Public values are being promoted as a core concept in the study of public administration, in particular, in discourses surrounding Moore’s public value management and Bozeman’s public value failure. This article outlines the approaches to the concept of values and public values. Particular attention is paid to the founding distinction between facts and values, which proves to be less clear than usually assumed. After discussing a range of possible characteristics of public values, an encompassing definition is attempted, which consequently has to accommodate opposing characteristics. It is concluded that the concept of public value is a fuzzy concept, and that is probably “as good as it gets.”
AlfordJ.HyghesO. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38 (2), 130-148.
2.
AlfordJ.O’FlynnJ. (2009). Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings’. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3), 171-191.
3.
BaoG.WangX.LarsenG. L.MorganD. G. (2013). Beyond new public governance: A value-based global framework for performance management, governance, and leadership. Administration & Society, 45, 443-467.
4.
Beck-JørgensenT. B. (2006). Public values, their nature, stability and change. The case of Denmark. Public Administration Quarterly, 30 (4), 365-398.
5.
Beck-JørgensenT. B.BozemanB. (2006). The public values universe: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39, 354-381.
6.
BeningtonJ. (2009). Creating the Public In Order To Create Public Value?International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3), 232-249.
7.
BeningtonJ. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Value. In: BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Public Value Theory & Practice (pp. 31-51). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave macmillan.
8.
BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (2011a). Public Value in Complex and Changing Times. In BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Public Value Theory & Practice (pp. 1-30). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (2011b). Conclusions: Looking Ahead. In BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Public Value Theory & Practice (pp. 256-274). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
BozemanB. (2002). Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62, 145-161.
11.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
12.
BozemanB.JohnsonJ. (2015). The political economy of public values: A case for the public sphere and progressive opportunity. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 61-85.
13.
BrocklehurstM. (1998). Organizational culture. In CooperC.L.ArgyrisC. (Eds.), The concise Blackwell encyclopedia of management (pp. 450-452). Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
CoatsD.PassmoreE. (2008). Public Value: The Next Steps in Public Service Reform. London: The Work Foundation.
15.
ColeM.ParstonG. (2006). Unlocking public value. A new model for achieving high performance in public service organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
16.
ConnollyW. E. (1984). The politics of discourse. In ShapiroM. J. (Ed.), Language and politics (pp. 139-167). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
FeeneyM. K. (2008, May28-31). Public Wars and Private Armies: Militaries, Mercenaries, and Public Values. Paper presented at The Copenhagen International Public Value Workshop University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
19.
FeeneyM. K.BozemanB. (2007). Public Values and Public Value Failure. Implications of the 2004-2005 Flu Vaccine Case. Public Integrity, 9(2), 175-190.
20.
FisherE.SladeC. PAndersonD.BozemanB. (2010). The public value of nanotechnology?Scientometrics, 85, 29-39.
21.
GibbardA. (2003). Thoughts and norms. Philosophical Issues, 13(1), 83-98.
22.
HattiangadiA. (2006). Is meaning normative?Mind & Language, 21, 220-240.
23.
HodgkinsonC. (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
24.
HonderichT. (Ed.). (1995). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
KairystD. (2003). Searching for the rule of Law. Suffolk University Law Review, 36, 307-332.
26.
KantI. (1981). Versuch den Begriff der negativen Grössen in die Weltweisheit einzuführen [Attempt to introduce the concept of negative magnitude into philosophy/social study]. In KantI. (Ed.), Vorkritische Schriften bis 1768, part two (pp. 779-819). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published 1763)
27.
KernaghanK. (2003). Integrating values into public service: the values statement as centerpriece. Public Administration Review, 63 (6), 711-719.
28.
KingS. M.ChiltonB. S.RobertsG. E. (2010). Reflections on defining the public interest. Adminisstration & Society, 41(8), 954-978.
29.
KripkeS. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
30.
LyonsJ. (1971). Introduction to theoretical linguistics: Reprint. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MarchJ. G. (1989). The power of power. In MarchJ. G.(Ed.), Decisions and organizations (2nd ed., pp. 116-149). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
32.
MeyerR. (2011). The public value failures of climate science in the US. Minerva, 49, 47-70
33.
MeynhardtT. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation?International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 192-219.
34.
MeynhardtT.MetelmannJ. (2009). Pushing the Envelope: Creating Public Value in the Labor Market: An Empirical Study on the Role of Middle Managers. International Journal of Public Administration32, 274-312.
35.
MittelstrassJ. (1984). Enzyclopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie [Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Theory of the Sciences] (Vol. 2). Mannheim, Germany: B. I.-Wissenschaftsverslag.
36.
MooreM. H. (2003). Creating public value: Strategic management in government (8th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
MooreM. H. (2013). Recognizing public value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
MoultonS. (2009). Putting Together the Publicness Puzzle: A Framework for Realized Publicness. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 889-900.
39.
MoultonS.BozemanB. (2008, May). The Subprime Mortgage Market: Implications for Managing Publicness. Paper Presented at the Public Values Research Workshop, Copenhagen.
40.
NabatchiT. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public value research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 71, 699-708.
41.
O’FlynnJ. (2007). From New Public Management to Public Value: Pradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66, 353-366.
42.
OvereemP. (2015). The concept of regime values: Are revitalization and regime change possible?The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 46-60.
43.
OysermanD. (2001). Values: Psychological; perspectives. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 16150-16153). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
44.
PapineauD.TanneyJ. (1999). Normativity and judgement [Supplement]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 73, 16-43.
45.
PetersonP. L. (1984). Semantic indeterminacy and scientific underdetermination. Philosophy of Science, 51, 464-487.
46.
PollittC.HupeP. (2011). Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 43, 641-658.
47.
PutnamH. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
RailtonP. (2000). Normative force and normative freedom: Hume and Kant. In DancyJ. (Ed.), Normativity (pp. 1-33). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
49.
RazJ. (2000). Explaining normativity: On rationality and the justification of reason. In DancyJ. (Ed.), Normativity (pp. 34-59). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50.
RescherN. (1982). Introduction to value theory. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
51.
RhodesR. A. W.WannaJ. (2007). The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible Government from the Platonic Guardians. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406-421.
52.
RicoeurP. (2004). Sur la Traduction [On translation]. Paris, France: Bayard.
53.
RobbinsS. P. (1980). The administrative process (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54.
RohrJ. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
55.
RothsteinL. E. (1975). What about the fact/value dichotomy: A belated reply. Journal of Value Inquiry, 9, 307-311.
56.
RutgersM. R. (1996). The Meaning of Administration. Translating Across Boundaries. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(1), 14-20.
57.
RutgersM. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Introduction. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(1), 92-113.
58.
RutgersM. R. (2012). Het Pantheon van Publieke Waarden [The pantheon of public values]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
59.
RutgersM. R.SchreursP. (2003). Reassessing Purpose and Value. Towards an End/Action model of values in public administration. In RutgersM. R. (Ed.), Retracing Public Administration (pp. 257-290). Amsterdam: JAI press/Elseviers International.
60.
ScheinE. H. (1987). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
ScheinE. H. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide: Sense and nonsense about culture change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
SeldenS. C.BrewerG. A.BrudneyJ. L. (1999). Reconciling competing values in public administration, Understanding the administrative role concept. Administration & society, 31(2), 171-204.
63.
SelfP. (1982). Administrative theories and politics: An enquiry into the structure and processes of modern government (3rd ed.). London, England: Allen & Unwin.
64.
SillsD. L. (Ed.). (1968). International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 527-543). New York, NY: Macmillan.
65.
SimonH. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
66.
SpanoA. (2009). Public Value Creation and Management Control Systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3), 328-348.
67.
SternW. (1924). Person und Sache: System des kritischen Personalismus. Wertphilosophy 3e band [Person and object: System of critical personalism]. Leipzig, Germany: Barth.
68.
StokerG. (2006). Public Value Management. A New Narrative for Networked Governance?American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57.
69.
TalbotC. (2008). Measuring Public Value: A competing values approach. London: The Work Foundation.
70.
TalbotC. (2009). Public Value – the Next ‘Big thing’ in Public mangement?International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 167-170.
71.
Van der WalZ.Van HoutE. Th. J.(2009). Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? The Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values. International Journal of Public Administration,32(3), 220-231.
72.
Van der WalZ.HubertL.Van den HeuvelH.KolthoffE. (2006). Central values of government and business: differences, similarities and conflicts. Public Administration Quarterly, 314-364.
73.
Van der WalZ.NabatchiT.De GraafG. (2015). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13-28.
74.
Van WartM. (1998). Changing public sector values. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
75.
WaldoD. (1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
76.
WallaceJ. (1998). Introduction. In DarwinC. (Ed.), The origin of species (pp. vii-xxiii). Ware, UK: Wordsworth editions. (Original work published 1859).
77.
WikforssA. M. (2001). Semantic normativity. Philosophical Studies, 102, 203-226.
78.
WittgensteinL. (1965). The blue and brown books. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
79.
WittgensteinL. (1976). Filosofische onderzoekingen [Philosophical Investigations]. Meppel, The Netherlands: Boom.
