Sales career opportunities are growing, and the number of women in sales is increasing. Educators must adequately prepare both men and women for today’s ethical sales dilemmas. Using the Personal Selling Ethics Scale, the current study analyzes the impact of idealism and relativism on the sales ethics evaluations of men and women. Results indicate that women evaluate sales ethics scenarios as less ethical than males and that varying positions on these ethical frameworks partially explain the divergence. Results also imply that today’s sales educators should primarily emphasize moral idealism when teaching sales ethics. Ethical codes and situation-based frameworks can aid this effort. When teaching relativistic individuals, educators can supplement idealistic methods via the use of cognitive moral development frameworks.
BarnettT.BassK.BrownG. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 469-480.
2.
BassK.BarnettT.BrownG. (1998). The moral philosophy of sales managers and its influence on ethical decision making. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18, 1-17.
3.
BassK.BarnettT.BrownG. (1999). Individual difference variables, ethical judgments, and ethical behavioral intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 183-205.
4.
BeuD.BuckleyM.HarveyM. (2003). Ethical decision-making: A multidimensional construct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12, 88-106.
5.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf
6.
CollinsD. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1,500 articles published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 1-73.
7.
DabholkarP.KellarisJ. (1992). Toward understanding marketing students’ ethical judgment of controversial personal selling practices. Journal of Business Research, 24, 313-329.
8.
DawsonL. (1992). Will feminization change the ethics of the sales profession?Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 12, 21-32.
9.
DawsonL. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143-1152.
10.
DobsonJ.WhiteJ. (1995). Toward the feminine firm: An extension to Thomas White. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5, 463-478.
11.
DonohoC.HeinzeT. (2011). The personal selling ethics scale: Revisions and expansions for teaching sales ethics. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 107-122.
12.
DonohoC.HercheJ.SwensonM. (2003). A cross cultural study of the effects of achievement and relationship values on student evaluations of personal selling ethical dilemmas. Marketing Education Review, 13, 53-63.
13.
DonohoC.PolonskyM.CohenD.BalazsA.HercheJ.SwensonM.SmithM. (1998). A preliminary investigation of the universality of the personal selling ethics scale. Contemporary Issues in International Business and Marketing, 1, 109-122.
14.
FerrellO.GreshamL. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, Summer, 87-95.
15.
FordR.RichardsonW. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205-221.
16.
ForsythD. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 175-184.
17.
ForsythD. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 461-471.
18.
FrankeG.CrownD.SpakeD. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920-934.
19.
FreudS. (1925). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: VOl. 19. (StracheyJ., Ed. & Trans. Vol. 19). London, England: Hogarth Press.
20.
GaedekeR.KelleyC.TootelianD. (1992). Business students’ perceptions of ethics in marketing. Journal of Education for Business, 67, 294-299.
21.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GrantJ. (1988). Women as managers: What they can offer to organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 56-63.
23.
GrimshawJ. (1993). The idea of a female ethic. In SingerP. (Ed., A companion to ethics (pp. 491-499). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24.
HuntA. (1997). Are women more ethical than men?Baylor Business Review, 15(1), 7.
25.
HuntS.VitellS. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16.
26.
IngramT.LaForgeR.SchwepkerC. (2007). Salesperson ethical decision making: The impact of sales leadership and sales management control strategy. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27, 301-315.
27.
KidwellJ.StevensR. E.BethkeA. (1987). Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: Myth or reality?Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 489-493.
28.
KleiserS.SivadasE.KellarisJ.DahlstromR. (2003). Ethical ideologies: Efficient assessment and influence on ethical judgments of marketing practices. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 1-21.
29.
KohlbergL. (1984). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive–developmental approach. In Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (pp. 170-205). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
30.
LeverJ. (1978). Sex differences in the complexity of children’s play and games. American Sociological Review, 43, 471-783.
31.
LoeT.WeeksW. (2000). An experimental investigation of efforts to improve sales student’s moral reasoning. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20, 243-251.
32.
LuthyM. (2007). Influences on undergraduates considering a career in professional selling. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 11(3), 1-7.
33.
MalinowskiC.BergerK. (1996). Undergraduate student attitudes about hypothetical marketing dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 525-535.
34.
McClarenN., (2000). Ethics in personal selling and sales management: A review of the literature focusing on empirical findings and conceptual foundations. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 285-303.
35.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
36.
O’FallonM.ButterfieldK. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375-413.
37.
PetersonR.BeltraminiR.KozmetskyG. (1991). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics: A replication. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 733-738.
38.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.
39.
PoolR. (1994). Eve’s rib: Searching for the biological roots of sex differences. New York, NY: Crown.
40.
RamseyR.MarshallG.JohnstonM.Deeter-SchmelzD. (2007). Ethical ideologies and older consumer perceptions of unethical sales tactics. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 191-207.
41.
RoxasM.StonebackJ. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 149-165.
42.
RueggerD.KingE. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179-186.
43.
SchlenkerR.ForsythD. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 369-396.
44.
SchminkeM. (1997). Gender differences in ethical frameworks and evaluation of others’ choices in ethical dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 55-65.
45.
SchminkeM.AmbroseM. (1997). Asymmetric perceptions of ethical frameworks of men and women in business and non-business settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 719-729.
46.
SikulaA.CostaA. (1994). Are women more ethical than men?Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 859-871.
47.
SinghapakdiA. (2004). Important factors underlying ethical intentions of students: Implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 261-270.
48.
SinghapakdiA.VitellS. (1994). Ethical ideologies of future marketers: The relative influences of Machiavellianism and gender. Journal of Marketing Education, 15, 34-42.
49.
SinghapakdiA.VitellS. (2007). Institutionalization of ethics and its consequences: A survey of marketing professionals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 284-294.
50.
SivadasE.KleiserS.KellarisJ.DahlstromR. (2003). Moral philosophy, ethical evaluations, and sales manager hiring intentions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 23, 7-21.
51.
SmithA.RogersV. (2000). Ethics-related responses to specific situation vignettes: Evidence of gender-based differences and occupational socialization. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 73-86.
52.
SmithS.OakleyE. (1997). Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students’ implications for management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 37-45.
53.
SteadW.WorrellD.SteadJ. (1990). An integrative model for understanding and managing ethical behavior in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 233-242.
54.
TanseyR.BrownG.HymanM.DawsonL.Jr. (1994). Personal moral philosophies and the moral judgments of salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14, 59-75.
55.
ValentineS.BatemanC. (2011). The impact of ethical ideologies, moral intensity, and social context on sales-based ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 155-168.
56.
VermeirI.Van KenhoveP. (2008). Gender differences in double standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 281-295.
57.
VitellS.SinghapakdiA. (1993). Ethical ideology and its influence on the norms and judgments of marketing practitioners. Journal of Marketing Management, 3, 1-11.
58.
WalkerL. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55, 677-691.
59.
WeeksW.MooreC.McKinneyJ.LongeneckerJ. (1999). The effect of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 301-313.
60.
WhippleT.WolfD. (1991). Judgments of marketing students about ethical issues in marketing research: a comparison to marketing practitioners. Journal of Marketing Education, 13, 56-63.
61.
WortrubaT. (1990). A comprehensive framework for the analysis of ethical behavior with a focus on sales organizations. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 10, 29-42.
