Students can be proactive and engaged or, alternatively, lack initiative and responsibility for their learning. Self-regulated learning involves learning strategies and mental processes that learners deliberately engage to help themselves learn and perform better academically. The results of this study provide empirical support for the theoretical relationships among cognitive evaluation theory, achievement goal theory, and self-regulated learning strategies in the context of the classroom. Superficial learning strategies were linked to extrinsic motivation, while intrinsic motivation determined deep cognitive and metacognitive strategy usage. Perceived autonomy, perceived competence, and task mastery orientation mediated the classroom environment’s effect on intrinsic motivation. These findings suggest that active applicationoriented experience delivered by enthusiastic faculty, who provide high interaction, supportive feedback, and clear goals that emphasize learning over grades, will increase intrinsic motivation and the use of self-regulated learning strategies. Teaching guidelines and pedagogical examples for enhancing intrinsic motivation are provided.
Ainley, M. D.1993. Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology85:395-405.
2.
Amabile, T. M.1996. Creativity in context. New York: Westview.
3.
Ames, C.1992. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology84:261-271.
4.
Ames, C., and J. Archer. 1988. Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology80 (3): 260-267.
5.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. 2003. Proposed draft—Eligibility procedures and standards for business accreditation. http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/brc/standards-4-25.pdf, p. 52-52 (accessed July 2003).
6.
Bagozzi, Richard P.1994. Structural equation models in marketing research: Basic principles. In Principles of marketing research, edited by R. Bagozzi, 317-385. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
7.
Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A socialcognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Bandura, Albert. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy on cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist28 (2): 117-148.
9.
Bandura, Albert. 2001. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. http://%20www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Bandura/Index.html%23guide (accessed November 2002).
10.
Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173-1182.
11.
Boekaerts, M.1997. Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researcher, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction7 (2): 161-186.
12.
Brandt, R.1988. On learning research: A conversation with Lauren Resnick. Educational Leadership46 (4): 12-16.
13.
Brunel, P.1999. Relationship between achievement goal orientations and perceived motivational climate on intrinsic motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports9:365-374.
14.
Celuch, Kevin, and Mark Slama. 1998. Critical thinking as an integrative theme for teaching lifelong learning skills in marketing. Marketing Education Review8 (3): 1-12.
15.
Celuch, Kevin, and Mark Slama. 2000. Student perceptions of a marketing course taught with the critical thinking approach. Marketing Education Review10 (1): 57-64.
16.
Celuch, Kevin, and Mark Slama. 2002. Promoting critical thinking and life-long learning: An experiment with the theory of planned behavior. Marketing Education Review12 (2): 13-22.
17.
Chickering, Arthur W., and Zelda F. Gamson. 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Wingspread Journal9 (2): 1-16.
18.
Chonko, Lawrence B.2003. A look to the future of marketing education: Observations of one teacher-researcher curmudgeon. Marketing Education Review13 (1): 1-20.
19.
Clark, Lee Anna, and David Watson. 1995. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment7 (3): 309-319.
20.
Cokley, Kevin O., Naijean Bernard, Dana Cunningham, and Janice Motoike. 2001. A psychometric investigation of the academic motivation scale using a United States sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development34 (2): 109-119.
21.
Corno, L.1986. The metacognitive components of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology11:333-346.
22.
Corno, L., and E. B. Mandinach. 1983. The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychology18:88-108.
23.
Daly, Shawn B.2001. Student-operated Internet businesses: True experiential learning in entrepreneurship and retail management. Journal of Marketing Education23 (3): 204-215.
24.
Das, J. P., J. A. Naglieri, and D. B. Murphy. 1995. Individual differences in cognitive processes of planning: A personality variable?Psychology Record45 (3): 355-371.
25.
Deci, Edward L.1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
26.
Deci, Edward L., R. Koestner, and Richard M. Ryan. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin125:627-668.
27.
Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
28.
Deci, William R., J. Nezlek, and L. Sheinman. 1981. Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40:1-10.
29.
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, and Heidi M. Winklhofer. 2001. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research38 (2): 269-277.
30.
Dillion, William R., and Matthew Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate analysis:Methods and applications. New York: John Wiley.
31.
Dorobantu, M., and S. J. H. Biddle. 1997. The influence of situational and individual goals on the intrinsic motivation of Romanian adolescents toward physical education. European Yearbook of Sports Psychology1:148-165.
32.
Duda, J. L., and J. Whitehead. 1998. Measurement of goal perspectives in the physical domain. In Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement, edited by J. L. Duda, 20-47. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
33.
Dweck, C. S., and E. L. Leggett. 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review95:256-273.
34.
Ferrer-Caja, Emilio, and Maureen R. Weiss. 2000. Predictors of intrinsic motivation among adolescent students in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport71:267-279.
35.
Ferrer-Caja, Emilio, and Maureen R. Weiss. 2002. Cross-validation of a model of intrinsic motivation with students enrolled in high school elective courses. Journal of Experimental Education71 (1): 41-66.
36.
Flink, C., A. K. Boggiano, and M. Barrett. 1990. Controlling teaching strategies: Undermining children’s self-determination and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59:916-924.
37.
Frontczak, Nancy T.1998. A paradigm for the selection, use and development of experiential learning activities in marketing education. Marketing Education Review8 (3): 25-34.
38.
Garcia, Teresa, and Paul R. Pontrich. 1996. The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology21 (4): 477-486.
39.
Gist, Marilyn E., and Terrence R. Mitchell. 1992. Self-efficacy: Atheoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review17:183-211.
40.
Gremler, Dwayne D., K. Douglas Hoffman, Susan M. Keaveney, and Lauren K. Wright. 2000. Experiential learning exercises in services marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education22 (1): 35-44.
41.
Hagborg, W. J.1992. Grades and motivational orientation among high school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment10:355-361.
42.
Harter, S.1981. A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology17:300-312.
43.
Hernandez, Sigfredo A.2002. Team learning in a Marketing Principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education24 (1): 73-85.
44.
Hwang, Young Suk, and Konstantinos Vrongistinos. 2002. Elementary inservice teachers’ self-regulated learning strategies related to their academic achievements. Journal of Instructional Psychology29 (3): 147-154.
45.
Kilpatrick, Marcus, Edward Hebert, and Dee Jacobsen. 2002. Physical activity motivation: A practitioner’s guide to self-determination theory. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance73 (4): 36-42.
46.
Kleinbaum, D. G., L. Kupper, and K. E. Muller. 1988. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd ed.Boston: PWS-Kent.
47.
Licht, B. G., and C. S. Dweck. 1984. Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children’s achievement orientations with skills area. Developmental Psychology20:628-636.
48.
Lilly, Bryan, and Michael J. Tippins. 2002. Enhancing student motivation in marketing classes: Using student management groups. Journal of Marketing Education24 (3): 253-264.
49.
Loranger, A. L.1994. The study of strategies of successful and unsuccessful high school students. Journal of Reading Behavior26:347-360.
50.
McKeachie, W. J.1990. Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology82:189-200.
51.
Mendenhall, W., and Terry Sincich. 1996. A second course in statistics:Regression analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
Meece, Judith L., Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, and Rick H. Hoyle. 1988. Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology80 (4): 514-523.
53.
Meece, Judith L., and K. Holt. 1993. A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology85:582-590.
54.
Miller, J. W.2000. Exploring the sources of self-regulated learning: The influence of internal and external comparisons. Journal of Instructional Psychology27 (1): 47-52.
55.
Nicholls, J. G.1989. The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Nolen, S. B.1986. Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction5 (4): 269-287.
57.
Nolen, S. B.1988. Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognitions and Instruction5 (4): 269-287.
58.
Ntoumanis, Nikos. 2001. Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self-determination theory in sports. Journal of Sports Science19 (6): 397-427.
59.
Papaioannou, A.1994. Development of a questionnaire to measure achievement goal orientations in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport65:11-20.
60.
Park, S. H. 1992. Motivational belief, volitional control and self-regulated learning. PhD diss., University of Michigan. Dissertation Abstracts International53 (5): 1456A.
61.
Peterson, Robert M.2001. Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education23 (3): 187-194.
62.
Pintrich, Paul R.1988. A process-oriented view of student motivation. In Improving teaching and learning through research: New directions for instructional research, Vol. 57, edited by J. Stark and L. Mets, 65-79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63.
Pintrich, Paul R.1989. The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments, Vol. 6, edited by C. Ames and M. Maehr, 117-160. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
64.
Pintrich, Paul R., and ElisabethV. De Groot. 1990. Motivational and self-regulation learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology82 (1): 33-40.
65.
Pintrich, Paul R., and T. Garcia. 1991. Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 7, edited by M. L. Maehr and P. R. Pintrich, 371-402. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
66.
Reeve, Johnmarshall, Elizabeth Bolt, and Yi Cai. 1999. Autonomy-supportive teachers how they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology91 (3): 537-548.
67.
Ridley, D. S., P. A. Schutz, R. S. Glanz, and C. E. Weinstein. 1992. Self-regulated learning: The interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education60 (4): 293-306.
68.
Rothstein, R.1990. Educational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
69.
Ryan, Richard M.1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43:450-461.
70.
Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist55 (1): 68-78.
71.
Siegel, Carolyn F.2000. Introducing marketing students to business intelligence using project-based learning on the World Wide Web. Journal of Marketing Education22 (2): 90-98.
72.
Somuncuoglu, Yesim, and Ali Yildirim. 1999. Relationship between achievement goal orientations and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Research92 (5): 267-277.
73.
Stipek, Deborah J., Julie S. Salmon, and Karen B. Givven. 1998. The value of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education29 (4): 465-488.
74.
Taylor, Kimberly A.1998. The marketing trade show: A new method for incorporating student projects into large classes. Journal of Marketing Education20 (3): 250-257.
75.
Utman, C. H.1997. Performance effects of motivational state: A metaanalysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review1: 170-182.
76.
Vallerand, R. J.1997. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 29, edited by M. P. Zanna, 271-360. New York: Academic Press.
77.
Vallerand, R. J., L. G. Pelletier, M. R. Blais, N. M. Briere, C. Senecal, and E. F. Vallieres. 1992. The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement52:1003-1017.
78.
Van Voorhis, Judy L. 1995. Implementing cooperative structures to increase motivation and learning in the college classroom. Paper presented at the Lilly Conference on College Teaching, June, Columbia, SC.
79.
Vlachopoulos, S., and S. J. H. Biddle. 1996. Achievement goal orientations and intrinsic motivation in a track and field event in school physical education. European Physical Education Review2:158-164.
80.
Weinstein, C. E., and R. E. Mayer. 1986. The teaching of learning strategies. In Handbook of research on teaching, edited by M. Wittrock, 315-327. New York: Macmillan.
81.
Weinstein, C. E., D. S. Ridley, T. Dahl, and E. S. Weber. 1989. Helping students develop strategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership46 (4): 17-19.
82.
Woolfolk, A. E.1990. Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
83.
Wright, Lauren K., Mary Jo Bitner, andValerie A. Zeithaml. 1994. Paradigm shifts in business education: Using active learning to deliver services marketing content. Journal of Marketing Education16 (3): 5-19.
84.
Zhou, Jing. 1998. Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology83 (2): 261-276.
85.
Zimmerman, B. J.1989. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology81 (3): 329-339.
86.
Zimmerman, B. J.1995. Self-efficacy and educational development. In Self-efficacy and changing societies, edited by A. Bandura, 202-231. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
Zimmerman, B. J., and M. Martinez-Pons. 1986. Development of a structured interviewfor assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal23:614-628.
