Various studies have analyzed the relationship between fiscal stress and contracting out, but have failed to achieve conclusive results. In this article, we take a broad view of fiscal stress, addressed in terms of financial condition and studied over a lengthy period (2000-2010). The relationship between fiscal stress and contracting out is studied using a dynamic model, based on survival analysis, a methodology that enables us to take into account the effect of time on this relationship. As this study period includes the years of the Great Recession (2008-2010), we also highlight the impact of this event on the fiscal stress–contracting out relation. The results obtained suggest that taking into account the passage of time and conducting a long-term assessment of financial condition enable a more precise understanding of this relation. We also find that the Great Recession reduced the probability of local governments’ contracting out public services.
Abad-GonzálezJ.Gutiérrez-LópezC. (2016). Modelización de la solvencia bancaria en escenarios adversos: Aplicación a los «PIIGS». Revista de Contabilidad, 19, 227-238. doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2015.11.002
2.
AlchianA. A. (1967). Pricing and society. London, England: Institute of Economic Affairs.
3.
AnsellC.BoinA.KellerA. (2010). Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18, 195-207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00620.x
4.
Balaguer-CollM. T.Brun-MartosM. I.ForteA.Tortosa-AusinaE. (2015). Local governments’ re-election and its determinants: New evidence based on a Bayesian approach. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 94-108. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.04.004
5.
BastidaF.BenitoB.GuillamónM. D. (2009). An empirical assessment of the municipal financial situation in Spain. International Public Management Journal, 12, 484-499. doi:10.1080/10967490903328139
6.
BelG. (2006). Economía y política de la privatización local [Economics and politics of local privatization].Madrid, España: Marcial Pons.
7.
BelG.FagedaX. (2006). Between privatization and intermunicipal cooperation: Small municipalities, scale economies and transaction costs. Urban Public Economics Review, 6, 13-31.
8.
BelG.FagedaX. (2007). Why do local governments privatize public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33, 517-534. doi:10.1080/03003930701417528
9.
BelG.FagedaX. (2008). Reforming the local public sector: Economics and politics in privatization of water and solid waste. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 11, 45-65. doi:10.1080/17487870802134884
10.
BelG.FagedaX. (2010). Partial privatisation in local services delivery: An empirical analysis of the choice of mixed firms. Local Government Studies, 36, 129-149. doi:10.1080/03003930903435856
11.
BelG.FagedaX. (2011). Big guys eat big cakes: Firm size and contracting in urban and rural areas. International Public Management Journal, 14, 4-26. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.547746
12.
BelG.FagedaX.WarnerM. E. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 553-577. doi:10.1002/pam.20509
13.
BerneR.SchrammR. (1986). The financial analysis of government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
BoyneG. A. (1998). Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in U.S. local government. Public Administration Review, 58, 474-484. doi:10.2307/977575
15.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 441-468. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug030
16.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 28, 326-351.
17.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66, 323-331. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x
18.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2008). Changing modes of service delivery: How past choices structure future choices. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 127-143. doi:10.1068/c0633
19.
CabezaI. (2009). Reflexiones sobre la crisis económica y el papel de la auditoria pública. Auditoría Pública, 47, 27-45.
20.
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. (1997). Indicators of government financial condition. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
21.
CarboniJ. (2015). Ex post contract market structure: Implications for performance over time. American Review of Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0275074015608753
22.
CarrJ. B.LeRouxK.ShresthaM. (2009). Institutional ties, transaction costs, and external service production. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 403-427. doi:10.1177/1078087408323939
23.
ChristoffersenH.Bo LarsenK. (2007). Economies of scale in Danish municipalities: Expenditure effects versus quality effects. Local Government Studies, 33, 77-95.
24.
DiefenbachT. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark side of managerialistic “enlightenment.”Public Administration, 87, 892-909. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x
25.
DijkgraafE.GradusR. H. J. M.MelenbergB. (2003). Contracting out refuse collection. Empirical Economics, 28, 553-570. doi:10.1007/s001810200145
26.
DiNapoliT. P. (2013). Fiscal stress drivers and coping strategies. Albany, New York: Office of the New York State Comptroller, Division of Local Government and School Accountability.
27.
DubinJ.NavarroP. (1988). How markets for impure public goods organize: The case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 4, 217-241.
28.
EarleJ. S. (2006). Employment and wage effects of privatization: Evidence from transition economies. Employment Research, 13, 3-6. doi:10.17848/1075-8445.13(1)-2
29.
EasterlyW.RebeloS. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 417-458. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(93)90025-B
30.
EvansG.HeathA.LalljeeM. (1996). Measuring left-right and libartarian-authoritarian values in the British electorate. British Journal of Sociology, 93-112.
31.
FerrisJ. M. (1986). The decision to contract out: An empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 289-311. doi:10.1177/004208168602200206
32.
FerrisJ. M.GraddyE. (1986). Contracting out: For what? With whom?Public Administration Review, 46, 332-344. doi:10.2307/976307
33.
FerrisJ. M.GraddyE. (1991). Production costs, transaction costs, and local government contractor choice. Economic Inquiry, 29, 541-554. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb00845.x
34.
FunkhouserM. (2012). Outsourcing and the critical need for access to capital. Public Administration Review, 72, 900-901. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02655.x
35.
GómezJ.PoloY.FuentelsazL. (2004). Aplicaciones del análisis de supervivencia a la investigación en economía de la empresa. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 19, 81-114
36.
González-GómezF.GuardiolaJ. (2009). A duration model for the estimation of the contracting-out of urban water management in southern Spain. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 886-906. doi:10.1177/1078087408329274
37.
González-RamírezR.GascóJ. L.TavernerJ. (2011). Relaciones entre outsourcing y estrategia en los ayuntamientos españoles. Auditoría pública: revista de los Organos Autónomos de Control Externo, 53, 33-46.
38.
GrahamS. E.WillettJ. B.SingerJ. D. (2012). Using discrete-time survival analysis to study event occurrence. In NewsomJ.JonesR. N.HoferS. M. (Ed.), Longitudinal data analysis: A practical guide for researchers in aging, health, and social sciences (pp. 329-371). New York, NY: Routledge
39.
GreenbergJ.HillierD. (1995). Indicators of financial condition for governments. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research, Paris-Amy.
40.
GrovesS. M.GodseyW. M. (2003). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook of local government. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
41.
GuardiolaJ.González-GómezF.García-RubioM. A. (2010). Is time really important for research into contracting out public services in cities? Evidence for urban water management in southern Spain. Cities, 27, 369-376. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2010.05.004
42.
HatchM. J.CunliffeA. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
HebdonR.JaletteP. (2008). The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada–United States comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 144-158.
44.
HefetzA.WarnerM. E. (2007). Beyond the market versus planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in US cities. Local Government Studies, 33, 555-572. doi:10.1080/03003930701417585
45.
HendrickR. M. (2011). Managing the fiscal metropolis: The financial policies, practices, and health of suburban municipalities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
46.
HonadleB. W. (2003). The States’ role in U.S. local government fiscal crises: A theoretical model and results of a national survey. International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 1431-1472. doi:10.1081/PAD-120024405
47.
HoodC. (1991). A public management for all seasons?Public Administration, 69, 3-19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
48.
HoodC. (1995). The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 93-110. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
49.
International City/County Management Association. (1989). Service delivery in the 90s: Alternative approaches for local governments. Washington, DC: Author.
50.
International City/County Management Association. (2003). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook for local government (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
51.
JamesE. H.WootenL. P. (2010). Leading under pressure: From surviving to thriving before, during, and after a crisis. New York, NY: Routledge.
JohnsonN.OliffP.WilliamsE. (2011). An update on State budget cuts: At least 46 States have imposed cuts that hurt vulnerable residents and the economy (Report). Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1214
54.
JordanM.M.YanW.HooshmandS. (2015). The role of State revenue structure in the occurrence and magnitude of negative revenue variance. American Review of Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0275074015608265
55.
KodrzyckiY. K. (1998). Fiscal pressures and the privatization of local services. New England Economic Review, 39-50.
56.
LaughlinR. C.PallotJ. (1998). Trends, patterns and influencing factors: Some reflections. In OlsonO.GuthrieJ.HumphreyC. (Eds.), Global warning: Debating international developments in new public financial management (pp. 376-399). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
57.
LevinJ.TadelisS. (2005). Profit sharing and the role of professional partnerships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 131-171. doi:10.1162/0033553053327506
58.
LevinJ.TadelisS. (2010). Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from U.S. cities. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58, 507-541. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x
59.
LevittB.MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
60.
López-HernándezA. M.Zafra-GómezJ. L.Ortíz-RodríguezD. (2012). Effects of the crisis in Spanish municipalities financial condition: an empirical evidence (2005-2008). International Journal of Critical Accounting, 4, 631-645. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCA.2012.051457
61.
LungováM. (2010). Estimated impacts of economic crisis on local municipalities: Comparison within Europe.
62.
MáñezJ. A.Pérez-LópezG.PriorD.Zafra-GómezJ. L. (2016). Understanding the dynamic effect of contracting out on the delivery of local public. Services, Regional Studies, 50, 2069-2080. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1090561
63.
MáñezJ. A.RochinaM. E.SanchisJ. A. (2008). Using survival models with individual data. In CongregadoE. (Ed.), Measuring entrepreneurship: Building a statistical system (pp. 227-246). New York, NY: Springer.
64.
MénardC.SaussierS. (2000). Contractual choice and performance the case of water supply in France. Revue d’économie industrielle, 92, 385-404. doi:10.3406/tiers.2001.1503
65.
MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (Ed.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199-215). Los Ángeles, CA: Beverly Hills.
66.
MirandaR. (1994). Explaining the privatization decision among local governments in the United States. Research in Urban Policy, 5, 231-274.
67.
MorganD. R.HirlingerM. W. (1991). Intergovernmental service contracts: A multivariate explanation. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 128-144. doi:10.1177/004208169102700107
MouritzenP. E.NielsenK. H. (1988). Handbook of comparative urban fiscal data. Odense, Denmark: Dansk Data Archives.
70.
NelsonA. A.BakuR. (2014). Local government responses to fiscal stress: Evidence from the public education sector. Public Administration Review, 74, 601-614. doi:10.1111/puar.12211
71.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton
72.
NogueiraS. P. S.JorgeS. M. F. (2016). Explanatory factors for the use of the financial report in decision-making: Evidence from Local Government in Portugal. Revista de Contabilidad, 19, 216-226. doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2015.09.002
73.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2000a). Competition in local services: Solid waste management. Paris, France: Author.
75.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2000b). Global trends in urban water supply and waste water financing and management: Changing roles for the public and private sectors. Paris, France: Author.
76.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Penguin.
77.
PallesenT. (2004). A political perspective on contracting out: The politics of good times experiences from Danish local governments. Governance, 17, 573-587. doi:10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00258.x
78.
PaulaisT. (2009). Local governments and the financial crisis: An analysis. Washington, D.C: EEUU, The Cities Alliance.
79.
Pérez-LópezG.Plata-DíazA. M.Zafra-GómezJ. L.López-HernándezA. M. (2013). Análisis de los factores determinantes y de las formas de gestión [Deuda viva municipal en un contexto de crisis económica]. Revista de contabilidad, 16, 83-93. doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2012.12.001
80.
Pérez-LópezG.PriorD.Zafra-GómezJ. L. (2015). Rethinking new public management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 1157-1183. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu088.
81.
Pérez-LópezG.PriorD.Zafra-GómezJ. L.Plata-DíazA. M. (2016). Cost efficiency in municipal solid waste service delivery. Alternative management forms in relation to local population size. European Journal of Operational Research, 255, 583-592. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.034
82.
Pérez-LópezG.PriorD.Zafra-GómezJ. L. (2017). Temporal scale Eficiency in DEA panel data estimations. An application to the solid waste disposal service in Spain, Omega. The International Journal of Management Sience, doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.03.005
83.
PetersB. G.PierreJ.Randma-LiivT. (2011). Global financial crisis, public administration and governance: Do new problems require new solutions?Public Organization Review, 11, 13-27. doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2012.12.001
84.
Plata-DíazA. M.Zafra-GómezJ. L.Pérez-LópezG.López-HernándezA. M. (2014). Alternative management structures for municipal waste collection services: the influence of economic and political factors. Waste Management, 34, 1967-1976. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.003
85.
PradhanJ. P.DasK. (2016). Regional profile of export duration of firms. In Manufacturing exports from Indian states: Determinants and policy imperatives, 107-129. Springer India.
86.
PrenticeR. L.GloecklerL. A. (1978). Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to the breast cancer data. Biometrics, 34, 57-67. doi:10.2307/2529588
87.
RodriguesM.TavaresA. F.AraujoJ. F. (2012). Municipal service delivery: The role of transaction cost in the choice between alternative governance mechanisms. Local Government Studies, 38, 615-638. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.666211
88.
RubinE. L. (2005). Images of organizations and consequences of regulation. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 6, 347-390. doi:10.2202/1565-3404.1110
89.
Ruiz-VillaverdeA.Picazo-TadeoA.González-GómezF. (2015). The “social choice” of privatising urban water services: A case study of Madrid in Spain. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37, 616-629. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.04.005
90.
SagerT. (2002). Democratic planning and social choice dilemmas: Prelude to institutional planning theory. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
91.
SavasE. (1987). Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
92.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 18, 155-195.
93.
SteytlerN.PowellD. (2010, September16-18). The impact of the global financial crisis on decentralized government in South Africa (Local Government Working Paper Series 1, November). Presented at the annual conference of the International Association of Centres for Federal Studies, Philadelphia, PA.
94.
TavaresA. F.CamöesP. J. (2007). Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies, 33, 535-553. doi:10.1080/03003930701417544
95.
Touche-Ross Company. (1987). Privatization in America. New York, NY: United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, County and City Data Book.
96.
United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG). (2009). The impact of the global crisis on local governments. Cavagraf, China: Author.
97.
VickersJ.YarrowG. K. (1991). Economic perspectives on privatization. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 111-132.
98.
WallsM.MacauleyM.AndersonS. (2005). Private markets, contracts, and government provision what explains the organization of local waste and recycling markets?Urban Affairs Review, 40, 590-613. doi:10.1177/1078087404273342
99.
WarnerM. E.BelG. (2008). Competition or monopoly? Comparing privatization of local public services in the US and Spain. Public Administration, 86, 723-735. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00700.x
100.
WilliamsonO. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
101.
Zafra-GómezJ. L.López-HernándezA.M.Hernández-BastidaA. (2009a). Evaluating financial performance in local government. Maximising the Benchmarking value. International Review of Admiinistrative Science, 75, 151-67. doi: 10.1177/0020852308099510.
102.
Zafra-GómezJ.L.López-HernándezA.M.Hernández-BastidaA. (2009b). Developing a model to measure financial condition in local government. Evaluating service quality and minimizing the effects of the socioeconomic environment: an applicationto Spanish municipalities. American Review of Public Administration, 39, 425-449. doi: 10.1177/0275074008320710.
103.
Zafra-GómezJ. L.López-HernándezA.M.Hernández-BastidaA. (2009c). Developing an alert system for local governments in financial crisis. Public Money & Management, 29, 175-181. doi: 10.1080/09540960902891731.
104.
Zafra-GómezJ. l.Pérez-MuñizM.A. (2010). Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: improve financial condiciton or reduce the quality of public services?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 609-629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/c09118
105.
Zafra-GómezJ. L.PedaguaL. E.Plata-DíazA. M.López-HernándezA. M. (2014). Do local authorities use NPM delivery forms to overcome problems of fiscal stress?Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 43, 21-46.
106.
Zafra-GómezJ. L.López-HernándezA. M.Plata-DíazA. M.Garrido-RodríguezJ. C. (2016a). Financial and political factors motivating the privatisation of municipal water services. Local Government Studies, 42, 287-308. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1096268
107.
Zafra-GómezJ. L.Plata-DíazA. M.Pérez-LópezG.López-HernándezA. M. (2016b). Privatisation of waste collection services in response to fiscal stress in times of crisis. Urban Studies, 53, 2134-2153. doi:10.1177/0042098015586697
108.
ZuckerL. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
109.
ZulloR. (2009). Does financial stress induce privatization? Correlates of private and intermunicipal contracting, 1992-2002. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, 22, 459-481. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01447.x
