Demands that exceed time and resources place pressure on public professionals, resulting in coping behavior. This study aims to provide insight in the prevalence and consequences of taking a more active strategy, professional coping. Next to traditional forms of coping studied in public administration, studying active coping can result in more insight in when and with what consequences frontline employees speak up and resist pressures. We explore to what degree teachers use speaking out using professional norms as a way to tackle the pressures they face. Moreover, we analyze the relationship between professional coping, work engagement, and intent to leave as important indicators of how immersed frontline employees are in their work. Using survey data (n = 1,270) from primary school teachers, we conclude that professional coping is in general regularly but not very often applied, but that professional coping is related to higher work engagement and lower intent to leave. We conclude that studying active coping strategies can not only be important for street-level literature in gaining insight in all types of behavior and their consequences but also for public service providers aiming for an engaged workforce.
AckroydS.KirkpatrickI.WalkerR. M. (2007). Public management reform in the UK and its consequences for professional organization: A comparative analysis. Public Administration, 85, 9-26.
2.
AspinwallL. G.TaylorS. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 417-436.
3.
AustinV.ShahS.MuncerS. (2005). Teacher stress and coping strategies used to reduce stress. Occupational Therapy International, 12, 63-80.
4.
BozemanD. P.PerrewéP. L. (2001). The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 161-173.
5.
BrandtstädterJ. (1992). Personal control over development: Implications of self-efficacy. In SchwarzerR. (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 127-145). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
6.
BrightL. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees?The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 149-166.
7.
BrodkinE. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 1253-1277.
8.
BrodkinE. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72, 940-949.
9.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London, UK: Routledge.
10.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
12.
DeVellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD. M.WilliamsonI. O.LambertL. S.ShippA. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802-827.
14.
EdwardsJ. R.CaplanR. D.Van HarrisonR. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28-67). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
EvansT. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 368-386.
16.
ExworthyM.HalfordS. (Eds.). (1999). Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219-239.
18.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
19.
Gonzalez-RomaV.SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.LloretS. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165-174.
20.
GreenglassE. R.FiksenbaumL. (2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being. European Psychologist, 14, 29-39.
21.
GreenglassE. R.SchwarzerR.TaubertS. (1999). The proactive coping inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. Retrieved from http://www.psych.yorku.ca/greenglass/
22.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
24.
HupeP.BuffatA. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16, 548-569.
25.
HupeP.HillM. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85, 279-299.
26.
HupeP.van der KrogtT. (2013). Professionals dealing with pressures. In NoordegraafM.SteijnB. (Eds.), Professionals under pressure (pp. 55-72). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
27.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
28.
KneyberR.EversJ. (2013). Het alternatief. Weg met de afrekencultuur in het onderwijs! (Translated as: “Flip the system: Changing education from the ground up”) Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom Uitgevers.
29.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
MaslachC.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
31.
MayP. J.WinterS. C. (2007). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 453-476.
32.
Maynard-MoodyS. W.MushenoM. C. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 329-358.
33.
Maynard-MoodyS. W.MushenoM. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the frontlines of public service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
34.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010-2013). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
35.
NoordegraafM. (2007). From “Pure” to “Hybrid” professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration & Society, 39, 761-785.
36.
NoordegraafM. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32, 1349-1371.
37.
NoordegraafM. (2015). Hybridity and beyond: (New) forms of professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organizations, 2, 187-206.
38.
NoordegraafM.SteijnB. (Eds.). (2013). Professionals under pressure. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
39.
OliverC. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
40.
RaykovT. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 223-232.
41.
ReuterT.SchwarzerR. (2009). Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In LockeE. A. (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 499-515), West-Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
SchaufeliW. B.GreenglassE. R. (2001). Introduction to special issue on burnout and health. Psychology & Health, 16, 501-510.
43.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.Gonzalez-RomaV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. The Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
44.
SchaufeliW. B.TarisT. W.Van RhenenW. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 173-203.
45.
SchottC.van KleefD.NoordegraafM. (2015). Confused Professionals? Capacities to cope with pressures on professional work. Public Administration Review, doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1016094
46.
SchwarzerR. (2000). Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In LockeE. A. (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 342-355). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
47.
SchwarzerR.KnollN. (2003). Positive coping: Mastering demands and searching for meaning. In LopezS. J.SnyderC. R. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 393-409), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
SchwarzerR.TaubertS. (2002). Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth: Proactive coping. In FydenbergE. (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges (pp. 19-35). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
SicilianoM. D. (2017). Professional networks and street-level performance: How public school teachers’ advice networks influence student performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 47, 79-101.
50.
SkinnerE. A.EdgeK.AltmanJ.SherwoodH. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216-269.
51.
ThomasR.DaviesA. (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26, 683-706.
52.
TummersL. G. (2011). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: A policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 555-581.
53.
TummersL. G.BekkersV. J. J. M.VinkE.MushenoM. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 1099-1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056
54.
TummersL. G.RoccoP. (2015). Serving clients when the server crashes: How frontline workers cope with e-government challenges. Public Administration Review, 75, 817-827.
55.
Van den BergD.ScheerenJ. (2015). Arbeidsmarktanalyse Primair Onderwijs 2015 (Labor market analysis primary education). CAOP Research & Europa. Retrieved from http://www.arbeidsmarktplatformpo.nl
