Given the complexity of their work, street-level bureaucrats rely on their professional networks to access implementation resources and information. Despite the acknowledged importance of these networks, little research exists on how network structure and composition influence frontline performance. This study analyzes a unique data set that includes the professional networks of more than 420 teachers in 21 public schools along with 3 years of administrative data on student test scores and student demographics. Using value-added models derived from the student test data, objective measures of teacher performance were calculated. The results suggest that street-level performance is influenced by both network structure and composition. Thus, the actions of street-level workers are not independent responses to individual dilemmas, but rather are developed and shaped by specific features of the social structure in which the individual bureaucrat is embedded.
AgranoffR. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
AndersenL. B.HeinesenE.PedersenL. H. (2014). How does public service motivation among teachers affect student performance in schools?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 651-671. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut082
4.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
AtteberryA.BrykA. S. (2010). Centrality, connection, and commitment: The role of social networks in a school-based literacy initiative. In DalyA. J. (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 51-76). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6.
BaldwinT. T.BedellM. D.JohnsonJ. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397.
7.
BalfourD. L.BartonW. (1996). Organizational commitment: Antecedents and outcomes in public organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 19, 256-277. doi:10.2307/3380574
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
10.
BlaseJ.BlaseJ. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
BorgattiS. P.FosterP. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991-1013.
12.
BrassD. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13(1), 39-79.
13.
BrassD. J.GalaskiewiczJ.GreveH. R.TsaiW. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795-817.
14.
BrassD. J.KrackhardtD. (1999). The social capital of twenty-first century leaders. In HuntJ. G.DodgeG. E.WongL. (Eds.), Out-of-the box leadership challenges for the 21st century army and other top performing organizations (pp. 179-194). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing .
15.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
16.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145-170. doi:10.3102/01623737023002145
20.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19, 476-509. doi:10.1177/0895904805276143
21.
CoburnC. E.ChoiL.MataW. (2010). I would go to her because her mind is math: Network formation in the context of a district-based mathematics reform. In DalyA. J. (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 33-50). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22.
CoburnC. E.RussellJ. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 203-235.
23.
CrossR.ParkerA. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
24.
CrossR.ParkerA.PrusakL.BorgattiS. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 100-120.
25.
CrossR.ParkerA.SassonL. (Eds.). (2003). Networks in the knowledge economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
CrossR.SingerJ.ColellaS.ThomasR. J.SilverstoneY. (2010). The organizational network fieldbook: Best practices, techniques, and exercises to drive organizational innovation and performance (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
DalyA. J. (2010). Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
28.
DalyA. J.FinniganK. S. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 39-79. doi:10.3102/0002831210368990
29.
DalyA. J.MoolenaarN. M.BolivarJ. M.BurkeP. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Education Administration, 48, 359-391.
30.
DixitA. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. The Journal of Human Resources, 37, 696-727. doi:10.2307/3069614
31.
FirestoneW. A.PennellJ. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63, 489-525. doi:10.3102/00346543063004489
32.
FoldyE. G.BuckleyT. R. (2010). Re-creating street-level practice: The role of routines, work groups, and team learning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 23-52. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun034
33.
FountainJ. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
FowlesJ.ButlerJ. S.CowenJ. M.StreamsM. E.TomaE. F. (2014). Public employee quality in a geographic context: A study of rural teachers. The American Review of Public Administration, 44, 503-521. doi:10.1177/0275074012474714
35.
FrankK. A.ZhaoY.BormanK. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148-171.
36.
FriedkinN. E.SlaterM. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139-157.
37.
GarmstonR. J.WellmanB. M. (1999). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
38.
GoddardY. L.GoddardR. D.Tschannen-MoranM. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109, 877-896.
39.
GofenA. (2014). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 473-493. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut037
40.
GoldsmithS.EggersW. D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
41.
GordonR.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2006). Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job (Hamilton Project Discussion Paper, April, 2006-01). Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
42.
GraberD. A. (2003). The power of communication: Managing information in public organizations. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
43.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
44.
HargreavesA. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London, England: Cassell.
45.
HarrisD. N. (2011). Value-added measures in education: What every educator needs to know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
46.
HeckR. H.LarsenT. J.MarcoulidesG. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125. doi:10.1177/0013161x90026002002
47.
HeymanJ.ArielyD. (2004). Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychological Science, 15, 787-793. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00757.x
48.
HillH. C. (2003). Understanding implementation: Street-level bureaucrats’ resources for reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 265-282. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug024
49.
HofmannD. A.LeiZ.GrantA. M. (2009). Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. American Psychological Association, 94, 1261-1274.
50.
HoxJ. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
HupeP.HillM. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85, 279-299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
52.
JacksonC. K.BruegmannE. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85-108. doi:10.1257/app.1.4.85
53.
JewellC. J.GlaserB. E. (2006). Toward a general analytic framework: Organizational settings, policy goals, and street-level behavior. Administration & Society, 38, 335-364. doi:10.1177/0095399706288581
54.
KadushinC. (2012). Understanding social networks: Concepts, theories, and findings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
KapucuN.HuQ.KhosaS. (2014). The state of network research in public administration. Administration & Society. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1177/0095399714555752
56.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
57.
KeiserL. R. (2010). Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ Decision making: Determining eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Administration Review, 70, 247-257. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02131.x
58.
KellowayE. K.BarlingJ. (2000). Knowledge work as organizational behavior. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 287-304. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00042
59.
KilduffM.KrackhardtD. (2008). Interpersonal networks in organizations: Cognition, personality, dynamics, and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
KilduffM.TsaiW. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London, England:Sage.
61.
KimS. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 245-261. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui013
62.
KimS.LeeH. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66, 370-385. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
63.
KohnA. (1986). No contest: The case against competition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
64.
KolibaC.MeekJ. W.ZiaA. (2011). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
65.
KrackhardtD.HansonJ. R. (1993, July). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104-111.
66.
LazegaE.MounierL.SnijdersT. A. B.TubaroP. (2012). Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: A case study. Social Networks, 34, 323-332.
67.
LeanaC. R.PilF. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17, 353-366.
68.
LeeJ.KimS. (2011). Exploring the role of social networks in affective organizational commitment: Network centrality, strength of ties, and structural holes. The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 205-223. doi:10.1177/0275074010373803
69.
LeeK.AllenN. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142.
70.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477-1490. doi:10.2307/30047959
71.
LevineA. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
72.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russel Sage.
73.
LortieD. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
MarksH. M.PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370-397. doi:10.1177/0013161x03253412
75.
MayP. J.WinterS. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 453-476. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum030
76.
Maynard-MoodyS. W.MushenoM. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
77.
MehraA.KilduffM.BrassD. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121-146.
78.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2001). Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 271-294.
79.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2003). Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review, 63, 689-699. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00332
80.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2005). Managerial networking: Issues of measurement and research design. Administration & Society, 37, 523-541.
81.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 429-456. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus057
82.
MeyerJ. P.PaunonenS. V.GellatlyI. R.GoffinR. D.JacksonD. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 152-156.
83.
MeyersM. K.GlaserB.DonaldK. M. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 1-22. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199824)17:1<1::AID-PAM1>3.0.CO;2-I
84.
MischenP. A.JacksonS. K. (2008). Connecting the dots: Applying complexity theory, knowledge management and social network analysis to policy implementation. Public Administration Quarterly, 32, 314-338. doi:10.2307/41288320
85.
MoolenaarN. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: Theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7-39.
86.
MoolenaarN. M.DalyA. J. (2012). Social networks in education: Exploring the social side of the reform equation. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 1-6. doi:10.1086/667762
87.
MoolenaarN. M.SleegersP. J. C.DalyA. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 251-262. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
88.
MorrisonE. W. (2002). Information seeking within organizations. Human Communication Research, 28, 229-242. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00805.x
89.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2008). The ties that bind: Social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 205-227. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum013
90.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
91.
OrganD. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-97. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
92.
OrganD. W.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
93.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MeierK. J. (2009). The human side of public organizations: Contributions to organizational performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 39, 499-518. doi:10.1177/0275074008323805
94.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MeierK. J. (2011). Public management: Organizations, governance, and performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373. doi:10.2307/976618
96.
PfefferJ.SuttonR. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
97.
PilF. K.LeanaC. R. (2009). Applying organizational research to public school reform: The effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1101-1124.
98.
PorterL. W.SmithF. J. (1970). The etiology of organizational commitment. Irvine: University of California.
99.
PrellC. (2011). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
100.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
101.
ProvanK. G.MilwardB. H. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1-33.
102.
RaiderH.KrackhardtD. (2001). Intraorganizational networks. In BaumJ. A. C. (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 58-74). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
103.
ReagansR.McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267. doi:10.2307/3556658
104.
ReyesP. (1990). Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance, and productivity. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
105.
RiccucciN. M. (2005). Street-level bureaucrats and intrastate variation in the implementation of temporary assistance for needy families policies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 89-111. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui005
106.
RiccucciN. M.MeyersM. K.LurieI.HanJ. S. (2004). The implementation of welfare reform policy: The role of public managers in front-line practices. Public Administration Review, 64, 438-448. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00390.x
107.
RoethlisbergerF. J.DicksonW. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108.
RomzekB. S. (1989). Personal consequences of employee commitment. The Academy of Management Journal, 32, 649-661. doi:10.2307/256438
109.
RomzekB. S. (1990). Employee investment and commitment: The ties that bind. Public Administration Review, 50, 374-382. doi:10.2307/976619
110.
RosenholtzS. J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
111.
RothsteinJ. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Education Finance and Policy, 4, 537-571. doi:10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.537
112.
SomechA.BoglerR. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577. doi:10.1177/001316102237672
113.
SparroweR. T.LidenR. C.WayneS. J.KraimerM. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325.
114.
StajkovicA. D.LuthansF. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
115.
StensötaH. O. (2012). Political influence on street-level bureaucratic outcome: Testing the interaction between bureaucratic ideology and local community political orientation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 553-571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur062
116.
TsaiW. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996-1004.
117.
TsaiW.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476. doi:10.2307/257085
118.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
119.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA.HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
120.
van den HooffB.de RidderJ. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
121.
VescioV.RossD.AdamsA. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
122.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
WeibelA.RostK.OsterlohM. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 387-412. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup009
125.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
126.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
127.
WillemA.BuelensM. (2007). Knowledge sharing in public sector organizations: The effect of organizational characteristics on interdepartmental knowledge sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 581-606. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul021
128.
YangT.-M.MaxwellT. A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 164-175. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008
129.
ZanderU.KogutB. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6, 76-92. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.1.76
