This essay discusses how scholarship on state politics and policy, intergovernmental relations, and federalism provides necessary context for understanding governmental responses to COVID-19. It also highlights how observing those responses can further push the bounds of existing scholarship and theory regarding policy innovation and cooperative and conflictual federalism. It argues that there is a space for mutual learning and sharing between scholars and practitioners.
BallaS. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29(3), 221–245.
4.
BentonJ. E. (2013). Local government collaboration: Considerations, issues, and prospects. State & Local Government Review, 45(4), 220–223.
5.
BentonJ. E. (2018). Intergovernmental relations in the earlier twenty-first century: Lingering images of further phases and emergence of a new phase. In StenbergC. W.HamiltonD. K. (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations in transition: Reflections and directions (pp. 15–36). Routledge.
6.
BerryW. D.BaybeckB. (2005). Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 505–519.
7.
BowlingC. J.PickerillJ. M. (2013). Fragmented federalism: The state of American federalism 2012–13. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43(3), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt022
8.
BowmanA. O. M. (2004). Horizontal federalism: Exploring interstate interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh035
9.
BowmanA. O. M. (2017). The state-local government(s) conundrum: Power and design. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1086/693475
10.
BowmanA. O. M.KearneyR. C. (2007). The resurgent states in the intergovernmental system: Cooperation and conflict. In StephensG. R.WikstromN. (Eds.), American intergovernmental relations: A fragmented federal polity (pp. 159–187). Oxford University Press.
11.
BowmanA. O. M.WoodsN. D. (2007). Strength in numbers: Why states join interstate compacts. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700401
12.
BowmanA. O. M.WoodsN. D. (2010). Expanding the scope of conflict: Interest groups and interstate compacts. Social Science Quarterly, 91(3), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00713.x
BurkeB. F.BrudneyJ. L. (2018). Why we fight. In StenbergC. W.HamiltonD. K. (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 58–74). Routledge.
17.
CuomoA. (2020a). Amid lack of federal direction, governor Cuomo, governor Murphy and governor Lamont announce regional approach to combatting COVID-19. Office of the Governor.
18.
CuomoA. (2020b). Pennsylvania joins New York, New Jersey and Connecticut’s regional coalition to combat COVID-19. Office of the Governor.
19.
DesmaraisB. A.HardenJ. J.BoehmkeF. J. (2015). Persistent policy pathways: Inferring diffusion networks in the American states. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 392–406.
20.
EinsteinK. L.GlickD. M.PalmerM. (2019). City learning: Evidence of policy information diffusion from a survey of U.S. mayors. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918785060
FowlerL.WittS. L. (2019). State preemption of local authority: Explaining patterns of state adoption of preemption measures. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(3), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz011
25.
GoodmanC. B. (2019). State legislative ideology & the preemption of city ordinances: The case of worker rights laws. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2mnws
26.
GoodmanC. B.HatchM. E.McDonaldB. D.III. (2020). State preemption of local laws: Origins and modern trends. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/u2f4x
HillJ. S.WeissertC. S. (1995). Implementation and the irony of delegation: The politics of low-level radioactive waste disposal. The Journal of Politics, 57(2), 344–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960310
KapucuN.AugustinM.-E.GarayevV. (2009). Interstate partnerships in emergency management: Emergency management assistance compact in response to catastrophic disasters. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 297–313.
36.
KarchA. (2007). Democratic laboratories: Policy diffusion among the American states. University of Michigan Press.
37.
KarchA.Nicholson-CrottyS. C.WoodsN. D.BowmanA. O. M. (2016). Policy diffusion and the pro-innovation bias. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 83–95.
38.
KarchA.RoseS. (2019). Responsive states: Federalism and American public policy. Cambridge University Press.
39.
KettlD. F. (2020). The divided states of America: Why federalism doesn’t work. Princeton University Press.
40.
KincaidJ. (2008). Three faces of contemporary American federalism. In MorganI. W.DaviesP. J. (Eds.), The federal nation: Perspectives on American federalism (pp. 63–81). Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
KincaidJ. (2014). Early state history and constitutions. In Haider-MarkelD. P. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of state and local government (pp. 239–270). Oxford University Press.
42.
KincaidJ. (2018). Why coercion and cooperation coexist in American federalism. In StenbergC. W.HamiltonD. K. (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 35–57). Routledge.
43.
KleimanN. (2020). Remaking federalism. The Kresge Foundation.
LindgrenE.AnderssonY.SukJ. E.SudreB.SemenzaJ. C. (2012). Monitoring EU emerging infectious disease risk due to climate change. Science, 336(6080), 418–419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215735
MallinsonD. J. (2020). Diffusion quarantine: The use of state preemption to prevent the spread of innovations. In HansonR. L.ZeemeringE. S. (Eds.), Cooperation and conflict between state and local government. Rowman & Littlefield.
48.
MallinsonD. J.HannahA. L. (2020). Policy and political learning: The development of medical marijuana policies in the states. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 50, 344–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaa006
Nicholson-CrottyS. C.WoodsN. D.BowmanA. O. M.KarchA. (2014). Policy innovativeness and interstate compacts. Policy Studies Journal, 42(2), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12060
53.
PachecoJ. (2012). The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion on the diffusion of antismoking legislation across the American states. Journal of Politics, 74(1), 187–202.
PerlmanB. J.ScicchitanoM.ZhangY. (2018). Putting the “R” back in IGR: The great recession and intergovernmental “relationships.” In StenbergC. W.HamiltonD. K. (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 92–112). Routledge.
Riverstone-NewellL. (2017). The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx037
58.
RoseS.BowlingC. J. (2015). The state of American federalism 2014–15: Pathways to policy in an era of party polarization. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 45(3), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjv028
59.
ScharffE. A. (2018). Hyper preemption: A reordering of the state-local relationship?Georgetown Law Journal, 106(4), 1469–1522.
WoodsN. D.BowmanA. O. M. (2011). Blurring borders: The effect of federal activism on interstate cooperation. American Politics Research, 39(5), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x10397923
66.
WoodsN. D.BowmanA. O. M. (2018). Collective action and the evolution of intergovernmental cooperation. Policy Studies Journal, 46(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12241