What Makes an Organization Public? Managers’ Perceptions in the Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment System

Abstract

The question “What makes an organization public?” is a leading point of scholarly inquiry in the field of public administration. This study supplements existing theory on publicness by further exploring the primary influences on an organization’s publicness—influences identified by analyzing data from in-depth interviews with senior-level managers of mental health and substance abuse treatment facilities. Results from a grounded theoretical analysis of these managers’ perceptions provide support for a conceptual framework of organizational publicness in which political authority, horizontal engagement, and public engagement are associated with higher levels of publicness. Better understanding of the prism through which senior managers conceptualize publicness may enhance managerial awareness of the most salient structural and institutional mechanisms that empower treatment facilities to effectively support individuals suffering from mental health disorders such as substance abuse, emotional distress, and depression.

Keywords

public administration public management organization theory publicness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agranoff

(2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Agranoff

McGuire

(2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 295-326.

Allison

G. T.

(1980). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In Shafritz

J. M.

Hyde

A. C.

(Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 510-529). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Antonsen

Jørgensen

T. B.

(1997). The “publicness” of public organizations. Public Administration, 75, 337-357.

Beitin

B. K.

(2012). Interview and sampling. In Gubrium

J. F.

Holstein

J. A.

Marvasti

A. B.

McKinney

K. D.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 243-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bingham

L. B.

Nabatchi

O’Leary

(2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547-558.

Bingham

L. B.

O’Leary

(2006). Conclusion: Parallel play, not collaboration: Missing questions, missing connections. Public Administration Review, 66, 161-167.

Bovaird

(2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846-860.

Boyne

G. A.

(2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97-122.

10.

Boyne

G. A.

Walker

R. M.

(2010). Strategic management and public service performance: The way ahead. Public Administration Review, 70, s185-s192.

11.

Bozeman

(1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Bozeman

(2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

13.

Bozeman

(2013). What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: Publicness theory as a case-in-point. Organization Studies, 34, 169-188.

14.

Bozeman

Bretschneider

(1994). The “publicness puzzle” in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 197-224.

15.

Bozeman

Moulton

(2011). Integrative publicness: A framework for public management strategy and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i363-i380.

16.

Bradstreet

(2006). Harnessing the “lived experience”: Formalising peer support approaches to promote recovery. Mental Health Review Journal, 11, 33-37.

17.

Brudney

J. L.

England

R. E.

(1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43, 59-65.

18.

Bryson

J. M.

(2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.

19.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Bloomberg

(2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74, 445-456.

20.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.

21.

Byrne

Happell

Welch

Moxham

L. J.

(2013). Things you can’t learn from books: Teaching recovery from a lived experience perspective. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 22, 195-204.

22.

Caldwell

N. D.

Roehrich

J. K.

George

(2017). Social value creation and relational coordination in public-private collaborations. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 906-928.

23.

Clarkson

K. W.

(1972). Some implications of property rights in hospital management. The Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 363-384.

24.

Cooper

T. L.

Bryer

T. A.

Meek

J. W.

(2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66, 76-88.

25.

Creswell

J. W.

(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five tradition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

26.

Dahl

R. A.

Lindblom

C. E.

(1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

27.

Denhardt

R. B.

Denhardt

J. V.

(2002). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549-559.

28.

De Vries

Bekkers

Tummers

. (2015). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146-166.

29.

Emerson

K. T.

Nabatchi

Balogh

(2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1-29.

30.

Feeney

M. K.

Welch

E. W.

(2012). Realized publicness at public and private research universities. Public Administration Review, 72, 272-284.

31.

Friedmann

P. D.

Alexander

J. A.

D’Aunno

T. A.

(1999). Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16, 71-80.

32.

Fung

(2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66-75.

33.

Fyall

(2016). The power of nonprofits: Mechanisms for nonprofit policy influence. Public Administration Review, 76, 938-948.

34.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

35.

Guo

Saxton

G. D.

(2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 1, 1-25.

36.

Guo

Neshkova

M. I.

(2013). Citizen input in the budget process: When does it matter most?. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 331-346.

37.

Hedegaard

Chen

L.-H.

Warner

(2015). Drug-poisoning deaths involving heroin: United States, 2000–2013 (NCHS Data Brief No. 190). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

38.

Heinrich

C. J.

Fournier

(2004). Dimensions of publicness and performance in substance abuse treatment organizations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 49-70.

39.

Hill

C. J.

Lynn

L. E.

(2005). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 173-195.

40.

Hood

James

Scott

(2000). Regulation of government: Has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished? Public Administration, 78, 283-304.

41.

Kettl

D. F.

(2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66, 10-19.

42.

Kettl

D. F.

(2008). The next government of the United States: Why our institutions fail us and how to fix them. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

43.

Leighninger

(2014). What we’re talking about when we talk about the “civic field” (and why we should clarify what we mean). Journal of Public Deliberation, 10(1), Article 8.

44.

Lynn

L. E.

Heinrich

C. J.

Hill

C. J.

(2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 233-262.

45.

Maynard-Moody

S. W.

Musheno

M. C.

(2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

46.

Meijer

Schillemans

(2009). Fictional citizens and real effects: Accountability to citizens in competitive and monopolistic markets. Public Administration and Management, 14, 254-291.

47.

Merritt

C. C.

Cordell

Farnworth

M. D.

(2018). Less is more? Publicness, management strategy, and organizational performance in mental health treatment facilities. Public Administration Quarterly, 42, 3-31.

48.

Merritt

C. C.

Farnworth

M. D.

(2018). Antecedents to managing publicness: A study of professional and cultural socialization. In Stazyk

E. C.

Frederickson

H. G.

(Eds.), The handbook of American public administration (pp. 244-258). London, England: Edward Elgar.

49.

Miller

S. M.

Moulton

(2014). Publicness in policy environments: A multilevel analysis of substance abuse treatment services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 553-589.

50.

Milward

H. B.

Provan

K. G.

(2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-380.

51.

Moulton

(2009). Putting together the publicness puzzle: A framework for realized publicness. Public Administration Review, 69, 889-900.

52.

Moulton

(2010). Integrating the public in public administration: Envisioning the scholarly field in 2020. Public Administration Review, 70(S1), S317.

53.

Moulton

(2012). The authority to do good: Publicly responsible behavior among private mortgage lenders. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 430-439.

54.

Moulton

Feeney

M. K.

(2010). Public service in the private sector: Private loan originator participation in a public mortgage program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 547-572.

55.

Nabatchi

(2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72, 699-708.

56.

Nabatchi

Amsler

L. B.

(2014). Direct public engagement in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 44, 63S-88S.

57.

Nelissen

Bemelmans-Videc

M.-L.

Godfroij

deGoede

(1999). Renewing government. Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Books.

58.

North

D. C.

(1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Nutt

P. C.

Backoff

R. W.

(1993). Organizational publicness and its implications for strategic management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 209-231.

60.

O’Toole

L. J.

Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45-45.

61.

Perry

J. L.

Rainey

H. G.

(1988). The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13, 182-201.

62.

Rainey

H. G.

(2014). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

63.

Rainey

H. G.

Backoff

R. W.

Levine

C. H.

(1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233-244.

64.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

65.

Romzek

B. S.

LeRoux

Blackmar

J. M.

(2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442-453.

66.

Romzek

LeRoux

Johnston

Kempf

R. J.

Piatak

J. S.

(2013). Informal accountability in multisector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813-842.

67.

Salamon

L. M.

(1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16, 29-49.

68.

Sandfort

J. R.

(2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729-756.

69.

Scott

W. R.

(2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

70.

Sowa

J. E.

(2015). Considering the public in public management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 584-588. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv011

71.

Stark

(2010). The distinction between public, nonprofit, and for-profit: Revisiting the “core legal” approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 3-26.

72.

Stinchcombe

A. L.

(1997). On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1-18.

73.

Stivers

(1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54, 364-369.

74.

Strauss

A. L.

(1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

75.

Strolovitch

D. Z.

(2006). Do interest groups represent the disadvantaged? Advocacy at the intersections of race, class, and gender. Journal of Politics, 68, 894-910.

76.

Suddaby

(2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.

77.

Teodoro

M. P.

Hughes

A. G.

(2012). Socializer or signal? How agency accreditation affects organizational culture. Public Administration Review, 72, 583-591.

78.

Thomas

S. P.

Pollio

H. R.

(2002). Listening to patients: A phenomenological approach tonursing research and practice. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

79.

Thomas

J. C.

(2013). Citizen, customer, partner: Rethinking the place of the public in public management. Public Administration Review, 73, 786-796.

80.

Van der Wal

De Graaf

Lasthuizen

. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public administration, 86(2), 465-482.

81.

Walker

R. M.

Bozeman

(2011). Publicness and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i279-i281.

82.

Wamsley

G. L.

Zald

M. N.

(1973). The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 33, 62-73.

83.

Weeks

E. C.

(2000). The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials. Public Administration Review, 60, 360-372.

84.

Wheeler

G. F.

Brady

F. N.

(1998). Do public-sector and private-sector personnel have different ethical dispositions? A study of two sites. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 93-115.

85.

Wheeler

J. R. C.

Nahra

T. A.

(2000). Private and public ownership in outpatient substance abuse treatment: Do we have a two-tiered system? Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 27, 197-209.

86.

Wildavsky

(1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review, 81, 3-21.

87.

Wittmer

Coursey

(1996). Ethical work climates: Comparing top managers in public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 559-572.