In the United States, despite record levels of public infrastructure spending, evidence on rising traffic congestion and deteriorating infrastructure condition raises questions about the efficiency of government infrastructure spending. This research aims at empirically assessing and explaining the relative efficiency in producing public highway infrastructure outcomes among American states. To achieve this purpose, a semiparametric analysis—the two-stage double bootstrap data envelopment analysis method—is applied to examine how highway infrastructure efficiency scores can be estimated and explained by a number of exogenous variables among 47 American states from 1995 to 2009. This study finds that there is a large efficiency variation among states in terms of producing quality highway infrastructure services. Furthermore, interstate competition, jurisdiction size, fiscal capacity, and political and fiscal institutions are the key factors influencing the efficiency performance of state highway infrastructure systems.
AfonsoA.SchuknechtL.TanziV. (2005). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123, 321-347.
2.
AfonsoA.SchuknechtL.TanziV. (2010). Public sector efficiency: Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. Applied Economics, 42, 2147-2164.
3.
AltJ. E.LowryR. C. (1994). Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review, 88, 811-828.
AndrewsR.EntwistleT. (2014). Public service efficiency: Reframing the debate. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
6.
Balaguer-CollM. T.PriorD. (2009). Short-and long-term evaluation of efficiency and quality. An application to Spanish municipalities. Applied Economics, 41, 2991-3002.
7.
BartleJ. R.ChenC. (2014). Future issues in state transportation finance. In RubinM. M.WilloughbyK. G. (Eds.), Sustaining the states: The fiscal viability of American state governments (pp. 211-234). New York, NY: CRC Press.
8.
BorgeL.FalchT.TovmoP. (2008). Public sector efficiency: The roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity, and democratic participation. Public Choice, 136, 475-495.
9.
BradfordD. F.MaltR. A.OatesW. E. (1969). The rising cost of local public services: Some evidence and reflections. National Tax Journal, 22(2), 185-202.
10.
BretonA.WintrobeR. (1975). The equilibrium size of a budget-maximizing bureau: A note on Niskanen’s theory of bureaucracy. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 195-207.
11.
BruceD.CarrollD. A.DeskinsJ. A.RorkJ. C. (2007). Road to ruin? A spatial analysis of state highway spending. Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(4), 66-85.
12.
CaseA. C.RosenH. S.HinesJ. R. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52, 285-307.
13.
ChanK. S.MestelmanS. (1988). Institutions, efficiency and the strategic behavior of sponsors and bureaus. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 91-102.
14.
CharnesA.CooperW. W.RhodesE. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
15.
ChenC. (2014). Measuring state highway sustainability: Taking the fiscal dimension into account. Public Works Management & Policy, 19, 255-276.
16.
ChenC. (2016). Effects of fiscal stress on state highway infrastructure finance: A composite index approach. Municipal Finance Journal, 37(2), 1-28.
17.
ChenC. (2017). Does money matter for infrastructure outcomes? The effects of public infrastructure finance on state infrastructure quality. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 29, 375-408.
18.
ChenC.KrizK. A.WangQ. (2016). How does the health of transportation infrastructure affect state credit ratings? An empirical analysis. Public Finance Review, 44, 660-680.
19.
DaraioC.SimarL. (2007). Advanced Robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: Methodology and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science.
20.
De BorgerB.KerstensK. (1996). Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Regional Science & Urban Economics, 26, 145-170.
21.
De BorgerB.KerstensK.MoesenW.VannesteJ. (1994). Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice, 80, 339-358.
22.
DellerS. C.HalsteadJ. M. (1994). Efficiency in the production of rural road services: The case of New England towns. Land Economics, 70, 247-259.
23.
DuncombeW.MinerJ.RuggieroJ. (1997). Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency. Public Choice, 93, 1-18.
24.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. (1997). Why is it so hard to help central city schools?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 85-113.
25.
EbdonC.FranklinA. L. (2004). Searching for a role for citizens in the budget process. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(1), 32-49.
26.
EgilmezG.McAvoyD. (2013). Benchmarking road safety of US states: A DEA-based Malmquist productivity index approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53, 55-64.
27.
EomT. H.RubensteinR. (2006). Do state-funded property tax exemptions increase local government inefficiency? An analysis of New York State’s STAR program. Public Budgeting & Finance, 26(1), 66-87.
28.
EomT. H.LeeS. H. (2014). A longitudinal analysis of impacts of court-mandated education finance reform on school district efficiency. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(1), 1-49.
29.
FalchT. (2001). Collective bargaining in the public sector and the role of budget determination. European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 75-99.
30.
GeysB.HeinemannF.KalbA. (2010). Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 265-278.
31.
GrayV. (1976). Models of comparative state politics: A comparison of cross-sectional and time series analyses. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 235-256.
32.
GrosskopfS.HayesK. J.TaylorL. L.WeberW. L. (2001). On the determinants of school district efficiency: Competition and monitoring. Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 453-478.
33.
GrossmanP. J.MavrosP.WassmerR. W. (1999). Public sector technical inefficiency in large U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 278-299.
34.
HaugP. (2008). Effects of democratic control on the efficiency of local public enterprises: Empirical evidence for water suppliers in eastern Germany. Public Finance and Management, 8, 1-19.
35.
HayesK. J.RazzoliniL.RossL. B. (1998). Bureaucratic choice and non-optimal provision of public goods: Theory and evidence. Public Choice, 94, 1-20.
36.
HeckmanA. C. (2015). The search for better government performance: Understanding the impact of management quality and resources on transportation infrastructure outcomes in the American states. Public Management Review, 17, 187-208.
37.
HemmeterJ. A. (2006). Estimating public library efficiency using stochastic frontiers. Public Finance Review, 34, 328-348.
38.
KalbA. (2010). Public sector efficiency: Applications to local governments in Germany. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science.
39.
KenyonD. A. (1991). Competition among states and local governments: Efficiency and equity in American federalism. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
40.
LeibensteinH. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. “X-efficiency.”American Economic Review, 56, 392-415.
41.
LeibensteinH. (1978). On the basic proposition of X-efficiency theory. American Economic Review, 68, 328-332.
42.
LindlbauerI.WinterV.SchreyöggJ. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of corporatization: An empirical analysis of German public hospitals. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 309-326.
43.
LinnaM. (1998). Measuring hospital cost efficiency with panel data models. Health Economics, 7, 415-427.
44.
LiuC.MikesellJ. L. (2014). The impact of public officials’ corruption on the size and allocation of U.S. state spending. Public Administration Review, 74, 346-359.
45.
MacmanusS. A. (2004). “Bricks and mortar” politics: How infrastructure decisions defeat incumbents. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(1), 96-112.
46.
MiguéJ.BelangerG.NiskanenW. A. (1974). Toward a general theory of managerial discretion. Public Choice, 17, 24-43.
47.
MoeneK. O. (1986). Types of bureaucratic interaction. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 333-345.
48.
MuellerD. C. (1989). Public choice II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
NeshkovaM. I.GuoH. (2013). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 267-288.
50.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine–Atherton.
51.
NiskanenW. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 617-643.
52.
O’ConnellL.YusufJ. E. (2011). An information model to present proposals to increase taxes: Two examples in the context of American values. International Journal of Public Administration, 34, 180-189.
53.
OstromE. (1972). Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53, 474-493.
54.
PangM. S.TaftiA.KrishnanM. S. (2014). Information technology and administrative efficiency in U.S. state governments: A stochastic frontier approach. MIS Quarterly, 38, 1079-1101.
55.
Pérez-LópezG.PriorD.Zafra-GómezJ. L. (2015). Rethinking new public management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 1157-1183.
56.
PoterbaJ. M. (1994). State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 799-821.
57.
RuggieroJ.DuncombeW.MinerJ. (1995). On the measurement and causes of technical inefficiency in local public services: With an application to public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 403-428.
58.
SimarL.WilsonP. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometric, 136, 31-64.
59.
SmithD. L.HouY. (2013). Balanced budget requirements and state spending: A long–panel study. Public Budgeting & Finance, 33, 1-18.
60.
StallmannJ. I. (2007). Impacts of tax & expenditure limits on local governments: Lessons from Colorado and Missouri. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 37(1), 62-65.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2010). 2008 Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2008cpr/
63.
WinstonC. (2013). On the performance of the U.S. transportation system: Caution ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 773-824.
64.
WinstonC.LangerA. (2006). The effect of government highway spending on road users’ congestion costs. Journal of Urban Economics, 60, 463-483.
65.
WitkoC.NewmarkA. J. (2009). The strange disappearance of investment in human and physical capital in the United States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 215-232.
66.
WyckoffP. G. (1990). Bureaucracy, inefficiency, and time. Public Choice, 67, 169-179.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
