Diffusion models explore the reasons policies transfer across governments. In this study, we focus on U.S. state level efforts in affordable housing. Drawing predominately from policy diffusion literature, our research examines the determinants of the creation of state Housing Trust Funds (HTFs). We utilize event history analysis with logit regressions and survival modeling to examine how problem severity, neighbor adoption, economic standing, elected leadership, housing investment, and demographics predict state HTF adoption. Results indicate that both problem severity and elected leadership predict the adoption of HTFs. This work improves our understanding of state policy diffusion and efforts in housing affordability.
AbelDennis. 2019. The Diffusion of Climate Policies among German Municipalities. Journal of Public Policy, 41 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000199
2.
AdamsBrian E. 2020. Decentralization and Policy Experimentation in Education: The Consequences of Enhancing Local Autonomy in California. Publius: The Journal of Federalism50 (1): 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz006
3.
AllardScott W.DanzigerSheldon. 2000. Welfare Magnets: Myth or Reality?Journal of Politics62: 350–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00016
4.
AllenMahally DPettusCarrieHaider-MarkelDonald P. 2004. Making the National Local: Specifying the Conditions for National Government Influence on State Policymaking. State Politics and Policy Quarterly4 (3): 318–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000400400304.
5.
AmmannJohn J. 1999. Affordable Housing: New Opportunities and Challenges for Housing Trust Funds. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law8 (3): 198–205. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25782395.
6.
AtkinsonMary Layton. 2020. Gender and Policy Agendas in the Post-war House. Policy Studies Journal48 (1): 133–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12237
7.
BasoloVictoria. 1999. Passing the Housing Policy Baton in the US: Will Cities Take the Lead?Housing Studies14 (4): 433–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039982713
8.
BasoloVictoriaScallyCorianne P.. 2008. State Innovations in Affordable Housing Policy: Lessons From California and New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate19 (4): 741–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2008.9521654
9.
BaybeckBradyBerryWilliam D.SiegelDavid A.. 2011. A Strategic Theory of Policy Diffusion via Intergovernmental Competition. The Journal of Politics73 (1): 232–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000988
10.
BeerCarolineCruz-AcevesVictor D.. 2018. Extending Rights to Marginalized Minorities: Same-sex Relationship Recognition in Mexico and the United States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly18 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440017751421
11.
BerryFrances Stokes. 1994. Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review 54 (4): 322–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/977379
12.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.. 1990. State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. American Political Science Review84 (2): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526
13.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.. 2014. Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research. In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by SabatierPaul A.Christopher M. Weible, 253–297. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
BerryWilliam D.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 2003. Reassessing the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in State Welfare Policy. Journal of Politics65 (2): 327–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00003
15.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991759
16.
BirdsallChris. 2019. Policy Adoption, Innovation, and Performance Management: The Case of Performance-Funding Policies in State Postsecondary Education. State and Local Government Review51 (1): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X19861425
17.
BoehmkeFrederick J.SkinnerPaul. 2012. State Policy Innovativeness Revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (3): 303–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440012438890
18.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesB. S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
BrattRachel G.StoneMichael E.HartmanChester W.. 2006. A Right to Housing: Foundation for A new Social Agenda. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
BrooksMary E. 1992. Housing Trust Funds: What Makes Them Work. Shelterforce63: 6–9.
21.
BrooksMary E. 1995. Housing Trust Funds: Seeking Security in Housing Finance. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law5 (1): 55–62.
22.
BrooksMary E. 2007. Housing Trust Fund Progress Report 2007. Frazier Park, CA: Housing Trust Fund Project.
23.
BurgardSarah A.SeefeldtKristin S.ZelnerSarah. 2012. Housing Instability and Health: Findings From the Michigan Recession and Recovery Study. Social Science & Medicine75: 221–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.020
24.
CarrollSusan. 2002. Representing Women: Congresswomen’s Perceptions of Their Representational Roles. In Women Transforming Congress, edited by RosenthalCindy Simon, 50–68. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
25.
Center for Community Change. 2016. The 2016 Housing Trust Fund Survey Report. Washington, DC: Center for Community Change. www.housingtrustfundproject.org
26.
ChettyRajHendrenNathanielKatzLawrence F.. 2016. The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence From the Moving to Opportunity Experiment. American Economic Review106 (4): 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572
27.
CollingwoodLorenEl-KhatibStephen OmarGonzalez O'BrienBenjamin. 2019. Sustained Organizational Influence: American Legislative Exchange Council and the Diffusion of Anti-Sanctuary Policy. Policy Studies Journal47 (3): 735–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12284
28.
ConnerlyCharles E. 1990. Housing Trust Funds: New Resources for Low-Income Housing. Journal of Housing47 (2): 96–104.
29.
ConnerlyCharles E. 1993. A Survey and Assessment of Housing Trust Funds in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association59 (3): 306–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975882
30.
Cruz-AcevesVictor D.MallinsonDaniel J.. 2019. Clarifying the Measurement of Relative Ideology in Policy Diffusion Research. State and Local Government Review51 (3): 179–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X20902818
31.
FayDaniel L. 2018. Moves and Countermoves: Countermovement Diffusion of State Constitutional Amendments. Policy Studies Journal46 (2): 354–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12214
32.
FiglioDavid N.KoplinVan W.ReidWilliam E.. 1999. Do States Play Welfare Games?Journal of Urban Economics46: 437–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2131
33.
FischerW.SardB.. 2017. Chart Book: Federal Housing Spending is Poorly Matched to Need. Tilt Toward Well-off Homeowners Leaves Struggling Low-Income Renters Without Help. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
34.
FlinkCarla M.MolinaAngel Luis Jr. 2017. Politics or Professionalism? Budgeting for Bilingual Education. Urban Affairs Review53 (6): 1064–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416652732
35.
FrankoWilliam W.WitkoChristopher. 2017. The New Economic Populism: How States Respond to Economic Inequality. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
FunkKendall D.PhilipsAndrew Q.. 2019. Representative Budgeting: Women Mayors and the Composition of Spending in Local Governments. Political Research Quarterly72 (1): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918775237
37.
GoetzEdward G. 1993. Shelter Burden: Local Politics and Progressive Housing Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
38.
GoetzEdward G. 1995. Potential Effects of Federal Policy Devolution on Local Expenditures. The State of American Federalism25 (3): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038214
39.
GrahamE. R.ShipanC. R.VoldenC.. 2013. The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science. British Journal of Political Science43 (3): 673–701. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000415
40.
GrayVirginia. 1973. Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study. American Political Science Review67: 1174–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956539
41.
HannahA. LeeMallinsonDaniel J.. 2018. Defiant Innovation: The Adoption of Medical Marijuana Laws in the American States. Policy Studies Journal46 (2): 402–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12211
42.
HeggelundGørildStensdalIselinDuanMaoshengWettestadJørgen. 2019. China’s Development of ETS as A GHG Mitigating Policy Tool: A Case of Policy Diffusion or Domestic Drivers?Review of Policy Research36 (2): 168–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12328
43.
HerbertChristopherHermannAlexanderMcCueDaniel. 2018. Measuring Housing Affordability: Assessing the 30 Percent of Income Standard. Cambridge, MA: Joint Cent for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
44.
HollanderRobynPatapanHaig. 2017. Morality Policy and Federalism: Innovation, Diffusion and Limits. Publius: The Journal of Federalism47 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw027
45.
HolmanMirya R. 2014. Sex and the City: Female Leaders and Spending on Social Welfare Programs in US Municipalities. Journal of Urban Affairs36 (4): 701–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12066
46.
Housing Trust Fund Project. 2021. State Housing Trust Fund Revenues 2021. Portland, OR: Housing Trust Fund Project, Community Change.
47.
HoymanMicheleWeinbergMicah. 2006. The Process of Policy Innovation: Prison Sittings in Rural North Carolina. Policy Studies Journal34 (1): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00147.x
48.
JohnsTracy L. 2015. Managing A Policy Experiment: Adopting and Implementing Recreational Marijuana Policies in Colorado. State and Local Government Review47 (3): 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X15612149
49.
Joint Center for Housing Studies. 2018. The State of the Nation’s Housing 2018. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
50.
Joint Center for Housing Studies. 2019. The State of the Nation’s Housing 2019. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
51.
Joint Center for Housing Studies. 2020. America’s Rental Housing 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
52.
KarchAndrewNicholson-CrottySean C.WoodsNeal D.O’M BowmanAnn. 2016. Policy Diffusion and the Pro-Innovation Bias. Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915622289
53.
KarchAndrewRosenthalAaron. 2016. Vertical Diffusion and the Shifting Politics of Electronic Commerce. State Politics and Policy Quarterly16 (1): 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015593811
54.
KeightleyMark P. 2017. An introduction to the low-Income Housing tax Credit. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
55.
KleitRachel GarshickPageStephen B. 2008. Public Housing Authorities Under Devolution. Journal of the American Planning Association74 (1): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360701825924
56.
KrenjovaJelizavetaRaudlaRinga. 2017. Policy Diffusion at the Local Level: Participatory Budgeting in Estonia. Urban Affairs Review54 (2): 419–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416688961
57.
KrueckebergDonald A. 1999. The Grapes of Rent: A History of Renting in A Country of Owners. Housing Policy Debate10 (1): 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1999.9521325
58.
LaddEverett CarllHadleyCharles D.. 1975. Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coalitions From the New Deal to the 1970s. New York, New York: WW Norton.
59.
LandisJohn D.McClureKirk. 2010. Rethinking Federal Housing Policy. Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 319–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2010.484793
60.
LarsenKristin. 2004. Florida’s Housing Trust Fund – Addressing the State’s Affordable Housing Needs. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law19 (2): 525–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42842853.
61.
LarsenKristin. 2007. Housing Opportunities in Florida: The State Housing Trust Fund. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law23 (1): 161–76.
62.
LarsenKristin. 2009. Reassessing State Housing Trust Funds: Results of A Florida Survey. Housing Studies24 (2): 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802705136
63.
LowiTheodore J. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics16 (4): 677–715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452
64.
MacDonaldJason A.O’BrienErin. 2011. Quasi-experimental Design, and Advancing Women’s Interests: Reexamining the Influence of Gender on Substantive Representation. Political Research Quarterly64: 472–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909354703
65.
MallinsonDaniel J. 2021. Who Are Your Neighbors? The Role of Ideology and Decline of Geographic Proximity in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations. Policy Studies Journal 49 (1): 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12351
66.
MartinIsaac. 2001. Dawn of the Living Wage: The Diffusion of A Redistributive Municipal Policy. Urban Affairs Review36 (4): 470–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122184966
67.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.. 1993. American Apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
McCabeBrian J. 2018. Costly, Regressive, and Ineffective: How Sensitive is Public Support for the Mortgage Interest Deduction in the United States. Housing Policy Debate28 (6): 963–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1494025
69.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH.. 2003. Political polarization and income inequality. Available at SSRN 1154098. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154098
70.
McLendonMichael K.HearnJames C.DeatonRuss. 2006. Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis28 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737028001001
71.
MedoffMarshall H.DennisChristopher. 2011. TRAP Abortion Laws and Partisan Political Party Control of State Government. American Journal of Economics and Sociology70 (4): 951–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00794.x
72.
MeseguerCovadonga. 2004. What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy24 (3): 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X04000182
73.
MillerChad R.RichardBrian. 2010. The Policy Diffusion of the State R&D Investment Tax Credit. State and Local Government Review42 (1): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X10364748
74.
MintromMichael. 1997. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation. American Journal of Political Science41: 738–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111674
75.
MuellerElizabeth J.SchwartzAlex. 2008. Reversing the Tide: Will State and Local Governments House the Poor as Federal Direct Subsidies Decline?Journal of the American Planning Association74 (1): 122–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360701813300
76.
National Low Income Housing Coalition. 2020. The GAP. A Shortage of Affordable Homes. Washington, DC: Author.
77.
Nicholson-CrottySeanCarleySanya. 2018. Information Exchange and Policy Adoption Decisions in the Context of us State Energy Policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly18 (2): 122–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440018759466
78.
OatesWallace E. 1968. The Theory of Public Finance in a Federal System. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique1 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/133460
79.
OrlebekeCharles J. 2000. The Evolution of Low-Income Housing Policy, 1949 to 1999. Housing Policy Debate11 (2): 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521375
80.
OsbornTracy L.MendezJeanette Morehouse. 2010. Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy31: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770903501384
81.
PachecoJulianna. 2012. The Social Contagion Model: Exploring the Role of Public Opinion on the Diffusion of Antismoking Legislation Across the American States. The Journal of Politics74 (1): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001241
82.
PachecoJulianna. 2017. Free-riders or Competitive Races? Strategic Interaction Across the American States on Tobacco Policy Making. State Politics & Policy Quarterly17 (3): 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440017705150
83.
PetersonPaul E. 1995. Who Should Do What? Divided Responsibility in the Federal System. The Brookings Review13 (2): 6. https://doi.org/10.2307/20080549
84.
PetersonPaul E.RomMark C.. 2010. Welfare Magnets: A New Case for A National Standard. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
85.
The Regional Economic Consulting (REC) Group. 2021. An Economic Analysis of the Florida Housing Programs. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Association of Local Housing Finance Authorities.
86.
RothsteinRichard. 2017. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
87.
ScallyCorianne P. 2009. State Housing Finance Agencies Forty Years Later: Major or Minor Players in Affordable Housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research29: 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X09348614
88.
ScallyCorianne P. 2012. The Past and Future of Housing Policy Innovation: The Case of us State Housing Trust Funds. Housing Studies27 (1): 127–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.631988
89.
SchneiderAnneIngramHelenDeleonPeter. 2014. Democratic Policy Design: Social Construction of Target Populations. In Theories of the Policy Process, 105–150. New York: Routledge.
90.
SchwartzAlex F. 2014. Chapter 9: State and Local Housing Policy and the Nonprofit Sector. In Housing Policy in the United States, 265–310. New York: Routledge.
91.
SeljanEllen C.WellerNicholas. 2011. Diffusion in Direct Democracy: The Effect of Political Information on Proposals for Tax and Expenditure Limits in the US States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (3): 348–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440011413087
92.
ShipanCharles RVoldenCraig. 2008. The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
93.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2012. Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners. Public Administration Review72 (6): 788–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02610.x
94.
ShipanCharles R.VoldenCraig. 2014. When the Smoke Clears: Expertise, Learning and Policy Diffusion. Journal of Public Policy34 (3): 357–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X14000142
95.
SmithKelly B. 2020. Learning Without Widespread Policy Adoption: Early Childhood Education in the American States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism50 (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz008
96.
SteinerBenjaminMakariosMatthew D.TravisLawrence F.III. 2015. Examining the Effects of Residential Situations and Residential Mobility on Offender Recidivism. Crime & Delinquency61: 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128711399409
97.
StoneMichael E. 2006. What is Housing Affordability? The Case for the Residual Income Approach. Housing Policy Debate17 (1): 151–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2006.9521564
98.
StonecashJeffrey. 2018. Class and Party in American Politics. New York, New York: Routledge.
99.
SwanstromTodd. 1988. Urban Populism, Uneven Development, and the Space for Reform. In Business Elites and Urban Development: Case Studies and Critical Perspectives, edited by CummingsS., 121–52. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
100.
VoldenCraig. 2006. States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00185.x
101.
WalkerJack L. 1969. The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States. American Political Science Review63 (3): 880–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954434
102.
WalterRebecca J.ColburnGreggYerenaAnaidPedersonMelonyFyallRachelCrowderKyle. (2020). Constraints and Opportunities for Innovation in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program. Housing and Society47 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2019.1706067
103.
WeaverR. Kent. 2020. Policy Dynamics in Federal Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Publius: The Journal of Federalism50 (2): 157–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaa003
104.
YiHongtaoBerryFrances StokesChenWenna. 2018. Management Innovation and Policy Diffusion Through Leadership Transfer Networks: An Agent Network Diffusion Model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory28 (4): 457–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy031
