (eds) International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 141–181.
48.
PlantJF (2001) Codes of ethics. Handbook of Administrative Ethics: 309–333.
49.
QuesadaMGJiménez-SánchezFVilloriaM (2013) Building local integrity systems in Southern Europe: The case of urban local corruption in Spain. International Review of Administrative Sciences79(4): 618–637.
50.
ReedQ (2008) Sitting on the fence: Conflicts of interest and how to regulate them. U4 Issue6(1).
51.
RendonRGRendonJM (2015) Auditability in public procurement: An analysis of internal controls and fraud vulnerability. International Journal of Procurement Management8(6): 710–730.
52.
RobertsRN (2010) Mandatory contractor codes of ethics and defense procurement integrity. Journal of Public Procurement10(2): 247–274.
53.
SchöberleinJJenkinsM (2019) Strategies to tackle corruption in local government procurement in Asia and Africa. Transparency International.
54.
SmithR (2010) The role of whistle-blowing in governing well: Evidence from the Australian public sector. The American Review of Public Administration40(6): 704–721.
55.
SoloveičikDŠimanskisK (2017) The evolving concept of ‘conflict of interests’ in the EU public procurement law. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review12(2): 112–131.
56.
SvaraJH (2014) Who are the keepers of the code? Articulating and upholding ethical standards in the field of public administration. Public Administration Review74(5): 561–569.
57.
TrepteP (2005) Transparency and accountability as tools for promoting integrity and preventing corruption in procurement: Possibilities and limitations. Paris: OECD.
58.
Van WaeyenbergeADaviesZ (2021) The whistleblower protection directive (2019/1937): A satisfactory but incomplete system. European Journal of Risk Regulation12(1): 236–244.
59.
Van WartM (2013) Changing Public Sector Values. New York and London: Routledge.
60.
VolintiruCOsunaJJORegionsE, et al. (2018) Preventing Corruption at the Local and Regional Level in South Mediterranean Countries. Brussels: European Committee of the Regions.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
