The Role of Interorganizational Competition in Motivating Street-Level Bureaucrats to Adopt Policy Entrepreneurship Strategies: The Case of Israeli Rabbis in Government Hospitals
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2021
The Role of Interorganizational Competition in Motivating Street-Level Bureaucrats to Adopt Policy Entrepreneurship Strategies: The Case of Israeli Rabbis in Government Hospitals
What is the role of interorganizational competition in motivating street-level bureaucrats to adopt policy entrepreneurship strategies? What are their main goals in adopting such strategies? We argue that in the wake of New Public Management, interorganizational competition encourages street-level bureaucrats to adopt policy entrepreneurship strategies. We further suggest that three competition-oriented elements motivate entrepreneurial initiatives at the street level: (a) personal, (b) organizational (interorganizational and intraorganizational), and (c) cultural demographic. In addition, we argue that the goal of street-level bureaucrats as policy entrepreneurs is to influence public policy results for their own benefit. They do so because they and their organizations are rewarded financially as their clients’ satisfaction with the services provided increases. Using in-depth interviews, online questionnaires, and textual analysis, we test these claims by analyzing the case of Israeli rabbis in government hospitals. We demonstrate how their goal in entrepreneurship is mainly to attract patients to their organization.
AndrewsR.Van de WalleS. (2013). New public management and citizens’ perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness. Public Management Review, 15(5), 762–783.
2.
ArnoldG. (2015). Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17(3), 307–327.
3.
BabbieE. R. (2009). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Wadsworth.
4.
BalboniM. J. (2015). Everyday religion in hospitals. Society, 52(5), 413–417.
5.
BallS. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.
6.
Barak-ErezD. (2008). Law and religion under the status quo model: Between past compromises and constant change. Cardozo Law Review, 30, 2495–2507.
7.
BarnettT.BassK.BrownG. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1161–1174.
8.
BergenA.WhileA. (2005). “Implementation deficit” and “street-level bureaucracy”: Policy, practice and change in the development of community nursing issues. Health & Social Care in the Community, 13(1), 1–10.
9.
BogdanovaE.BindmanE. (2016). NGOs, policy entrepreneurship and child protection in Russia: Pitfalls and prospects for civil society. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 24(2), 143–171.
10.
Brammli-GreenbergS.WaitzbergR.PermanV.GamzuR. (2016). Why and how did Israel adopt activity-based hospital payment? The Procedure-Related Group incremental reform. Health Policy, 120(10), 1171–1176.
11.
BriskinA. (1998). The stirring of soul in the workplace. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
12.
BrodkinE. Z. (1990). Implementation as policy politics. In PalumboD. J.CalistaD. J. (Eds.), Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box (pp. 107–118). Greenwood Press.
13.
BrodkinE. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 2), i253–i277.
14.
BrouwerS.HuitemaD. (2018). Policy entrepreneurs and strategies for change. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1259–1272.
15.
BrubakerR. (2012). Religion and nationalism: Four approaches. Nations and Nationalism, 18(1), 2–20.
16.
BrynerG. C. (1987). Bureaucratic discretion. Pergamon Press.
17.
BuurmanM.DurR. (2012). Incentives and the sorting of altruistic agents into street-level bureaucracies. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1318–1345.
18.
ChibnallJ. T.BrooksC. A. (2001). Religion in the clinic: The role of physician beliefs. Southern Medical Journal, 94(4), 374–379.
CohenN. (2016). Forgoing new public management and adopting post-new public management principles: The on-going civil service reform in Israel. Public Administration and Development, 36(1), 20–34.
22.
CohenN. (2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175–187.
23.
CohenN.BenishA.Shamriz-IlouzA. (2016). When the clients can choose: Dilemmas of street-level workers in choice-based social services. Social Service Review, 90(4), 620–646.
24.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE.
25.
DanaL. P. (2009). Religion as an explanatory variable for entrepreneurship. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10(2), 87–99.
26.
DanaL. P. (Ed.). (2010). Entrepreneurship and religion. Edward Elgar Publishing.
27.
DayanN.BidermanA. (2014). Cultural competence in health services: Legislation and policy in the USA, Australia, England and Israel: A comparative view. Promoting Health in Israel, 5, 35–43. (In Hebrew)
28.
DeStefanoJ.Schuh MooreA. M. (2010). The roles of non-state providers in ten complementary education programmes. Development in Practice, 20(4–5), 511–526.
29.
DillerM. (2000). The revolution in welfare administration: Rules, discretion, and entrepreneurial government. New York University Law Review, 75(5), 1120–1121.
30.
Don-YehiyaE. (1999). Religion and political accommodation in Israel. Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies.
31.
Du GayP. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. SAGE.
32.
DuroseC. (2007). Beyond “street level bureaucrats”: Re-interpreting the role of front line public sector workers. Critical Policy Analysis, 1(2), 217–234.
33.
ElroyI.SchusterM.ElmakiasI. (2016). The cultural competence of general hospitals in Israel. The Smokler Center for Health Policy Research.
34.
EvansT. (2010). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386.
35.
EvansT.HarrisJ. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.
36.
GaedeB. M.GaedeB. (2016). Doctors as street-level bureaucrats in a rural hospital in South Africa. Rural Remote Health, 16, 1–9.
37.
GassnerD.GofenA. (2018). Street-level management: A clientele-agent perspective on implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 551–568.
38.
GiladS.Alon-BarkatS. (2018). Enhancing democracy via bureaucracy: Senior managers’ social identities and motivation for policy change. Governance, 31(2), 359–380.
39.
GilbertN.GilbertB. (1989). The enabling state: Modern welfare capitalism in America. Oxford University Press.
40.
Gilliat-RayS. (2011). “Being there” the experience of shadowing a British Muslim Hospital chaplain. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 469–486.
41.
GofenA. (2013). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493.
42.
Golan-NadirN.CohenN. (2017). The role of individual agents in promoting peace processes: Business people and policy entrepreneurship in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Policy Studies, 38(1), 21–38.
43.
HabermasJ. (2005). Religion in the public sphere. Philosophia Africana, 8(2), 99–109.
44.
HewisonA. (1999). The new public management and the new nursing: Related by rhetoric? Some reflections on the policy process and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(6), 1377–1384.
45.
HillM.HupeP. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. SAGE.
46.
HirschmanC. (2004). The role of religion in the origins and adaptation of immigrant groups in the United States. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1206–1233.
47.
HupeP.HillM. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299.
IzadiM.HoseinpourfardM.AyoubianA.KarbasiM.JahangiriM.JalaliA. (2013). A survey to the implementation of Islamic standards in the hospitals of Iran for attraction of Muslim medical tourists. International Journal of Travel Medicine and Global Health, 1(2), 99–102.
50.
JordanS. R. (2014). The innovation imperative: An analysis of the ethics of the imperative to innovate in public sector service delivery. Public Management Review, 16(1), 67–89.
51.
KacperczykA. (2013). Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organization Science, 24(3), 664–683.
52.
KingS. M. (2007). Religion, spirituality, and the workplace: Challenges for public administration. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 103–114.
53.
KingdonJ. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). HarperCollins.
54.
KirkwoodN. A. (1993). Hospital handbook on multiculturalism & religion. Church Publishing.
55.
KoenigH. G.KoenigH. G. (2008). Medicine, religion, and health: Where science and spirituality meet. Templeton Foundation Press.
56.
KondrackiN. L.WellmanN. S.AmundsonD. R. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224–230.
57.
KuratkoD. F.MontagnoR. V.HornsbyJ. S. (1990). Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 49–58.
58.
LaveeE.CohenN. (2019). How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: The case of urban renewal. Governance, 32(3), 475–492.
59.
Le GrandJ. (1991). Quasi-markets and social policy. Economic Journal, 101, 1256–1267.
60.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation. (Original work published 1980)
61.
MattisonD.JayaratneS.CroxtonT. (2000). Social workers’ religiosity and its impact on religious practice behaviors. Advances in Social Work, 1(1), 43–59.
62.
MayP. J.WinterS. C. (2007). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476.
63.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358.
64.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
65.
Maynard-MoodyS.PortilloS. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy theory. In DurantR. F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252–277). Oxford University Press.
66.
McDonaldA.PostleK.DawsonC. (2008). Barriers to retaining and using professional knowledge in local authority social work practice with adults in the UK. British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1370–1387.
67.
McLaughlinM. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178.
NautaM.KokalyM. (2001). Assessing role model influences on students’ academic and vocational decisions. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(1), 81–99.
76.
NavotD.CohenN. (2015). How policy entrepreneurs reduce corruption in Israel. Governance, 28(1), 61–76.
77.
OliverM.WoywodtA.AhmedA.SaifI. (2010). Organ donation, transplantation and religion. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 26(2), 437–444.
78.
PetcheyR.WilliamsJ.CarterY. H. (2008). From street-level bureaucrats to street-level policy entrepreneurs? Central policy and local action in lottery-funded community cancer care. Social Policy & Administration, 42(1), 59–76.
79.
PollittC.BouckaertG. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
80.
QuartierT. (2010). Deathbed rituals: Roles of spiritual caregivers in Dutch hospitals. Mortality, 15(2), 107–121.
81.
RhodesT. L. (2003). When the spirit moves you: Administration, law, and spirituality in the workplace. In GiacaloneR. A.JurkiewiczC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 378–389). M.E. Sharpe.
82.
RiccucciN. M. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Georgetown University Press.
83.
RobinsonO. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41.
84.
RoseN. (1992). Governing the enterprising self. In MorrisP.HeelasP. (Eds.), The values of the enterprise culture: The moral debate (pp. 141–164). Routledge.
85.
SandfortJ. R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756.
86.
ScharffC. (2016). The psychic life of neoliberalism: Mapping the contours of entrepreneurial subjectivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 107–122.
TaylorI. (2007). Discretion and control in education: The teacher as street-level bureaucrat. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(4), 555–572.
90.
TeskeP.SchneiderM. (1994). The bureaucratic entrepreneur: The case of city managers. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 331–340.
91.
ThomannE. (2015). Customizing Europe: Transposition as bottom-up implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1368–1387.
92.
TummersL.BekkersV. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
93.
Vigoda-GadotE.MizrahiS. (2008). Public sector management and the democratic ethos: A 5-year study of key relationships in Israel. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 79–107.
94.
WaitzbergR.MerkurS. (2017). Policy efforts to strengthen public hospitals in Israel. Eurohealth, 23(4), 34–38.
95.
WellerR. P. (Ed.). (2004). Civil life, globalization and political change in Asia: Organizing between family and state (Vol. 10). Routledge.
96.
WickhamP. A. (1997). Developing a mission for an entrepreneurial venture. Management Decision, 35(5), 373–381.
97.
WilsonG. K. (1985). Business and politics: A comparative introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
98.
WyrwichM.StuetzerM.SternbergR. (2016). Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: A tale of two regions. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 467–492.
99.
YanaiN. (1996). The citizen as pioneer: Ben-Gurion’s concept of citizenship. Israel Studies, 1(1), 127–143.
100.
ZhangY. (2000). Using the internet for survey research: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(1), 57–68.
