Over the last decade, a growing number of public administration theorists have taken up the question of how ontology—assumptions about the nature of existence—shapes our understanding of governance. This substantially updated primer, originally published in Public Administration Review, introduces the essay, provides a basic explanation of ontology, describes the fundamental debates in philosophies of ontology, and discusses why ontology is important to social and political theory and therefore public administration theory and practice. Using an ideal-type approach grounded in differing ontological assumptions, a Governance Typology is provided to support analysis of differing public administration theories. An integrative approach to governance is offered that is grounded in relational process ontology—a foundation that may support a viable synthesis of the other four primary ideal-types. The essay concludes with a call for personal reflection on the part of scholars and practitioners regarding their own ontological commitments and an invitation to collaborative inquiry.
AdamsG. B. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 211–218.
2.
AmoahL. G. A. (2010). Public policy formation in Africa: Toward a grounded ontology. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(4), 606–610.
3.
AnsellC. (2011). Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford University Press.
4.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
5.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
6.
AnzaldúaG. (2004). La concienda de la mestiza: Towards a new consciousness. In HeldkeL.O’ConnorP. (Eds.), Oppression, privilege, and resistance: Theoretical perspectives on racism, sexism, and heterosexism (pp. 739–751). McGraw-Hill.
7.
BachrachP. (1967). The theory of democratic elitism: A critique. Little, Brown.
8.
BartelsK. P. R. (2012). The actionable researcher: Cultivating a process-oriented methodology for studying administrative practice. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(3), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806340306
9.
BeemanC.BlenkinsopS. (2008). Might diversity also be ontological? Considering Heidegger, Spinoza and indigeneity in educative practice. Encounters on Education, 9(8), 95–107.
10.
BennettJ. (2001). The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics. Princeton University Press.
11.
BevirM. (2011). Public administration as storytelling. Public Administration, 89(1), 183–195.
12.
BordasJ. (2007). Salsa, soul, and spirit: Leadership for a multicultural age (Vol. 1). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
13.
BoxR. C. (1992). An examination of the debate over research in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 62–69.
14.
BoxR. C. (1998). Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. SAGE.
15.
BoxR. C. (2008). Making a difference: Progressive values in public administration. M.E. Sharpe.
16.
BoxR. C. (Ed.). (2009). Public administration and society: Critical issues in American governance (2nd ed.). M. E. Sharpe.
17.
BriggM. (2007). Biopolitics meets terrapolitics: Political ontologies and governance in settler-colonial Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 403–417.
18.
BroddJ. (2003). World religions. Saint Mary’s Press.
19.
ButlerA. C. (1980). Josiah Warren and the sovereignty of the individual. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, IV(4), 433–448.
20.
CaldwellL. K. (1988). The administrative theories of Hamilton & Jefferson: Their contribution to thought on public administration (2nd ed.). Holmes & Meier. (Original work published 1944)
21.
CandlerG. G.VentrissC. (2006). Introduction to the symposium: The destiny of theory: Beyond the new science of organizations. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(4), 495–500.
22.
CarrA.ZanettiL. A. (1999). Metatheorizing the dialectic of self and other. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(2), 324–345.
23.
CatlawT. J. (2005). Constitution as executive order: The administrative state and the political ontology of “We the People.”Administration & Society, 37, 445–482.
24.
CatlawT. J. (2007). Fabricating the people: Politics and administration in the biopolitical state. University of Alabama Press.
25.
CatlawT. J. (2008). Frederick Thayer and the structural transformation of the public sphere. Administration & Society, 40(4), 358–383.
26.
CatlawT. J.StoutM. (2007). Postmodernism and public policy. In RabinJ. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public administration & public policy (pp. 1524–1529). Taylor & Francis.
27.
ChristC. P. (2003). She who changes: Re-imagining the divine in the world. Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
ClarkB. (1998). Political economy: A comparative approach (2nd ed.). Praeger.
29.
ConnollyW. E. (2011). A world of becoming. Duke University Press.
30.
CobbJ. BJr.. (1990). Two types of postmodernism: Deconstruction and process. Theology Today, 47(2), 149–158.
31.
ConnollyW. E. (2013). The fragility of things: Self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Duke University Press.
32.
CookS. D. N.WagenaarH. (2012). Navigating the eternally unfolding present: Toward an epistemology of practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 3–38.
33.
CoxR. W. (1995). Critical political economy. In HetneB. (Ed.), International political economy: Understanding global disorder (pp. 30–52). Fernwood Publishing.
34.
CrowleyT. (1997). An introduction to historical linguistics (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
35.
DahlR. A. (1998). On democracy. Yale University Press.
36.
DeLeonP. (1992). The democratization of the policy sciences. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 125–129.
37.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia [MassumiB., Trans.]. Continuum.
38.
DenhardtR. B. (1981). Toward a critical theory of public organization. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 628–635.
39.
DryzekJ. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge University Press.
40.
EvansK. G. (2000). Imagining anticipatory government. In MorcolG.DennardL. F. (Eds.), New sciences for public administration and policy: Connections and reflections (pp. 195–220). Chatelaine Press.
41.
EvansK. G.WamsleyG. L. (1999). Where’s the institution? Neoinstitutionalism and public management. In FredericksonG. H.JohnstonJ. M. (Eds.), Public management reform and innovation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 117–144). University of Alabama Press.
42.
FarmerD. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. University of Alabama Press.
43.
FarmerD. J. (2002). Introduction. Administration & Society, 34, 87–90.
44.
FarmerD. J. (2005). To kill the king: Post-traditional governance and bureaucracy. M.E. Sharpe.
45.
FarmerD. J. (2010). Public administration in perspective: Theory and practice through multiple lenses. M.E. Sharpe.
46.
FischerF. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
47.
FollettM. P. (1924). Creative experience. Longmans, Green.
48.
ForesterJ. (1989). Planning in the face of power. University of California Press. (Reprint, 1988)
49.
ForesterJ. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.
50.
FoxC. J.MillerH. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. SAGE.
51.
FungA. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton University Press.
52.
GausJ. M. (1947). Reflections on public administration. University of Alabama Press.
53.
GodwinW. (1842). Enquiry concerning political justice and its influence on morals and happiness, 2 vols. (Vol. 1). J. Watson.
54.
GrahamD. W. (2002). Heraclitus and Parmenides. In CastonV.GrahamD. W. (Eds.), Presocratic philosophy: Essays in honour of Alexander Mourelatos (pp. 27–44). Ashgate.
55.
GrahamD. W. (2008). Heraclitus. In ZaltaE. N. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.
56.
GriffinD. R. (2007). Whitehead’s radically different postmodern philosophy: An argument for its contemporary relevance. State University of New York Press.
57.
HarmonM. M.McSwiteO. C. (2011). Whenever two or more are gathered: Relationship as the heart of ethical discourse. University of Alabama Press.
58.
HäyryM. (2012). Passive obedience and Berkely’s moral philosophy. Berkeley Studies, 23, 3–14.
59.
HeideggerM. (1992). Parmenides [SchuwerA.RojcewiczR., Trans.]. Indiana University Press.
60.
HeidelbergR. L. (2018). Getting it right: Public administration undergoing epistemology. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(1), 23–42.
61.
HendriksF. (2010). Vital democracy: A theory of democracy in action. Oxford University Press.
62.
HessM.AdamsD. (2002). Knowing and skilling in contemporary public administration. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(4), 68–79.
63.
HoweL. E. (2006). Enchantment, weak ontologies, and administrative ethics. Administration & Society, 38(4), 422–446.
64.
HummelR. P. (1998). Practice illuminating theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(2), 150–158.
65.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419–436.
66.
JunJ. S. (Ed.). (2002). Rethinking administrative theory: The challenge of the new century. Praeger Publishers.
67.
KampenJ. K.TamásP. (2014). Should I take this seriously? A simple checklist for calling bullshit on policy supporting research. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9830-8
68.
KeastR. L.MandellM. P.BrownK. A.WoolcockG. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371.
69.
KeatingA. (2013). Transformation now! Toward a post-oppositional politics of change. University of Illinois Press.
70.
KellyR. M. (1998). An inclusive democratic polity, representative bureaucracies, and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 201–208.
71.
KickertW. J. M. (1993). Autopoiesis and the science of (public) administration: Essence, sense and nonsense. Organization Studies, 14(2), 261–278.
72.
KingC. S.FelteyK. M.SuselB. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317–326.
73.
KingC. S.StiversC., & Collaborators. (Eds.). (1998). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era. SAGE.
74.
KingC. S.ZanettiL. A. (2005). Transformational public service: Portraits of theory in practice. M.E. Sharpe.
75.
KirlinJ. J. (1996). The big questions of public administration in a democracy. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 416–423.
76.
LoveJ. M. (2008). The rugged individualist club. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(4), 424–449.
77.
MacIntyreA. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?University of Notre Dame Press.
78.
McSwiteO. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. SAGE.
79.
MingusM. S. (2000). Relational holism and the possibility of quantum administration: Farfetched ideas or an ascendant worldview? In MorcolG.DennardL. F. (Eds.), New sciences for public administration and policy: Connections and reflections (pp. 243–263). Chatelaine Press.
80.
Morstein MarxF. (1946). The lawyer’s role in public administration. The Yale Law Journal, 55(3), 498–526.
81.
MurrayN. (2000). In search of truth: Eastern metaphysics, quantum science and public administration philosophy. In MorcolG.DennardL. F. (Eds.), New sciences for public administration and policy: Connections and reflections (pp. 221–242). Chatelaine Press.
82.
NabatchiT.LeighningerM. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Jossey-Bass.
83.
NicholL. (2004). Foreword. In BohmD. (Ed.), On dialogue (pp. XV–XX). Routledge.
84.
OstromV. (1989). The intellectual crisis in American public administration (2nd ed.). University of Alabama Press. (Original work published 1973)
85.
OstromV. (1997). The meaning of democracy and the vulnerabilities of democracies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. University of Michigan Press.
86.
PalmerJ. (2008). Parmenides. In ZaltaE. N. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.
87.
PeschU. (2008). The publicness of public administration. Administration & Society, 40, 170–193.
88.
Plato. (2004). Republic [ReeveC. D. C., Trans.]. Hacket Publishing.
89.
ProzorovS. (2014a). Ontology and world politics: Void universalism I: Vol. 1, interventions [JennyE.Vaughan-WilliamsN., Eds.] (2 vols.). Routledge.
90.
ProzorovS. (2014b). Theory of the political subject: Void universalism II: Vol. 1, interventions [JennyE.Vaughan-WilliamsN., Eds.] (2 vols.). Routledge.
91.
PulitanoE. (2003). Toward a Native American critical theory. University of Nebraska Press.
92.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2011). The future of the study of public administration: Embedding research object and methodology in epistemology and ontology. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 916–924.
93.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2015). Government: A public administration perspective. Routledge.
94.
RiccucciN. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Georgetown University Press.
95.
RosenauP. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton University Press.
96.
SchmidtM. R. (1993). Grout: Alternative forms of knowledge and why they are ignored. Public Administration Review, 53(6), 525–530.
97.
SchmittC. (1985). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty [SchwabG., Trans.]. MIT Press.
98.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
99.
SharpE. B. (1980). Toward a new understanding of urban services and citizen participation: The coproduction concept. Midwest Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 105–118.
100.
SimonH. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Macmillan.
101.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197–237.
102.
SouzaV. B.NetoL. M. (2019). A typology of coproduction: Emphasizing shared power. In StoutM. (Ed.), From austerity to abundance? Creative approaches to coordinating the common good (pp. 117–140). Emerald Group.
103.
SpicerM. W. (2004). Public administration, the history of ideas, and the reinventing government movement. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 353–362.
104.
StiversC. (2002). Toward administrative public space: Hannah Arendt meets the municipal housekeepers. Administration & Society, 34, 98–102.
105.
StiversC. (2008). Governance in dark times: Practical philosophy for public service. Georgetown University Press.
106.
StoutM. (2009). Enhancing professional socialization through the metaphor of tradition. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(3), 289–316.
107.
StoutM. (2010a). Back to the future: Toward a political economy of love and abundance. Administration & Society, 42(1), 3–37.
108.
StoutM. (2010b). Reclaiming the (lost) art of ideal-typing in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(4), 491–519.
StoutM. (2012a). Competing ontologies: A primer for public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 388–398.
111.
StoutM. (2012b). Toward a relational language of process. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(3), 407–432.
112.
StoutM. (2013). Logics of legitimacy: Three traditions of public administration praxis. CRC Press.
113.
StoutM.LoveJ. M. (2015a). Integrative process: Follettian thinking from ontology to administration. Process Century Press.
114.
StoutM.LoveJ. M. (2015b). Relational process ontology: A grounding for global governance. Administration & Society, 47(4), 447–481.
115.
StoutM.LoveJ. M. (2019). Integrative governance: Generating sustainable responses to global crises. Routledge.
116.
StoutM.StatonC. (2011). The ontology of process philosophy in Follett’s administrative theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(2), 268–292.
117.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
118.
ThayerF. C. (1981). An end to hierarchy and competition: Administration in the post-affluent world (2nd ed.). New Viewpoints. (Original work published 1973)
119.
TønderL.ThomassenL. (Eds.). (2005). Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack. Manchester University Press.
120.
VandenbusscheL.EdelenbosJ.EshuisJ. (2020). Plunging into the process: Methodological reflections on a process-oriented study of stakeholders’ relating dynamics. Critical Policy Studies, 14, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2018.1488596
121.
VigodaE. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.
122.
WaldoD. (1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration (2nd ed.). Holmes & Meier Publishers. (Original work published 1948)
123.
WamsleyG. L. (1996). A public philosophy and ontological disclosure as the basis for normatively grounded theorizing in public administration. In WamsleyG. L.WolfJ. F. (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration: Modern paradoxes and postmodern challenges (pp. 351–401). SAGE.
124.
WatanabeT. (2009). Eastern epistemology and the psychology of the subjective self. In TeoT.StennerP.RutherfordA.ParkE. (Eds.), Varieties of theoretical psychology: International theoretical and practical concerns (pp. 92–102). Captus University Publications.
125.
WeberM. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. Free Press.
126.
WeberM. (1994). Ideal-type constructs. In HeydebrandW. (Ed.), Sociological writings: Max Weber (pp. 262–276). Continuum.
127.
WhetsellT. A. (2013). Theory-pluralism in public administration: Epistemology, legitimacy, and method. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), 602–618.
128.
WhitakerG. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 240–246.
129.
WhiteJ. D. (1999). Taking language seriously: The narrative foundations of public administration research. Georgetown University Press.
130.
WhiteS. K. (2000). Sustaining affirmation: The strengths of weak ontology in political theory. Princeton University Press.
131.
WidderN. (2005). Two routes from hegel. In TønderL.ThomassenL. (Eds.), Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 32–49). Manchester University Press.
132.
ZanettiL. A. (1997). Advancing praxis: Connecting critical theory with practice in public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 27, 145–167.
