This study introduces marketing educators to the Madeline Hunter Direct Instruction Model (HDIM) as an approach to significantly and substantially improve student learning through course-embedded assessment.The effectiveness of the method is illustrated in three different marketing courses taught by three different marketing professors. The results demonstrate double-digit improvement in student achievement. Examples of application exercises are provided. The HDIM offers a viable tool for use in an environment in which marketing faculties are increasingly required to demonstrate course-embedded assessment as part of annual review, promotion, and tenure processes.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
2.
Anderson, R.C., Kulhavy, R.W., & Andre, T. ( 1972). Conditions under which feedback facilitates learning from programmed lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology , 63, 186-188.
3.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. ( 2006). AACSB eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: Author. Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/process/documents/AACSB_STANDARDS_Revised_Jan07.pdf
4.
Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. ( 2001). Teaching methods in US undergraduate economics courses . Journal of Economic Education, 32, 269-279.
5.
Bloom, B.S. ( 1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. New York: Addison Wesley .
6.
Brunner, J. ( 1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Burns, A.C. ( 2006). Teaching experientially with the Madeline Hunter method: An application in a marketing research course. Simulation & Gaming, 37, 284-294.
8.
Bushman, J., & Bushman, J. ( 2004). Instruction that fits. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
9.
Butler, A.C., Karpicke, J.D., & Roediger, H.L. , III. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 273-281.
10.
Carroll, W.M. ( 1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360-367.
11.
Catrambone, R. ( 1995). Following instructions: Effects of principles and examples . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 227-244.
12.
Church, G.M., & Carpenter, B.B. (2000). The life in inventions: Patents as sources of biological information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 28(Fall). Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://www.istl.org/00-fall/article5.html
13.
Dildy, P. ( 1982). Improving student achievement by appropriate teacher in-service training: Utilizing program for effective teaching (PET). Education, 103, 132-138.
Goldberg, M. ( 1990). Portrait of Madeline Hunter. Educational Leadership, February, 41-43.
16.
Graeff, T.R. ( 1998). Writing behavioral learning objectives for marketing courses: Meeting the challenge of AACSB outcomes assessment. Marketing Education Review, 8, 13-25.
17.
Hansen, D.E. ( 2003). Using the Voeks method to improve student learning in principles of marketing classes. Journal of Marketing Education , 25, 108-117.
18.
Hess, P.W. ( 2007). Enhancing leadership skill development by creating practice/feedback opportunities in the classroom. Journal of Management Education , 31, 195-213.
19.
Hoffman, F., & Oreopoulos, P. (2006, October). Professor qualities and student achievement (NBER Working Paper No. W12596). Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=937297
20.
Hunter, M. ( 1982). Mastery teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
21.
Hunter, M. ( 1985). What’s wrong with Madeline Hunter? Educational Leadership, 42, 57-60.
22.
Hunter, M. ( 1986). Madeline Hunter replies: Develop collaboration; built trust. Educational Leadership, 43, 68.
23.
Hunter, M. ( 1994). Mastery teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
24.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. ( 1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Kaplan, R., & Simmons, F.G. ( 1974). Effects of instructional objectives used as orienting stimuli or as summary/review upon prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 614-622.
26.
Lammers, W.J., & Murphy, J.J. ( 2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 54-67.
27.
Manatt, R.P., & Stow, S.B. ( 1986). Developing and testing a model for measuring and reporting educational outcomes of K-12 schools: A technical report. Ames: Iowa State University.
28.
Mandeville, G.K., & Rivers, J. ( 1988). Effects of South Carolina’s PET program. Educational Leadership, 46, 63-66.
29.
Mills, G.E., & Pace, R.W. ( 1989). What effects do practice and video feedback have on the development of interpersonal communication skills? Journal of Business Communication, 26, 159-176.
30.
National Park Service. (2008). Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park (2008). Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.nps.gov/blca/forteachers/lp_hunter.htm
31.
Paladino, A. ( 2008). Creating an interactive and responsive teaching environment to inspire learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 185-188.
32.
Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D. ( 1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research and application . Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice-Hall .
33.
Post, L.W. ( 1987). Frankly, my dear. The English Journal , 76(1), 28-30.
34.
Rivers, J. ( 1988, April). Teacher perceptions of PET with special emphasis on coaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
35.
Sardo-Brown, D. ( 1990). Experienced teachers’ planning practices: A US survey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 16, 57-71.
36.
Scott, C.D., & Bush, R.F. ( 2008). An exploratory study investigating the effects of practice exams on learning in the fundamentals of marketing course. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Society of Marketing Advances, St. Petersburg, FL.
37.
Shaftel, J., & Shaftel, T.L. ( 2007). Educational assessment and the AACSB. Issues in Accounting Education, 22, 215-232.
38.
Stallings, J., & Krasavage, E. ( 1986). Program implementation and student achievement in a four-year Madeline Hunter follow-through project. Elementary School Journal, 87, 117-138.
39.
Stallings, J., Robbins, P., Presbrey, L., & Scott, J. ( 1986). Effects of instruction based on the Madeline Hunter model on students’ achievement: Findings from a follow-through project. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 571-587.
40.
Tuovinen, J.E., & Sweller, J. ( 1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology , 91, 334-341.
41.
Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D.M., & Liem, A.D. ( 2008). College seniors’ theory of their academic motivation . Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 812-828.
42.
Wegner, S.B., Holloway, K.C., & Garton, E.M. ( 1999). The effects of internet-based instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3, 98-106.
